Young: Into the Tar Pit of Genetics – WorkCompCentral (subscription)

By Julius Young

Workers compensation in California is about to enter the tar pit of genetics.

Julius Young

Thats the take-away fromCity of Jackson v. WCAB (Christopher Rice), an April 26, 2017, ruling by the California Court of Appeals 3rd District that has been certified for publication.

Writing for the three-judge panel, (Blease, Hoch and Renner), Justice Blease finds thatapportionment may be properly based on genetics/heritability.

The case involved a claim of cumulative trauma to the neck of a 29-year-old police officer who had served for five years. This was not a long work history, but Rice alleged that repetitive bending and twisting of his head and neck on the job was the cause of his neck, shoulder, arm and hand pain.

X-rays demonstrated degenerative disc disease, and the qualified medical evaluator found that Rice had cervical radiculopathy and cervical disc disease.

The QMEs report and deposition indicated that heritability and genetics, and genetic issues, were a causative factor meriting apportionment.

In a supplemental report and in deposition,the QME cited various journal articles for the proposition that genomics is a significant causative factorin cervical spine disability.One such study claimed that the role of genetic factors in disc degeneration was as much as 75%. Another study claimed it was 73%.

The court notes that the QMEdecided to err on the side of the patient in case there was some unknown inherent weakness in the studyand thusapportioned out 49% to Rices personal history, including but not limited to the genetic cause of degenerative disease.

The award of the trial judge was based on the QMEs opinion, but the Workers' Compensation Appeals Boardpanel reversed, returning the case to the trial judge for an unapportioned award. The WCAB panel noted that:

Finding causation on applicants genetics opens the door to apportionment of disability to impermissible immutable factors ... Without proper apportionment to specific identifiable factors, we cannot rely upon Dr. [Sloane] Blairs determination as substantial medical evidence to justify apportionment 49% of applicants disability to non-industrial factors.

Rices employer appealed, and thus the case was eventually heard by the Court of Appeals panel.

After noting that there are a number of post-SB 899 cases thatuphold apportionment based on non-industrial pathological degenerative changes, the 3rd DCA states that:

We perceive no relevant distinction between allowing apportionment based on a pre-existing congenital or pathological condition and allowing apportionment based on a pre-existing degenerative condition caused by heredity or genetics.

Rice argued that the QME cannot have known his degenerative disc disease was caused by genetics because the QMEhad never developed data on his family medical history. The DCA panel states:

It was unnecessary for Dr. Blair to conduct such an analysis because her research indicated that genetics or heredity was a majority factor inallcases of degenerative disc disease."

Whether this case will be a game-changer in California workers comp remains to be seen.

The case will be appealed to the California Supreme Court, but whether itdecides to hear it is discretionary.

In the meantime, Ill make some predictions:

And there are major unknowns:

Were already in an era when some individuals are engaging their own genetic tests. Ive participated in 23andme.com, sending off a vial of my saliva. And in fact I get periodic updates about various screenings they do with my genetic material. As mapping the genome gets cheaper, will we see efforts to use that sort of data to rule in/rule out a genetic component to disability? And how scientifically sophisticated are the studies about genetic causation, anyway? This is a field that is rapidly evolving.

There are many questions to be answered. But it looks like a tar pit to me.

Julius Young is a claimants' attorney for the Boxer & Gerson law firm in Oakland. This column was reprinted with his permission from his blog,www.workerscompzone.com.

The Hartford has reported net income of $378 million for the first quarter of the year, a 17% increase from $323 million in the first quarter of 2016. Net income for commercial lines was up 3% in the quarter, to $231 million. But the commercial lines combined ratio of 96.0 was a 4.9-point increase. Read More

One of West Virginia Gov. Jim Justices family coal operations was fined $10,684 for six safety violations following the death of a worker in February. Gov. Jim Justice The state Office of Miners Health, Safety and Training fined Justice Low Seam Mining Inc. for violations discovere. Read More

The Honorable Frank R. McKay, Chairman of the Georgia State Board of Workers Compensation,

Please plan to join us for our Annual All-Day Seminar on Tuesday, May 9, 2017. We hope you find it

The Texas Department of Insurance will host its 2017 Texas Safety Summit from May 9-11 at the Hilt

Read more:
Young: Into the Tar Pit of Genetics - WorkCompCentral (subscription)

Related Posts