That social media can be addictive and creepy isnt a revelation to anyone who uses Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the like. But in Jeff Orlowskis documentary The Social Dilemma, conscientious defectors from these companies explain that the perniciousness of social networking platforms is a feature, not a bug.

They claim that the manipulation of human behavior for profit is coded into these companies with Machiavellian precision: Infinite scrolling and push notifications keep users constantly engaged; personalized recommendations use data not just to predict but also to influence our actions, turning users into easy prey for advertisers and propagandists.

As in his documentaries about climate change, Chasing Ice and Chasing Coral, Orlowski takes a reality that can seem too colossal and abstract for a layperson to grasp, let alone care about, and scales it down to a human level. In The Social Dilemma, he recasts one of the oldest tropes of the horror genre Dr. Frankenstein, the scientist who went too far for the digital age.

In briskly edited interviews, Orlowski speaks with men and (a few) women who helped build social media and now fear the effects of their creations on users mental health and the foundations of democracy. They deliver their cautionary testimonies with the force of a start-up pitch, employing crisp aphorisms and pithy analogies.

Never before in history have 50 designers made decisions that would have an impact on two billion people, says Tristan Harris, a former design ethicist at Google. Anna Lembke, an addiction expert at Stanford University, explains that these companies exploit the brains evolutionary need for interpersonal connection. And Roger McNamee, an early investor in Facebook, delivers a chilling allegation: Russia didnt hack Facebook; it simply used the platform.

Much of this is familiar, but The Social Dilemma goes the extra explainer-mile by interspersing the interviews with P.S.A.-style fictional scenes of a suburban family suffering the consequences of social-media addiction. There are silent dinners, a pubescent daughter (Sophia Hammons) with self-image issues and a teenage son (Skyler Gisondo) whos radicalized by YouTube recommendations promoting a vague ideology.

This fictionalized narrative exemplifies the limitations of the documentarys sometimes hyperbolic emphasis on the medium at the expense of the message. For instance, the movies interlocutors pin an increase in mental illness on social media usage yet dont acknowledge factors like a rise in economic insecurity. Polarization, riots and protests are presented as particular symptoms of the social-media era without historical context.

Despite their vehement criticisms, the interviewees in The Social Dilemma are not all doomsayers; many suggest that with the right changes, we can salvage the good of social media without the bad. But the grab bag of personal and political solutions they present in the film confuses two distinct targets of critique: the technology that causes destructive behaviors and the culture of unchecked capitalism that produces it.

Nevertheless, The Social Dilemma is remarkably effective in sounding the alarm about the incursion of data mining and manipulative technology into our social lives and beyond. Orlowskis film is itself not spared by the phenomenon it scrutinizes. The movie is streaming on Netflix, where itll become another node in the services data-based algorithm.

The Social DilemmaRated PG-13 for dystopian speculation and some graphic images of violence. Running time: 1 hour 34 minutes. Watch on Netflix.

Read more:
The Social Dilemma Review: Unplug and Run - The New York Times