Background

Medicine is an ever-changing field, but the significance of anatomy in clinical practice has stood the test of time.14 Anatomical knowledge is fundamental one has to gain in order to master clinical arts ranging from the basics of physical examination to the extremes of performing complex invasive procedures.3

Despite its importance, clinicians find clerkship students basic anatomy knowledge poor.1,2,5 A guest editorial note in the journal of Canadian radiologists once stated, Senior medical students completing radiology rotations sometimes struggle to recall the basic elements of first-year anatomy.6

Students attribute this to information overload, the need to translate between multiple dimensions, and the lack of clinical correlations in the teaching.7,8 These learning challenges are further aggravated by the tides currently hitting the Anatomy world. The community has been struggling with the scarcity of anatomists, the enormous size of students, and the lack of funding for acquiring enough cadavers.35,9

The ordeals of 21st-century anatomy are not limited to these. The further advent of new technologies has revolutionized how doctors scrutinize patients interiors.5,10 Despite surgeons and a few other specialties still getting acquainted with cadaver-like tactile anatomy; radiology has now become the primary venue for anatomy.5,11 Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasonography by offering super tissue resolution have made a noninvasive glimpse into the brain, viscera, vasculature, and developing fetus possible.

This has come with its own challenges to the curriculum. For instance, the invention of CT and MRI has put much emphasis on cross-sectional anatomy.12 A topic seldom discussed in classes in the past. We often used to train doctors on the hearts anatomy, by either using cadavers or models. But, echocardiography is how close they would ever be in practice.

At the dawn of these millennia, the mentioned dynamics of development in medicine, the challenges in anatomy teaching, and the perceived deficiencies in the young graduates culminated in a global call for a facelift in the anatomy curriculum. This resulted in a shift from traditional didactic to more clinical-oriented problem-based learning.5,10,13,14 unsurprisingly, one landmark of the new anatomy curriculum was an emphasis on radiologic anatomy.

This emphasis via the re-engineered anatomy curriculum helped students increase interest in the subject.5,12 It also helped students gain a thorough understanding of anatomical spatial relationships in multiple planes.16,17 Improvement in course scores.12,14 And development of professional competency were noted.9

The utilization of radiological images is a favored instructional format by students. Rizzolo et al revealed that 80% of students liked the concept of radiologic anatomy.18 Radiology, by bridging the gap between anatomy and clinical medicine, provides the raison dtre of the course to the students.14 Studies were also done to assess the effectiveness of radiologic images in gross anatomy teaching; they concluded, that integrating anatomy instruction with radiologic imaging was an effective approach for teaching students.15,19

However, despite best practice guideline recommendations from medical organizations such as the Association of American Medical College, the General Medical Council and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, the role medical images play in teaching gross anatomy is not standardized, its weight varying among and even within countries.2022

Research on the issue has been done in North America, Europe, and a few Asian countries but there is a paucity of information regarding medical schools in Africa and the rest of the developing world. This study, therefore, aimed to determine the extent of the use of radiologic images in the learning of anatomy in Ethiopian medical schools. Ethiopia, where this study has taken place, has undergone a major transformation in medical education; increasing its public medical schools from 5 to 28 in a relatively short time. Its annual medical school admission also has increased from the hundreds to thousands. In a state of rapid expansion, it is only natural to assume the existence of challenges.

We carried out the study in the school of medicine of Dire Dawa University. After reviewing of literature, we designed a questionnaire that used an online google survey program. Through the Ethiopian anatomical society, we identified individuals currently offering gross anatomy to medical students. We invited those identified to participate in our survey. Once the identified individual had agreed to participate in our survey, an e-mail was sent directing them to the Web site that hosted our survey. The Web site was used to collect responses, compile, analyze and display results.

Among 28 public medical schools found in Ethiopia, 20 took part in the survey. Of 42 anatomists available in these medical schools, 34 responded to the survey questions, making a response rate of 80.9%.

Regarding experiences of the anatomists in teaching gross anatomy to medical students, the majority (55.9%) had an experience of 46 year, 32.4% had an experience of 13 years, 8.8% had an experience of 78 years, and 2.9% had an experience of greater than 10 years. Regarding academic rank, 67.6% were lecturers and 32.4% were Assistant professors.

Regarding the delivery time of anatomy to medical students, the majority of medical schools teach anatomy in the first and second year.

When asked if they had any training or course in radiologic anatomy, the majority (73.5%) said No. the rest (26.5%) had taken a course in their post-graduate studies.

Regarding utilization of radiologic images in teaching gross anatomy, 55.9% used radiologic images in teaching. Most used images in didactic lecturing (66.7%) and others (5.6%) incorporated them into problem-based learning (PBL). (Figure 1) When asked what percent of images used in teaching are radiological; the majority (68.4%) stated <5%. (Figure 2)

Figure 1 Radiologic image usage with respect to teaching methodology.

Figure 2 The relative proportion of radiologic images when compared to total images used to teach.

Regarding the preferred radiologic modality based on the utilization in teaching, the majority 15 (44.2%) ranked X-ray high. MRI 5 (14.7%), ultrasound 4 (11.7%) and CT-scan 3 (8.8%).

Regarding the provision of a computer/web-based resource to their students, 44.1% confirm availability. Of those providing the resource, the majority stated offering dissection videos or online lectures.

Regarding the availability of Radiologists in their schools, the majority (72.2%) stated having full-time Radiologists in their medical schools. However, they noted a lack of relationship between the Radiology and Anatomy departments. Almost all responded that the Radiologists had no contributions to teaching Anatomy to medical students.

Radiological imaging has revolutionized the means of studying patients anatomy. In parallel, it is important that our anatomy teaching adjusts to that context. Its alarming that our survey has found only slightly higher than half of the medical schools reported the incorporation of radiologic images in their teaching; even among those, limitations both in extent (responsible for <5% out of the total teaching images) and variety observed.

There are many existing resources on the Internet for studying anatomy.9,12,23 For example, a study by Choi et al evaluated electronic resources and reported that there were over 100 educational Web sites focused on teaching anatomy.24 Despite many Ethiopian institutions offering web or computer-based learning, we have found the majority are online lectures or dissection videos. Despite, this being helpful in schools where cadaver is in short supply, it comes with an inherent limitation. A study has shown Students often cannot appreciate arbitrary planes and structural relations in such demonstrations.23

Providing students with Radiological digital teaching files/webs that are organized in ways making multidimensional (axial, sagittal, and coronal) visualization possible would help in alleviating this shortcoming. These files have become increasingly easy to develop with picture archives and communication systems (PACS).

One other important finding of our survey is the lack of relationship between anatomy and radiology departments. The importance of establishing relations between these two has been discussed in literatures.9,13,17,25 Beginning medical students appreciate the clinical insights provided by radiologists. Radiologists can provide students with a clear grasp of why knowing anatomy is relevant. The radiology department could also help in providing medical images.

Despite the nationwide used medical school curriculum developed by the consortium of medical schools in Ethiopia allocating significant sessions for radiologic anatomy; this survey revealed the role it plays to be limited. The study has also shown most instructors lacked prior training in radiologic anatomy. We, therefore, recommend the concerned authorities provide continue medical education on radiologic anatomy.

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computer tomography; PACS, picture archiving & communication system.

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Informed consent was taken on the online survey, ethical approval was granted by Dire Dawa Universitys institutional review board with Reference no.0029/2014.

Consent for publication was taken and agreed to publish.

We would like to acknowledge members of the Ethiopian anatomic society who took part in the survey.

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

We have received no financial support in undertaking this study.

The authors declare they have no competing interests including financial and non-financial.

1. Fitzgerald JEF, White MJ, Tang SW. Are we teaching sufficient anatomy at medical school? Opinions Newly Qual Doctors. 2008;724:718724.

2. Schober A, Pieper CC, Schmidt R, Wittkowski W. Anatomy and imaging: 10 years of experience with an interdisciplinary teaching project in preclinical medical education from an elective to a curricular course Anatomie und bildgebung: 10 Jahre Erfahrung mit einem interdisziplinren Lehrprojek. RoFo. 2014;186(5):458465. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1355567

3. Turney B. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104107. doi:10.1308/003588407X168244

4. Branstetter B, Faix L, Humphrey A, Schumann J. Preclinical medical student training in radiology: the effect of early exposure. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(1):W9W14. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.2139

5. Dinesh Kumar V, Rajprasath RVKN. Specializing anatomy - Developing an integrated radiologi- cal anatomy module for the first year medical students. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(3):41064113.

6. Munk PL, Nicolaou S, Forster BB, Darras KE. A Golden Opportunity for Radiologists: bringing Clinical Relevance to Undergraduate Anatomy Through Virtual Dissection. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017;68:20162017. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2016.08.006

7. Cheung CC, Bridges SM, Tipoe GL. Why is anatomy difficult to learn? The implications for undergraduate medical curricula. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(6):752763. doi:10.1002/ase.2071

8. Waseem N, Eraky MA, Iqbal K. Why do medical students forget anatomy later on? A qualitative study. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;68:12281232.

9. Mitchell BS, Williams JE. Trends in Radiological Anatomy Teaching in the UK. Clin Radiol. 2002;57(12):10701072. doi:10.1053/crad.2002.1116

10. Lufler RS, Zumwalt AC, Romney CA, Hoagland TM. Incorporating radiology into medical gross anatomy: does the use of cadaver CT scans improve students. Acad Perform Anat. 2010;63:5663.

11. Barros NDE, Rodrigues CJ, Junqueira A, Antonio R, Germano M. The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat. 2001;41(1):3641. doi:10.1002/1098-2353(200101)14:1<36::AID-CA1006>3.0.CO;2-G

12. Grignon B, Oldrini G, Walter F. Teaching medical anatomy: what is the role of imaging today? Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;38(2):253260.

13. Chowdhury R, Wilson IOR, Oeppen RS. The departments of radiology and anatomy: new symbiotic relations? Clin Radiol. 2008;63(8):918920. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2008.03.004

14. Chew C, O`Dwyer PJ, Young DGJ, Gracie JA. Radiology teaching improves Anatomy scores for medical students. Br J Radiol. 2020;93(1114):20200463. doi:10.1259/bjr.20200463

15. Marker DR, Bansal AK, Juluru K, Magid D. Developing a radiology-based teaching approach for gross anatomy in the digital era. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(8):10571065. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2010.02.016

16. Rengier F, Doll S, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Kirsch J, Kauczor H-U, Giesel FL. Integrated teaching of anatomy and radiology using three-dimensional image post-processing. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(12):28702877. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1507-2

17. Gunderman RB, Wilson PK. Viewpoint: exploring the human interior: the roles of cadaver dissection and radiologic imaging in teaching anatomy. Acad Med. 2005;80(8):745749. doi:10.1097/00001888-200508000-00008

18. Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB, OBrien M, et al. Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):142151. doi:10.1080/01421590500343065

19. Erkonen WE, Albanese MA, Smith WL, Pantazis NJ. Effectiveness of teaching radiologic image interpretation in gross anatomy. A long-term follow-up. Invest Radiol. 1992;27(3):264266. doi:10.1097/00004424-199203000-00016

20. Keeffe GWO, Davy S, Barry DS. Annals of Anatomy Radiologists views on anatomical knowledge amongst junior doctors and the teaching of anatomy in medical curricula. Ann Anat. 2019;223:7076. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2019.01.011

21. Association of American Medical Colleges. Association of American Medical Colleges.Learning Objectives for Medical Student Education: Guidelines for Medical Schools. 1st ed. washington DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1998.

22. GMC. General Medical Council. Promoting Excellence: Standard for Medical Education and Training. 1st ed. London, UK: General Medical Council; 2015:51.

23. Murakami T, Tajika Y, Ueno H, et al. An integrated teaching method of gross anatomy and computed tomography radiology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;449:438449. doi:10.1002/ase.1430

24. Choi A-RA, Tamblyn R, Stringer MD. Electronic resources for surgical anatomy. ANZ J Surg. 2008;78(12):10821091. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04755.x

25. Jack A, Burbridge B. The utilisation of radiology for the teaching of anatomy in Canadian medical schools. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2012;63:160164. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2010.11.005

Read the original here:
Extent of utilization of radiologic images in teaching | AMEP - Dove Medical Press