The Union Public Service Commission is inviting applications for the post of Specialist Grade-III to be hired by the concerned department under Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. Candidates willing to take up the post can apply for the same till August 31, 2017 (Thursday). The number of vacancies are eight for Unreserved Category (4), OBC (3) and ST (1) only. The qualified candidates would be offered the salary as per PB-3 i.e. Rs.15, 600-39,100 with Grade Pay Rs.6600/- plus N.P.A as admissible (Pre-Revised). The post carries probation of one year.

Eligibility Parameters:Age: Not exceeding 40 years on the normal closing date. Not exceeding 45 years for ST and 43 years for OBC candidates on the normal closing date, in respect of posts reserved for them. (Relaxable for Govt. servants by 5 years in accordance with instructions issued by the Central Govt.)

Educational Qualification:

Roles and Responsibilities: The Officer shall be responsible for

Documents for Interview:Qualified and eligible candidates will receive official communication from the Commission for interview. Candidates shortlisted for interview on the basis of the information provided in the online applications submitted by them will be required to send self-attested copies of documents/relevant certificates in support of the claims made in the application as and when demanded by the Commission.

About UPSC:Established on 1 October 1926 as Public Service Commission, the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) is India's prestigious central recruiting agency that conducts appointments to and examinations for All India services and group A & group B of Central services. It was known as Federal Public Service Commission by the Government of India Act, 1935 and was then renamed as today's Union Public Service Commission after the independence.

Read more here:
UPSC-2017 Invites Applications for Assistant Professor Anatomy (III) - Business Standard

Please wait while we sign you in with LinkedIn.

This may take some time.

Please be patient and do not refresh the page.

(A new window from LinkedIn should open for you to authorize the B&T login. If you don't see this please check behind this window, and if it is still not there check your browser settings and turn off the pop-up blocker.)

See the article here:
Infographic: Anatomy Of A Successful Creative - B&T

Team Selection: Bold, but it worked

It was painfully clear after Saturdays defeat to Leeds United that the majority of our first choice players were in need of a rest and, with the opportunity to field a weakened team in the cup presented to Simon Grayson, he did just that.

Only Gabon international Didier Ndong retained his place in the Sunderland XI, and the ten changes that the manager made gave us a mixed bad in terms of individual performances. Grayson spoke pre-match about those playing taking their chances to keep their place and I think that in the cases of Bryan Oviedo, Lynden Gooch and Robbin Ruiter they did just that. On the flip side, Adam Matthews and Papy Djilobodji were incredibly poor and they wont have done themselves any favours.

That said, we won. So, all in all, the decision to make a raft of changes can only be considered a rousing success.

Verdict: Grayson had to take a gamble and make mass changes. We rode our luck for the most part but we won inside 90 minutes, which is the most important thing.

The Carlisle fan we spoke to in Fan Focus prior to the game suggested that theyd set up in an unorthodox system and it had me wondering before the game whether wed do the same in order to match their shape.

And we did, sort of. For the first time this season we lined up in a 5-3-2/3-1-4-2, with a back five consisting of Bryan Oviedo, Papy Djilobodji, John OShea, Adam Matthews and Donald Love.

The fluidity allowed Oviedo and Love to flourish - and both had very good games - but the same cannot be said about Djilobodji or Matthews, who struggled immensely and were continually dug out of the shit by the fantastic OShea, who marshaled our defence superbly. In fairness to Matthews he isnt a centre half and Im not entirely sure why he was playing, especially when someone like Tom Beadling or Michael Ledger would have really appreciated the opportunity to play for the first team in a position that theyre familiar with.

We looked good on the break and our energy in attack was useful. Joel Asoro found himself one on one with the Carlisle goalkeeper on two occasions but couldnt score - still, it was testament to the way that we set up in the game that he was even presented with the opportunity to get beyond the Carlisle defence with his pace and determination. On another day, we could have had another two or three goals.

Verdict: We looked uncomfortable in defence but in attack we were incredibly fluid - it was worth a try, but I expect well go back to a more traditional 4-2-2-2 on Saturday.

With the game tied at 1-1 and Carlisle firmly in the driving seat it was the introduction of our three substitutes that perhaps gave us the opportunity to re-affirm ourselves as the favourites for a win.

After Carlisles fortunate penalty they were all over us and it honestly felt as though we were going to concede a second imminently. Had it not been for Robbin Ruiter, we probably would have.

Grayson was forced into some quick thinking and he brought on Lamine Kone and James Vaughan, who battled hard and gave the spine of our side the solidity it needed in order to get through the rest of the game.

Then when Aiden McGeady was introduced it forced Carlisle to drop back ten yards or so, handing us the initiative to go and seek a second goal - and it worked.

Verdict: Kone and Vaughan were introduced when it was clearly needed and McGeady gave Carlisle something extra to think about. Nothing surprising but they helped us to win the game and hold our lead.

Grayson was keen to talk up the performance of Robbin Ruiter, who was fantastic between the sticks last night, and indicated that he now has a serious headache over which goalkeeper to select this coming Saturday at Barnsley.

He told the Sunderland Echo:

When he was required to make saves, he made them, and that's why we signed him after the trial period.

Hed done enough in training and in the two games he played for us to make that decision to sign him permanently. It gives us that competition for places that we needed.

I was pleased with him and I was pleased with quite a lot of the players that came in tonight and who haven't figured.

Thats what the players are required to do, they get paid to play and put on performances. A lot of them have done some decent things, weve obviously got to make improvements in certain areas but weve been asked a lot of questions tonight and ultimately we came through the game.

Ive not seen much more than what I expected of the players, I watch them every day in training, thats where I learn about them, how good they are and the deficiencies they have at times. Its nice to see that theyve stood firm and won a cup tie.

I have to say, I think that Graysons pep talk before the game about affording opportunities and ensuring that the players took their chance to stake a claim for a regular spot in the team was outstanding.

Quite a number of the ten players that were brought in for this cup tie upped their game considerably and it would be unfair if Grayson wasnt at least credited with a part in that.

What I like about Grayson is that hes very personable in his words - he doesnt try to bullshit you and is very honest about his style of man-management, which is refreshing having suffered from the negativity of David Moyes for such a long period last season.

Verdict: Dot on. Grayson knows exactly how to motivate not only his first choice eleven, but the squad as a whole.

Read more here:
Grayson's Anatomy: How did the Sunderland manager rate after last night's win v Carlisle? - Roker Report (blog)

Welcome to the Anatomy of a Goal, where each week we dissect one goal (or near goal) from the previous weeks Columbus Crew SC match.

For match 26 on the 2017 MLS Season, we take a look at Giles Barness 67th minute goal that put Orlando City SC level with Crew SC at 1-1, as part of the draw on Saturday.

Heres a look at the finish from the Orlando attacker.

After entering halftime up 1-0, the Black & Gold played on the back foot for much of the second half. New Designated Player signing Pedro Santos entered the match, but had little effect up to this point. The Lions goal seemed like it had been coming the entire half.

Orlando Citys equalizer began with center-back Tommy Redding picking up the ball just across the midfield line in his defensive half. Redding sees a wide open Cyle Larin (just to the right of the image) and plays an entry pass to the feet of the striker.

With the ball on the wing, Larin has space in front of him and can either play a pass to his strike partner Carlos Rivas, dribble the ball at Crew SC center-back Lalas Abubakar, or pass down the line to right back Scott Sutter.

The Columbus defense has a five-man backline, featuring both wing backs, with two defensive midfielders right in front of the center back trio.

Larin decides to carry the ball forward and is met by the Black & Golds newest addition, Santos. Under pressure, Larin once again has the same three options.

This time, Larin decides to slide the ball over to his right-back, Sutter, who is immediately defended by Waylon Francis. With the ball at his feet and no path forward, Sutter can pass the ball back into Larin, drop the ball back to Rivas, or dribble the ball backward to create more space.

Sutter finds Larin in the penalty box, who has his back to the goal and is defended by Abubakar.

With his back to the goal and Abubakar providing pressure, Larin has three options as Sutter cuts toward the goal. If Sutter is able to beat Francis, he can play a slotted pass to his right back, Larin can drop the ball back to Rivas or attempt to beat Abubakar off the dribble.

Sutters run goes nowhere, so Larin drops the ball back to Rivas.

Larins pass lacks pace, allowing Mohammed Abu to pressure the Orlando striker.

Rivas and Abu fight for the ball, and just as it looks like Abu might be about to set off on a Columbus counter attack . . .

. . . Rivas deflects the ball to teammate Cristian Higuita.

At the top of the triangle is the eventual goalscorer, Barnes. Wil Trapp is just to the left of Barnes, and should be marking the Lions attacker.

In the above video, Higuita uses an excellent turn to get around Abu, and send himself toward the goal and into a position to eventually slot the ball into Barnes.

Having left Abu behind, Higuita and Rivas both head toward the Black & Golds goal. Barnes is still near Trapp, though Trapp will totally abandon the midfielder.

With a touch from Rivas, Higuita continues his run forward. Abubakar leaves Larin to Francis and heads toward Higuita. Barnes begins his run in the channel between the Crew SC center backs. Trapp does not follow Barnes.

Here, Higuita can see that Barnes has beaten Trapp. If Higuita is able to beat Abubakar with a pass then Barnes should be in on goal.

In the middle of the 18-yard-box, Jonathan Mensah defends Dom Dwyer and holds Barnes onside.

Higuita plays a pass right between the legs of Abubakar as Barness has easily beaten Trapp. Trapp still hasnt attempted to recover from leaving Barnes open.

Here, is a quick video of Higuitas pass right between the legs of Abubakar. The Columbus center back leaves himself open for a nutmeg and Higuita makes the perfect pass right into the path of Barnes.

Just as Higuitas pass heads toward Barnes, you can see that the Orlando attacker was held onside by Jonathan.

From the side angle, Barnes was likely one to two yards onside as Higuita nutmegged Abubakar.

With only the goalkeeper between him and the goal, Barnes can continue dribbling forward, fire a quick shot or slot a pass into the path of Dwyer.

Barnes decides to keep dribbling and, once inside the six-yard-box, hits his shot from an incredibly difficult angle. Zack Steffen has cut off the near post, so Barnes must look to between the keepers legs.

The above video shots multiple angles of Barnes difficult shot. Steffen positions himself well, only leaving a difficult angle to the back post open for Barnes.

Barness shot just beats Steffen and Josh Williams . . .

. . . and caroms of the post for the equalizer from a difficult angle.

Findings:

The rest is here:
Anatomy of a Goal: Giles Barnes Equalizer - Massive Report

The struggle is real, Grey's Anatomy fans.

We've still got over a month before we can check back in with the good doctors of Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital to see how they're recovering after last season's (literally) explosive finale.Our impatience over waiting for the two-hour season 14 premiere may be growing stronger, but we've got a new way to distract ourselves from our Grey's hunger pangs: The season 13 gag reel.

Exclusive to E! News, and available as a bonus feature on the season 13 DVD set (in stores August 29), this year's reel has all of your faves cutting loose and cracking up. There's Ellen Pompeo continually referring to Dr. Webber as the "Director of Admissions" despite knowing full-well that's not his title, and Justin Chambers stumbling over the usually easily pronounceable phrase "surgical consult." Not to be outdone, Jesse Williams begins saying lines that aren't even his, while an extra full-on breaks a table in one scene.

"We still doing the TV show?" Chandra Wilson asks hysterically.

When the show returns for season 14, some of the laughter from the gag reel just might be making its way into the final cut, Jessica Capshaw recently admitted to E! News. When asked how the hospital was handling the events of the finale, she had this to offer:"I think it's in a recovery and I think it's not only in a recovery, but it's in sort of like a moment where you find your placeand you gain a little traction and then you move positively and forward-ly on. We did a table read for both the firstand second episodes, and they are righteously hysterical. They're so much fun and very sort of going back to firstand second season Grey's. It's very funny. It's very irreverent and funny and sort of on its side. I think it'swhat you remember and love about the beginning of the original group."

Whose flub has you cracking up the most? Sound off in the comments below!

Grey's Anatomy: The Complete 13th Season hits shelveson Tuesday, Aug. 29, while Season 14 premieres Thursday, Sept. 28 at 8 p.m. on ABC.

Read the original here:
Grey's Anatomy Season 13's Gag Reel Is Here to Help You Start ... - E! Online

Freeman

Bars are wonderful places, and they're staffed by more than just a Sam Malone from "Cheers" or whoever worked the taps at the Mos Eisley Cantina in "Star Wars."

I put myself through school working in a bar, and I'm still working in a few. It's a lot more than just pouring beers, flirting or cracking skulls. Today, we're talking about service industry workers that don't survive on tips. Certain employees make more money, work more and meet more, um, partners.

First off, owners foot the bills and in my experiences may be the most worthless person in the bar. Their opinion of what may or may not work usually doesn't. Owners change the dcor to from the dingy old music posters and Magic Markered dollar bills that everybody loved to clean-cut Jimmy Buffet-looking crap that looks like it was designed by your cat lady aunt who's trying really hard to impress her imaginary knitting club. Owners sometimes raise drink prices by a quarter which means a lot more math for bartenders, which means bartenders spend more time doing something besides making money.

Managers, duh, manage the bar. They do just about everything: order booze, run social media, fix computers, hire, fire, re-hire, make schedules and try to figure out how to keep the place afloat. There are "fun managers" that might let you drink on the job, and there are "dickhead managers" that treat the staff like personal slaves and may charge you for the half a Red Bull you chugged because you worked a double.

Owners and managers will tell you when to close or how late to stay open, even if there's nobody coming in for drinks or their leechlike friends aren't leaving after closing time.

Depending on your bar's size or style, you might have a chef, who's generally everybody's favorite. He's the dude that will add extra everything to your employee meal. Most important, the chef will probably be your drug connection.

Next are most people's least favorite workers: security. Bouncers are the smashed bugs underneath the totem pole. Movies make this job seem a lot cooler than it actually is. Nearly 99 percent is doing absolutely nothing, unless you're allowed to get drunk and screw off with your bouncer friends then the job can be really fun.

As a bouncer, you're standing, stopping fights, preventing fights, hoping that fights happen, getting into fights, talking to girls, checking IDs, charging covers (even when there isn't one) and other types of manual labor such as taking out garbage. Mostly just standing. Sitting if you're lucky.

Like I said, I've done most jobs, but there's one I never have and never will do: deejay. A deejay basically has the best job in the place. They don't deal with customers except for taking requests. (Here's a hint: If you want your song to get played, be a hot chick.) As long as the laptop, spinny things and electricity is working, deejays make their money because they don't work for tips. Pretty awesome. Even better, nobody gets hit on more than a deejay.

It's closing time for today. Tune in next week for bartenders, servers and a secret worker.

Read more Freeman: coloradodaily.com/columns. Stalk him: comfyconfines.wordpress.com

Visit link:
Popular to Contrary Opinion: The anatomy of a bar - Colorado Daily

Team Selection

Its pretty simple: we have a squad with a decent amount of quality in it; however, we simply dont have enough quality in reserve if things arent working out or players are feeling somewhat jaded. Both Lee Cattermole and Aiden McGeady looked tired yesterday, and whether you think thats acceptable or not it goes to show that we desperately need quality reinforcements.

This week will give Grayson the chance to experiment in the cup and rest several players/give others a chance to impress, but it really does feel like the side needs several quality additions in order to really push on this season. Yesterdays bench, for example, was bereft of quality - wheres the dynamic striker and the tricky playmaker? Asoro is young and Khazri just hasnt cut the mustard so far this season as he looks for an escape from Wearside.

Verdict: What can you say, we played well until the first goal, but there just seemingly isnt enough quality on the bench to really make a difference when we need it.

Leeds did play well yesterday, but Sunderland could have perhaps played better - or at least smarter.

For once this season we had the lions share of possession (55%) and we had more shots on goal; however, the quality just wasnt there for Sunderland. Only 2/12 of our shots on goal actually hit the target, and it felt like we struggled to consistently create clear chances on goal.

Leeds targeted our full-backs with their pacey forwards, and Jones and Galloway struggled to stand up to their men. Leeds had 8 shots in total and 5 of those found the target - they were efficient with the ball and really gave us a difficult time of it.

The 4-4-2 that has worked so well this season struggled somewhat against Leeds fluid shape that resembled a 4-3-3. Leeds were able to both commit numbers to the middle of the park, and further up the pitch while their defence was steadfast to say the least. They were quicker and smarter than us.

Verdict: I wouldnt be surprised to see Grayson try some new things this week. The 4-4-2 is a decent shape, but we need other options. Perhaps a formation resembling Leeds could suit us well when needed?

Grayson certainly learned from the Sheffield Wednesday game and made changes with plenty of time to spare yesterday as Matthews replaced Galloway after 55 mins (enforced or not, I think that move was coming); Khazri replaced the ineffective Vaughan at the same time, and then Asoro came on for the final 15 minutes.

Unfortunately, as already noted, I just dont think we have enough quality in reserve to really swing a game in our favour. That can change of course; perhaps someone plays well against Carlisle, or maybe we bring in several new faces. Ultimately though, we need more options, and that really isnt Graysons fault as hes not the man in charge of finances and negotiations.

Verdict: Tried to make positive changes, but they just didnt work. Khazri looked inneffective (read to leave?), and Asoro still looks too young while Matthews was definitely an improvement on Galloway. You cant really lay much blame at Graysons feet for this - financially were struggling and bringing new players in isnt an easy task.

Grayson really was spot on in his assessment of the match:

For 20 minutes we were dominant. We asked a lot of questions of them.

I don't think (Liam) Cooper knew too much about it when it hit him on the head and hit the bar - 70 seconds later it's in the back of our next. Those are the fine margins in a football match.

From then onwards, I don't think you can fault the players' effort or commitment, but it was just that final ball that really matters, when you're trying to get back in to a game.

Hes right, we struggled after going behind and couldnt find that bit of quality needed to get back on track.

It really is fine margins in football, but Sunderland need to be a little more capable of making their own luck, and whether thats through new additions, squad rotation, or tactical tweaks, Grayson will work on those weaknesses as he looks to take this club forward.

Verdict: Positive realism as Grayson took the loss on the chin and acknowledges the need to improve. I have every confidence well do just that with him as manager.

Go here to read the rest:
Grayson's Anatomy: How did the Sunderland manager rate after Saturday's defeat at home to Leeds? - Roker Report (blog)

From his favourite silhouettes to his evolving style over the years, he tells us all

Hamza Bokhari, Creative Head at JEEM, fashion, beauty and travel enthusiast shares his style quotient with us. Known for his brilliant designs, he has also gone through his own style transformations. From his favourite silhouettes to his evolving style over the years, he tells us all

Understanding your body is the key to looking good and a trait found amongst all impeccably dressed fashionistas. While people shy away from talking about their bodies, these brave souls explain how they work their anatomies to their advantage

How would you describe your body type?

I would like to believe I am lean.

Has your body type changed over the last five years?

From flab to fab.

How has your style changed over the years?

I was always into style, but I believe since the past five years I am much more comfortable in my skin.

How do you dress your body according to your body type?

I dress however I like, I have never let my height or weight decide my fashion choices.

In your opinion what is your most troublesome area?

Well like most Pakistani men, it has to be my lower belly.

In your opinion what is the biggest mistake a person can make while dressing here?

Matching! Matching! Matching!

Which silhouettes suit your body the most?

I love experimenting with the kimono silhouette and I like to believe I ace the look.

What is the one piece of clothing that you shy away from wearing and why?

Tank tops and mini shorts.

More here:
Style Anatomy: Hamza Bokhari - The Express Tribune

It is just right, that the Health Ministry has chosen the IMA (Indian Medical Association), Indias largest voluntary autonomous body of doctors from all fields. The key features that make it suitable for the Gorakhpur enquiry, is that this body would be looking into the matter medically, and not with an eye of punishment. I am quite sure, with a vast, mostly non-government aided practicing experience, many must already be knowing what in all probability would mainly be a viral epidemic. Surely there would be areas of suggestions for improvement of overall care and preparedness.

Another advantage, it is not answerable and should not lean to any political entity, nor can itbesqueezed around by protocol, as it is not a Constitutional body, unlike the MCI. That it shall use true scientific principles, is understood.

If you look from the point of advantages of adversity, it is just as well that awareness has finally spread, systems are upgraded, and if this turns out to be a viral epidemic, the best standards of epidemic control, and prevention shall have to be put in place.Gorakhpur is a city that has had many trysts with epidemics.

To put it lightly, sometime back I happened to open the topic with a gentleman from the place. A citys description is best stated in its own language. This is what that gentleman said, Aap bas yoon samajhiye ki Baman (brahmin), Bimaari (disease), aur Bihari (no offence, every community has a sore point) sey Gorakhpur trust (infested, soft T) hai! Never had a better summary, which the IMA team may keep in mind!

The first reported viral epidemic in Gorakhpur was in 1978 (Japanese, JE), where 1022 cases were reported, with 297 deaths. After that the road has been rather bumpy.

The year 2005 was rather tragic. The outbreak reported was 5,737, mostly JE. 1344 children died.

But to get the full view, the Directorate of National Vector Borne Disease Control Program (NVBDCP), has reported 26,668 between 2010-2017. The break up was 24,668 of Acute encephalitis syndromes (AES), an all-encompassing terminology WHO, though it settles down to a condition of fulminant encephalitis, as against the known virus JE. There were 4,093 deaths in the same period for AES, and 307 in the JE cases.

Gorakhpur has the dubious reputation of being the world capital of JE, though the total worldwide population at exposure, and that which may suffer is close to 3 billion, which would include South-East Asia prominently.

This years epidemic was unfortunate, but such is the story of all vagaries of nature. The BRD Medical College, may have expanded a bit, but that it should be epidemic ready, is difficult to imagine. For that matter, which medical facility shall have 2,000 extra ICU beds ready where the disease does not accept anything as a cure, and supportive care is all that can be given.

One may overstock antibiotics, saline drips, ventilators, even rooftops with oxygen, but the real process that takes down the patient is the inflammation inside the brain that causes increase in the respiratory rate-a central process, but not a lung pathology that would be amenable to oxygen.

However, medicine has a place for palliation and one can understand the emotions of those who felt that oxygen was in shortage. Ventilators, oxygen are what can be done as a palliation, and as a physician I would go a step further in what soothes the patients relatives. But the fact is that the gasping stage many patients reach due to disrupted central ventilatory centre, is not because of loss of oxygen, and even ventilatory support is less likely to change course.

However, I cannot say that such prop-ups facilities should not be ready. The outcome of the disease may not change though. I suppose this is a key question the IMA enquiry committee may like to take. Till we have vaccines that ensure protection, and till we have medicines that are curative, some actions can be initiated to change or dampen the incidence of the disease.

It is widely stated that Gorakhpur, a densely populated town, close to the Himalayan foothills of Nepal, has many water-bodies, and water pooling after the rains start, which is the period between May and November. Being a vector-borne disease, regular fogging in such areas should start to keep the population of vectors down.

Generic sprays and mosquito repellent ointments should be for free distribution (much like free condoms as disease prevention).

Health workers may be doubled to keep appropriate control over the still waters. Mosquito sprays and creams should be checked and supplied at every house. Expenses need not be high, and would also create extra rural jobs.

Surely, the enquiry shall bring better facilities to the BRD Medical College that may reduce fatalities in other diseases. Should doctors be suspended or dismissed? There may be specific cases, but I fail to understand any direct action or omission that would throw the blame directly on them.

Transferring doctors? That would be the best gift!

The inspection by IMA pending, the remedial aspects are technical, mostly regarding the methods of mitigating the vector population, and giving a first shield to the population.

A few years ago, Rotary International and IMA, made India Polio-free.

Innovative epidemiologic techniques need to be put in place. May I add to the vocabulary, Technical mosquito nets You got me wrong The ones that keep the mosquitoes trapped in, the way they do in Punjab!

To make the tragedy bearable, may I be spared this one:

Badaltey zamaaney, mein khayaal kuchh aisa aaya, Parwaana bhesh badalkar, kahin Qaatil bankey to na aaya(In a changing world, a thought just came to mind,Was a killer vector, impersonating the romantic drone?)

PS: One of the theories regarding King Tut is that he suffered malaria shortly before he occupied his Grand tom.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

Read this article:
Anatomy of an epidemic - Times of India (blog)

Oh, baby! "Grey's Anatomy" Season 14 isn't just bringing back an old friend, it's introducing a new (super-cute) young one.

It was already announced that Kim Raver would be returning as Dr. Teddy Altman in a guest arc in Season 14, and new photos show Raver scrubbed in with the Grey Sloan crew, including Ellen Pompeo (Meredith Grey), Jesse Williams (Jackson Avery), Camilla Luddington (Jo Wilson), and Sarah Drew (April Kepner):

Check out some new photos with Raver, who just joined Instagram and fittingly made "Grey's" her first pics:

Welcome home!

Teddy left "Grey's" when she was fired by Owen Hunt (Kevin McKidd) so she could go take her dream job. She was mentioned in the Season 13 finale when Owen's sister Megan was discovered to have been alive all this time. Owen, Amelia (Caterina Scorsone), and Riggs (Martin Henderson) were all on the way to reunite with Megan (now recast and played by Abigail Spencer) when Season 13 ended.

Sarah Drew is always great about sharing on-set photos, and she also shared some new Japril pics, including two adorable family photos with baby Harriet Kepner-Avery. If Harriet looks a little different than you remember, that's not a coincidence. In her first caption, Drew notes that this new season has a new Harriet:

So stinkin' cute! How can they let Maggie come between them, instead of giving Maggie her own man? Come on, now.

Speaking of the whole Maggie/Jackson/April thing, Maggie actress Kelly McCreary told TV Guide that, yes, the stars were just messing with fans when posting those Jaggie + Japril photos. At the time of her interview, she wasn't sure what Season 14 would hold for that particular love triangle:

"April left Maggie with a lot of questions. Maggie having feelings, Jackson having feelings -- that was something that had literally never crossed Maggie's mind. What [we pick up] with is Maggie trying to find out if that's true or not and beyond that, none of us knows."

McCreary sounded curious about the whole Jackson and Maggie dynamic:

"Those two characters for all of the reasons that people don't want them to be together -- that's what makes good drama. Whether they come together in a romantic way or in a strictly platonic way, there's a dynamic there. There's shared family. There's background that is worth exploring for character and story purposes. So yeah, I want to have scenes with him."

"Grey's Anatomy" Season 14 premieres Thursday, September 28 on ABC.

Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

See the article here:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 14 Photos Reveal 'New Harriet' & Teddy's ... - Moviefone