Category Archives: Anatomy

Anatomy

Grey’s Anatomy: The Kai Bartley Character Explained (& Where You’ve Seen The Actor) – Screen Rant

Summary

Kai Bartley is a character new to Grey's Anatomy in season 18 and keen-eyed viewers may recognize the actor from one of their other notable performances. Over the 20 seasons and counting of Grey's Anatomy, dozens of new characters have been introduced, some appreciated by fans, others not so beloved. The characters who end up sticking around are those like Bartley, who present fascinating new dynamics with other characters in the series. It's difficult for a character to be a lone wolf on the show unless their name is Meredith Grey (Ellen Pompeo).

Kai Bartley fits well in that mold with their own storylines, and connections with other characters that feel authentic and grow those other cast members as well. They are also part of a legacy of exemplary LGBTQ+ representation in Grey's Anatomy. Shonda Rhimes has always made an effort to have representation be a core tenet of all her shows and Grey's Anatomy, in particular, frequently features diverse characters in both supporting and major parts, ever since its debut in 2005 when the subject was not as represented on mainstream television.

Grey's Anatomy season 20, episode 4 might have marked the return of Arizona, but it's Amelia Shepherd's latest potential romance that is most notable.

Kai Bartley is the first character to appear on Grey's Anatomy who identifies as non-binary. Using the pronouns they/them, Bartley arrives in season 18, episode 2, "Some Kind of Tomorrow", as a neuroscientist working in Minnesota who helps Amelia Shepherd (Caterina Scorsone) on a Parkinson's research team. Amelia frequently travels between Minnesota and Seattle for research and she and Kai slowly develop feelings for one another.

In season 18, episode 12, "The Makings of You", Kai and Amelia go on a date and end up having sex later that night, signaling a serious step forward in their relationship. It's the type of relationship Kai's actor, E.R. Fightmaster, hoped for when they were cast on the show. The actor, who is also non-binary, told NBC how great it would be to become a love interest akin to Derek "McDreamy" Shepherd (Patrick Dempsey), from the first 11 seasons of the show.

Kai and Fightmaster would be welcome back considering Fightmaster's romantic, intelligent, and nuanced portrayal of the character.

While the end of Kai's story saw them leaving for London for a job opportunity in season 19, episode 15, "Mama Who Bore Me", a departure that broke Amelia's heart, they could return in a later season. Kai and Fightmaster would be welcome back considering Fightmaster's romantic, intelligent, and nuanced portrayal of the character. They bring quite a bit to the series.

Grey's Anatomy is the most high-profile project of Fightmaster's career up to this point. While they have only had a few screen credits in their filmography, they began their career with The Second City Chicago, the comedy and acting boot camp that has produced stars from John Belushi to Tim Robinson. Their only other credits come in short films, and two episodes of Work in Progress and Tales From the Closet, the latter of which they play themselves.

However, Fightmaster does have one other notable non-Grey's Anatomy role, which comes in Aidy Bryant's (also a Second City alum) comedy series Shrill, where they play Em/Emily. Em appears in season 2 of the show and begins dating Fran (Lolly Adefope), a relationship that's threatened when Fran wavers on moving in with Em. Both Fightmaster's Grey's Anatomy and Shrill characters are non-binary, and neither role makes a big deal about how they identify, creating a much welcomed and normalized characterization.

Watch on Netflix

Grey's Anatomy is considered one of the great television shows of our time, winning several awards and four Emmys. The high-intensity medical drama follows Meredith Grey and the team of doctors at Grey Sloan Memorial, who are faced with life-or-death decisions on a daily basis. They seek comfort from one another, and, at times, more than just friendship. Together they discover that neither medicine nor relationships can be defined in black and white.

Expand

Read the rest here:
Grey's Anatomy: The Kai Bartley Character Explained (& Where You've Seen The Actor) - Screen Rant

Anatomy

Grey’s Anatomy Season 20 Subtly Confirms Simone & Lucas Still Have A Future Together – Screen Rant

Warning! SPOILERS about Grey's Anatomy season 20, episode 6 ahead.

Simone and Lucas have been barely communicating in Greys Anatomy season 20, but one detail in season 20, episode 6 hints their connection is still far from being severed despite the ending twist. Connecting immediately after Greys Anatomy season 19 introduced them as the new interns, Lucas and Simone had all the markings to become the medical dramas newest It couple. Their fast friendship, their undeniable attraction they fought because getting into Grey Sloan Memorial as interns was already a last-chance opportunity, and Simones canceled wedding returning on track all upped the stakes of their evident feelings for each other.

However, choosing to operate on Sam Sutton despite only being interns in Greys Anatomy season 19s ending left Simone and Lucas out of sync. From Simone throwing Lucas under the bus when asked by the hospitals lawyers if she would have opened the patient if Lucas werent in the OR to Lucas moving out of Merediths house without telling Simone or Mika, they shut each other out, transforming their misunderstandings into a permanent disconnection. This prompted a new world order in Greys Anatomy season 20, leading the interns alliances to mutate greatly because of Lucas and Simones unwillingness to talk.

No medical drama has had the staying power of Grey's Anatomy, and the long-running ABC series returns for its landmark 21st season

Greys Anatomy season 20, episode 6s events finally convinced Lucas to try talking to Simone again before finding out she had given his old room to Blue, leaving him unsettled. While Lucas was always the one trying to talk about their relationship as Simone preferred to avoid talking about what they were, Simone had created an opening by asking him to study together after episodes where they barely spoke, which he refused. All these mix-ups can contribute to the two finally having a future together if only they talked to each other.

While getting together right after Greys Anatomy season 19s finale could have easily let their bond go up in flames, Lucass disappointment can prompt a showdown he and Simone cannot avoid. Although all their attempts at connecting failed in Greys Anatomy season 20, their feelings were always there. Its particularly evident in Simone continuing to involve Lucas and Lucas comforting her after her difficult patient in Greys Anatomy season 20, episode 5, despite still being angry at her behavior. Were another high-stakes situation to cause Simone and Lucas to clash, they could talk it out instead of avoiding each other.

Although Simone and Lucass inability to be on the same wavelength in Greys Anatomy season 20 elicited various awkward encounters, it also gave all the interns the chance to form new alliances. Bailey forcing the interns to collaborate in Greys Anatomy season 20 tried to facilitate such a development, especially after the events of Greys Anatomy season 19s finale only brought conflict among the interns. However, it was Lucas and Simone actively avoiding each other that brought Simone to work with Blue and eventually get to know him, definitely substituting Lucas as a housemate and shifting the groups established dynamics.

Lucas and Simones rift upsets the intern groups balance, letting new friendships bloom and making the group better and more united as a consequence.

Greys Anatomys earliest seasons followed a similar pattern. While George, Meredith and Izzie originally hated Alex, Izzie befriending him eventually made him more acceptable to the others, like Meredith and Cristina becoming each others persons brought Cristina closer to Izzie and George, despite their differences. Similarly, Lucas and Simones separation affected the trio, with Mika able to form a bond with Jules, just as Simone befriended Blue. This could potentially benefit the interns in Greys Anatomy season 20 as, even if Simone and Lucas were to reconnect, they could all work better together having finally accepted each other.

Episode #

Title

Release Date

7

She Used to Be Mine

May 9, 2024

8

Blood, Sweat and Tears

May 16, 2024

9

I Carry Your Heart

May 23, 2024

10

TBA

May 30, 2024

Grey's Anatomy airs new episodes every Thursday on ABC at 9pm ET.

Grey's Anatomy is considered one of the great television shows of our time, winning several awards and four Emmys. The high-intensity medical drama follows Meredith Grey and the team of doctors at Grey Sloan Memorial, who are faced with life-or-death decisions on a daily basis. They seek comfort from one another, and, at times, more than just friendship. Together they discover that neither medicine nor relationships can be defined in black and white.

Expand

See the original post:
Grey's Anatomy Season 20 Subtly Confirms Simone & Lucas Still Have A Future Together - Screen Rant

Anatomy

Ross Procedure Outcomes in Children Tied to Anatomy – Newswise

Newswise The Ross procedurewhich uses a childs healthy pulmonary valve to replace a diseased aortic valvehas been shown to have excellent outcomes in pediatric patients overall. But how does a patients age and heart anatomy impact the surgerys success?

To answer this question, a team at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles recently conducted a 30-year study of more than 300 pediatric patients who underwent the Ross at CHLA. The studythe largest pediatric Ross study of its kind at a single centerexamined outcomes not only by patients age, but also by the complexity of their congenital heart disease.

What we found is that the risk is higher in neonates and infants, but that is because those patients have a higher rate of more complex heart defects, says Markian Bojko, MD, a USC surgical resident and author of the study. The higher risk is a result of those other pathologies, not the Ross procedure itself.

Dr. Bojko presented the findings at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Annual Meeting, held April 27-30 in Toronto. Vaughn Starnes, MD, Chief of Cardiovascular Surgery and Co-Director of the Heart Institute at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, was the studys senior author.

Childrens Hospital Los Angeles is one of just a handful of pediatric centers in the country with expertise in performing the Ross procedure, and Dr. Starnes is a world leader in this complex surgery.

Because the Ross uses the childs own valve, that valve then grows with the child instead of needing multiple replacements. Long-term survival rates for children with a Ross also match the general populationsomething that is not true for those who receive mechanical valves. In addition, patients do not have to be on lifelong blood thinner therapy.

Being on blood thinners is difficult for kids, says Dr. Starnes, the H. Russell Smith Foundation Chair in Cardiothoracic Surgery. They cant go to the playground; they cant play sports like soccer or baseball. But children with a Ross procedure can do all of those things. It gives them back their childhood.

Still, there has been a perception that the technically demanding operation is too risky in younger patientsspecifically neonates (younger than 30 days) and infants under 1 year.

In the study, the team looked at all pediatric patients, from birth to 18 years of age, who underwent the Ross at CHLA since 1992. The study, which included 317 patients, found that:

What we found is that its these more complex defects that raise the risk, often because these babies need a second major surgery at the same time as the Ross, Dr. Bojko explains. But when the disease was isolated, even the youngest patients did very well.

The research builds on the results of a 2021 study, led by John Cleveland, MD, at CHLA, which showed that the Ross had excellent long-term durability for infants and neonates.

That study also found that more complex diseaseespecially Shones complex and interrupted aortic arch with ventricular septal defectsignificantly increased the risk of poor outcomes for these youngest patients.

Based on those resultsconfirmed by this latest researchthe CHLA team often takes a single-ventricle approach for these high-risk babies.

Doing a Norwood for babies with Shones complex allows those babies and their heart structures to grow for a year or two, Dr. Starnes says. Then we can go back and take down the Norwood and do a Ross procedure at that later time. That significantly lowers the risk.

But for many other young patients who need an aortic valve, the Ross remains the best option, he adds. Its becoming the operation of choice for young adults and children.

Study authors were Markian Bojko, Luke Wiggins, John Cleveland, Ramsey Elsayed, David Cleveland and Vaughn Starnes.

Continue reading here:
Ross Procedure Outcomes in Children Tied to Anatomy - Newswise

Anatomy

Explore the Props That Give ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Its Edge – Shondaland.com

The world of Greys Anatomy requires lots (and lots) of props. From 3D-printed fetuses to sourcing the right medical instruments to creating edible food to capture the magic and accuracy of Greys, the props have been spearheaded by property master Ryan Blank.

One of his more memorable prop endeavors was in season 14 when he and special effects coordinator Jason Gustafson set up the famous elephant toothpaste experiment for Maggie, which Blank says was a wonderful and unique challenge.

This experience using massive beakers to create 20-foot-tall spouts of elephants toothpaste was the most fun Ive had in my entire career, he recalls. Jason and I, because we did the practice runs repeatedly together, ran the gag on set the day it was shot. Repeating the gag over and over with consistent results was an absolute blast.

Blanks props can be so popular that hes even encountered cast members attempting to pilfer them from the set. But one of the most challenging moments in his job is when props are changed at the last minute or during rehearsal for the scene, and the list of these props is endless and always evolving, he says.

Though this weeks prop wasnt as hands-on (or messy!) as the elephant toothpaste, it still took thought, time, and a major collaboration. Miranda gifts a copy of the just-released Red Cloak Volume 12 to Dorian, one of her patients, whos been at Grey Sloan for 51 days clearly, things have not been easy for Dorian. In the original script for the episode, Blue and Mika admire the book, with Mika saying she might swipe it from Dorian. But theres no need for that: Blue has the entire collection at home. Although the book only makes a brief appearance in the final version, a lot of effort went into making it.

Typically, in a situation where something must be created, I would research and find examples of something similar to work from, Blank explains. In this case, I was perfect for the task as a lifelong consumer and collector of comic books. I already knew what would make the book authentic. Mom was wrong my love for comic books finally paid off!

Dorian (Freddy Miyares)

To imagine the Red Cloak series, Blank worked with episode director Debbie Allen to understand the writers expectations for what it should look like and what the tone should be. He then collaborated with production designer John Zachary, who enlisted

Zachary gave Beeguer some references that reflected the mood of what I thought was appropriate, along with the script pages. These showed the characters from the show interacting with the comic book, helping me understand the context, Beeguer says. They emphasized that the main focus should be on the composition of the pages and cover, with the text and story coming second. This approach will ensure that viewers can grasp the content and subject matter even if the filming doesnt capture the text clearly.

In the early 2000s, Beeguer created several short comics for Heavy Metal magazine, which he incorporated as an inspiration. I used sketches, photographs, and various personal artworks to train an artificial intelligence model, he explains. By providing prompts that described elements like the red cape and the action, I compiled a series of promising images and a style.

A mockup of graphic novel Red Cloak by Matthias Beeguer

Ultimately, the AI model generated hundreds of images. Although not everything was right for Red Cloak, it gave Beeguer a head start on imagining the artwork. He used Photoshop to add missing elements, adjust the images, and put together the narrative and the composition, which tell a story across several pages.

Controlling the backgrounds and the colors was very important for cohesiveness, he says. The bulk of the work was given to the covers and backing options, painting details, and textures to achieve a more finished look. The whole process took two days. Unfortunately, at the end of the second day, we realized that the dimensions of the frames were different than the book the prop department had ordered with the printer, so I spent an extra day reconverting to a different, more elongated composition, which of course gave me further opportunities to fix numerous issues, repaint some elements, and make sure everything was going to look its best in high resolution.

For Beeguer, the process was rewarding and enjoyable despite the hurdles. Working with unrestricted creativity is my favorite approach, and Im incredibly thankful to the Greys Anatomy team for giving me the rare opportunity to exercise that principle, he says.

Not only do the fictional Red Cloak books appear in the episode, but they have also been used to decorate Blues bedroom in the intern house. Discerning fans can spot the series on his bookcase. Although they play only a small role on this season of Greys Anatomy, it is a memorable one.

John chose well, Blank says of Beeguers work. The images were incredible, and we had more than enough material to create multiple versions of the graphic novel.

Emily Zemler is a freelance writer and journalist based in London. She regularly contributes to the Los Angeles Times, Rolling Stone, and Observer, and is the author of five books. Follow her on Twitter @emilyzemler.

Get Shondaland directly in your inbox:

Link:
Explore the Props That Give 'Grey's Anatomy' Its Edge - Shondaland.com

Anatomy

Can science explain why couples break up? The mathematical anatomy of a fall – The Conversation

French director Justine Triets Anatomy of a Fall, winner of the 2023 Oscar for best original script, reconstructs a fatal fall in order to dissect the collapse of the romantic relationship between the films leading couple, Sandra Voyter and Samuel Maleski.

Far from an exception, breakups of the sort depicted in the film are commonplace: global data shows high levels of marriage failure, with a marked increase towards the end of the last century.

In some Western countries, as many as 50% of marriages do not make it past 25 years, giving rise to the popular maxim half of all marriages end in divorce.

According to Triet, the strange thing is for a relationship to work. The majority are hellish, and the film aims to go deep into that hell.

Importantly, divorce statistics do not account for the number of relationships that are unhappy. Perhaps the majority are indeed hellish, but some marriages today are long-lasting, and seem stronger and more loving than any that came before. This dichotomy widespread failure or exceptional success seems to summarise the current state of marriage in the West. This has been dubbed the all or nothing marriage.

Scientific studies have established that romantic relationships tend to drop off, meaning that, on average, satisfaction levels reduce over time. Successful couples are able to arrest this fall, finding a satisfying level that can last indefinitely. Many others, however, gradually decline to the point where breaking up is only a matter of time.

Relationship psychology shows that love alone is not enough to keep a couple together it requires effort. Relationship scientist John Gottman likens this to the second law of thermodynamics, whereby a closed system such as a marriage degenerates unless energy is supplied. As he puts it, if you do nothing to make things get better in your marriage but do not do anything wrong, the marriage will still tend to get worse over time.

The all or nothing theory therefore suggests that successful relationships require a significant investment of time and energy. Couples who make this commitment will be rewarded with a high level of satisfaction, while those who fail to do so, like Samuel and Sandra in Triets film, are destined to fail.

But why do some couples manage to stop this fall and stay happy? Like Samuel and Sandra, all couples start out in love, and want to be happy together forever. If we assume that they are compatible and willing to make the effort together, they form what some call an Adam and Eve relationship the Biblical archetype of a harmonious, lasting union.

Using dynamic systems to analyse this relationship model confirms the all or nothing theory.

Dynamic systems are a mathematical tool for understanding the evolution of a variable over time. In the case of romantic relationships, we are interested in the feeling of love in a couple. Because effort is needed to sustain the relationship, it becomes a dynamic system controlled by effort: effort regulates feeling, with the objective of making the feeling last forever.

By applying this effort control theory, our research has found that a successful relationship requires effort beyond the partners preferred level, and that this effort gap is difficult to sustain over time.

As Sandra Voyter says in Triets film, there are times when a relationship is chaotic, others when you fight alone, sometimes alongside your partner, and sometimes against your partner.

Samuel and Sandras relationship has elements in common with any other couples relationship. The starting point is very high: feeling is at its peak, and there is a shared belief that it will never end. Both are willing to contribute to the happiness of the relationship by making their own individual efforts, and both know that some kind of shock or external event will eventually alter this state.

Generally speaking, couples with the same socioeconomic, cultural, or religious background known as homogamous couples are more stable. Many couples, however, are heterogamous, meaning they differ in one or more of these regards.

Heterogamy can extend beyond an individuals circumstances: on its most elemental level, it can boil down to a mismatch or imbalance in how efficient one member of a couple is in transforming effort into feeling or happiness. Such a disparity may lead to asymmetrical levels of effort being dedicated to making the relationship successful, which are already higher than those both members would prefer to make.

This is the case in Samuel and Sandras relationship: at one point in the film Samuel highlights this imbalance, and Sandra replies that she does not believe a couple should make equal efforts, saying she finds the idea depressing.

Our latest computational models for assessing the dynamics of imbalanced effort levels in couples allow us to simulate the evolution of happiness in a relationship, both in predictable environments and with varying levels of uncertainty. Our simulations suggest that Sandra is right: each partner does not have to make the same level of effort.

One of the films scenes where Sandra and Samuel reproach each other for the efforts made or not made to sustain the relationship displays typical negative couple dynamics, where each has a bone to pick. The film also implies that Samuel has made or is making more effort than Sandra in their relationship. Our analysis shows, perhaps surprisingly, that the more emotionally efficient partner has to make a greater effort to sustain the relationship. In the film, it appears that this is Samuel.

Our analysis also shows that when the couple is subjected to a stressful episode, both partners need to increase their effort levels if the relationship is to survive. However, the more efficient partners effort level has to increase more. In the film, Sandra and Samuels relationship is subjected to a tremendous misfortune, which has a prolonged and pronounced effect on its narrative arc. This is why Samuel feels much more stressed than Sandra.

Mathematics offers an outcome in line with the films plot: the continuous overexertion of the most emotionally efficient partner amplified by a prolonged period of crisis leads to the relationship falling apart. In the case of the film, this also leads to Samuels fall.

Original post:
Can science explain why couples break up? The mathematical anatomy of a fall - The Conversation

Anatomy

Grey’s Anatomy Still Hasn’t Topped One of Its Earliest Seasons – CBR

This article discusses topics about gun violence.

Grey's Anatomy is often categorized as one of the best medical dramas in TV history, mainly due to its three-dimensional characters and heart-wrenching storylines. The show has also welcomed a plethora of famous faces, including Sandra Oh, Patrick Dempsey, and Sarah Paulson, all of which add to the allure of this impactful show. Grey's has also managed to commission a number of successful spin-offs, such as Private Practice, Station 19, and Grey's Anatomy: B-Team, which strive to expand this gripping universe.

Now in its 20th season, many fans believe that the show was at its peak during the earlier seasons, more specifically, Season 2. This season saw the interns grow from strength to strength, helping to truly define and shape the MAGIC era. Plus, many fans state that nostalgia plays a big part in Grey's Anatomy's success and the earlier seasons help to transport them back to a much more memorable time in the franchise's lore.

Episode Title

Viewership

"Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head"

18.98 million

"Enough is Enough"

17.57 million

"Make Me Lose Control"

18.12 million

"Deny, Deny, Deny"

18.28 million

"Bring the Pain"

18 million

"Into You Like a Train"

16.67 million

"Something to Talk About"

18.13 million

"Let It Be"

19.74 million

"Thanks for the Memories"

20.33 million

"Much too Much"

19.59 million

"Owner of a Lonely Heart"

20.59 million

"Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer"

15.70 million

"Begin the Begin"

18.97 million

"Tell Me Sweet Little Lies"

21.04 million

"Break on Through"

18.44 million

"It's the End of the World"

37.88 million

"As We Know It"

25.42 million

"Yesterday"

24.36 million

"What Have I Done to Deserve This?"

24.76 million

"Band-Aid Covers the Bullet Hole"

22.51 million

"Superstition"

21.13 million

"The Name of the Game"

22.35 million

"Blues for Sister Someone"

20.76 million

"Damage Case"

21.99 million

"17 Seconds"

22.60 million

"Deterioration of the Fight or Flight Response"

22.50 million

"Losing My Religion"

22.50 million

Though Grey's Anatomy can easily brag about its ratings year-on-year, there's no denying that Season 2 was one of its most successful in terms of viewership. The season managed to accumulate an average of 21.07 million views, ensuring that the show could easily compete against its contemporaries such as Desperate Housewives and Boston Legal.

Not to mention, Season 2 saw a dramatic improvement in its storylines, especially when it came to the relationships between the characters. Whether it's Cristina and Meredith arguing over McDreamy or Mark and Addison's rocky relationship, these instances had viewers hooked from the very beginning. This success also allowed the cast and crew to win a number of prestigious awards, including the Golden Globe for Best Drama Series in 2006. As such, throughout Season 2, Grey's Anatomy managed to secure its position as a prime-time medical drama.

Grey's Anatomy is a deeply female show, placing strong women at the forefront of everything it does. Though modern fans may not see this as a large achievement, at the time that Season 2 was airing, the show was competing against the hit medical drama E.R. This show placed George Clooney in the spotlight and didn't offer his female counterparts the chance to lead the way. Therefore, it's evident that Shonda Rhimes was keen to take a risk, which ultimately paid off. Season 2 introduced us to a number of female leaders, including Cristina Yang, Izzie Stevens, and Addison Montgomery, all of whom were able to showcase their professional and personal prowess.

For example, in Season 2, Episode 3, "Deny, Deny, Deny," Cristina Yang is struggling to remain on bed rest since she is such a dedicated and driven worker. Yet, we also see a more vulnerable side of her, especially when she finally breaks down about her recent emergency abortion. This highlights the duality of female leaders, showcasing how characters like Cristina can tackle immense challenges but can also struggle with deeply human experiences such as grief and shock. These contradictions help fans view her as a much more complex character and empathize with her on a more nuanced level.

Another prime example of female strength is in Season 2, Episode 6, "Into You Like a Train". Despite feeling nervous about the future of her relationship with Derek, Meredith quickly puts these anxieties aside to help the victims of a horrific train crash. Meredith's actions symbolize her career-driven mindset and indicate that no matter how much she loves Derek, she will always put her job first. Thus, she comes across as a motivated and passionate woman, something that was not commonly seen on-screen during the mid-2000s. It also elucidates that although Seattle Grace is teeming with gossip, clumsy friendships, and sleazy sexual escapades, the staff truly care about their patients. Plus, Meredith's later rejection also exemplifies that women are sometimes forced to develop a secure work-life balance, even when it feels like their world is caving in.

Year

Award Title

Winner

2006

Outstanding Casting for a Drama Series

Grey's Anatomy

2007

Outstanding Supporting Actress In a Drama Series

Katherine Heigl

2010

Outstanding Prosthetic Makeup For A Series, Miniseries, Movie Or A Special

Grey's Anatomy

2010

Outstanding Makeup For A Single-Camera Series (Non-Prosthetic)

Grey's Anatomy

2011

Outstanding Guest Actress In A Drama Series

Loretta Devine

Admittedly, Grey's Anatomy has been criticized in recent years for its convoluted storylines that are based more on hysteria, rather than actual medical cases. But in Grey's Anatomy Season 2, the writers managed to show off their medical knowledge in a range of hyper-realistic and emotive episodes. Throughout Season 2, Episode 16, "It's The End of The World," viewers are exposed to the harsh nature of gun violence, and these themes are only exacerbated when the team must remove the bullet before it explodes. Tensions are high during this episode, but it still manages to hit close to home because gun violence is a recurrent issue throughout the U.S., and cases like this occur in hospitals on a regular basis. Plus, this episode shows Miranda Bailey going into labor, tugging on the viewers' heartstrings once again as they witness a fan-favorite character welcome new life into the world.

Grey's Anatomy's use of extensive medical knowledge helps the show stand head and shoulders above the rest. This is mainly because the show does not have to rely on silly plot developments and can use practical solutions to solve real-life problems. For example, in Season 2, Episode 11, "Owner of a Lonely Heart," George uses leeches to restore the blood flow in a patient with a slow capillary flow. This may sound like an obscure method of treatment, but leeches have immense medical benefits, so seeing this in the hospital indicates just how intuitive the interns can be. In addition, the fact that the interns have somewhat easy access to these creatures highlights just how advanced Seattle Grace is and how it managed to be a thought leader in its respective field. As a result, these intricate examples show that Season 2 places a greater focus on realism, ensuring that it can reap the benefits of increased dramatic tension.

Top 5 Grey's Anatomy Episodes of All Time:

With a staggering 20 seasons under its belt and heaps of memorable moments, it's clear that fans will hold Grey's Anatomy in their hearts forever. Though the show has seen a slight dip in ratings over the course of time, it's now available on a collection of popular streaming sites, so avid viewers can tune in whenever they please.

Even when key characters such as Alex Karev and Stephanie Edwards decide to call it quits, the show manages to bring in a collection of new staff without having to erase previous cast members entirely. There have always been rumors regarding when the show will end, but until that time comes, it's safe to say that Grey's Anatomy will continue to revel in great levels of success.

View original post here:
Grey's Anatomy Still Hasn't Topped One of Its Earliest Seasons - CBR

Anatomy

A Beloved Grey’s Anatomy Character Was Way More Problematic Than Fans Will Admit – CBR

Summary

In Greys Anatomy, Alex Karev was one of the original five interns who survived in the Seattle Grace Hospital for more than 15 years. He was shot, experienced a bomb going off in the OR, fell in love with a trauma patient, and saw many friends die, but lived through them all. Alex was introduced as the typical bad boy of the group who would go to any lengths to get his way. Before Mark Sloan became McSteamy, Alex Karev had a reputation for sleeping around and was generally the jerk that every woman hated. However, its safe to say that Alex Karev had one of the best character transformations in the series.

He went on from being the underdog to being interim chief and the best surgeon he could be. Alex didnt have an easy upbringing, and seeing him make something of himself was the best arc he could get. Unfortunately, no matter how good he go, Alex was problematic, and he remained that way despite the fans choosing to ignore his red flags.

Alex Karev got off on the wrong foot with almost everyone. He somehow thought it was okay to bully George because he was a softie and a more considerate gentleman than he was ever going to be. He used cheap tricks to get surgeries as an intern and started an incredibly toxic relationship with Izzie after being disrespectful and mean to her. Fortunately, the show impressively followed into the classic trope of turning the bad boy into a humble human being, but thats also not without its fair share of demerits.

The trope was not going to work for Alex fully because his problematic behavior was never really properly taken care of. It may have been suppressed for a while, but the tendency to go haywire was always there for Alex, and he mostly just needed a little push. Fans have been ignoring Alexs occasional meltdowns and mess-ups for years, and all for the sake of his character progressing comparatively better than he started.

Alex is a complicated character who rightfully belongs to the gray area. Hes not completely bad or good but struggles to keep up with his self-proclaimed righteousness and the occasional urge to punch the next guy. Hes a fascinating blend of arrogance and emotional vulnerability that made the audience fall for him in the first place. The viewers love an underdog, and Alex Karev played the perfect candidate who had the odds stacked against him. So, the fans naturally rooted for him to succeed and come out shining on the other side.

One of the major reasons why fans still choose to ignore Alexs red flags is because he represents hope for all those people who have been dealt a difficult hand. Being abandoned by his addict father at a young age and having to take care of his family wasnt exactly an ideal situation for a kid to nurture and grow. As he said one time, he was the kid and the father of the family. With his kind of background and childhood, its a more appealing sentiment and storyline to have him become someone better rather than end up as a failure.

Fans could have ignored a lot of what Alex did, but it's almost criminal to forgive him the way he treated women who were in a relationship with him. His and Izzies relationship may have been presented as a modern-day A Walk to Remember by the show, but there was nothing glorifying about their love. Alex and Izzie may have felt like their love was special, but they were definitely not meant to be together. Although Alex had been there for Izzie during her cancer treatment, the events leading up to their marriage were alarming from a relationship standpoint. He was mostly stressed and on edge throughout Izzies treatment, especially during and after the surgery. He said hurtful things to her and sometimes even blew things out of proportion.

Despite Izzie being a problematic character herself, she didnt deserve the way Alex used her as a punching bag. His reactions regarding the women he had a relationship with always had been severe. For instance, his whole meltdown regarding the DeLuca and Jo situation was absolutely uncalled for. Despite being a confident and successful person, Alex had still not recovered from his insecurities and jealousy. His jealousy played a major role in making his and Jos relationship quite unhealthy to the human eye, and beating DeLuca to a pulp was simply the cherry on top.

Although Alexs was a survivor and endured a terrible childhood, he was still too attached and emotional. He got overly attached to women like Izzie, Jo, and even Jane Doe, and then, because of his lack of communication skills, he ended up hurting them because he didnt know how to channel his feelings. Alex Karev was always the hot thing around the hospital, but he was never the healthiest. He had a pattern of falling too hard for women with traumatic pasts or present and then was unable to process the requirements and responsibilities of having a good relationship. Its not like he was a terrible partner because he was there whenever he was needed and was a guy to rely on in a tough situation.

However, his rage and violent tendencies didnt help his case at all, and they got worse with time. Instead of calming his demeanor down, the show went on to ignore his anger burst and even gave that arc a boost when he beat DeLuca and never even apologized for it when the former gave him a chance to. One of the worst things the show did to Alexs character was to make him more impulsive and stubborn as the seasons progressed. He rarely admitted his faults and was too proud to come out when his head was down for once.

While these qualities were necessary for a guy like him to survive in the world, they became so embedded in his personality that it was almost impossible for him to separate them. Fans werent too quick to admit that the Alex in latter seasons of the show was simply a more controlled version of what he was in the beginning. Despite coming a long way from how he was, his underlying problems and personality traits were never addressed in a way that would make him a good candidate for a redemption arc.

Almost the entire Greys Anatomy fandom can unanimously agree that Alex Karev had the worst exit in the show. The way he left the drama undid everything that the show might have done to redeem his character from the initial bad boy persona to a decent person who made it to the finish line as he dreamt. When Alex Karevs screen time was drastically reduced, the viewers were alarmed that the fan-favorite character might be leaving the show. They were right, but the show did not handle the characters exit well at all, which even enraged the fans at one point. Instead of having a tearjerker episode, Karev chose to walk off by sending four hand-written letters to the four most important people in his life.

Even with the actor not being on the screen, the prospect of Alex saying goodbye the way he did wouldnt have hurt that much. However, the whole storyline about him leaving Jo, his current wife, for his old flame, Izzie Stevens, was downright cruel. This one action cemented everything about his character being impulsive, unhealthy, and problematic, and no amount of handwritten letters could have redeemed that. Alex mentioned that he had left to stay with Izzie and their twins, whom they had via frozen embryos before Izzies surgery. All would have been forgiven if Alex Karev had gone out with guns blazing and a heartfelt goodbye that would have turned him into the hero that everyone wished him to be. However, the way his character was written off was not the treatment the character of that scale deserved.

Sure, there were many things wrong with Alex, but he was a fan-favorite character who stuck to the originality of what made the show tick in the first place. He may not have been a perfect boyfriend or a human, but he saved countless lives, and sometimes, he didnt even get the credit for it. Although Alex Karev could have been more than what he was, the fans will forever love him and have been more than eager to brush off his shortcomings.

A drama centered on the personal and professional lives of five surgical interns and their supervisors.

Excerpt from:
A Beloved Grey's Anatomy Character Was Way More Problematic Than Fans Will Admit - CBR

Anatomy

How a Village Comes to Life in ‘Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes’ – The New York Times

In Anatomy of a Scene, we ask directors to reveal the secrets that go into making key scenes in their movies. See new episodes in the series on Fridays. You can also watch our collection of more than 150 videos on YouTube and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

In this sequence from Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, we see how a tribe functions in an idyllic village before threats emerge. The scene follows Noa (Owen Teague), Soona (Lydia Peckham) and Anaya (Travis Jeffery) as they return from the ritual of collecting an eagle egg that they will nurture.

Narrating the sequence, the director Wes Ball said, The goal was really just to set up a world that was wonderful, that was ultimately going to be forever changed.

The scene was shot on location in Australia with the principal actors in performance capture gear. Ball said that they shot the sequence twice, once with the actors, and then a second time without the performers. He said he chose the best performance to be digitally dropped into the scene. He also had other performers do their movements on a stage and put them in as background in the scene as well.

Its an interesting process where I can take all of these different little elements and layer them all together, he said.

Read the Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes review.

Sign up for the Movies Update newsletter and get a roundup of reviews, news, Critics Picks and more.

Excerpt from:
How a Village Comes to Life in 'Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes' - The New York Times