Category Archives: Embryology

College Embryology Textbook Confirms: Human Development Begins at Fertilization – LifeNews.com

Another new medical textbook has confirmed that human life begins at conception.

The details in The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology by professorsKeith Moore, T.V.N. Persaud, and Mark Torchia add even more validity to the pro-life position. Even at the earliest moment, when the unborn child is a one-cell zygote, it already is a unique, living human being, the authors wrote.

Their textbook is not outside the mainstream. A few years ago, pro-life blogger Sarah Terzo compiled a list of dozens of textbooks and medical experts that also stated that human life begins at conception.

The Federalist reports about the new book:

the book confirms the premise of the pro-life movement.

The authors of this textbook state in two separate cases that human development is a continuous process that begins when an oocyte from a female is fertilized by a sperm from a male, and also that human development begins at fertilization when a sperm fuses with an oocyte to form a single cell, the zygote. In other words: human life begins at conception.

The textbook contains a number of interesting facts about an unborn babys development, starting from the moment of fertilization. Live Action News, which first reported about the new edition of the textbook, listed some of these details:

All major external and internal structures are established during the fourth to eighth weeks.

Upper limb buds are recognizable at day 26 or 27 as small swellings on the ventrolateral body walls.

Embryos in the sixth week show spontaneous movements, such as twitching of the trunk and developing limbs.

By the end of this week (8th week), the embryo has distinct human characteristics; however, the head is still disproportionately large, constituting almost half of the embryo.

SUPPORT LIFENEWS! If you like this pro-life article, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!

Abortion activists, especially those at Planned Parenthood, are fond of saying that no one really knows when life begins, and a woman should be able to decide her views on the matter of abortion and human life.

Planned Parenthood Vice President Dawn Laguens recently got a lot of attention after she avoided answering interview questions on national TV about what an unborn baby is.

Fox Newss Tucker Carlson asked her, You work for the countrys biggest abortion provider, if you can hear the heartbeat of this fetus, what is it? Is it a piece of tissue or is ita separate human being?

I think thats up to each individual to decide what they believe, Laguens replied.

This is a complete denial of science. Textbooks, researchers and many others have confirmed over and over again that a baby in the womb is a separate, living human being from the moment of fertilization. To believe otherwise is wrong.

Read more here:
College Embryology Textbook Confirms: Human Development Begins at Fertilization - LifeNews.com

Virtual Human Embryo Project – The Endowment for Human …

Welcome to The Virtual Human Embryo (VHE), a 14,250-page, illustrated atlas of human embryology, which presents all 23 Carnegie Stages of development during the 8-week embryonic period.

This $3.2 million, 11-year initiative engaged a team led by Dr. Raymond F. Gasserone of the leading embryologists of the last half century. His team created thousands of restored, digitized, and labeled serial sections from the world's largest collection of preserved human embryos. They used these serial sections to create animations, fly-throughs, and 3-D reconstructions.

The VHE is now available to researchers, educators, and students everywhere. Read More...

See the article here:
Virtual Human Embryo Project - The Endowment for Human ...

Abby Milanesa of the Buena Vista 4-H wins state title – The Salinas Californian

Lorin Hoffman-Lurz Published 2:59 p.m. PT March 17, 2017 | Updated 2:59 p.m. PT March 17, 2017

Undefeated members of the 3 Egg Omelet are from left to right: Kayla Hurl, Abby Milanesa and Siana Barrett. The proud moderator is Francine A. Bradley, Ph.D., extension poultry specialist emerita, U.C., Davis.(Photo: Provided)

The 2017 California State Senior Avian Bowl Finals were held Saturday, Feb. 25 at the Fresno County Fairgrounds. Several teams composed of high school aged students competed in this poultry knowledge bowl. Local student, Abby Milanesa of the Buena Vista 4-H club and her two teammates: Kayla Hurl from Parkfield and Siana Barrett from Dos Palos entered the competition as the 3 Egg Omelet. They went undefeated in each heat and claimed the California State Senior Avian Bowl Championship. In addition to each girl winning a belt buckle for their efforts, they will now advance to the National Avian Bowl contest this November which will be held at the National Poultry and Egg Conference in Louisville, Kentucky.

An Avian Bowl is a double-elimination knowledge bowl based on poultry-related subject matter. 4-H members from any state who want to compete must use the Clemson University study guide to prepare. This years topics included embryology, biosecurity, understanding food poisoners and several other avian subjects. Each state hosts a qualifier in which both junior and senior teams compete against each other. Questions vary and team contestants must use a buzzer to answer the questions to earn points. Seeding is accomplished by a written exam before the competition.

This isnt 14 year old Abbys first State Avian Bowl win. I started competing in Avian Bowl when I was nine, stated Abby. That year, I was on a team with my sister, Ellie, and Mariah OGrady. It was the first year I was allowed to compete at the state level, and it was my sister and Mariahs last year eligible to compete as juniors, so it was the only year we would have ever have been able to compete together. I studied really hard and we won the State Junior competition that year.

Deirdre OGrady, one of Abbys 4-H poultry project leaders, said, Abby knew she had stiff competition going in, but with her years of Avian Bowl experience was able to finish strong. Abby continued, There were 2 teams from Ventura County, and one of them I already knew. I also knew they were really good. When I saw them, I got really nervous, and I didnt think we would beat them. After the written test, the Ventura County team was seeded first and we

were second. The first time we came up against them, initially we were losing by 10 points. Then we came back to quickly answer the knowledge questions which gave us the lead in that round, and it came down to the last question. We were the only team who beat them, and we beat them twice. It wont be the first time Abby has travelled to Kentucky. Her sister won the state title in 2015 and the family traveled to Kentucky. Ellies California team won that year. Abby said I am really excited to be going to Nationals, and I have A LOT of studying to do between now and then. I also am really glad that I have 2 very strong teammates to compete with.

To receive more information about the National Avian Bowl or the Monterey County 4-H Program, contact Lorin Hofmann-Lurz, Monterey County 4-H Program Representative at 759-7386 or lhofmannlurz@ucanr.edu.

Read or Share this story: http://bit.ly/2nAS2OP

Read more from the original source:
Abby Milanesa of the Buena Vista 4-H wins state title - The Salinas Californian

First ‘three-parent babies’ could be born in UK this year as docs secure licence to perform controversial IVF – The Sun

THE first three-parent babies could be born in the UK this year after doctors were given the go-ahead to start performing controversial new IVF therapy.

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has granted a licence to a team at the University of Newcastle, who have pioneered the new treatment.

Getty Images

HFEA chair Sally Cheshire announced the development in her opening speech at the authoritys annual conference this morning.

She said: This significant decision represents the culmination of many years of hard work by researchers, clinical experts, and regulators, who collectively paved the way for Parliament to change the law in 2015, to permit the use of such techniques.

Patients will now be able to apply individually to the HFEA to undergo mitochondrial donation treatment at Newcastle, which will be life-changing for them, as they seek to avoid passing on serious genetic diseases to future generations.

The treatment has the potential to allow couples who carry, and therefore risk passing on, deadly genetic diseases to conceive healthy babies.

Though it is dubbed a three-parent treatment,babies born as a result of the therapy would only inherit personality traits, those that affect appearance and other features that make a person unique, from theirmum and dad not the donor.

The move comes after the HFEA gave the therapy, called mitochondrial donation, the green light in December last year.

Speaking after that historical decision, MrsCheshire said: This is life-changing for those families.

But critics have warned it marks the first step towards so-called designer babies.

The NHS is now poised to spend 8million offering the IVF to 25 couples.

The licence is the first stage of the process, and gives the Newcastle clinic the green light to perform the procedure.

The second stage requires each patient application to be individually approved by the HFEA, they confirmed.

Earlier this year the first baby to be born using the technique was welcomed into the world by his parents in Mexico.

The baby boy was born in April after his parents, who are from Jordan, were treated by a team of American specialists in the country.

Scientists at the University of Newcastle, which has been at the forefront of pioneering the treatment, have already lined up women to have the therapy, known as mitochondrial replacement therapy.

The team hopes to treat up to 25women a year with NHS funding.

Prof Sir Doug Turnbull, who has led the team at Newcastle in developing the new IVF therapy, said he is delighted for patients.

This will allow women with mitochondria DNA mutations the opportunity for more reproductive choice, he said.

Mitochondria diseases can be devastating for families affected and this is a momentous day for patients who have tirelessly campaigned for this decision.

He said in December, his team will aim to treat up to 25 carefully selected patients each year, and would offer follow-up care for any children born.

Getty Images

Fertility experts across the UK also welcomed the development.

Professor Adam Balen, chair of the British Fertility Society, said the granting of a licence to the Newcastle centre marks a historical step towards eradicating genetic diseases.

The decision is the latest step in a 10-year process from the first proof of concept studies.

Dr Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, who funds the centre for mitochondrial research at Newcastle said: Affected couples in the UK who have dreamt of having a baby free of mitochondrial disease will have an option open to them for the first time, he said.

Now we must give the first patients and their doctors the time and space to discuss the next steps with the patience, sensitivity and scientific rigour that they have displayed throughout.

Fertility clinics in the UK will not automatically be given the right to offer the treatment.

Rather, each clinic will have to apply to the HFEA for permission to do so.

The Sun

Prof Balen said given their pivotal role in developing the treatment the Centre for Life at Newcastle University is likely to be the only centre approved to offer the therapy.

The pioneering therapy aims to prevent potentially fatal diseases being passed from parents to their offspring.

Babies receivingmitochondrial replacement therapy would receive a tiny amount of DNA from a third person besides their mother and father.

Fertility specialists carrying out the treatment will aim to replace abnormal genes in themitochondria small structures that are found in every human cell.

Mitochondria are small structures found in our cells. They generate energy that is used to power every part of our body. Mitochondria have their own DNA, which only controls mitochondrial function and energy production, according to the Wellcome Trust. This is completely separate from our nuclear DNA, which is what makes us who we are, governing our appearance and personality. Mitochondrial disease can be fatal, affecting multiple organs. It includes diabetes, heart problems, epilepsy and stroke-like incidents, and in serious cases death. Mitochondrial DNA disease is passed from mother to baby. The new mitochondrial donation technique, uses DNA from the mitochondria of a healthy donor, the nucleus of a mothers egg and a fathers sperm to create an embryo. The technique allows for those women who carry potentially fatal genetic mutations to have healthy babies. As the nuclear DNA is not altered, mitochondrial donation will not affect a childs appearance or personality or any other features that make a person unique. It simply allows for a child to be free of mitochondrial disease.

Source: The Wellcome Trust

To do so involves taking the DNA from themothers egg that bears thefaulty genes, and transferring it into a donor egg, with healthy mitochondria.

Because the nucleus from the mothers egg is used the technique does not affect the babys appearance, personality, or other traits that make a person unique.

It simply allows the mitochondria which only controls a cells energy production to function normally, allowing a child to be born free of mitochondrial disease, which can prove fatal.

Mitochondria only hold around 0.1per cent of a persons DNA, which is always inherited from the mother and has no influence over individual characteristics.

Alamy

But faulty mitochondrial DNA can lead to a wide range of potentially fatal conditions affecting vital organs, muscles, vision, growth and mental ability.

In theory, mitochondrial replacement can not only prevent a child developing inherited diseases, but also protect future generations.

Last year, the UK became the first country in the world to legalise mitochondrial replacement after MPs and peers voted in favour of allowing it.

Critics say the technique is not fool-proof and small numbers of faulty mitochondria may still be carried over into the child.

They also argue that unforeseen problems might occur once the procedure is used to create human babies.

For instance, replacing the DNA might have more of an impact on personal traits than has been envisaged.

Dr David King, from the watchdog group Human Genetics Alert, said the HFEA had approved experiments on babies using the technology that was dangerous and medically unnecessary.

He accused experts backing the treatments of shameless emotional blackmail and scientific misrepresentations.

Dr King added: This decision opens the door to the world of GM (genetically modified) designer babies.

We pay for your stories! Do you have a story for The Sun Online news team? Email us at tips@the-sun.co.uk or call 0207 782 4368

Go here to read the rest:
First 'three-parent babies' could be born in UK this year as docs secure licence to perform controversial IVF - The Sun

First ‘three-parent babies’ to be born this year as licence approved for new fertility technique – The Independent

Researchers in Newcastle have been granted permission to use anew 'three-parent baby' fertility technique that prevents children from inheriting lethal genetic diseases.

Three-person IVF was given the go-aheadby fertility regulator the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in December.

Now the regulator has approved a licence for scientists at Newcastle University meaning the first babies to be born with donated DNA from a third woman in addition to their mother and father are expected to be born later this year.

The UK was the first country to legalise mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT), as the technique is known.

One in 200 children are born with faulty genes in their mitochondria, small structures inside cells that generate energy.

This can lead to a wide range of potentially fatal conditions affecting vital organs, muscles, vision, growth and mental ability.

Just 0.1 per cent of a persons DNA is held in the mitochondria. It is always inherited from the mother and has no influence over individual characteristics such as appearance and personality.

In mitochondrial replacement,an embryo containing healthy mitochondria from the donor is combined withnuclear DNA from the babys mother and father.

In theory, mitochondrial replacement can not only prevent a child developing inherited diseases, but also protect future generations.

Critics say the technique is not foolproof and small numbers of faulty mitochondria may still be carried over into the child, and even replicate in the developing embryo.

More to follow...

Read the original here:
First 'three-parent babies' to be born this year as licence approved for new fertility technique - The Independent

Creating something out of nothing – BioNews

Last week saw an exciting breakthrough in embryology (reported elsewhere on BioNews), as stem cells from an adult mouse were used to grow a structure resembling a mouse embryo in vitro for the first time seemingly creating something out of nothing.

If it were possible to apply this research to human embryology, it could make scientists less dependent on fertilised eggs; using in-vitro-derived embryos could speed up research and potentially assuage some ethical concerns.

This type of research and its ethical, social and legal implications sit firmly within the scope of BioNews, and within the public engagement and policy work of the Progress Educational Trust (PET). The creation of eggs and sperm outside the body has already been selected as a theme for our Annual Conference in December.

It is vital that questions such as this are discussed in BioNews by a range of commentators. We strongly believe that we should give a platform to a variety of people whether we agree with them or not so that our readers can assess different arguments and draw their own conclusions about challenging issues.

But, sadly, we can't create something out of nothing we need to raise funds to enable us to continue publishing BioNews. So please help us reach our 4,000 target via PayPal (click here), by text (text 'PROG23 10' or any other amount to 70070), or by post (as detailed here).

More here:
Creating something out of nothing - BioNews

Bolles students observes chicks – Beaches Leader

Fifth graders at the Bolles Lower School Ponte Vedra Beach Campus science lab observed and tracked the development of chicks as part an embryology unit. The 4H of St. Johns County provided science teacher Carolyn Houston with an incubator and eggs from an egg-laying farm. The students then weighed and numbered ...

PLEASE LOG IN FOR PREMIUM CONTENT. Our website requires visitors to

to view the best local news. Not yet a subscriber?

Read more:
Bolles students observes chicks - Beaches Leader

State-of-the-art national fertility centre of excellence opens in Cork – TheCork.ie

7 March 2017 By David OSullivan david@TheCork.ie

Irish-owned Waterstone Clinic, formerly known as Cork Fertility Centre, has opened a state-of-the-art national centre of excellence at Lotamore House in Cork. The 13,000 sq ft advanced fertility unit is a major architectural and technological achievement and features a world-class laboratory with the latest embryology technology. The new development has also brought a significant boost to employment in Cork, with staff numbers at the clinic increasing by 30% to 55.

Waterstone Clinic, which consistently has one of the highest live birth rates in Europe, includes Cork Fertility, now relocated from its College Road premises to Lotamore House, as well as Waterford Fertility and Limerick Fertility. Due to the increasing number of patients travelling from Dublin, a fourth clinic, Dublin Fertility, has opened on Leeson Street.

Speaking about the new centre at Lotamore House, Medical Director of Waterstone Clinic, Dr John Waterstone said: We have been at the forefront of reproductive medicine in Ireland for 15 years and our facility in Cork reflects our achievements and ambitions as a national reproductive health care provider of the highest calibre. We believe we have created the most advanced fertility unit in the country which will allow us to provide an even better service for our patients.

Lotamore House is a historic 18th century Cork building, and we have sympathetically refurbished and restored it, preserving its fine period details while incorporating modern facilities and comforts. We have endeavoured to make a visit to Lotamore House as stress-free as possible for patients, with generous parking, spacious waiting areas and an interior design that maximises privacy.

The 1,500 sq ft laboratory space features the latest embryology technology including a large cryopreservation storage area and a dedicated Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) laboratory. PGD is a highly complex reproductive technology that prevents debilitating genetic conditions being passed on to children, and in 2014, the clinic announced the birth of the first baby in the Republic after PGD for cystic fibrosis.

The comprehensive range of treatments at Waterstone Clinic include IVF, ICSI, surgical sperm retrieval including MicroTese, sperm donation, egg donation, PGD and Pre-Implantation Genetic Screening (PGS). As the clinics medical consultants also hold Health Service Executive consultant posts, they can directly manage the care of any patients who require hospital admission or surgery.

The cutting-edge clinic is also the first in Ireland to use the new time-lapse incubator, EmbryoScope Plus. The system, which allows for the comprehensive monitoring of embryo development, will be provided free-of-charge.

Dr Waterstone stated: Most clinics in Ireland using time-lapse technology charge patients extra for the service. This practice reflects a trend towards increasing and undesirable commercialisation of assisted reproduction. I have long campaigned for regulation to combat the financial exploitation of vulnerable patients through expensive add-on investigations and treatments. Until such guidelines are in place, it is the responsibility of fertility clinics across the country to self-regulate and deliver honest advice and ethical management.

A series of patient information seminars will be held at Waterstone Clinic. The first seminar is on Thursday, March 23rd. Register at http://www.waterstoneclinic.ie/events

comments

Read more:
State-of-the-art national fertility centre of excellence opens in Cork - TheCork.ie

Historic Lotamore House is rejuvenated as a fertility clinic – Irish Examiner

A multi-million euro private medical investment at Corks historic Lotamore House has just come to completion, after an 18-month-plus gestation.

Lotamore House, in Tivoli, Cork, which has been transformed to become the Waterstone Clinic.

Now set to employ 55, the Waterstone Clinic (previously known as the Cork Fertility Centre,) has just completed as a 13,000sq ft centre of excellence at the 210-year old Lotamore House in Cork.

The classical, villa-style building was sold in 2013 to Dr John and Susan Waterstone for an unconfirmed 800,000 having had a recently chequered past in previous ownerships.

It was controversially and briefly occupied by a protest group the Rodolphus Allen Private Family Trust after the property was taken over by receivers Deloitte from previous private owner, Sidney McElhinney, who had plans to turn it into a 90-bed nursing home.

Lotamore House had previously sold for over 3m, on 11 acres by the Tivoli dual carriageway, and other previous uses of the grande era villa included offices for a computer firm, as well as being offices for Irish Sweepstakes in the mid-1900s.

It had operated too as a luxury guesthouse for many years, hosting judges on the circuit, among other guests.

It featured on TV news during the brief-lived occupation until garda moved a caravan off its ground.

And, a proposal to document Lotamore Houses transition to 21st century fertility clinic was pitched to RT by a production company, GoodLookingFilms, but the broadcaster didnt commission the series which promised to mix medical science and embryo technology with Grand Designs.

Private family owners included the Hacketts, the Ronayne Mahonys, the Cudmores, the Lunhams and the Huguenot merchant family, the Perriers.

Now, claiming to be the most advanced fertility unit in the country, Lotamore is set to play a role in creating new families, out of a building with three centuries of Cork history.

The Waterstone Clinic previously operated in College Road, Cork, with clinic also in Waterford, Limerick and Dublin, on Leeson St.

At Lotamore, it has grown its lab space five fold to 1,500 sq ft of high tech lab with with the latest embryology technology and the building also accommodates five scan rooms (up from two), five consultation rooms, five recovery rooms, three masterbatorium, two theatres, a reception etc.

Procedures are on a day-visit basis, with no overnight facilities.

Lotamore House is a historic 18th century Cork building, and we have sympathetically refurbished and restored it, preserving its fine period details while incorporating modern facilities and comforts.

We have endeavoured to make a visit to Lotamore House as stress-free as possible for patients, with generous parking, spacious waiting areas and an interior design that maximises privacy, said founder Dr John Waterstone, who will host Lotamores first seminar post-opening on March 23.

Irish Examiner Ltd. All rights reserved

Originally posted here:
Historic Lotamore House is rejuvenated as a fertility clinic - Irish Examiner

Should Naturalism Define Science? (RJS) – Patheos (blog)

Methodological naturalism. For most scientists this is a foregone conclusion; a scientist studies nature and looks for natural cause and effect. Among Christians the term is often viewed as a cop-out, giving away the farm by ruling divine action out of bounds. Many atheists view the term as indicative of a failure to face facts and admit that there is nothing but the natural world. Which view is closest to yours?

Jim Stump, in his recent book Science and Christianity: An Introduction to the Issues, digs into the concept of methodological naturalism. His first point (as a good philosopher) is that methodological naturalism is not an easy concept to define. Well, methodological isnt terribly hard to grasp. Methodological is contrasted with metaphysical or ontological naturalism. The emphasis in methodological naturalism is on the method of doing science rather than on the existence or nonexistence of anything beyond the natural world. All scientists can approach their work as methodological naturalists no matter what views they hold concerning the ultimate shape of reality Christians, atheist, Hindu, Buddhist, or whatever. For Jim, the hard term is natural. What counts or doesnt count as natural? Most definitions are, or seem, circular. Natural phenomena are those that are investigated by natural means obeying natural laws.

The trouble with adopting methodological naturalism it that it seems we have to predetermine what counts as natural. And that will inescapably involve metaphysical notions and values that are not properly scientific by the standards of methodological naturalism.In that case, our metaphysics is going to affect our science, so long as we are committed to science as explanatory. (p. 71-72)

Commenters on this blog have occasionally suggested that methodological naturalism is metaphysical naturalism in disguise because it simply rules out everything else. Certainly some who favor intelligent design feel this danger. Lets not worry about defining natural at this time and move on to look at the nature and practice of methodological naturalism.

Practice of Science. It is relatively easy to see where the practice of chemistry and physics; geology and agriculture; genetics and embryology along with many other disciplines and subdisciplines can be approached through the lens of methodological naturalism. We look for and confine ourselves to the study of the interactions between atoms and molecules, even subatomic particles, the interaction of light and gravity with matter, and the laws that describe these interactions.

Problems may arise when scientists in these fields look to grand unifying theories. Jim brings some of Alvin Plantingas work into the discussion.

There is something to be said for recognizing disciplinary boundaries. Michael Ruse compares methodological naturalism to going to a doctor and expecting not to be given any political advice. The doctor may have very strong political views, but it would be inappropriate for him or her to disseminate them in that context. So, too, the scientist ought not to disseminate religious views, as they are not relevant to the task at hand. But Plantinga counters that in assessing grand scientific theories we will necessarily cross disciplinary lines in order to use all that we know that is relevant to the question. For the Christian, he thinks this properly allows the use of biblical revelation in assessing whether something like the theory of common ancestry is a correct explanation. And he believes that can be called Augustinian, or theistic, science. (p. 76)

In part this is because, historically speaking, what counts as natural is a moving target. I think Plantinga has an important point concerning grand theories but (big but) he is completely off-base in applying his concern to the question of common ancestry. Evolution and common descent are natural scientific questions with methodological naturalism an appropriate approach even for devout Christians. Before digging a little deeper into places where methodological naturalism should be held lightly we will look briefly at reasons for retaining methodological naturalism.

Retaining Methodological Naturalism. In the natural sciences (biology, chemistry, physics, geology, astronomy, climatology, meteorology ) reasons given for abandoning methodological naturalism are always gap arguments. Jim does not put it quite this bluntly, but after reading quite widely, this is the clear conclusion. I have not yet found an argument that is not based on a possibly temporary state of ignorance. Protestations to the contrary are emotional rather than evidence based.

Inserting supernatural agency or events into explanations has a fairly poor track record historically. Science has been remarkably successful at figuring out the causes of phenomena that were once explained by supernatural agents from thunder and solar eclipses, to disease and epilepsy. Of course that doesnt mean that science will be able to figure out everything in the future. But it should give us pause before thinking weve found some phenomenon for which there will never be any scientific explanation. To do otherwise would be to inhibit scientific investigation. Take the example of how the first living cell came about. Scientists dont have very promising models right now for how that could have happened through natural means. (p. 77-78)

Both Alvin Pantinga (Jim cites a couple of articles written in 1996 and 1997) and Stephen Meyer (Signature in the Cell) suggest that this should allow us to draw the conclusion that the best explanation is that here we have a place where God acted as an intelligent agent. Jim notes But should we call it the best scientific explanation we have at present if we say and then a miracle happened and there was life? It seems more in keeping with our present usage to say, At present we have no scientific explanation for that phenomenon. (p. 78) To insert a supernatural act of God here is to insert God into a gap in our knowledge. If the gap fills where is God? Of course God is responsible for the origin of life, just as he is responsible for the weather and the formation of a babe in the womb; but it isnt either God or science. It is God and science. As a Christian I am convinced that as scientists we study Gods ordained and sustained creation. Perhaps there are places where there will never be a satisfactory scientific explanation, but it is unwise to draw this conclusion about any individual proposal.

When is methodological naturalism troublesome? Here I leave Jims chapter and give my own view. Methodological naturalism is troublesome when we step away from the impersonal (chemistry, physics, ) and move to the personal. If there is a God who interacts with his creation methodological naturalism will give the wrong result in these instances.

Methodological naturalism applied to the study of history will guarantee that we never find God active in history. Methodological naturalism would require us to accept that dead people never come back to life without some yet unknown scientific mechanism for rejuvenation. Methodological naturalism would require us to propose a natural explanation for every act of Jesus from walking on water to stilling the storm, healing the lame, blind, and deaf, and feeding the multitudes. For many the natural explanation is that these never happened they are tall tales. But, the incarnation is a very personal act. If the Christian God exists, methodological naturalism wont get to the truth. N. T, Wright makes this argument in his book The Resurrection of the Son of God. If we dont eliminate the possibility of resurrection, then The Resurrection makes good sense. Many scholars today, of course, simply eliminate the possibility and look for natural explanations.

I will suggest that another place where methodological naturalism fails is in some areas of the social sciences. Humans and human social constructs are shaped by interpersonal interactions. The plasticity of the human brain means that we are shaped and formed not only by nature i.e. our genes, but also through community our social environment. Ideas change people. If there is a God who interacts with his people, his presence and interaction will change people. Natural explanations, ignoring the supernatural, i.e. God, will never get to the complete truth. Here is a case where the a priori move to eliminate God from consideration will limit understanding if there is a God. This isnt miraculous, but neither is it natural because God isnt natural.

Methodological naturalism is troublesome when it shapes our grand theories of being. However, it is counterproductive, and can be destructive to faith, to insist on gaps in impersonal processes and insert divine as opposed to natural cause.

What do you think?

Is methodological naturalism a useful approach?

What are the limits, if any, to methodological naturalism?

If you wish to contact me directly you may do so at rjs4mail[at]att.net

If interested you can subscribe to a full text feed of my posts at Musings on Science and Theology.

See the original post:
Should Naturalism Define Science? (RJS) - Patheos (blog)