Category Archives: Genetics

Myriad Genetics to Present at the 2017 Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference – GlobeNewswire (press release)

May 30, 2017 16:05 ET | Source: Myriad Genetics, Inc.

SALT LAKE CITY, May 30, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Myriad Genetics, Inc. (NASDAQ:MYGN), a leader in molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine, announced today that Mark C. Capone, president and CEO, is scheduled to present at the Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference at 10:00 a.m. PDT on June 13, 2017, at the Terranea Resort in Rancho Palos Verdes, California.

The presentation will be available to interested parties through a live audio webcast accessible through a link in the investor information section of Myriads website at http://www.myriad.com.

About Myriad Genetics Myriad Genetics Inc., is a leading personalized medicine company dedicated to being a trusted advisor transforming patient lives worldwide with pioneering molecular diagnostics. Myriad discovers and commercializes molecular diagnostic tests that: determine the risk of developing disease, accurately diagnose disease, assess the risk of disease progression, and guide treatment decisions across six major medical specialties where molecular diagnostics can significantly improve patient care and lower healthcare costs. Myriad is focused on three strategic imperatives: transitioning and expanding its hereditary cancer testing markets, diversifying its product portfolio through the introduction of new products and increasing the revenue contribution from international markets. For more information on how Myriad is making a difference, please visit the Company's website: http://www.myriad.com.

Myriad, the Myriad logo, BART, BRACAnalysis, Colaris, Colaris AP, myPath, myRisk, Myriad myRisk, myRisk Hereditary Cancer, myChoice, myPlan, BRACAnalysis CDx, Tumor BRACAnalysis CDx, myChoice HRD, EndoPredict, Vectra, GeneSight and Prolaris are trademarks or registered trademarks of Myriad Genetics, Inc. or its wholly owned subsidiaries in the United States and foreign countries. MYGN-F, MYGN-G.

Related Articles

Salt Lake City, Utah, UNITED STATES

Myriad Genetics, Inc. Logo

LOGO URL | Copy the link below

Formats available:

See the original post:
Myriad Genetics to Present at the 2017 Goldman Sachs Global Healthcare Conference - GlobeNewswire (press release)

‘This is not the end’: Using immunotherapy and a genetic glitch to … – Washington Post

The oncologist was blunt: Stefanie Johos colon cancer was raging out of control and there was nothing more she could do. Flanked by her parents and sister, the 23-year-old felt something wet on her shoulder. She looked up to see her father weeping.

I felt dead inside, utterly demoralized, ready to be done, Joho remembers.

But her younger sister couldnt accept that. When the family got back to Johos apartment in New Yorks Flatiron district, Jess opened her laptop and began searching frantically for clinical trials, using medical words shed heard but not fully understood. An hour later, she came into her sisters room and showed her what shed found. Im not letting you give up, she told Stefanie. This is not the end.

That search led to a contact at Johns Hopkins University, and a few days later, Joho got a call from a cancer geneticist co-leading a study there. Get down here as fast as you can! Luis Diaz said. We are having tremendous success with patients like you.

What followed is an illuminating tale of how one womans intersection with experimental research helped open a new frontier in cancer treatment with approval of a drug that, for the first time, capitalizes on a genetic feature in a tumor rather than on the diseases location in the body.

The breakthrough, made official last week by the Food and Drug Administration, immediately could benefit some patients with certain kinds of advanced cancer that arent responding to chemotherapy. Each should be tested for that genetic signature, scientists stress.

These are people facing death sentences, said Hopkins geneticist Bert Vogelstein. This treatment might keep some of them in remission for a long time.

In August 2014, Joho stumbled into Hopkins for her first infusion of the immunotherapy drug Keytruda. She was in agony from a malignant mass in her midsection, and even with the copious amounts of oxycodone she was swallowing, she needed a new fentanyl patch on her arm every 48 hours. Yet within just days, the excruciating back pain had eased. Then an unfamiliar sensation hunger returned. She burst into tears when she realized what it was.

As months went by, her tumor shrank and ultimately disappeared. She stopped treatment this past August, free from all signs of disease.

[Negotiating cancer: Tips from one whos done it ]

The small trial in Baltimore was pivotal, and not only for the young marketing professional. It showed that immunotherapy could attack colon and other cancers thought to be unstoppable. The key was their tumors genetic defect, known as mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency akin to a missing spell-check on their DNA. As the DNA copies itself, the abnormality prevents any errors from being fixed. In the cancer cells, that means huge numbers of mutations that are good targets for immunotherapy.

The treatment approach isnt a panacea, however. The glitch under scrutiny which can arise spontaneously or be inherited is found in just 4percent of cancers overall. But bore in on a few specific types, and the scenario changes dramatically. The problem occurs in up to 20percent of colon cancers and about 40percent of endometrial malignancies cancer in the lining of the uterus.

In the United States, researchers estimate that initially about 15,000 people with the defect may be helped by this immunotherapy. That number is likely to rise sharply as doctors begin using it earlier on eligible patients.

Joho was among the first.

***

Even before Joho got sick, cancer had cast a long shadow on her family. Her mother has Lynch syndrome, a hereditary disorder that sharply raises the risk of certain cancers, and since 2003, Priscilla Joho has suffered colon cancer, uterine cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

Stefanies older sister, Vanessa, had already tested positive for Lynch syndrome, and Stefanie planned to get tested when she turned 25. But at 22, several months after she graduated from New York University, she began feeling unusually tired. She blamed the fatigue on her demanding job. Her primary-care physician, aware of her mothers medical history, ordered a colonoscopy.

When Joho woke up from the procedure, the gastroenterologist looked like a ghost, she said. A subsequent CT scan revealed a very large tumor in her colon. Shed definitely inherited Lynch syndrome.

She underwent surgery in January 2013 at Philadelphias Fox Chase Cancer Center, where her mother had been treated. The news was good: The cancer didnt appear to have spread, so she could skip chemotherapy and follow up with scans every three months.

[More than two-thirds of cancer mutations are due to random DNA copying errors, study says]

By August of that year, though, Joho started having relentless back pain. Tests detected the invasive tumor in her abdomen. Another operation, and now she started chemo. Once again, in spring 2014, the cancer roared back. Her doctors in New York, where she now was living, switched to a more aggressive chemo regimen.

This thing is going to kill me, Joho remembered thinking. It was eating me alive.

She made it to Jesss college graduation in Vermont that May. Midsummer, her oncologist confessed he was out of options. As he left the examining room, he mentioned offhandedly that some interesting work was going on in immunotherapy. But when Joho met with a hospital immunologist, that doctor told her no suitable trials were available.

Joho began planning to move to her parents home in suburban Philadelphia: I thought, Im dying, and Id like to breathe fresh air and be around the green and the trees.

Her younger sister wasnt ready for her to give up. Jess searched for clinical trials, typing in immunotherapy and other terms shed heard the doctors use. Up popped a trial at Hopkins, where doctors were testing a drug called pembrolizumab.

***

Pembro is part of a class of new medications called checkpoint inhibitors that disable the brakes that keep the immune system from attacking tumors. In September 2014, the treatment was approved by the FDA for advanced melanoma and marketed as Keytruda. The medication made headlines in 2015 when it helped treat former president Jimmy Carter for melanoma that had spread to his brain and liver. It later was cleared for several other malignancies.

Yet researchers still dont know why immunotherapy, once hailed as a game changer, works in only a minority of patients. Figuring that out is important for clinical as well as financial reasons. Keytruda, for example, costs about $150,000 a year.

By the time Joho arrived at Hopkins, the trial had been underway for a year. While an earlier study had shown a similar immunotherapy drug to be effective for a significant proportion of patients with advanced melanoma or lung or kidney cancer, checkpoint inhibitors werent making headway with colon cancer. A single patient out of 20 had responded in a couple of trials.

Why did some tumors shrink and others didnt? What was different about the single colon cancer patient who benefited?

Drew Pardoll, director of the Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at Hopkins, and top researcher Suzanne L. Topalian took the unusual step of consulting with the cancer geneticists who worked one floor up.

This was the first date in what became the marriage of cancer genetics and cancer immunology, Pardoll said.

[A consumers guide to the hottest field in cancer treatments immunotherapy]

In a brainstorming session, the geneticists were quick to offer their theories. They suggested that the melanoma and lung cancer patients had done best because those cancers have lots of mutations, a consequence of exposure to sunlight and cigarette smoke. The mutations produce proteins recognized by the immune system as foreign and ripe for attack, and the drug boosts the systems response.

And that one colon-cancer patient? As Vogelstein recalls, We all said in unison, He must have MMR deficiency! because such a genetic glitch would spawn even more mutations. The abnormality was a familiar subject to Vogelstein, who in the 1990s had co-discovered its role in the development of colon cancer. But the immunologists hadnt thought of it.

When the patients tumor tissue was tested, it was indeed positive for the defect.

The researchers decided to run a small trial, led by Hopkins immunologist Dung Le and geneticist Diaz, to determine whether the defect could predict a patients response to immunotherapy. The pharmaceutical company Merck provided its still-experimental drug pembrolizumab. Three groups of volunteers were recruited: 10 colon cancer patients whose tumors had the genetic problem; 18 colon cancer patients without it; and 7 patients with other malignancies with the defect.

The first results, published in 2015 in the New England Journal of Medicine, were striking. Four out of the 10 colon cancer patients with the defect and 5 out of the other 7cancer patients with the abnormality responded to the drug. In the remaining group, nothing. Since then, updated numbers have reinforced that a high proportion of patients with the genetic feature benefit from the drug, often for a lengthy period. Other trials by pharmaceutical companies have shown similar results.

The Hopkins investigators found that tumors with the defect had, on average, 1,700 mutations, compared with only 70 for tumors without the problem. That confirmed the theory that high numbers of mutations make it more likely the immune system will recognize and attack cancer if it gets assistance from immunotherapy.

The studies were the foundation of the FDAs decision on Tuesday to green-light Keytruda to treat cancers such as Johos, meaning malignancies with certain molecular characteristics. This first-ever site-agnostic approval by the agency signals an emerging field of precision immunotherapy, Pardoll said, one in which genetic details are used to anticipate who will respond to treatments.

***

For Joho, now 27 and living in suburban Philadelphia, the hard lesson from the past few years is clear: The cancer field is changing so rapidly that patients cant rely on their doctors to find them the best treatments. Oncologists can barely keep up, she said. My sister found a trial I was a perfect candidate for, and my doctors didnt even know it existed.

Her first several weeks on the trial were rough, with an early hospitalization after she cut back too quickly on her fentanyl and went into withdrawal. She still has some lasting side effects today joint pain in her knees, minor nausea and fatigue but they are manageable.

I have had to adapt to some new limits, she acknowledged. But I still feel better than I have in five years.

The FDAs decision last week was an emotional moment. Diaz, now at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, immediately texted her. We did it! he exulted.

I got chills all over my body, Joho said. To think that I was at the end of the road, with no options, and then to be part of such a change.

Her experience has prompted her to drop plans to go back into marketing. Now she wants to help patients navigate the new cancer landscape. Become an expert on your cancer is her message. Dont be passive. She encourages patients to try clinical trials.

As a cancer survivor with Lynch syndrome, Joho will be closely watched; if she relapses, she is likely to be treated again with immunotherapy. And if her mother relapses, Keytruda might now be her best chance.

Coming out the other side, I feel really lucky, Joho said. Shes also grateful for something else: A few years ago, her sister Jess was tested for the disorder that has so affected their family. She was negative.

Continue reading here:
'This is not the end': Using immunotherapy and a genetic glitch to ... - Washington Post

Immunity: Beyond classical genetics – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer).

In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A Nature Research Journal

Read this article:
Immunity: Beyond classical genetics - Nature.com

Genetics Research Companies Enter JLABS – Investing News Network (press release) (registration) (blog)

The three genetic research companies joining JLABS include Ranomics and ZOETICS Pharmaceuticals.

In the life science field, often large companies with substantial capital and a recognizable name brandmaintaining a line of productswill host smaller startups in order to seek innovation from fresh new voices.

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ), through their Inspiration Labs, announced their location in Toronto will now host over 40 new companies. Among those, there are two that are working on some form of genetic research development.

The no-strings attached model has been very important to our success in attracting so many quality companies, as it allows entrepreneurs the freedom to operate and do what is best for their company, Melinda Richter, head of the JLABS, said in the statement. We are hopeful that providing JLABS to the life sciences ecosystem in Toronto will support continued economic growth and development in the region.

In a space where these companies may not have the opportunity to fully investigate their genetic research from other investors or on their own, entering the JLABS opens the doors for quality space to continue their work.

As previously detailed to Investing News Network by Meghan Alonso, CEO of Imua Services and expert on start up medical device companies, siad this type of initiation is very common for titans of the industry.

What [Johnson & Johnson have] done to feed this system of innovation and make it easy at to grab anything that they want to theyve built infrastructure [in several cities in the US] where they have an incubator, and they have space available for these small start-up companies to have their office, and they share lab space, she said, referring to the process start ups may go through in general.

With that in mind, heres a look at those genetic research companies.

This company is working on creating, testing and accessing genetic changes as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.

Their work at JLABS will include creating a database of genetic variants as a way to help clinicians better diagnose hereditary cancers related to specific genes. One of the most intriguing aspects of current gene therapy research is the possibility of modifying cancerous cells in the body to kill the cancer itself.

Ranomics is able to provide substantial evidence on the variations of the genes they get to test and can provide information on ones that havent been researched or used in a clinical setting.

Last year the company raised 1.6 million from an undisclosed investor for their platform.

As reported by BetaKit, the founder of Ranomics Cathy Tie said the biggest problem facing the testing process of hereditary diseases is the inconclusiveness in it, over 60 percent of them dont have a real resolution.

This is due to newly identified genetic variants in the patient that have no clinical or medical precedence, leading to mis-or-non-diagnosis and compromising patient care, Tie told the online publication.

According to JLABS, ZOETIC is developing an antigen-specific immune tolerance induction technology, which will target unwanted immune responses that come from therapeutic biologics, autoimmune diseases and AAV mediated gene therapy. Thanks to their tech, the company may be able to improve the success rate of gene therapy.

ZOETICS gene therapy division is trying to expand the current limitations of gene therapy. The companyclaims patients present an immune response to the vector transporting the gene therapy itself, which prevents the delivery of the normal genes to the cell.

In 2016, the company announced it holds the exclusive rights to the proprietary phospholipid nanoparticles from Dr. Sathy Balu-Iyer, professor of pharmaceuticals sciences for theUniversity at Buffalo.

This discovery was tested in a 2015 study and showed promising results according to ZOETIC, which will seek to commercialize the product with biopharmaceutical companies currently marketing products in the hemophilia community.

This announcement and the possibility of a breakthrough development in the genetic research area from one of these companies shows the commitment to this type of research, despite the hype period for this work having shown low returns.

Dont forget to follow us @INN_LifeScience for real-time news updates.

Securities Disclosure: I, Bryan Mc Govern, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.

Read more:
Genetics Research Companies Enter JLABS - Investing News Network (press release) (registration) (blog)

PLOS Genetics Research Prize 2017: The story behind last year’s winning research – PLoS Blogs (blog)

In 2016, the PLOS Genetics Research Prize was awarded to Naranjo, Smith et al., for their work on a complex trait adaptation. Hunter Fraser, the corresponding author of the winning article and Associate Professor at Stanford University, tells us about the challenges he faced bringing the research to fruition and what winning the prize meant to him.

I was thrilled beyond words to start my job as an Assistant Professor in 2009. The previous two years had been toughI had been fired from a postdoc position and then laid off from an industry job just 18 months laterso I was eager to turn things around. I was bursting with ideas for how to study the evolution of gene expression, but was missing just one ingredient: data.

During my ill-fated postdoc, I had devised an approach to use allele-specific gene expression data to identify lineage-specific selection on gene expression (see our papers Introduction for details). I wanted to use high-throughput sequencing of cDNA from inter-species hybrids for this, since sequence reads overlapping with heterozygous genetic variants (of which there are many in hybrids) could be used to measure the mRNA level of each allele. However, my advisor did not believe this would work, as this was before any publications of high-throughput cDNA sequencing (now known as RNA-seq). Without his support, I was unable to collect the data I so desperately wanted, and moved on to an industry position soon after that.

Fast forward to 2009: After being laid off in a corporate restructuring, I was chomping at the bit to start my faculty position. Things went slowly at firstI was busy buying equipment, writing grants, meeting new colleagues, and searching for my first lab hire, so those allele-specific expression (ASE) data I needed were still just a tantalizing mirage. However, I was overjoyed when I came across a paper (Tirosh et al., Science 2009) that generated exactly the type of ASE data that I wanted, from a hybrid between two species of budding yeast.

I immediately downloaded the papers supplemental information, and in a moment rivaling any Christmas morning, I eagerly opened the file. There I found over 17,000 glorious data points: ASE ratios for 4400 genes in four conditions. I sorted the genes by their ratios and copied them into an online functional enrichment calculator, which returned just one enriched annotation: toxin response. Remarkably, these gene annotations were all derived from a single paper that measured the transcriptional response to citrinin, a naturally occurring toxin produced by several species of fungi. And the enrichment was incredibly strong: 40-fold greater than expected among the 1% of genes with the strongest ASE biased towards one of the parental species (Saccharomyces paradoxus). This was clear evidence that natural selection had been acting on the expression levels of these citrinin-responsive genesquite an exciting discovery, particularly since in 2009 polygenic gene expression adaptation was just a theoretical possibility, with no known empirical examples.

I had no idea that this discoverywhich took all of six minutes to makewould take us the next six years to characterize. It was an exceptional undergraduate, Santiago Naranjo, who spearheaded the project during his three years in the lab. Santiago made a number of key observations, including characterizing the fitness of different strains in the presence of citrinin and performing precise allelic replacements (with laborious pre-CRISPR technology) to test the effects of specific transcriptional regulatory regions on the expression of our top candidate genes. After Santiago graduated, the torch was passed to an inventive graduate student, Justin Smith, who performed critical experiments measuring the fitness effects of Santiagos promoter-swaps, as well as the effects of up-regulating our candidate genes. Along the way, several others made essential contributions as wella true team effort. Altogether, their work implicated three specific genes involved in this complex adaptation (including a gene we named CIS1, ostensibly standing for CItrinin Sensitive, but which in fact was just an excuse to name a gene after my favorite scientific word), while also demonstrating an approach for investigating polygenic gene expression evolution more generally.

We were incredibly honored to be awarded the PLOS Genetics Research Prize for this work. It was especially inspiring to receive the award for this project, since out of all the work to come from my lab, this one was perhaps our hardest-won victoryat several points along the way it was not even clear if we could get the project to a publishable conclusion. But now we are more excited than ever about applying this framework to other inter-species hybrids from across the tree of lifeincluding fruit flies, archaea, mice, cichlids, and zonkeys, my personal favorite model system to study the evolution of zebra stripes!

If there is a 2016 PLOS Genetics article that you think deserves this years Research Prize, please take a look at the Prize Page and see the Prize Rules for more information and nominate here.

Nominations close on Friday, June 16, 2017 at 11.59 PM Eastern Time.

Competing Interests statement: Hunter Fraser is the corresponding author of PLOS Genetics Research Prize 2016s winning article. The article is discussed in this blog.

Featured Image credit: May 2015 Issue Image. Post-transcriptional Regulation of Hair Cycling by miR-22. Image Credit:Yuan and colleagues

Read the original post:
PLOS Genetics Research Prize 2017: The story behind last year's winning research - PLoS Blogs (blog)

In fruit fly and human genetics, timing is everything – Phys.Org

May 25, 2017 A fruit fly wing, tagged with fluorescence to study gene development. Credit: McKay Lab (UNC-Chapel Hill)

Every animal starts as a clump of cells, which over time multiply and mature into many different types of cells, tissues, and organs. This is fundamental biology. Yet, the details of this process remain largely mysterious. Now, scientists at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have begun to unravel an important part of that mystery.

Using the fruit fly Drosophila, a standard lab model for studying animal biology, the researchers discovered a cascade of molecular signals that program gene activity to drive the fly from one stage of maturation to the next, like a baby turning into an adult. Part of this programming, they found, involves alterations to the way DNA is packaged. Those alterations open up certain regions of DNA to allow gene activity and close off other regions to prevent gene activity. The scientists found evidence that these changes to DNA accessibility occur in sequence.

"We're finally getting at one of the core mechanisms in biology, which determine the timing and sequence of events in normal animal development at the level of our genes," said Daniel J. McKay, PhD, assistant professor of genetics at the UNC School of Medicine and biology at the UNC College of Arts and Sciences.

This basic biology finding could have significance for human health, too. The changes to cell reprogramming that the scientists observed in the young flies can occur inappropriately in adult human cells - spurring cancer, for example.

"We hope that this work will help us better understand what goes awry in cancer and other diseases," McKay said.

In the study, published in Genes & Development, McKay and colleagues began by examining the molecular impact of the fruit fly hormone ecdysone, which causes a young insect to shed its old form and adopt a new one as it moves toward maturity.

Scientists know that ecdysone binds to a receptor, EcR, in the nuclei of cells throughout the bodies of insects. EcR is a transcription factor, a genetic master switch. When bound by ecdysone, it turns on a particular set of genes. And those genes, in turn, are involved in the development of proteins - the machines of biology.

Analyzing Drosophila wing cells, McKay and colleagues found evidence that wing development occurs via a cascade of these changes in gene activity.

"We found first-tier genes that respond immediately to ecdysone, and then they - together with EcR - activate a second tier of genes, and then these two tiers of genes, operating in concert, act on a third tier," said McKay. "So we observed these waves of changes in gene expression that drive the development of wing tissue."

Using genome-wide sequencing technologies, McKay's team found that these changes in gene expression are associated with changes in the way DNA is "packaged."

DNA is looped around support proteins called histones, and this histone-DNA combination is called chromatin.

When chromatin is relatively loose and open, genes can become active. When chromatin is tight and closed, genes are mostly silenced. McKay and colleagues found that ecdysone activates some genes to produce special transcription factor proteins that open or close chromatin. This altering of chromatin represents a fundamental reprogramming of cells.

McKay and colleagues had shown in prior work that the pattern of chromatin accessibility in the fruit fly appears to change significantly over the course of development but can be very similar at any given time across fly tissues.

To the scientists, these findings collectively suggest that changes in chromatin leads to cascades of gene activity that drive fly development. That is, chromatin changes - over time - would help enforce the timing of the various processes underway during biological development. And these changes represent an important developmental mechanism, one that is likely at work in humans.

McKay and his team plan further research to study how these cascades of changing chromatin accessibility and gene activity differ from one part of the fly to another.

As McKay notes, this area of investigation could have relevance beyond developmental biology. The expression of growth and survival genes is normal during early biological development - when we're young. But cancerous cells, for example, use those genes to sustain runaway proliferation to cause disease.

Therefore, understanding the molecular factors that open or close chromatin - and allow or shut down the activity of these powerful genes - may give biologists a better picture of how cancers arise. Armed with that knowledge, scientists could try to create more precise weapons with which to fight cancer cells.

Explore further: Altered primary chromatin structures and their implications in cancer development

More information: Christopher M. Uyehara et al, Hormone-dependent control of developmental timing through regulation of chromatin accessibility, Genes & Development (2017). DOI: 10.1101/gad.298182.117

Cancer development is a complex process involving both genetic and epigenetic changes. Genetic changes in oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes are generally considered as primary causes, since these genes may directly regulate ...

The three-dimensional arrangement of the chromosome within which genes reside can profoundly affect gene activity. These structural effects remain poorly understood, but Assistant Professor of Plant Science Moussa Benhamed ...

Cellular senescence is a state in which normal healthy cells do not have the ability to divide. Senescence can occur when cancer-causing genes are activated in normal cells or when chemotherapy is used on cancer cells. Thus, ...

Sometimes, the silencing of a gene is as important as its activation. Nonetheless, up to now, most studies on hormone-mediated gene regulation have focused on researching the factors that influence the activation of certain ...

An international team of biologists has discovered how specialized enzymes remodel the extremely condensed genetic material in the nucleus of cells in order to control which genes can be used. The discovery will be published ...

Chromatin remodeling proteins (chromatin remodelers) are essential and powerful regulators for critical DNA-templated cellular processes, such as DNA replication, recombination, gene transcription/repression, and DNA damage ...

Mountain-dwelling East African honey bees have distinct genetic variations compared to their savannah relatives that likely help them to survive at high altitudes, report Martin Hasselmann of the University of Hohenheim, ...

A baby's babbles start to sound like speech more quickly if they get frequent vocal feedback from adults. Princeton University researchers have found the same type of feedback speeds the vocal development of infant marmoset ...

A team of researchers, led by a plant cell biologist at the University of California, Riverside, has for the first time identified a small RNA species and its target gene that together regulate female germline formation in ...

Researchers at the University of Iowa have discovered that a molecule which can sense the swelling of fat cells also controls a signaling pathway that allows fat cells to take up and store excess glucose. Mice missing this ...

Beekeepers across the United States lost 33 percent of their honey bee colonies during the year spanning April 2016 to April 2017, according to the latest preliminary results of an annual nationwide survey. Rates of both ...

Living cells must constantly process information to keep track of the changing world around them and arrive at an appropriate response.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Read this article:
In fruit fly and human genetics, timing is everything - Phys.Org

Best way to get children to understand evolution? Teach genetics first – Study International News

Teach genetics first and then teaching evolution could be a breeze. Source: Shutterstock

Evolution is one of the trickiest subjects to teach and not just because some people find it controversial. The ideas are subtle, the language and concepts can be confusing how many of us have thought survival of the fittest was an encouragement to go to the gym. Many studies have sought to discover the reasons why evolution is so difficult for students to understand and accept, but few have attempted to find ways to improve the understanding of evolution in the classroom.

As there is such a direct connection between genetics and evolution, we thought perhaps if you teach genetics first, this might help students understand evolution better. Our large randomised control trial of UK secondary school students, published in PLOS Biology, showed this to be true to a surprising degree.

It seemed intuitive to us a good understanding of genetics should help theunderstanding of evolution DNA is the heritable material through which variation needed for evolution occurs. If you understand DNA, you can understand what mutations are. And if you understand what mutations are, you can understand they can change frequency in populations and bingo, evolution can happen.

In its simplest, evolution is no more than mutations changing frequency. The differences between species started out as new mutations that went from being rare within one species, but then became very common.

While this connection might seem self-evident, genetics and evolution are typically taught to 14 to 16-year-old secondary school students as separate topics with few links and in no particular order. Sometimes theres a large time span between the two. Our idea was simple teach genetics first and look at how that affects the understanding and acceptance of evolution.

Using questionnaires, we conducted a study of almost 2,000 students over three years. Importantly, all that was changed in our study was the order of the teaching material exactly what was to be taught was left to the teachers. This meant our study was a realistic mimic of what would happen should any switch be made. We tested students before and after the two subjects were taught and so could examine the extent to which students improved in their understanding.

Not your grandfathers great-grandfather. Source: Flickr/Afrika Force

Schools typically split students by their ability, into higher level and foundation level classes. Importantly, we found both ability groups did best when taught genetics first.

An understanding of evolution and acceptance of the idea of evolution are two different things. Acceptance is the belief the scientific view of evolution is the correct version you can understand evolution but not accept it and you can accept it but not understand it.

We found students typically accepted evolution to a greater degree after taking the evolution class. Both before and after testing, the students with a better understanding were those with higher levels of acceptance. However, these effects were not strong.

We also set up a series of focus groups to find out why the understanding and acceptance of evolution are not more strongly coupled. Evidence from these suggests what is more important for evolution acceptance is not what is taught, but who provides the endorsement. For some students, being told key authority figures such as parents or teachers approve of scientific evidence for evolution made a big difference to their ability to accept it.

Television documentaries were commonly given as a source of reassurance about evolution, and some students felt these, and their presenters, were important in helping them accept evolution. Perhaps more predictable, religious leaders, and their views on evolution, were also of key importance. For students from a Catholic background, being told the Pope approves of evolution was important in helping them to approach evolution as any other science.

Our study was not designed to investigate why teaching order has an effect. Ordering effects like the one we looked at have been seen before indeed, in the field of artificial intelligence, there are cases where ordering matters for computers to learn too. But why does the order matter? Our original idea was what psychologists called priming preloading with some facts to make it easier to take in other information.

But could it also be that teaching genetics first minimises the disruption to understanding that can happen when people think that their beliefs are being questioned or challenged? Many students told us that the perceived conflict between their religious views and the science made it hard for them to study evolution.

Perhaps helping them understand that mutations can change frequency under the banner of genetics enabled students to learn with less of a clash of ideas? We suggest a simple test: dont teach students material labelled as evolution, teach it as population genetics instead and then tell them after the fact that they have just learned about evolution.

Whatever the underlying cause, the data suggest a really simple, minimally disruptive and cost-free modification to teaching practice: teach genetics first. This will at least increase evolution understanding, if not acceptance. As with many emotive subjects, it takes more than teaching the facts to shift hearts as well as minds.

ByLaurence D. Hurst, Professor of Evolutionary Genetics at The Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath; Momna Hejmadi, Associate professor, University of Bath, and Rebecca Mead, Postdoctoral Researcher of Education, University of Bath

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Survival of the upbeat: Study says optimistic people are evolutionarily superior

University study finds we can train our brains to regulate emotions

Read Full Article

{"total":77,"error":"","twitter":0,"google":0,"pinterest":0,"facebook_total":76,"vk":0,"linkedin":0,"stumbleupon":0,"buffer":1}

Read more here:
Best way to get children to understand evolution? Teach genetics first - Study International News

FDA Clears First Cancer Drug Based on Genetics of Disease, Not Tumor Location – Scientific American

By Natalie Grover and Bill Berkrot

Merck & Co's immunotherapy Keytruda chalked up another approval on Tuesday as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said the cancer medicine can be used to treat children and adults who carry a specific genetic feature regardless of where the disease originated.

It is the first time the agency has approved a cancer treatment based solely on a genetic biomarker.

"Until now, the FDA has approved cancer treatments based on where in the body the cancer started - for example, lung or breast cancers," said Richard Pazdur, head of oncology products for the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. "We have now approved a drug based on a tumor's biomarker without regard to the tumor's original location."

The accelerated approval was for solid tumor cancers not eligible for surgery or that have spread in patients identified as having a biomarker called microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR).

Tumors with those traits are most common in colorectal, endometrial and gastrointestinal cancers, but may also appear in cancers of the breast, prostate, bladder and thyroid gland.

The approval covers patients whose cancer has progressed despite prior treatment and those who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. It also includes patients with colorectal cancer whose disease has advanced after chemotherapy.

The FDA grants accelerated approvals to drugs for serious conditions with unmet medical needs if the treatment appears to have certain effects deemed reasonably likely to predict a clinical benefit. Merck must still conduct studies to confirm the anticipated benefit.

Keytruda belongs to a new class of drugs called PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors that help the immune system fight cancer by blocking a mechanism tumors use to evade detection.

It was previously approved to treat advanced melanoma, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancers and classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

Merck shares rose 0.8 percent to $64.55.

View original post here:
FDA Clears First Cancer Drug Based on Genetics of Disease, Not Tumor Location - Scientific American

Improve evolution education by teaching genetics first – Phys.org – Phys.Org

May 23, 2017 Children taught genetics first increase their understanding of evolution. Credit: Miki Yoshihito, Flickr

Evolution is a difficult concept for many students at all levels, however, a study publishing on May 23 in the open access journal PLOS Biology has demonstrated a simple cost-free way to significantly improve students' understanding of evolution at the secondary level: teach genetics before you teach them evolution.

Currently in the UK setting the two modules are taught in isolation often with long time intervals between. The team, led by Professor Laurence Hurst at the Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath hypothesised that since core concepts of genetics (such as DNA and mutation) are so intimately linked to the core concepts of evolution, then priming students with genetics information might help their understanding of evolution.

The researchers conducted a large controlled trial of almost 2000 students aged 14-16 in 78 classes from 23 schools across the south and south west of the UK, in which teachers were asked to teach genetics before evolution or evolution before genetics.

The students were tested prior to teaching and after. The five year study, found that those taught genetics first improved their test scores by an average of seven per cent more than those taught evolution first.

Teaching genetics before evolution was particularly crucial for students in foundation classes, who increased their understanding of evolution only if they were taught genetics first. The higher ability classes saw an increase in evolution understanding with both orders, but it was greatest if genetics was taught first.

The team also tested the students' understanding of genetics and found that the genetics-first effect either increased genetics understanding as well or made no difference, meaning that teaching genetics first doesn't harm students' appreciation of this subject.

Professor Hurst, commented: "These are very exciting results. School teachers are under enormous pressure to do the best for their students but have little time to make changes and understandably dislike constant disruption to the curriculum."

"To be sensitive to their needs, in the trial we let teachers teach what they normally teach - we just looked at the order effect."

First author on the paper Dr Rebecca Mead, a former teacher herself, said: "It's remarkable that such a simple and cost-free intervention makes such a big difference. That genetics-first was the only intervention that worked for the foundation classes is especially important as these classes are often challenging to teach. This research has encouraged teachers to rethink how they teach evolution and genetics and many schools have now changed their teaching practice to genetics-first. I hope more will follow."

The team also looked at whether students in the study agreed or disagreed with the scientific view of evolution. They found that whilst the teaching of evolution increased acceptance rates to over 80 per cent in the cohort examined, the order of teaching had no effect.

Qualitative focus group follow-up studies showed that acceptance is heavily conditioned by authority figures (teachers, TV personalities, religious figures) and the correlation between the students' understanding of evolution and their acceptance of it is weak.

Dr. Mead commented: "Some students reported that being told that key authority figures approve of the scientific evidence for evolution made a big difference to their learning experience. It would be worth testing alternative ways to help students overcome preconceptions."

Explore further: Evolution and religion: New insight into instructor attitudes in Arizona

More information: Mead R, Hejmadi M, Hurst LD (2017) Teaching genetics prior to teaching evolution improves evolution understanding but not acceptance. PLoS Biol 15(5): e2002255. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002255

Evolution can be an emotionally charged topic in education, given a wide range of perspectives on it. Two researchers from Arizona State University are taking an in-depth look at how college professors handle it.

College students' views about evolution and creationism are often shaped by what they learned in their high school biology classes, according to a University of Minnesota study published in the May issue of BioScience, the ...

University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Associate Professor Lee Meadows, Ph.D., is author of a new book that claims it's possible to teach evolution without offending students who have strong religious convictions against ...

The Texas Board of Education will decide whether to scrap a requirement that public schools teach high school students to scrutinize "all sides" of scientific theory after hearing Tuesday from academics who say that was meant ...

High school and college students who understand the geological age of the Earth (4.5 billion years) are much more likely to understand and accept human evolution, according to a University of Minnesota study published in ...

South Dakota legislators are weighing whether to let teachers decide how much skepticism to work into lessons on contentious scientific topics such as evolution and climate change.

In human history, the transition from hunting and gathering to farming is a significant one. As such, hunter-gatherers and farmers are usually thought about as two entirely different sets of people. But researchers reporting ...

A new species of a fossil pliosaur (large predatory marine reptile from the 'age of dinosaur') has been found in Russia and profoundly change how we understand the evolution of the group, says an international team of scientists.

People using smartphones are more likely to make rational and unemotional decisions compared to PC users when presented with a moral dilemma on their device, according to a new study from City, University of London.

A-tisket, A-tasket. You can tell a lot from a basket. Especially if it comes from the ruins of an ancient civilization inhabited by humans nearly 15,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene ages.

Middle Stone Age humans in the Porc-Epic cave likely used ochre over at least 4,500 years, according to a study published May 24, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Daniela Rosso from the University of Barcelona, ...

(Phys.org)A trio of researchers with Columbia University has conducted a series of experiments regarding how much effort people are willing to exert in fact-checking news stories. In their paper published in Proceedings ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

More:
Improve evolution education by teaching genetics first - Phys.org - Phys.Org

Exercise, genetics and the fat gene – Irish Times

According to the World Health Organization, after high blood pressure, tobacco use and high blood sugar, physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. So its fitting a physically active lifestyle is promoted in global public health policies. But does physical activity confer the same benefits on everyone to the same extent?

In the early 1990s, five universities in the United States and Canada recruited 90 Caucasian families and 40 African-American families including both parents and three or more biological adult offspring to the Heritage Family Study. The study investigated the role of genetics in the cardiovascular, metabolic and hormonal responses to the same 20-week programme of aerobic exercise the families undertook.

Although age, sex and race had a minimal impact on the training responses, researchers noted in a 2007 report in the American Journal of Epidemiology that there are marked inter-individual differences in the response . . . to regular exercise, and these differences are not randomly distributed but clearly aggregate in families.

For example, the heritability estimates for changes in cardiovascular and diabetes risk following a programme of endurance training ranged from 20 to 60 per cent.

And, this year, a review in the journal Sports Medicine concluded: Shared familial factors, including genetics, are likely to be a significant contributor to the response of body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness following physical activity.

The studys lead author, Joshua Zadro, is a physiotherapist and PhD candidate at the University of Sydney, with an interest in researching the relationship between genetics, physical activity and low back pain.

The results of our study demonstrate that our genes influence how well our bodies respond to increased physical activity, he told The Irish Times. Moreover, our genes play a larger role in dictating changes in our body composition after a diet and exercise programme such as our weight, body mass index, or percentage of body fat compared to how our fitness changes after an exercise programme.

This means some individuals who are physically active and have a calorie-restricted diet may not demonstrate significant improvements in their body composition or fitness, with genetics potentially being to blame for these disappointing results.

With genetics playing an important part in exercise, what is the role of the recently identified fat mass and obesity-associated gene (FTO) in shaping our response? A leading Irish researcher is part of a team investigating the impact of personalised nutrition advice on healthy eating and lifestyle in the Food4 Me study.

Eileen Gibney, a lecturer/assistant professor in nutrition in the UCD Institute of Food and Health, and School of Agriculture and Food Science, explained what is meant by the so-called obesity gene.The term refers to variations within our genetic make-up that may predispose an individual and by this I mean make someone more susceptible to to obesity.

Dr Gibney said that for certain diseases, the variation and incidence of the disease is direct. For example, with cystic fibrosis a defect in one gene causes one disease. Obesity, however, is caused by many factors that vary from one individual to another.

With respect to obesity, she said, there are some genetic variations, which are rare but do have a direct impact on risk of obesity. Take, for example, the metabolism of leptin, a hormone secreted by our fat cells, and which influences weight control. However, most other obesity-associated genetic variations so far discovered are more subtle, and present a risk that is small.

Ongoing research in may reveal more variations within our genes that are potentially obesity-associated, she said. If we can bring these all together, then together they may explain some of the risk of obesity. But it is important to note this is a risk or risk of increased predisposition; it is not a determinant. So its not as if obesity is unavoidable. It may simply mean you need to work harder; exercise more and be more vigilant with your diet. Even individuals with a genetic predisposition to obesity can and should maintain a healthy weight through healthy eating and exercise.

The emerging field of nutrigenomics investigates the relationship between food and genetics, with a view to devise diets based on an individuals genetic profile.

Dr Gibney is one of a team of international experts engaged in the European Food4Me project, which aimed to explore the applications of personalised nutrition. She was co-author of a recent Food4Me study published in the journal Obesity, which investigated the effect of physical activity levels on obesity traits among European adults with a variant of the FTO gene.

Within the Food4Me study, over 1,600 individuals across Europe took part in a six-month personalised nutrition study, she said. One area of investigation, led by Drs Celis-Morales and Marsaux, was to examine the FTO gene, where there is a known variant associated with risk of obesity. By this we mean that if someone has this specific genetic variant, they are more likely to be overweight than someone without this variation.

Researchers within the Food4Me team measured physical activity in the study group and allocated these individuals into three groups: low, medium and high.

Drs Celis-Morales and Marsaux then looked to see if there was a difference in weight/obesity in each of these groups between those who had the genetic variant or not, she said. They showed in the low-exercise group that those with the FTO variant were more obese than those without, as expected. But in the high-exercise group there was no difference in obesity between those with the risky genetic variation and those without.

This means that being active as recommended in many healthy eating and lifestyle campaigns removed the risk of obesity.

With the World Health Organization implicating physical inactivity in 21-25 per cent of cases of breast and colon cancer, 27 per cent of diabetes and 30 per cent of ischaemic heart disease, there is no doubting the importance of exercise, irrespective of ones genetic profile.

Original post:
Exercise, genetics and the fat gene - Irish Times