Category Archives: Human Behavior

Malaysia, Indonesia Muslim groups call for Starbucks boycott over LGBT stance – Washington Examiner

Muslim groups in Malaysia and Indonesia are calling for a Starbucks boycott due to the company's support of LGBT issues.

The Muslim Malaysian group Perkasa called on its members to boycott Starbucks coffee shops this week, the Associated Press reported.

"Our objection is because they are promoting something that is against human instinct, against human behavior and against religion," Amini Amir Abdullah, Perkasa's Islamic affairs bureau chief, told Reuters. "That's why we are against it."

Perkasa called on the Malaysian government to revoke trading licenses for Starbucks, as well as other companies like Microsoft and Apple.

The call came days after an Indonesian Islamic group, Muhammadiyah, also denounced the coffee chain in the nation with the world's largest Muslim population.

According to the Associated Press, shares in the company that operates Starbucks in Indonesia fell and a boycott Starbucks hashtag was popular for a short time.

Amini said the call for boycott stemmed from a report that Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz supports gay marriage. In 2013 Schultz, who was Starbucks CEO at the time, responded to a question from a shareholder who suggested that Starbucks had lost customers due to its support of LGBT rights by saying, "Not every decision is an economic decision. The lens in which we are making that decision is through the lens of our people."

"Though we are founded in the United States, we are a global company with over 300,000 partners and 26,000 stores in 75 markets around the world," a Starbucks spokesperson told the Washington Examiner. "In all countries where we do business, we are proud to be a part of the fabric of the local community, and we strive to be respectful of local customs and traditions while staying true to Starbucks long-standing values and purpose."

Sodomy is illegal and punishable by up to 20 years in prison in Malaysia and, while homosexuality is not illegal in Indonesia, Indonesia's Constitutional Court is looking to make homosexual sex and sex out of wedlock a criminal activity, the Associated Press reported.

Read the rest here:
Malaysia, Indonesia Muslim groups call for Starbucks boycott over LGBT stance - Washington Examiner

Self-Driving Cars Will Soon Make Moral Decisions As Well As Humans – IFLScience

In his book The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, Darwin proudly argued that our sense of morality was a uniquely human trait. Even though that claim has been disputed in recent years, its fair to say humans still top the charts when it comes to moral senses.

But it looks like we might soon have some competition, namely in the form of driverless cars.

A new study in the journal Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience has looked at human behavior and moral assessments to see how they could be applied to computers.

Just like a human in a car, a driverless car could be faced with split-second moral decisions. Picture this: A child runs into the road. The car has to work out whether it hits them, veers off to hit a wall and potentially kill other passersby, or hit the wall and potentially kill the driver.

It was previously assumed that this kind of human morality could never be described in the language of a computer as it was context dependent.

But we found quite the opposite, Leon Stfeld, first author of the study, said in a statement.

Human behavior in dilemma situations can be modeled by a rather simple value-of-life-based model that is attributed by the participant to every human, animal, or inanimate object."

They worked this out by asking participants to drive a car in a typical suburban neighborhood on a foggy day in an immersive virtual-reality simulation. During the simulation, they were faced with unavoidable crashes with inanimate objects, animals, people, etc. Their task was to decide what object the car crashes into.

The results were then plugged into statistical models leading to rules to work out how and why a human reached a moral decision. Remarkably, patterns emerged.

Now we have worked out the laws and mechanics in the way a computer would understand, it means we could now simply teach machines to share our morality. This will have some huge implications in regards to self-driving cars.

We need to ask whether autonomous systems should adopt moral judgments, if yes, should they imitate moral behavior by imitating human decisions, should they behave along ethical theories and if so, which ones, and critically, if things go wrong who or what is at fault? senior author Professor Gordon Pipa said.

"Now that we know how to implement human ethical decisions into machines we, as a society, are still left with a double dilemma," Professor Peter Knig, another senior author, added. "Firstly, we have to decide whether moral values should be included in guidelines for machine behavior and secondly, if they are, should machines act just like humans."

Go here to read the rest:
Self-Driving Cars Will Soon Make Moral Decisions As Well As Humans - IFLScience

CAL FIRE: Human behavior causes fire near Coleman Fish Hatchery – KRCRTV.COM

ANDERSON, Calif. - A mutual response of CAL FIRE Shasta and Tehamaunits brought a three and a half acre fire near the Coleman National Fish Hatchery under control Wednesday night.

CAL FIRE said the fire broke out around 8:30 p.m. one mile away from the hatchery. Crews utilized five engines, two watertenders, two air tankers, a helicopter and two bulldozers to bring it under control.

No structures were damaged and there were no reports of injuries.

Crews said dry river bottom vegetation caught fire. An official at the scene said the fire was caused by human behavior, but the exact cause has not been determined, pending an investigation.

Go here to see the original:
CAL FIRE: Human behavior causes fire near Coleman Fish Hatchery - KRCRTV.COM

Muslim group calls for Starbucks boycott over LGBT stand – The Jerusalem Post

Customers sit outside of a Starbucks cafe in Jakarta, Indonesia July 1, 2017.. (photo credit:REUTERS)

KUALA LUMPUR - A prominent Muslim group in Malaysia has joined calls by Islamic conservatives in Indonesia for a boycott of Starbucks to protest against the international coffee chain's support of gay rights.

Activists say intolerance of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people has spiked in recent years in Indonesia and Malaysia, both majority Muslim, multi-ethnic Southeast Asian countries.

Perkasa, a group with about 700,000 members that campaigns for the rights of ethnic Malay Muslims, said it agreed with calls this week by Muhammadiyah, Indonesia's second-largest Muslim group, for a boycott of Starbucks over its pro-LGBT stand.

Perkasa also agreed with the Indonesian group's call for Starbucks' operating license to be revoked, it said.

Amini Amir Abdullah, who heads Perkasa's Islamic affairs bureau, said Starbucks' position challenged Malaysia's constitution, which recognized Islam as the country's official religion.

"Our objection is because they are promoting something that is against the human instinct, against human behavior and against religion. That's why we are against it," Amini told Reuters in an interview on Wednesday.

Muhammadiyah's call for a boycott has gained support from the Indonesian Ulema Council, its top clerical body.

The religious groups' opposition to Starbucks came after a video from 2013 circulated online of pro-LGBT comments made by the company's chairman and former chief executive, Howard Schultz.

In the video, Schultz said Starbucks embraced diversity and "not every decision is an economic decision," in response to a shareholder who complained that the company had lost customers because of its support for gay marriage.

Starbucks Malaysia could not be reached for comment.

PT Sari Coffee Indonesia, which holds the license to run the Starbucks chain in Indonesia, said in a statement it was not affiliated with any political or ideological groups.

"We are grateful and proud to have been a part of local communities in Indonesia for 15 years, always maintaining the deepest respect for, and adherence to, Indonesia's local laws, culture and beliefs," said Fetty Kwartati, a director at PT MAP Boga Adiperkasa, the parent company of PT Sari Coffee Indonesia.

Some Muslims in Indonesia, however, said the boycott call would not stop them from buying Starbucks coffee.

"I love their products, not their CEO," said Jakarta resident Kornelius Kamajaya.

The boycott call got a similar response from some in Malaysia.

"Don't make it such an issue that we have to boycott a company because of one small statement," said Muhammad Azril Maridzuan, an assistant bank manager in Kuala Lumpur.

Muslim groups should not "be so extremist" even though gay rights was against their religious beliefs, he said.

Share on facebook

View post:
Muslim group calls for Starbucks boycott over LGBT stand - The Jerusalem Post

In quest to replace Common Access Card, DoD starts testing behavior-based authentication – FederalNewsRadio.com

A year after then-chief information officer Terry Halvorsen first publicly floated the idea of killingDoDs Common Access Card in favor of a collection of more flexible authentication technologies, the Pentagon is beginning to test drive at least one of the potential replacements for the CAC.

Last week, the Defense Innovation Unit-Experimental reached an agreement with Plurilock Technologies, a Victoria, British Columbia-based firm that holds several patents on behavior-based authentication (or, behaviour-based, to our friends to the north).

The company claims that after spending about 20 minutes monitoring and analyzing the specific patterns people engage in when using their computers particularly their habits when pressing keys on their keyboards and their mouse movement techniques its software can build a reliabledigital fingerprint for any user that can be used later on to sound an alarm when an impostor is logged onto a system using someone elses credentials.

Human behavior has a degree of variability its organic, Plurilocks CEO, Ian Paterson said in an interview. A person may have had coffee in the morning, they may be tired at the end of the day, but they still retain unique characteristics, and thats what we track.

Sponsored Content: Register for our free webinar to learn how DHS, Department of Transportation, FirstNet and FEMA are implementing their emergency communications strategies.

The aforementioned CIO, Terry Halvorsen, said last June that DoD would eliminate the CAC within two years. The replacement, he continued to emphasize in subsequent public statements, would not be a single technology, but a collection of 10 or more different authentication factors that give the department a higher degree of identity assurance than it currently haswithout tying users to a single piece of plastic with an embedded microchip.

The evaluation thats now underway with Plurilocks system appears to be consistent with that game plan. Paterson said the test deployment thats now beginninginside one of DoDs combat support agencies (the company declined to say which one) will monitor users behavior only after theyve logged into a computer by some other means.

If the system detects something unusual, it can be configured to do a number of things, from delivering immediate alerts to security administrators, to locking the users terminal, to simply asking a user to authenticate themselves again. And depending on how they re-authenticate, it can take a series of steps that rely on other factors to provide higher degrees of identity assurance.

Paterson argued that sort of continuous monitoring of users behavior is the only realway to know whether the person sitting behind a computer screen is truly who they claim to be.

For some of our large clients in the financial sector, theyve told us it only takes one oops for someone to walk away and leave their terminal unlocked, he said. It doesnt take much imagination to think that if somebodys going through a divorce, if theres been money changing hands, it becomes a liability for that business. Because were sitting in the background continuously, the second an intruder would sit down and start trying to interact with that desktop, we would be able to stop them in real time.

Worried about the Trump administration's proposed cuts to federal retirement? Find out what these 100 members of Congress have to say about it.

Excerpt from:
In quest to replace Common Access Card, DoD starts testing behavior-based authentication - FederalNewsRadio.com

Sexual Violence Among Baboons Shows Links to Human Behavior … – Seeker

T T heir relationship began innocently enough. He started to pay extra attention to her, and her attraction to him grew over time. One day, however, the dynamic changed. While she was peacefully sitting having a meal, he attacked her without warning. The unprovoked abuse continued, yet she stayed with him, still feeling the attraction and too afraid to go anywhere else. Later, his presence benefitted their youngsters.

Such is a typical story of a wild, female chacma baboon, which in many ways is a tale that mirrors those of certain chimpanzees and human domestic abuse survivors the world over, a new study published in the journal Current Biology indicates. Males of all three species may use long-term sexual intimidation to control their mates, suggesting that this mating strategy has a long history in primates, including humans.

The behavior has often been reported in our species, and has been documented in male chimps over the past decade. The new study focuses on chacma baboons, which are among the largest of all monkeys.

What is interesting is that the forms of sexual violence reported in chacma baboons may resemble some common patterns of sexual intimidation in humans, namely domestic violence, in the sense that they are similarly expressed in the context of long-term relationships between one male and one female, which are otherwise characterized by close spatial proximity and sometimes high levels of affiliation, said senior author Elise Huchard of the University of Montpelliers Institute of Evolutionary Sciences.

There is nothing paradoxical in forming a strong bond with someone, and displaying aggression in the context of such relationship, added Huchard. Conflict is an integral part of social life in every species including humans, and it's often with those people that you often see that you may have a conflict.

Huchard, lead author Alice Baniel, and co-author Guy Cowlishaw studied wild chacma baboons at Tsaobis Nature Park, a semi-arid environment in Namibia. The study occurred over four different periods from 20052014, during which time the researchers documented 222 chases or attacks led by males.

The researchers observed that males often formed social bonds with particular fertile females, which they then attacked and chased repeatedly usually without provocation in the weeks preceding her ovulation and prior to their mating.

It can also be that there is an event triggering the attack, such as a rival approaching or vocalizing, or the proximity of another baboon group, Huchard said. The latter case is typical: males often chase and attack some females of their own group when meeting another group, and they generally target sexually receptive females in such occasions.

RELATED: Human Hands More Primitive Than Chimp Hands

Some of the females were badly injured in the attacks, with certain individuals suffering premature deaths after repeated bouts of injuries.

The prior studies on sexual intimidation in chimps found that fertile females have higher levels of cortisol, a hormone indicative of stress. Increased stress can alter immune response. It can also disrupt reproduction and growth.

If a female baboon does give birth to offspring sired by the male, his behavior somewhat changes.

Several studies (on baboons) have shown that its often the male who has been monopolizing a female during her conceptive estrus who becomes her friend when she gives birth, Huchard explained. The female follows the male everywhere with her newborn, and the male essentially tolerates her presence; however, studies have shown that males defend their female friend's offspring against predators or infanticidal attacks, which are not uncommon in baboons.

She continued, Male-female bonds progressively dissolve as infants grow towards independency, and are often finished when a female becomes fertile again, when her juvenile is fully weaned.

A common factor among primates that practice long-term sexual intimidation is that the species tend to have males that are larger than the females. Such size differences, in turn, appear to be driven by patterns of male-to-male competition. This can happen when there are several adult males for each sexually receptive female within a population.

Since sexual coercion can stunt a victims growth, it might even further drive sexual size dimorphism, helping to keep the vicious cycle going.

Not all primate species have males that engage in long-term sexual intimidation, though. In lemurs, for example, it is common that females are larger than males. Even among baboons, chimps, and certainly humans, not all males practice sexual coercion.

There is increasing research to show that animals are capable of innovations, rational decisions, self-control, empathy, strategic behavior, etc., Huchard said. So, it's possible that male baboons are just driven by their sexual hormones, but it's also very possible that their actions are strategic and adjusted to the social context.

In humans, the intensity and frequency of long-term sexual intimidation by males vary widely across cultures. This points to a strong cultural component affecting the behavior.

Its even possible that there is a cultural basis for baboon sexual intimidation, as for human sexual intimidation, Huchard said. Thats a question for future research, but it wont be an easy one to answer.

Original post:
Sexual Violence Among Baboons Shows Links to Human Behavior ... - Seeker

Study Finds That Human Ethics Could Be Easily Programmed Into Driverless Cars – Futurism

In BriefA study has found that it would be fairly simple to programautonomous vehicles to make similar moral decisions as humandrivers. In light of this, the question becomes whether we wantdriverless cars to emulate us or behave differently. Programming Morality

A new study from The Institute of Cognitive Science at the University of Osnabrck has found that the moral decisions humans make while driving are not as complex or context dependent as previously thought. Based on the research, which has been published inFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience,these decisions follow a fairly simple value-of-life-based model, which means programming autonomous vehicles to make ethical decisions should be relatively easy.

For the study, 105 participants were put in a virtual reality (VR) scenario during which they drove around suburbia on a foggy day. They then encountered unavoidable dilemmas that forced them to choose between hitting people, animals, and inanimate objects with their virtual car.

The previous assumption was that these types of moral decisions were highly contextual and therefore beyond computational modeling. But we found quite the opposite, Leon Stfeld, first author of the study, told Science Daily. Human behavior in dilemma situations can be modeled by a rather simple value-of-life-based model that is attributed by the participant to every human, animal, or inanimate object.

Alot of virtual ink has been spilt online concerning the benefits of driverless cars. Elon Musk is in the vanguard, stating emphatically that those who do not support the technology are killing people.His view is that the technology can be smarter, more impartial, and better at driving than humans, and thus able to save lives.

Currently, however, the cars are large pieces of hardware supported byrudimentary driverless technology. The question of how many lives they could save is contingent upon how we choose to program them, and thats where the resultsof this study come into play. If we expect driverless cars to be better than humans, why would we program them like human drivers?

As Professor Gordon Pipa, a senior author on the study, explained, We need to ask whether autonomous systems should adopt moral judgements. If yes, should they imitate moral behavior by imitating human decisions? Should they behave along ethical theories, and if so, which ones? And critically, if things go wrong, who or what is at fault?

The ethics of artificial intelligence (AI) remains swampy moral territory in general, and numerous guidelines and initiatives are being formed in an attempt to codify a set of responsible laws for AI.The Partnership on AI to Benefit People and Society is composed of tech giants, including Apple, Google, and Microsoft, while the German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure has developed a set of 20 principles that AI-powered cars should follow.

Just how safe driverless vehicles will be in the future is dependent on how we choose to program them, and while that task wont be easy, knowing how we would react in various situations should help us along the way.

Here is the original post:
Study Finds That Human Ethics Could Be Easily Programmed Into Driverless Cars - Futurism

What moral code should your self-driving car follow? – Popular Science

Imagine you are driving down the street when two peopleone child and one adultstep onto the road. Hitting one of them is unavoidable. You have a terrible choice. What do you do?

Now imagine that the car is driverless. What happens then? Should the car decide?

Until now, no one believed that autonomous carsrobotic vehicles that operate without human control could make moral and ethical choices, an issue that has been central to the ongoing debate about their use. But German scientists now think otherwise. They believe eventually it may be possible to introduce elements of morality and ethics into self-driving cars.

To be sure, most human drivers will never face such an agonizing dilemma. Nevertheless, with many millions of cars on the road, these situations do occur occasionally, said Leon Stfeld, a researcher in the Institute of Cognitive Science at the University of Osnabrck and lead author of a new study modeling ethics for self-driving cars. The paper, published in Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, was co-authored by Gordon Pipa, Peter Knig, and Richard Gast, all of the institute.

The concept of driverless cars has grown in popularity as a way to combat climate change, since these autonomous vehicles drive more efficiently than most humans. They avoid rapid acceleration and braking, two habits that waste fuel. Also, a fleet of self-driving cars could travel close together on the highway to cut down on drag, thereby saving fuel. Driverless cars will also encourage car-sharing, reducing the number of cars on the road and possibly making private car ownership unnecessary.

Improved safety is also an energy saver. [Driverless cars] are expected to cause fewer accidents, which means fewer cars need to be produced to replace the crashed ones, providing another energy savings, Stfeld said. The technology could help [fight climate change] in many ways.

The study suggests that cars can be programmed to model human moral behaviors involving choice, deciding which of multiple possible collisions would be the best option. Scientists placed human subjects into immersive virtual reality settings to study behavior in simulated traffic scenarios. They then used the data to design algorithms for driverless cars that could enable them to cope with potentially tragic predicaments on the road just as humans would.

Participants drove a car in a typical suburban neighborhood on a foggy day when they suddenly faced collision with an animal, humans or an inanimate object, such as a trash can, and had to decide what or whom to spare. For example, adult or child? Human or animal? Dog or other animal? In the study, children fared better than adults. The dog was the most valued animal, the others being a goat, deer and boar.

When it comes to humans versus animals, most people would certainly agree that the well-being of humans must be the first priority, Stfeld said. But from the perspective of the self-driving car, everything is probabilistic. Most situations arent as clear cut as should I kill the dog, or the human? It is more likely should I kill the dog with near certainty, or alternatively spare the dog but take a 5 percent chance of a minor injury to a human? Adhering to strict rules, such as always deciding in favor of the human, might just not feel right for many.

Other variables also come into play. For example, was the person at fault? Did the adult look for cars before stepping into the street? Did the child chase a ball into the street without stopping to think? Also, how many people are in harms way?

The German Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure attempted to answer these questions in a recent report. It defined 20 ethical principles for self-driving cars, several of which stand at odds with the choices humans made in Stfelds experiment. For example, the ministrys report says that a child who runs onto the road is more to blameand less worthy of savingthan an adult standing on the footpath as a non-involved party. Moreover, it declares it unacceptable to take a potential victims age into account.

Most peopleat least in Europe and very likely also Northern American cultureswould save a child over an adult or elderly person, Stfeld said. We could debate whether or not we want cars to behave like humans, or whether we want them to comply to categorical rules such as the ones provided by the ethics committee report.

Peter Knig, a study co-author, believes their research creates more quandaries than it solves, as sometimes happens in science. Now that we know how to implement human ethical decisions into machines we, as a society, are still left with a double dilemma, he said. Firstly, we have to decide whether moral values should be included in guidelines for machine behavior and secondly, if they are, should machines should act just like humans?

The study doesnt seek to answer these questions, only to demonstrate that it is possible to model ethical and moral decision-making in driverless cars, using clues as to how humans would act. The authors are trying to lay the groundwork for additional studies and further debate.

It would be rather simple to implement, as technology certainly isnt the limiting factor here, Stfeld said. The question is how we as a society want the cars to handle this kind of situation, and how the laws should be written. What should be allowed and what shouldnt? In order to come to an informed opinion, its certainly very useful to know how humans actually do behave when theyre facing such a decision.

Marlene Cimons writes for Nexus Media, a syndicated newswire covering climate, energy, policy, art and culture.

Continued here:
What moral code should your self-driving car follow? - Popular Science

Gut Bacteria May Be Linked to Mood, Behavior in Healthy Humans – PsychCentral.com

Interactions between gut bacteria and the brain may play an important role in human health and behavior.

In a new study, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles have discovered that microbiota in the gut interacts with brain regions associated with mood and behavior in healthy humans.The findings add to the growing body of evidence of a significant link between the gut and the brain.

Earlier studies have shown that microbiota, a community of microorganisms in the gut, can influence behavior and emotion. Rodent models have demonstrated the effects of gut microbiota on emotional and social behaviors, such as anxiety and depression, but there has been little scientific evidence in humans.

For the new study, the researchers wanted to identify brain and behavioral characteristics of healthy women clustered by gut microbiota profiles. A total of 40 women gave fecal samples for profiling, and magnetic resonance images were taken of their brains as they looked at images of individuals, activities, or other objects that evoked an emotional response.

The women were divided by their gut bacteria composition into two groups: 33 had more of a bacterium called Bacteroides; the remaining seven had more of the Prevotella bacteria.

Women in the Bacteroides group showed greater thickness of the gray matter in the frontal cortex and insula, brain regions involved with complex processing of information. These women also had larger volumes of the hippocampus, a region involved in memory processing.

In contrast, women in the Prevotella group displayed more connections between emotional, attentional and sensory brain regions and lower brain volumes in several regions, such as the hippocampus.

In this group, the womens hippocampus was less active as they looked at negative images. They also rated higher levels of negative feelings such as anxiety, distress and irritability after looking at photos with negative images than did the women in the Bacteroides group.

The new findings support the concept of brain-gut-microbiota interactions in healthy humans. Researchers still do not fully understand whether the bacteria in the gut influence the development of the brain and its activity when unpleasant emotional content is encountered, or if existing differences in the brain influence the type of bacteria that reside in the gut.

In either case, however, the findings could lead to important changes in how we perceive human emotions.

Source: University of California, Los Angeles Health Sciences

APA Reference Pedersen, T. (2017). Gut Bacteria May Be Linked to Mood, Behavior in Healthy Humans. Psych Central. Retrieved on July 5, 2017, from https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/07/05/gut-bacteria-may-be-linked-to-mood-behavior-in-healthy-humans/122846.html

Originally posted here:
Gut Bacteria May Be Linked to Mood, Behavior in Healthy Humans - PsychCentral.com

Making ‘greenness’ human: UW lecture highlights environmentalism for the everyday student – Dailyuw

Urban environmentalist Jenny Price gave a lecture at the UW on July 3 in an attempt to help students and others understand how a change in human behavior can become a way of addressing environmental crises. The goal was to bring together the perspectives of urban environmentalism and the hard sciences with the humanities.

The lecture is a part of the summer institute City/Nature: Urban Environmental Humanities, which is sponsored by the Simpson Center for the Humanities and funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH). The institute provides UW scholars the opportunity to connect with other academics and provide professional development across disciplines. Price is visiting the university from Princeton.

The lecture addressed how to help environmentalists understand why people think and respond to environmentalism the way they do, as a way to address climate change. As important as technological or scientific solutions are, these solutions lack the ability to address social behaviors as a means of creating social change.

Its a critique about 21st century environmentalism, Price said when discussing her work and the book she is writing: Stop Saving the Planet 8 Other Tips for 21st-Century Environmentalists.

I really want to emphasize right up front that Im not critiquing all environmentalists, she said.

The frustration between environmentalists and those most affected by the negative effects of climate change as well as environmental damage aligns with the growing distance between humans and nature. Lower-income communities often fall into this gap.

There is a long American tradition that nature is a world that is away from humans, Price said.

This social distancing alienates what is in fact intertwined in the life of the city.

Environment is the very foundation of our lives, Price said.

Environmentalists and non-environmentalists alike need to change the notion that the planet needs to be saved, according to Price. She explained that the language of saving nature does not help people understand the environment as the center of their lives. How resources are accessed, controlled, and allocated brings nature squarely into the framework of community, class, and social change, she said.

Companies often use green initiatives to emphasize their care for environmental change, a characteristic Price calls green virtue. The result, Price said, is a corporation that maintains a high and mighty attitude, shifting responsibility off of their shoulders.

The responsibility then shifts to the public buying the product. These are who Price labels virtuous consumers, or those who carry the weight of environmental problems. She calls this trickle-down environmentalism.

What Price pointed out is that the people who are contributing least to environmental problems are often given responsibility for solutions solutions that happen to be expensive. This leaves the public angry, Prince continued, and antagonistic towards environmentalists and environmentalism.

The big question that hung in the air during the lecture was simple: how to make the responsibility for sustainability that of the government and large corporations.

According to Price, if the solution is salvation then environmentalists are missing 93 percent of environmental activities. She tracks this thinking through actions, policies, and solutions.

The environmental movement has not yet penetrated the popular discourse, Price said. Yet the concept of nature is deeply rooted in the way humans think, and incidentally making the environment the focus of a growing conversation paves the way toward social change. In the long run, this means environmental changes.

Its really about sustainable cities. Price said, when discussing what urban environmentalism is.

Preserving areas outside of the city has been the primary focal point of traditional environmentalism to date, but within the realm of urban environmentalism, the focus shifts to the city and how to create sustainability within it.

The long-term goal is to make urban environmentalism a common course in universities, fully integrating environmentalists perspectives within the hard sciences with the humanities.

UW Italian and French studies professor Richard Watts is not an environmentalist. At least, not in the literal sense of the word. Watts work has focused on the post-colonial world and he explores the social landscape of the places that France colonized.

However, he is heading the City/Nature: Urban Environmental Humanities institute.

One of the things I realized [was that] environmentalism was a constant in this literature and cinema, Watts said.

The intersection between the two fields created an avenue for art to act as a means of environmental change. The future of the environment, environmentalism, the role of the humanities and higher education merges in this seminar.

These summer programs bring some of the best and most creative minds in humanities fields together in real time to examine important subjects in depth and then seed the results of this process in classrooms and lecture halls around the country. NEHs Director of Education Programs Carol Peters said in an email.

The City/Nature institute will be running from June 26 to July 14 at the UW. According to the Simpson Center for the Humanities, the institute will offer participants the chance to engage in the development of an undergraduate course syllabus that is interdisciplinary. Visiting scholars will explore this approach in seminars and discussions.

Reach reporter Hannah Pickering at news@dailyuw.com. Twitter: Hannah_Pick95

Read more from the original source:
Making 'greenness' human: UW lecture highlights environmentalism for the everyday student - Dailyuw