Category Archives: Human Behavior

Ocean pollution is no laughing matter – Mother Nature Network (blog)

We go to the beach to see its natural beauty. If we're lucky, maybe we'll see a dolphin flopping off in the distance, or a whale exploding plumes of vapor above the surface. We never go to the beach to see trash, and yet it's always there. Obviously, the garbage is full of stuff people don't want, like old toothbrushes, flossers, cigarette lighters, shopping bags, popped balloons ... I could go on and on. As you know, most of this junk is made of plastic.

Since most of the disposable plastic can't get recycled it just sits in landfills, releasing toxins. Tons of it journeys down our waterways, into the depths of the oceans or pushed onto the beaches and most sadly, stuck in the bodies of just about everything that lives on our planet.

Join me exclusively on MNN as I reflect about the impact that human behavior has on our fellow Earthlings. As you can tell, this piece is about the immense problem that's bleeding into our oceans: disposable plastic.

Let's take a quick trip to Midway Atoll, which is located between North America and Asia in other words, an island in the middle of nowhere. Just a few dozen people live there, and yet the tiny patch of land is completely littered with human-produced garbage.

The garbage that's strewn about is not new it takes quite a long time to reach Midway via the ocean currents. While the plastic is floating around in the ocean, it accumulates algae particles on it, and this algae confuses seabirds, like the Laysan albatross, into thinking the plastic is food. For instance, small lighters are often confused for squid bodies.

It's not just seabirds that feel the burn from plastics invading their environment. All kinds of animals wind up either eating plastic or getting entangled.

Since we humans are causing these problems, we need to find solutions. The animals can't. They have evolved to thrive in their environments. Disposable plastic is less than a century old, they don't have time to adapt even though I wish they would try!

Well, some animals do try, like these hermit crabs.

If you're feeling powerless from this suffocating tidal wave of garbage, there are some things you can do. Before the planet gets zip-locked in an airless vacuum filled with hormone disruptors (unpronounceably called phthalates), we can refuse much of this stuff. We need to be pickier, and let those around know it, too. We need to act like this albatross chick:

And tell our own chic--er, children about it. We humans need to change our behavior before every trip to the beach winds up like this:

Thanks to Rob Lang for doing a guest stint on the photo blog for MNN! He lives in Seattle, and you can follow him on Instagram/UnderdoneComics, where he posts a new cartoon almost every weekday morning. You can buy shirts, environmentally righteous tote bags, prints and other stuff at UnderdoneComics.com.

See original here:
Ocean pollution is no laughing matter - Mother Nature Network (blog)

When the Fox Becomes a Friend – New York Times

Photo Paula Cocozza Credit Christian Sinibaldi

HOW TO BE HUMAN By Paula Cocozza 278 pp. Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt & Company. $26.

Paula Cocozzas hypnotic first novel, How to Be Human, features 34-year-old Mary Green and the urban fox that takes up residence in her London garden. Mary, who as a girl wrote letters to herself to stem acute loneliness, welcomes the vulpine caller. The fox is soon leaving tokens for her, the kind a knight pledges before going into battle. She begins to call him a friend. Within weeks, theyve formed a natural intimacy. In this suspenseful tale animal and human behavior begin to meld, even reverse, and whos dangerous and whos endangered is not always clear.

Mary fetishizes her fox with Jamesian granularity: She understood his show of nonchalance was the disguise for an as yet unarticulated intention. The novel is dynamic with contrasts: the fecund and the fallow. The single and the paired. The urban and the wild. His jaws slackened to liberate his tongue, and he licked his lips with her thoughts. In short order, the fox has possessed her. Time is measured by his visits, his winks, his yawns. His poise today was a stillness with caveats: Every hair bristled with his power to surprise. Mary plies his attentions to her psychic wounds, and who can begrudge her that? Who has not wanted to believe that an animal loves her? If, as I do, one likes to dwell on the handsome presence of animals, and on the rustlings of various leaves, grasses and insects, this novel satisfies and delights. But even greater pleasure is to be had from the dark side of Marys enchantments.

The opening pages present a confounding mystery: Who or what has placed a baby on Marys steps? Next door, Michelle and Eric, with their two small children, seem troubled; Mary perceives them as the classic stressed and self-absorbed young family, somewhat perplexing to all but those in the same straits. She even conjectures, persuasively, that they dont really want the baby shes a crafty one, Mary. When she ventures into their domestic midden she begins to seem like a predator, a fox in a henhouse (indeed, eggs of all kinds are a recurring motif); the narrative balance is wonderfully sly and assured throughout. The mystery surrounding the baby deepens and twists. Readers may slowly come to realize they are on thrillingly unstable ground, waiting to see how far afield Mary will go.

And go she does. Where ones uneasiness sets in will be a personal matter. Is it when Mary leaves her own scent in the garden, by way of a strategic squat? Or is it only once shes gone full-on feral? How soon might one wonder if the fox loves her back, or if hes been outfoxing her all along? And Marys ex, Mark, is a disturbing bystander, on the face of it a clingy pest. But is he as bad as all that?

Cocozza cleverly blurs our capacities to judge Marys narrowing world. I wanted to root for this spirited underdog all the way. But is that who she really is? She might be the eloquently rationalizing Humbert Humbert of the neighborhood, or maybe the spooked and high-strung governess in The Turn of the Screw, losing herself in an obsession. Or, in the end, maybe just another fragile soul trying to get by, chasing a dream of happiness: She tried to keep up, but at some perfect point where distance equaled darkness, he began to silver and fade for her, as if his fur were intercut with nights invisible stripes, and it was no longer possible to know for sure if she was seeing him or seeing the night behind him. One thing is sure: Mary bends whats at hand to her needs. What more does it take to be human?

Elizabeth McKenzies most recent novel is The Portable Veblen.

A version of this review appears in print on June 25, 2017, on Page BR13 of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: Fox and Friend.

See the article here:
When the Fox Becomes a Friend - New York Times

Tobii Pro combines eye tracking with VR to understand human … – The Internet of Business (blog)

Stockholm-based Tobii Pro is a world leader in eye-tracking technology, with its products and services used by businesses and academic institutions around the world. Now, it is combining eye tracking solutions with virtual reality.

Eye-tracking technology is a widespread method employed by organizations and institutions keen to understand human behavior better. The movement of the eyes offers information about much more than what we are looking at. Eye tracking is also a doorway into what draws our attention and for how long it keeps it. Its a simple, objective way to observe the conscious and unconsciousmind at work.

There are plenty of parties interested in applying eye-tracking technology, from advertisers conducting market research to psychologists observing phobias.

In this regard, Tobii Pro has notched up a real track record. It currently provides eye-tracking research products and services to every one of the worlds top 50 universities, four of the top five global market research organizationsand 18 of the worlds top 20 advertising spenders.

Read more:Competition Charities challenged to take advantage of AR & VR technologies

Tobii Pro has now announced new research solutions that combine eye tracking with virtual reality (VR). This will allow the companys partners to conduct eye-tracking research within virtual environments, supporting potentially endless new experiments.

The new eye-tracking solution has been embedded into HTCs Vive headset andcomes with Tobii Pros software development kit. Researchers will now be able to conduct experiments in virtual environments that would otherwise be too costly, dangerous or difficult to create in real life.

Tobii Pros new VR eye-tracking solution promises to open doors for researchers of human behavior. Most notably, scientists eager to better understand anxieties, phobias and disorders such as PTSD [post-traumatic stress disorder] can now carefully control stimuli, regulate scenarios and study without putting participants at risk.

This is because with VR, the real world can be duplicated to allow for stricter controls on variables than behavioural studies usually support.

The technology is also useful for testing professionals in disciplines where on-the-job training might put lives at risk. Tobii Pro highlights surgeons and crane operators as examples in which the need to ensure professional skills are constantly assessed and sharpened cannot be met in the real world.

Recreating these high-risk environments virtually and applying eye-tracking technology will provide objective insights into situational awareness and form an ideal training tool.

Combining eye tracking with VR is growing as a research methodology and our customers have started to demand this technology to be part of their toolkit for behavioral studies, said Tobii Pro president Tom Englund.

The Tobii Pro VR Integration is our first step in making eye tracking in immersive VR a reliable and effective research tool for a range of fields. It marks our first major expansion of VR-based research tools.

Read more:Lloyds is banking on Virtual Reality to attract top grads

Tobii Pros new VR solution is a retrofit of the HTC Vive business edition headset. Its capable of eye tracking all types of eyes and collecting binocular eye tracking data at 120 Hz.

The headset can be used in conjunction with handheld controllers. Its been designed not to compromise the user experience or the output of eye tracking data.

Follow this link:
Tobii Pro combines eye tracking with VR to understand human ... - The Internet of Business (blog)

Human behavior at center of workplace safety debate – Business Insurance

DENVER A clash of workplace safety philosophies was on display at a safety conference on Wednesday, with panelists debating the extent to which employees are part of the problem or the solution to reducing workplace safety incidents.

The two philosophies aimed at reducing workplace injuries and fatalities behavior-based safety and human and organization performance are somewhat at odds with each other, but moderator Thomas Krause, partner with Krause Bell Group based in Ojai, California, told attendees of the American Society of Safety Engineers Safety 2017 conference in Denver who came to see a fight that they would be disappointed. Although panelists at times engaged in verbal sparring over terminology and philosophies, the discourse remained lively but civil.

Asked what the difference is between behavior-based safety and human and organization performance, Todd Conklin, senior adviser, environmental safety, health and quality, at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, said human and organization performance represents a shift in thinking.

If I were to boil it down to one thing, it is a shift in how we perceive the worker, said Mr. Conklin. The behavioral approach sees workers as problem to be fixed. This new view sees the employee not as problem to be fixed, but as problem solver.

E. Scott Geller, alumni distinguished professor in the Department of Psychology at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, Virginia, and a long-time advocate for the behavior-based safety approach, objected to the idea that the philosophy employs a blame-the-employee mentality. He said that perception is a misapplication of the philosophy and that behavior-based safety involves self-motivation and a culture of caring among workers who should feel empowered to point out safety hazards to other employees.

Im not sure caring more makes you safer, because Im not sure lack of caring causes accidents, Mr. Conklin countered.

In the human and organization performance philosophy that he champions, employers seek input from workers on what they need to do their job safely to improve the system, Mr. Conklin said.

Its always true that if the worker had made a better choice there would have been a different outcome, he said. We need to ask what do you need in order to do this job in a way that if it fails, it fails as gracefully and safely as it possibly can.

Boston-based General Electric Co. implemented behavior-based safety approaches several years ago and has now implemented human and organization performance philosophies. Kurt Krueger, global manager of health and safety programs at GE, said the company found that employees do things that make sense to them in the time and context they have to take a particular action. These philosophies helped the company understand that there was a deeper story than just why an employee chose to do what he or she did that led to an event. Understanding there is a deeper story facilitated conversations with management about sustainable safety, he said.

Our job is to help them understand theres a deeper story, said Mr. Krueger. Human and organization performance context gave our leaders coaching and the perspective that theres something more to learn and (that they) need to go to employees to learn that. That was incredibility important.

However, achieving buy-in from senior management of human and organization performance philosophies was not easy, said Mr. Krueger. Instead, the safety team implemented it at the grassroots level, created success stories and developed champions for the philosophy who could promote it to management. Mr. Krueger stressed human and organization performance is not a program but an ongoing process or an operating philosophy that dictates how operational leaders react to failures and learn from them.

Measuring its success is difficult because the benchmarks are softer than objective numbers, Mr. Krueger said. Having implemented both philosophies, GE has achieved sustained success with human and organization performance rather than quick improvements that tended to fade with behavior-based approaches, he said.

One key element of human and organization performance is that it acknowledges that failures will happen rather than believing that all accidents can be prevented, Mr. Conklin said.

There is a realization that you cant manage uncertainty, so you use certain ideas to manage uncertain outcomes, he said. We have to get off this idea that all accidents are preventable and understand that accidents are accidents. You cant predict fatalities because fatalities exist in successful work. The best you can hope for is control.

Behavior-based safety, when done right, considers the entire system, including environmental factors that could facilitate safety, and involves the worker in decisions about safety, Mr. Geller said.

Whats missing now is that conversation between peers or between a supervisor and a worker, he said. Its caring. Its demonstrating I care about your safety.

Read more from the original source:
Human behavior at center of workplace safety debate - Business Insurance

Jack Ma: A 4-Day Work Week Is Coming Soon – Fortune

Billionaire Jack Ma, chairman of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., speaks during the company's inaugural Gateway '17 conference in Detroit, Michigan on June 20, 2017.Jeff Kowalsky Bloomberg via Getty Images

Alibaba founder Jack Ma thinks artificial intelligence will make people's lives a lot easier in the future.

"I think in the next 30 years, people will only work four hours a day and maybe four days a week," Ma said Tuesday during a CNBC interview at the Gateway '17 Conference. "My grandfather worked 16 hours a day in the farmland and [thought he was] very busy. We work eight hours, five days a week and think we are very busy."

The Chinese billionaire also addressed the rise of artificial intelligence , advocating that machines shouldn't be made to replicate human behavior.

"I don't think we should make machines like humans," Ma said. "We should make sure the machine can do things that human beings cannot do."

He ultimately believes humans will prevail over machines, saying, "humans will win."

But he does believe technology could spark major problems, and even war. "The third technology revolution may cause the Third World War," Ma told CNBC.

Excerpt from:
Jack Ma: A 4-Day Work Week Is Coming Soon - Fortune

Mountain lions fear humans, UC Santa Cruz study reveals – KSBW The Central Coast

SANTA CRUZ, Calif.

"Fraidy cat" isn't the way most people think of mountain lions, but when it comes to encounters with humans, perhaps they should.

New research into the behavior of these big cats indicates that they don't like encountering humans any more than we like bumping into them on hiking trails.

"We exposed pumas in the Santa Cruz mountains to the sound of human voices to see if they would react with fear and flee, and the results were striking: They were definitely afraid of humans," said Justine Smith.

WATCH: Mountain lion flees from sound of human voice

Smith was the lead author of the paper "Fear of the human 'super predator' reduces feeding time in large carnivores," published Wednesday.

The findings are valuable as human development encroaches on lion habitat and drives up the number of human-puma encounters.

The most recent cougar who wandered into a heavily populated neighborhood in Santa Cruz hid in a tree for hours until it was tranquilized and re-located into the mountains. The cougar appeared to be afraid during the April incident as more and more curious onlookers showed up.

READ MORE: Santa Cruz mountain lion found hiding in tree

Smith and her colleagues devised a novel experiment to gauge puma behavior: Her team placed audio equipment at puma kill sites in the Santa Cruz Mountains; when a puma came to feed, its movements triggered motion-activated technology that broadcast recordings of people talking, and a hidden camera captured the puma's responses.

They broadcast recordings of Pacific tree frog vocalizations as a control.

Human voice recordings were broadcast to mimic the natural volume of human conversation.

"We found that pumas almost always ran from the sound of humans--and almost never ran from the sound of frogs," said Smith, now a postdoctoral researcher at UC Berkeley. In 29 experiments involving 17 pumas, the pumas fled in 83 percent of cases as soon as it heard human voices, and only once upon hearing frogs.

READ MORE: Adorable wild mountain lion kittens found

National Park Service

In addition to establishing the fear response, the study reveals changes in puma feeding behavior that could have implications for their well-being in human-dominated landscapesand their impact on prey populations, particularly deer.

"We found that pumas took longer to return to their kills after hearing people, and subsequently reduced their feeding on kills by about half," said Smith. "Those behavioral changes are significant, as our previous work has shown that they cause pumas to increase their kill rates by 36 percent in areas with high human activity."

This is the first study to experimentally link the fear of humans to feeding behavior in large carnivores, said Chris Wilmers, associate professor of environmental studies at UC Santa Cruz and a senior author on the study.

"Fear is the mechanism behind an ecological cascade that goes from humans to pumas to increased puma predation on deer," said Wilmers, a wildlife ecologist who studies the cascading effects large carnivores can have on their prey. "We're seeing that human disturbancebeyond huntingmay alter the ecological role of large carnivores. As we encroach on lion habitat, our presence will likely affect the link between top predators and their prey."

The experiment was part of a long-term study of puma ecology in the Santa Cruz Mountains that began in 2008.

All 17 pumas in this study have housing developments in their home range, and exposure to humans is commonplace. Kill sites were identified with data transmitted from GPS-monitoring collars worn by pumas that have been captured, collared, and released as part of the project.

In addition to Smith and Wilmers, coauthors include Justin Suraci and Ayana Crawford at UC Santa Cruz, and Michael Clinchy, Devin Roberts, and Liana Zanette at Western University in Canada.

See the original post here:
Mountain lions fear humans, UC Santa Cruz study reveals - KSBW The Central Coast

How Far Have You Gone to Curtail Human’s Nefarious Activities? – The Good Men Project (blog)

Humans are the most complicated being on earth. The state (good, bad or worst) of the world today is totally dependent on the activities of humans. Human behavior is dynamic and can be hardly studied for future outcome. This is because there are some factors (social, economic, political and environmental) that can influence a persons behavior at a given period.

This simply explains why humans have different motives per time; some individuals are planning on safeguarding the lives and property in a particular society, while others are planning to execute terrorist act. It also explains how some top leaders are planning to make the world a better place by helping the needy and refugees while others are building nuclear weapon program worth billions of Dollars for the destruction of mankind.

I am narrowing this perspective of human behavior to workplace environment based on personal experience. Apart from capital and machineries, good employees are the most important organizational valuable resources. But, on the contrary, immoral employees are business worst nightmares especially when it is difficult to identify and flush them out of your organization.

It came to a period in my company where profit was declining despite a steady rise in the number of customers and increased sales. One didnt need to tell me that something is wrong somewhere. The workers were productive and showing great zeal to achieving stated goals, but I knew that someone somewhere was exploiting my companys loopholes.

One major thought on my mind then was; problem identification. This is because. without identifying where the problem is, there is no way you can solve it. It was not quite long when I started to spy on iPhone text messages that I uncovered some nefarious activities of my staff.

Firstly, the companys products were overloaded in each truck. More than 10 packs were not accounted for per day. This is simply connivance between the supervisor, security personnel and the customers. Secondly, the companys vehicles were most times used for private purposes; i.e. transporting heavy duty goods to other locations. Thirdly, fifteen liters of fuel was bought per day instead of the stipulated twenty liters.

Putting round pegs on round hole was my first action. This entails sacking the most unscrupulous staff and redeploying others. Immoral employees are like virus; they have the capacity to negatively affect the good ones. Hence keeping them is like wanting your organizations growth to be stalled.

By redeployment, I selected employees that, with the best of my knowledge and good judgment, can maintain a high sense of integrity in handling organizational resources.

Theorganizations employees monitoring program was intensified. Instead of quarterly performance appraisal program, a more proactive performance management program was introduced. This was geared towards evaluating the daily workers input. Employees monitoring software and spy camera were also installed in the organization to have real time activities of workers.

By laying off the bad eggs which were cogs in the wheels of my organizations progress, there was need to hire. In doing this, I paid adequate attention on past behavior of the applicants. According to study, past behavior is the best predictor of future behavior, so capturing reliable data on candidates reputation isthebest way of evaluating their integrity. Unless we do so, immoral behaviors will remain the silent killer of individual careers and organizational effectiveness.

In conclusion, humans have good or evil motives. One needs to be extremely careful when dealing with your fellow individuals because you do not know who wants you down and whose gat your back covered. The more effort you put to curtail humans nefarious activities, the safer the world would be for us to dwell.

Get the best stories from The Good Men Project delivered straight to your inbox, here.

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Richard Agu is a speaker and freelance writer passionate about entrepreneurship, business start-ups, Self development, sports and health. He co-owns a blog that specializes on dishing out quality skin care tips.

Read more here:
How Far Have You Gone to Curtail Human's Nefarious Activities? - The Good Men Project (blog)

High-fat diet leads to same intestinal inflammation as a virus – UCLA Newsroom

FINDINGS

A new study by scientists at UCLA found that when mice eat a high-fat diet, the cells in their small intestines respond the same way they do to a viral infection, turning up production of certain immune molecules and causing inflammation throughout the body. The scientists also found that feeding the mice tomatoes containing a protein similar to that in HDL, or good cholesterol, along with the generic cholesterol drug Ezetimibe, reversed the inflammation.

The results could lead to new types of drugs, targeting the intestinal cells, to reduce peoples risk of heart attacks and strokes, or to treat other conditions linked to inflammation, including cancer and inflammatory bowel disease.

Researchers already knew that prolonged obesity can cause inflammation of the liver and fat tissues, and that this inflammation contributes to the development of diabetes and heart disease. Studies have also shown that higher levels of high-density lipoprotein, or HDL, cholesterol, reduces a persons risk of heart disease.

The UCLA research team, led by Alan Fogelman, chair of the department of medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,previously developed genetically engineered tomatoes that contained 6F, a protein resembling the main protein in high-density lipoprotein. In early experiments on 6F, they found that the compound was active in the small intestines of mice, and that it reduced inflammation. But exactly how it did this was unclear.

The scientists fed either a standard chow or a high-fat, high-cholesterol Western diet to mice that were especially prone to developing clogged arteries. They also treated some of the mice with either 6F, in the form of a tomato concentrate containing the protein, Ezetimibe, or both. After two weeks, cells from the small intestines of the mice were collected and blood samples were taken. The researchers measured cholesterol levels as well as the levels of inflammatory and immune molecules in both the intestines and throughout the body.

The findings shed light on the molecular details of how high-fat diets cause inflammation in the body, by making the intestines activate the pathway normally triggered by a virus. This suggests that blocking this immune reaction as 6F and Ezetimibe do may treat inflammatory diseases and decrease peoples risk of heart attack and stroke.

The authors of the study are all faculty and researchers at UCLA, affiliated with the Department of Medicine; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology; Department of Human Genetics; Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Molecular Genetics; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior; and Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology. The first author is Pallavi Mukherjee; Fogelman is the senior author.

The studywas published June 7, 2017, in the Journal of Lipid Research.

The study was funded by the United States Public Health Service (2P01 HL-30568) and the Castera, Laubisch, and Milt Grey funds at UCLA.

Alan Fogelman, Mohamad Navab and Srinivasa Reddy are principals in Bruin Pharma, which is working to commercialize apoA-I mimetics, including the 6F peptide studied in this paper; Fogelman is additionally an officer of the company.

Read the rest here:
High-fat diet leads to same intestinal inflammation as a virus - UCLA Newsroom

The Reason for Human Reason – Catholic Culture

By Fr. Jerry Pokorsky (bio - articles - email) | Jun 21, 2017

There is no contradiction between faith and reason, faith and science.Both share the same Author.Without contradiction, faith grasps truths that are beyond the reach of science.

There can be no earthly scientific proof of the Resurrection of Jesus, for example, just as there can be no scientific proof of Transubstantiation- the dogma of the Faith that mere bread and wine become the precious Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ at every Mass. Yet the Church infallibly teach these as dogmas of faith.Should we expect scientists- or any group of scientists- to share the same charism of infallibility?

We rightly tend to trust doctors, despite the many uncertainties in the medical profession.Most of us are living longer today because of science. Science can significantly improve the quality of life; but if abused, science can be used to destroy on a massive scale.Furthermore, scientific stud and the use of sciencewill forever remain prone to error, hitting a home run here and there, striking out on other occasions.

Yet many have more faith in science than in Gods revelation, even when experience suggests caution. In the 1960s, as many will recall, we were told that margarine was far healthier than butter.Now butter is said to be much healthier than margarine.Go figure.Newtons theories of physics were updated and somewhat replaced by Einsteins theory of relativity. Now scientists are calling into question some of the details of Einsteins theories.After all, E=mc2 can only go so far in explaining reality.

Darwins theory of evolution remains for many an enduring infallible dogma of science.Does scientific evidence truly support the theory?Genetic DNA configurations are fragile. Genetic mutations are necessary for significant changes in an organism.But the evidence accumulated by some scientists suggests mutations only result in deformation and death, not cross-species evolution.

Did evolution take place in increments?Are some races more human than others?Nazi Germany claimed to represent the master race because the Nazis placed themselves ahead of the curve in the evolutionary process. On the other hand, is there evidence of a widespread evolutionary leap from one species (monkeys, for example)en masseto the human species? If so, what is the scientific evidence?

Our faith teaches us that God created the world and His creation is good.He created the land and the sky and the animals. And my theory is that God created monkeys and many other creatures for our amusement and affection.Animals in so many ways are designed to be metaphors of human behavior and quite charming to behold: think of the comical behavior of monkeys in a zoo and the play of dolphins in the sea.These are subjective, not scientific observations, I realize.But scientific inquiry will never persuade me that the wildly funny beaks of birds have only a functional or evolutionary purpose.Thats my theory, anywayin search of empirical evidence which I recognize would be impossible to find.

As science authentically studies nature, many more mysteries unfold.The fascinating scientific reports from the Mars Exploration Rover, for instance, raise more questions than they resolve.Ultimately, science is the study of ever-expanding and never-ending mysteries. I think every honest scientist would agree.

There are those who say there is no scientific basis for the dogmas of the Catholic faith beyond the little that is supplied by archaeological digs and historical reporting.From the point of view of the empirical scientific method, this is true.But the fact that the mysteries of our faith are not accessible by science, does not mean faith is false or that it is opposed to science.The smile of a child is wonderful and mysterious, no matter how many brain waves and facial muscles are analyzed by science.The mystery of life with God as its Author will never be entirely grasped by our weak human reason.

But with Gods grace and with the eyes of faith we can delight in Gods revelation and more quickly grasp the meaning of the results of scientific inquiry.The study of science is the study of Gods handiwork.

Through faith in God's revelation, we move beyond the limitations of the physical world and with faith, we insist that the Eucharist is the source and summit of our life.On the authority of Jesus Himself, the Word is made flesh at every Mass and Christ feeds us with His sacred Body and Blood. Scientific analysis cannot prove the Divinity of the consecrated bread and wine any more than a scientific analysis can prove the existence of our immortal souls. To believe, we need a competent authority to tell us.And God cannot deceive.

But notice what these facts of faith do for us.The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature. (2 Peter 1-4). "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God." (Saint Athanasius)"The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."(Saint Thomas Aquinas)And best of all, This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever." (John 6:58)

Human reason and science are not obliterated or contradicted; human reason and science are elevated by faith and Gods grace. In believing and loving God, we are better able to love others.In union with Christ, we become more human in virtue, as intended by God.This is why we rejoice in Holy Communion and testify to our belief in the Real Presence.

Our faith in Jesus and His Real Presence gives us the reason for human reason.

Sound Off! CatholicCulture.org supporters weigh in.

All comments are moderated. To lighten our editing burden, only current donors are allowed to Sound Off. If you are a donor, log in to see the comment form; otherwise please support our work, and Sound Off!

There are no comments yet for this item.

View post:
The Reason for Human Reason - Catholic Culture

Mountain Lions Are Terrified of Humansand That’s a Problem – Gizmodo

This puma (not involved in the study) fed on a single deer for five days. New research suggests these feedings can be interrupted by the pumas fear of humans, requiring them to hunt more often. (Image: Jon Nelson/Flickr)

We typically think of large predatory animals like mountain lions as fearless beasts thatll stop at nothing to procure a mealeven if that meal consists of human flesh. New research suggests that this view is wrong, and that big cats dont like to bump into us any more than we like to bump into them. Problem is, this fear of humans is altering the feeding behavior of big carnivores, and that may not be a good thing.

A study published led by by scientists from UC Santa Cruz and Western University in London, Ontario and published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, suggests that mountain lions in the Santa Cruz mountains, sometimes known as pumas or cougars, are spooked by the sound of human voices. These fearful encounters are causing the carnivores to flee their kill sites. Afterwards, some pumasalbeit very slowly and cautiouslywill return to their fallen prey, resulting in a 50 percent reduction in their feeding time on average. To make up for these lost meals, the pumas have to kill more deer, which often requires them to encroach upon human settings. In other words, fear of humans is altering puma behavior, and subsequently, their role in the ecosystem.

Big carnivores are scary, both to humans and the animals they prey upon. But as a new study

Were increasingly learning that large carnivores like pumas and wolves are critical to the health and stability of ecosystems. Last year, similar work by the same team of researchers confirmed a long-held notion that carnivores perform an important role in ecosystems by inducing fear in their prey. The presence of large predatory animals, the study showed, generates a landscape of fear that alters the feeding behavior of prey animals, which subsequently influences their impacts on other species down the food chain.

What this new study shows is that large carnivores like pumas can experience an almost identical situation, living within a landscape of fear generated by human activity that in turn affects the large carnivores relationship with its preyin this case, deer, said study co-author Justin Suraci in an interview with Gizmodo.

To assess a potential fear response in large carnivores, the researchers placed audio equipment at puma kill sites in the Santa Cruz mountains. Whenever a puma came to feed, its movements triggered a device that broadcast recordings of people having conversations at natural volumes. The researchers used recordings of Pacific tree frog vocalizations as a control.

A hidden camera captured images of the animals responses, revealing that pumas almost always run away from human voices, but practically never from the sounds of frogs. Across 20 experiments involving 17 pumas, 83 percent of pumas fled when exposed to human voices, and only one puma ran away when hearing frogs (wow, that must be one nervous puma).

Revealingly, pumas took longer to return to their kills after hearing human voices, reducing their feeding on these kills by half. Previous work from these scientists revealed higher kill rates of deer in more urbanized settings, and this finding is finally offering a plausible explanation as to why. Unable to eat the entire carcass in peace, the pumas are forced to kill more deer, which ironically often leads them into contact with more humans. More dead deer may seem trivial, perhaps even potentially beneficial, but the change in hunting habits could be altering the ecosystem in unexpected ways. There are often downstream effects to considerbut future work will have to suss this out.

To our knowledge this is the first direct experimental test of whether large carnivores respond fearfully to human presence, and whether this response has measurable ecological consequences, write the researchers in their study.

That mountain lions fear humans may come as a surprise to some, but theres good reason for this behavior.

For many large carnivore populations (including the pumas in our study area), humans are a primary source of mortality, and this is nothing new, said Suraci. People have been persecuting big, scary predators for thousands of years because of perceived threats to human life and livelihoods (e.g., shared prey such as big game or livestock), and pumas have been almost completely wiped out across much of North America over the past couple of centuries. Indeed several states offered bounties to kill pumas well into the 1960s. So there is plenty of cause for pumas to fear humans.

As to how pumas learn this behavior, Suraci says thats a much trickier question. All of the pumas in their study had some form of human habitation or development within their home range, and were likely to have experienced interactionssome of them potentially negativewith people. Suraci says it may also be the case that puma kittens, who spend up to a year with their mom, learn appropriate human avoidance behavior from her.

But in short, we really dont know exactly how they develop their fear of humans, he said. That they do behave fearfully towards humans, however, may be beneficial for both pumas and people, as pumas may actively try to avoid interactions with humans, reducing the likelihood of human-wildlife conflict.

It may seem counterintuitive and even dangerous to maintain populations of large carnivorous animals, but Suraci says theyre important for maintaining balanced ecosystems, preventing outbreaks of smaller predators (e.g. raccoons and coyotes) and large herbivores (e.g., deer) that act as pests to humans and can devastate biodiversity when unchecked.

What our study shows is that just having the large carnivores present may not be sufficient to allow them to fulfill this important role, if the fear of humans is changing the way they interact with their prey, he said. We need to consider how our own activities affect not just species abundance but also behavior if we want to maintain healthy ecosystems.

[Proceedings of the Royal Society B]

See the original post here:
Mountain Lions Are Terrified of Humansand That's a Problem - Gizmodo