Category Archives: Immunology

Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology Report 2017 – Large Therapy Area Pipeline with a High Degree of … – Yahoo Finance

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology - Large Therapy Area Pipeline with a High Degree of Repositioning Potential" drug pipelines to their offering.

Immunology is a large therapy area characterized by disorders of the immune system - specifically an aberrant immune response against healthy tissues present in the body, leading to chronic or acute inflammation. Depending on the specific site affected, this can lead to various types of chronic pain and loss of mobility, and have a negative impact on quality of life.

This disease area has a total of 2,145 products in active development, trailing only oncology, infectious diseases and central nervous system disorders in terms of pipeline size. There are a total of 529 immunology pipeline products that act on first-in-class molecular targets, representing approximately 40% of the total immunology pipeline for which the molecular target was disclosed.

Due to a degree of crossover between immunology indications in terms of their underlying pathophysiology, it is not uncommon for products being developed for this therapy area to have developmental programs testing them across multiple indications.

Approximately one-fifth of first-in-class pipeline products are in development for two or more indications within the therapy area. This presents an opportunity for companies to develop innovative products across multiple immune disorders, and therefore reach a larger pool of patients than products developed for single indications.

Scope

- What are the key points of overlap in the pathophysiology of immune disorders?

- What is the current standard of treatment across these markets, and what lessons can be learned by companies seeking to innovate and build on these products?

- Which molecule types and molecular targets are most prominent within the pipeline?

- Which first-in-class targets are most promising?

- Do immunology products attract high deal values, and which specific product types are able to attract the highest values?

- Which molecule types and molecular targets dominate the deals landscape?

Key Topics Covered:

1 Table of Contents

2 Executive Summary

3 The Case for Innovation in the Immunology Market

4 Introduction

5 Pipeline Landscape Assessment

6 Immunology Signaling Network, Disease Causation and Innovation Alignment

7 First-in-Class Target and Pipeline Program Evaluation

8 Strategic Consolidations

9 Appendix

For more information about this drug pipelines report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/z8fppq/frontier_pharma

View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20170221005737/en/

Go here to see the original:
Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology Report 2017 - Large Therapy Area Pipeline with a High Degree of ... - Yahoo Finance

Remicade: Driving Down Merck’s Immunology Franchise – Market Realist

Merck and Companys Valuation after Its 4Q16 Earnings Release PART 6 OF 10

One of Merck and Co.s (MRK) blockbuster drugs, Remicade is one of the top-selling drugs for the treatment of inflammatory disorders. However, after the loss of exclusivity in the European markets in February 2015, Merck has reported a consistent decline in Remicade revenues. Apart from Merck, Johnson &Johnson (JNJ) also has marketing rights for Remicade in several countries outside Europe.

Remicades revenues fell~32% to $269 million in 4Q16, compared to $396 million in 4Q15. This was mainly due to the entry of generic competitors and biosimilars following the loss of exclusivity in European markets.

Merck expects Remicades revenues to keep declining as a growing number of new patients prefer biosimilars over Remicade.

Apart from Remicade, Simponi is a drug from the Inflammatory franchise. Simponis revenues remained flat at ~$186 million in 4Q16, compared to its 4Q15 revenues of $185 million.

Zetia and Vytorin are the blockbuster drugs from Mercks Cardiovascular franchise. Both drugs are used to lower LDL cholesterol levels in the blood.

The combined revenues for these drugs fell to $874 million in 4Q16. For the US markets, the sales for Zetia declined in 4Q16 while the sales for Vytorin grew. Worldwide sales were affected due to loss of exclusivity of Vytorin in the US, while Zetia sales were nearly constant for 4Q16 compared to 4Q15.

The competitors for Zetia include Niaspan from AbbVie (ABBV) and Lipitor from Pfizer (PFE). Investors can consider the VanEck Vectors Pharmaceutical ETF (PPH), which holds ~5.2% of its total assets in Merck.

View post:
Remicade: Driving Down Merck's Immunology Franchise - Market Realist

Majoring in defense: UAB’s new Undergraduate Immunology Program – The Mix

It doesnt matter whether you live in Beverly Hills or a Brazilian favela every human being is only a few inches away from disaster. From birth to death, on our arms, legs and everywhere else, each of us carries microbes that would love to get under our skin and reproduce, with potentially fatal results. A paper cut, an insect bite, an untimely rubbing of the eyes it takes very little for bacteria, viruses and other invaders to get inside and start wreaking havoc.

When that happens, the invaders are quickly surrounded by some of the billions of immune cells on constant patrol in our bodies. This finely coordinated attack is more complex than any human military organization. The immune system can be divided into two main categories innate and adaptive but there are LOTS of subdivisions: macrophages, natural killer cells, granulocytes, neutrophils, T and B cells, plasma cells, memory cells, regulatory T cells and so on. The list is long, and growing longer all the time with new discoveries. In recent years, researchers have learned how to target specific immune cells in new treatments for everything from cancer to rheumatoid arthritis. But there is much more to do.

Every year, hundreds of thousands of people die from infection by HIV, tuberculosis and the malaria-causing parasite Plasmodium. Although new checkpoint inhibitors have extended the lives of Jimmy Carter and many others, much more research is needed to help the 7+ million people worldwide who die each year from cancer. And heart disease, the leading cause of death on the planet, has a strong immune component as well.

Essentially all human diseases have an immune component, says Frances Lund, Ph.D., chair of the UAB School of Medicine Department of Microbiology. The future cures or treatments for many of the diseases that are of national and global concern will be dependent on our ability to successfully modulate the immune system.

With UABs new Undergraduate Immunology Program, which launches in fall 2017, students get a front-row seat to the life-and-death struggle going on inside us all and an ideal springboard for careers in medicine, academic research, industry and more. This is a cutting-edge major, says Louis Justement, Ph.D., director of the program, and a professor in the microbiology department. Students will get comprehensive experience in the scientific process, critical thinking, problem solving, scientific methodology and in communicating science. Our goal is to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of the future and build up a pipeline of young immunologists to tackle the pressing problems of the 21st century.

Louis Justement, Ph.D. (School of Medicine) and Vithal Ghanta, Ph.D. (College of Arts and Sciences) are veteran researchers and educators of young scientists. "This is a cutting-edge major," Justement says. "Our goal is to prepare students for the challenges and opportunities of the future."

The Undergraduate Immunology Program is the only one of its kind in the Southeast, and one of a handful in the country, notes Vithal Ghanta, Ph.D., the programs co-director and a professor in the UAB College of Arts and SciencesDepartment of Biology. It is modeled on UABs Undergraduate Neuroscience Program, which has attracted elite students from across the country over the past eight years. Both programs are interdepartmental majors between the College of Arts and Sciences and School of Medicine.

This represents a true collaboration between the departments of Biology and Microbiology, says Lund. We believe that this unique educational opportunity will not only attract students who are passionate about science and medicine, but will perfectly prepare those students to take on the scientific and clinical challenges of the 21st century here in Alabama and across the world.

There are more than 100 faculty at UAB focusing on basic or clinical immunology, in 15 departments and four schools. Immunology and infectious diseases research at UAB is supported by $182 million in federal funding. Immunology has always been one of the strongest areas of research here, Justement says. Students will be able to choose among research opportunities in dozens of UAB labs, contributing to work that is targeting everything from cancer vaccines to next-generation asthma treatments. Students coming through our program have the ability to be integral members of labs across campus, Ghanta says. They can start as early as the freshman year, depending on their experience and ability to handle other coursework. By their junior year, all students in the major will be required to begin working in a UAB lab.

The interaction between the College of Arts and Sciences and School of Medicine faculty is critical, Justement says. Vithal and her colleagues know exactly how to work with undergraduates and help them learn. Meanwhile, Justement has years of experience preparing leaders in the lab as associate director of UABs Medical Scientist Training Program. People like me on the graduate side, since we are constantly working with graduate students and medical students, know what it takes to succeed in those arenas, and have insight on how curricula can prepare undergraduates to achieve, he says.

Our goal is to give undergraduate students a very solid foundation, adds Ghanta. They will be exposed to the various sub-fields of immunology in graduate school or medical school; we want to make sure they have a solid foundation to build on. Ghanta has taught a popular undergraduate immunology course in the Department of Biology for years. She says she regularly gets emails from former students who are now in medical school, letting me know that having this undergraduate immunology really helps them."

More than 100 faculty at UAB focus on basic or clinical immunology, in 15 departments and four schools, with $182 million in federal research support.

The first two years of the program are largely focused on overall university requirements and foundational science courses. But in order to let students jump right in, Justement and Ghanta have designed Current Topics in Immunology, a teaser course that shines new light on hot topics in the media. Justement says hell tell the story of a doctor who was cured of Ebola but then almost lost his vision later, because the virus was able to survive within his eyes. The reason is these are immune-privileged sites that need to be protected from the immune response, and it turns out the pathogen is able to take advantage of this, he says.

In their second year, students will take part in a seminar where investigators from across the university will share details on research in their labs. The students will get an idea of whose work sounds neat, who they would want to work with and why its important, Justement says.

In their junior and senior years, students in the program will take in-depth courses that delve into the fundamental cellular and molecular processes that control the immune response. This will provide them with a solid appreciation of how the immune system works as a whole, Ghanta says. Then, she adds, students will build on this knowledge by further exploring the interactions between the immune system and pathogens that try to subvert, or escape, the normal surveillance mechanisms used to detect and destroy them. Finally, students will learn about the dark side of the immune response, Justement says. When things go wrong it leads to numerous life-threatening diseases, including autoimmunity, asthma and chronic inflammation that in turn can cause heart disease, diabetes or cancer.

Essentially all human diseases have an immune component. The future cures or treatments for many of the diseases that are of national and global concern will be dependent on our ability to successfully modulate the immune system. Frances Lund, Ph.D., chair of the UAB Department of Microbiology.

Justement and Ghanta have formed a committee with the directors of the Undergraduate Neuroscience Program and leaders of the recently launched Undergraduate Program in Genetic and Genomic Sciences, and a new major in informatics that is now being developed. Soon, UAB will be able to offer students a suite of biomedical undergraduate programs, Justement says, all well suited to preparing them for professional and graduate school."

There are many opportunities to cross-fertilize among the specialties, Justement adds. There is neuro-immunology, tumor immunology and bioinformatics, just to name a few, he says. Students will be able to tailor their studies to the areas where they have the most interest. Well be able to make an amazing, unique educational experience even better.

The Undergraduate Immunology Program will help retain top students from the Birmingham area, and throughout Alabama, Justement says. But were also looking to expand our national footprint. UAB is creating a unique position in the world of undergraduate education."

Here is the original post:
Majoring in defense: UAB's new Undergraduate Immunology Program - The Mix

Immunology Space Attracting High Levels of Investment – Drug Discovery & Development

With a total of 2,145 products currently in development, the immunology market is experiencing a high level of investment compared to many other therapy areas, and companies working within it are seeking to build on the clinical and commercial success of marketed products such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-) inhibitors, according to business intelligence provider GBI Research.

The companyslatest reportstates that, within immunology, the largest pipeline segments are general treatment of inflammation, with 510 products currently in development, and rheumatoid arthritis, with 488. Additionally, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, transplantation, ulcerative colitis, lupus, and allergies are all substantial indications with over 100 pipeline products in development.

The immunology pipeline is highly diverse in terms of molecule type. Unlike the market, which is mostly limited to small molecules, the pipeline contains a wide range of other molecule types including monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), gene therapies, vaccines, and cell therapies.

Due to a degree of crossover between immunology indications in terms of their underlying pathophysiology, it is not uncommon for pipeline products to undergo developmental programs testing them across multiple indications. The majority of first-in-class pipeline products are being developed for a single indication, but approximately a fifth are in development for two or more indications within the therapy area.

While small molecules account for 91% of marketed products, they comprise only 43% of the pipeline. Both mAbs and proteins account for a much higher proportion of the pipeline than the market, and a number of other molecules that do not yet have a presence in the market, such as gene therapies, vaccines, and cell-based therapies, have a well-established presence in the pipeline, that is not limited to the early stages of development.

In terms of the market landscape, a total of 497 licensing deals and 433 co-development deals in the immunology therapy area were identified as having been completed between 2006 and 2016, with a combined aggregate value of $46 billion.

This high level of deal-making activity is indicative of a strong willingness on the part of pharmaceutical companies to engage in strategic consolidations in order to mitigate some of the risks associated with drug development in the immunology therapy area. Considering the very strong commercial performance of products in the immunology market, companies have a meaningful incentive to invest in such products.

Follow this link:
Immunology Space Attracting High Levels of Investment - Drug Discovery & Development

Immunology in perspective – OUPblog (blog)

Among students of science, in contrast to those who do science, the dominant discussion revolves around the degree to which scientific interpretations are subject to extra-curricular influences, specifically, to what extent are facts independent of the larger political context in which science resides. (Political refers to the economic costs and benefits measured as improved health, productivity, military defense, etc.; promotion of ideological commitments; corporate advancement; social flourishing, and the like.) The question is not just applicable to understanding how science makes its truth claims, but represents a general quandary: Scientists, historians, lawyersall citizensconstantly face the task of drawing the line around credible disputes over the standing of facts and their meaning, which ultimately determines their status as true. This matter is posed throughout our culture. Indeed, in whatever endeavor we engage, assumptions are made about the reality of our perceptions and the comprehension of our understanding. This question is the basic philosophical challenge that under-girds all forms of knowledge.

In regards to science, I will unpack this matter in two parts. First, a dictum: facts assume their meaning only within the theory or model in which they are placed. The movement of the stars have one understanding in a Ptolemaic universe and a very different one in a Copernican. This point places the foundation of the factual in a tentative position. This is not a weakness, for such skepticism is the basis of acknowledging the fallibility of scientific pursuits and the basis for the never-ending search for truth. The second dimension of this issue concerns the more ill-defined problem of how the social context in which science is embedded influences truth claims. In some sense this is a trivial point: Funding of research is determined by the economic costs and benefits measured as improved health, productivity, military defense, etc.; promotion of ideological commitments; corporate advancement; social flourishing, etc. But the question is the degree to which science is subject to less well-defined extra-curricular influences, i.e., how does science refract its larger political contextpolitical in its broadest connotations.

Putting aside the most egregious examples (Nazi racial science, Lysenko genetics, creationism), immunology illustrates this problem quite clearly: First, the self/nonself distinction that governs contemporary immune theory draws directly from commonly held notions of personal identity. Immunologists configure such identity in diverse ways, but, most obviously, immunity has been conceived as a discriminatory function. Given its historical development as a clinical science and the persistent demands of treating disease, immunologists have focused their study of the immune reaction in terms of its most activated staterejection of the other (which in turn defines the self). After all, the response to pathogens, if successful, by-and-large requires immune assault. The very language of warfare percolated into immune-talk with the discovery of infectious diseases. And the same terminology was then applied to autoimmune phenomena and immune tumor surveillance. Only in the context of evaluating the control mechanisms of this prominent arm of immunity was immune tolerance considered. And the notions of personal identity have been extended to the language of cognition (e.g. lymphocytes see antigens, possess memory, and learn), which makes the most direct reference to human being.

However, another subtle human orientation structures modern immunology, one less dominant than that marshaled by host defense, but nevertheless growing in influence. If we step outside the clinic, we recognize how immunity serves as the critical mediator of the organisms interactions within its environment. The immune system is basically a cognitive faculty, an information processor: The immune system perceives the world essentially as do animals employing olfactory and taste sensors, i.e., through molecular coupling of substances to specific receptors. The signals of such interactions are then processed in an ascending hierarchy of controls, and like the nervous system, the immune system responds to, or ignores, the universe it perceives. Simply stated, the immune system is like a mobile brain, and most of its work deals with mediating the animals intercourse with its environment, external and internal. And those interactions must invoke mechanisms to tolerate assimilative exchange.

About 20 years ago, those interested in this domain of immune function began calling their research, eco-immunology. The field is growing in many directions, but because of funding priorities such investigations are still largely tied to the defensive orientation of immunologys origins. But we require a more expansive view, for the immune system serves both to differentiate the self from the other,and to provide the gateway for assimilative, co-operative environmental relationships. The current interest in the microbiome, the holobiont, and symbiosis more generally is an expression of a biology that is moving from an insular organism-centered science to an ecological orientation, subordinating individuality to the communal.

Just as immunologists responded to the immediate problem of treating infectious diseases, the turn towards ecology is a response to a complex medley of challenges that have shifted focus from the individual patient to his larger environmental context. Although immunology is, in fact, a member of the environmental sciences viewed strictly with scientific criteria, that focus has remained subordinate to the clinical scenario. And in drawing away from an insular orientation, contextual immunology has asserted a compelling theoretical re-orientation. On this view, immunology is again reflecting broader cultural influences about personal identity, namely, immune theory (in part) derives its current ecological concerns from the larger political and social milieu in which individuality has been re-conceived. When considering immunologys Zeitgeist, immunologists who have joined, what I call the ecological imperative, have developed a heightened sense of the world defined not in terms of insular individualism, but rather in terms of a more global perspective. The focus on identity remains, but it has undergone a significant modification with deep repercussions for immune theory.

Two pervasive forces stimulating this re-alignment are at play: 1) the environmental crisis (if not a catastrophe) has placed us in a collective mind-set, and 2) the massive socio-political challenges arising from economic globalization and mass capitalism have displaced our private identities based on liberal political precepts with a growing cultural compass. The political consequences (e.g., the traumas of social-religious xenophobia, populism, resurgent nationalism, fundamentalism) and economic disruptions are obvious. These reactions to the blurring and redefining of identities testify to the power of these influences.

So, I see these pervasive forces insinuating their effects in the fundamental ways we conceive the world and our own identities. To the extent that immunology is the science of identity, the heretofore governing precepts of defining and protecting individuality are undergoing a shift to an ecological or contextual perspective. Recognizing how these social forces impact on our orientation to the world, our ways of understanding notions of selfhood, has become a constituent of immunologys theoretical orientation: comprehending the establishment and maintenance of symbiosis; discerning the organization and regulation of the resting immune system; discovering the mechanisms of tolerance that govern normal surveillance and exchange each reflect a contextual orientation and are commanding increasing attention.

Shedding notions of autonomy has deep repercussive effects, and the ecological imperative that has seeped into immunology reveals much about our thought collective. Simply, because of globalization and the growing environmental crisis, we have become more aware of the larger context in which we live. This is true not only in politics or economics, but also in science. Immunology is a vivid case in point of science and its supporting culture in dialogue.

Featured image:Applied immunology. Public domain via Wikimedia Commons.

Continue reading here:
Immunology in perspective - OUPblog (blog)

Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology – Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed Over the Past … – Yahoo Finance

DUBLIN, Feb 15, 2017 /PRNewswire/ --

Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology - Large Therapy Area Pipeline with a High Degree of Repositioning Potential" drug pipelines to their offering.

Research and Markets Logo

Immunology is a large therapy area characterized by disorders of the immune system - specifically an aberrant immune response against healthy tissues present in the body, leading to chronic or acute inflammation. Depending on the specific site affected, this can lead to various types of chronic pain and loss of mobility, and have a negative impact on quality of life.

This disease area has a total of 2,145 products in active development, trailing only oncology, infectious diseases and central nervous system disorders in terms of pipeline size. There are a total of 529 immunology pipeline products that act on first-in-class molecular targets, representing approximately 40% of the total immunology pipeline for which the molecular target was disclosed.

Due to a degree of crossover between immunology indications in terms of their underlying pathophysiology, it is not uncommon for products being developed for this therapy area to have developmental programs testing them across multiple indications.

Approximately one-fifth of first-in-class pipeline products are in development for two or more indications within the therapy area. This presents an opportunity for companies to develop innovative products across multiple immune disorders, and therefore reach a larger pool of patients than products developed for single indications.

Key Topics Covered:

1 Table of Contents

2 Executive Summary

2.1 Large Therapy Area Characterized by a High Degree of Pathophysiological Crossover

2.2 Strong Pipeline Shows High Level of Versatile Innovation

2.3 Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed over the Past Decade

3 The Case for Innovation in the Immunology Market

3.1 Growing Opportunities for Biologic Products

3.2 Diversification of Molecular Targets

3.3 Innovative First-in-Class Product Developments Remain Attractive

3.4 Regulatory and Reimbursement Policy Shifts Favor First-in-Class Product Innovation

3.5 Sustained Innovation

4 Introduction

4.1 Therapy Area Introduction

4.2 Symptoms

4.3 Etiology and Pathophysiology

4.3.1 Innate Immunity

4.3.2 Adaptive Immunity

4.3.3 The Role of Cytokines

4.3.4 Autoimmunity

4.3.5 Etiologic Factors for Autoimmunity and Allergies

4.3.6 Conclusion

4.4 Co-morbidities and Complications

4.5 Epidemiology

4.6 Treatment

4.6.1 Non-Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs

4.6.2 Glucocorticoids

4.6.3 Biologics and Targeted Therapies

5 Pipeline Landscape Assessment

5.1 Overview

5.2 Pipeline Development Landscape

5.3 Molecular Targets in the Pipeline

5.4 Comparative Distribution of Programs between the Oncology Market and Pipeline by Therapeutic Target Family

5.5 First-in-Class and Versatile Pipeline Programs

5.6 First-in-Class Immunology Products by Phase, Molecule Type and Molecular Target

5.7 Versatility of First-in-Class Pipeline Products

6 Immunology Signaling Network, Disease Causation and Innovation Alignment

6.1 Complexity of Signaling Networks

6.2 Signaling Pathways and First-in-Class Molecular Target Integration

6.3 First-in-Class Matrix Assessment

7 First-in-Class Target and Pipeline Program Evaluation

Read More

7.1 Pipeline Programs Targeting Toll-Like Receptors 3, 6 and 8

7.2 Pipeline Programs Targeting Spleen Tyrosine Kinase

7.3 Pipeline Programs Targeting IL-7R

7.4 Pipeline Programs Targeting C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 6

7.5 Pipeline Programs Targeting P2RX7

7.6 Pipeline Programs Targeting ITK

7.7 Pipeline Programs Targeting IRAK4

7.8 Pipeline Programs Targeting Orai1

7.9 Pipeline Programs Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily Member 5

7.10 Conclusion

8 Strategic Consolidations

8.1 Industry-Wide First-in-Class Deals

8.2 Licensing Deals

8.2.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value

8.2.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value

8.2.3 Deals by Molecule Type and Value

8.2.4 Deals by Molecular Target and Value

8.3 Co-development Deals

8.3.1 Deals by Region, Year and Value

8.3.2 Deals by Stage of Development and Value

8.3.3 Deals by Molecule Type and Value

8.3.4 Deals by Molecular Target and Value

8.4 List of First-in-Class Pipeline Products with and Without Prior Deal Involvement

9 Appendix

9.1 Abbreviations

9.2 References

9.3 Research Methodology

9.3.1 Data integrity

9.3.2 Innovative and meaningful analytical techniques and frameworks

9.3.3 Evidence based analysis and insight

9.4 Secondary Research

9.4.1 Market Analysis

9.4.2 Pipeline Analysis

9.4.3 Licensing and Co-development Deals

For more information about this drug pipelines report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/lgc9s8/frontier_pharma

Media Contact:

Research and Markets

Laura Wood, Senior Manager

press@researchandmarkets.com

For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470

For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630

For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900

U.S. Fax: 646-607-1907

Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716

To view the original version on PR Newswire, visit:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/frontier-pharma-versatile-innovation-in-immunology---substantial-deal-making-activity-observed-over-the-past-decade---research-and-markets-300407842.html

Read this article:
Frontier Pharma: Versatile Innovation in Immunology - Substantial Deal Making Activity Observed Over the Past ... - Yahoo Finance

Immunology Fair-Market Value Compensation Rates for US Health Care Providers: FMV/Fee Schedules for Thought … – Business Wire (press release)

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Research and Markets has announced the addition of the "Fair-Market Value Compensation Rates for U.S. Health Care Providers: FMV/Fee Schedules for Thought Leaders/KOLs - Immunology" report to their offering.

Fair-Market Value Compensation Rates for U.S. HCPs - Immunology presents hourly and half-day flat compensation rates for four (4) Thought Leader levels based on degree of influence. The analysis includes rates for six (6) specific activities as well as for other non-specified activities. The findings presented in this report result from the input from executives at 16 life science organizations.

This study presents fair-market value (FMV) compensation rates by percentiles, with averages, for six (6) activities as well as for non-specific activities, for four (4) levels of Thought Leader influences (rare, international, national and local).

Payments made to physicians and thought leaders have been under scrutiny for a few years and companies have been working to adjust their rates to level with industry standards. Adjustments to market rates should be done periodically and are best done through 3rd party research, providing a fair and balanced assessment of rates.

The research findings deliver markets rates used in the conduct of exchanges with Thought Leaders from 16 life science organizations. These payment benchmarks help legal, compliance and medical affair executives refine and support the development of fee schedules that are aligned with market conditions.

Key Topics Covered:

1. Research Methodology

2. Definitions

- Therapeutic Area

- Thought Leader Levels

- Salary Data versus Market Rates

- Hourly Rates

- Flat Rates

3. Flat Rates

- Advisory Board Lead

- Advisory Board Non-lead

- Consulting Scientific / Clinical Content

- Consulting Commercial Content

- Speaking Scientific / Clinical Content

- Speaking Commercial Content

- Other Activities

4. Hourly Rates

- Advisory Board Lead

- Advisory Board Non-lead

- Consulting Scientific / Clinical Content

- Consulting Commercial Content

- Speaking Scientific / Clinical Content

- Speaking Commercial Content

- Other Activities

For more information about this report visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/9429rg/fairmarket_value

Here is the original post:
Immunology Fair-Market Value Compensation Rates for US Health Care Providers: FMV/Fee Schedules for Thought ... - Business Wire (press release)

Study reveals new role for cancer drug in tumor immunology – News-Medical.net

February 13, 2017 at 2:23 AM

A drug first designed to prevent cancer cells from multiplying has a second effect: it switches immune cells that turn down the body's attack on tumors back into the kind that amplify it. This is the finding of a study led by researchers from NYU Langone Medical Center and published recently in Cancer Immunology Research.

According to experiments in mice, macrophages - immune cells that home in on tumors - take in the drug nab-paclitaxel (brand name Abraxane). Once inside these cells, say the study authors, the drug changes them so that they signal for an aggressive anti-tumor immune response.

"Our study reveals a previously unappreciated role for Abraxane in tumor immunology," says corresponding author Dafna Bar-Sagi, PhD, Vice Dean for Science and Chief Scientific Officer at NYU Langone.

"In doing so, it suggests ways to improve the drug and argues for its inclusion in new kinds of combination treatments," says Bar-Sagi, also a professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology at NYU Langone, and associated with its Perlmutter Cancer Center.

Abraxane over Paclitaxel

Abraxane is comprised of the decades-old cancer drug, paclitaxel, combined with nanoparticles of the protein albumin (nab). Paclitaxel alone is not effective against pancreatic cancer, but Abraxane (nab-paclitaxel) is part of a leading treatment for the disease. Why the albumin-bound form works better has been a major question in the field.

Paclitaxel prevents structures called microtubules inside cancer cells from breaking up, a required step if they are to multiply as part of abnormal growth. Many in the field assume that nab-paclitaxel too primarily targets microtubules in cancer cells, with albumin perhaps helping the drug to get inside cells, and with fewer toxic side-effects.

The new findings suggest that, on top of any effect on cancer cells, Abraxane's effectiveness may proceed from its impact on macrophages, which roam the bloodstream and build up in many tumors.

The study results revolve around the immune system, in which cells like macrophages trigger a massive attack on bacteria or other invading microbes. This system can also recognize and attack cancer cells. Factors secreted by tumor cells, however, dampen the immune response in part by switching macrophages from their immune-stimulating stance, termed M1, into an M2 mode that suppresses their immune function.

In experiments in macrophage cell lines, the study authors found that nab-paclitaxel is more effective than paclitaxel partly because albumin enables macrophages to take up the drug through a natural process called macropinocytosis.

Once inside macrophages, according to experiments in mice with pancreatic tumors, nab-paclitaxel causes the macrophages to switch from immune-suppressing M2 cells back into M1 cells that amplify the body's effort to kill cancer cells. Past studies had found that paclitaxel has a similar structure to substances given off by bacteria that trigger macrophage activation. The study authors show that the same pathway is evoked by nab-paclitaxel in pancreatic tumor-associated macrophages.

"Our findings argue that it may be possible to develop more treatments that selectively target macrophages by coupling albumin to immune-activating agents," said lead study author Jane Cullis, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in Bar-Sagi's lab. "We may also be able to adjust albumin's structure such that drugs attached to it stay in macrophages longer, or combine Abraxane with T-cell treatments for greater therapeutic effect. In principle, such treatments should be useful against the many tumor types infiltrated by macrophages."

Continue reading here:
Study reveals new role for cancer drug in tumor immunology - News-Medical.net

Best Treatment For Warts? Candida Antigen Immunology Injection Works Better And Faster Than Freezing – Medical Daily

Warts are a common butannoying health problem affliciting countless peopleworldwide. Cryotherapy traditionally has been regarded as the most effect wart removal treatment, but new research from the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Iransuggests that aninjection of candida antigen, a type of immunotherapy,may be able to get rid of warts faster and keep them away.

The study, now published online in International Journal of Dermatology,found that 76.7 percent of patients with either a verruca vulgaris wart (found anywhere on the body) or a plantar wart (found on the bottom of feet) were cured with immunotherapy, compared to only 56.7 percent of wart patients treated with cryotherapy. In addition, patients who recieved immunotherapy were cured with fewer sessions than those whose warts were frozen off.

Read: 'Tree Man' Finally Gets Surgery To Remove Warts Caused By Rare Genetic Disease Epidermodysplasia Verruciformis

"Intralesional immunotherapy is an effective treatment of warts," the authors wrote, according to a post on Medical Xpress. "This method has a better therapeutic response, needs fewer sessions, and is capable of treating distant warts."

Plantar warts, or warts found on the bottoms of feet, are common, especially among children. Photo Courtesy of Pixabay

For the study, 60 patients with either a body or footwart were divided into two groups. The first group recieved an immunotherapy treatment consistingof an injection of candida antigen into their warts every three weeks until complete improvement or a maximum of three sessions. The second group recieved cryotherapy consisting of liquid nitrogen for a maximum of 10 weeks of until the wart had completely cleared.

Warts occur when your skin comes in contact with one of the many viruses classifed as human papillomavirus. In most cases, warts are harmless causing little more than slight discomfort and embarrassment. According to WebMD, they are very contagious, and can spread not only from person to person but also from one part of the body to another.

While some warts can go away on their own, for the most part they need to be treated. Cryotherapy is the standard treatment for warts and involves freezing a wart using a very cold substance, usually liquid nitrogen. The treatment is often painful and may need several tries before the wart is completely removed. This treatment also comes with the risk of possible scarring.

Candida antigen injections are a relatively new treatment option for wart removal, and this is not the first time its success in wart thereapy has been documented. However, as reported by Dermotology News, this treatment also comes with its own set of possible side effects and may cause discomfort, redness, and swelling.

Source: Khozeimeh F, Jabbari F, Mahboubi Oskouei Y, et al. Intralesional immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy in the treatment of warts. International Journal of Dermatology. 2017

See Also:

Warts More Likely Contracted From Home, Not Public Hotspots

After HPV Vaccinations Rates of Genital Warts Decline Significantly in Women, but Not Men

Read the original:
Best Treatment For Warts? Candida Antigen Immunology Injection Works Better And Faster Than Freezing - Medical Daily

Immunology takes new approach to beating cancer – The Advocate

Two years after she was diagnosed with stage 4 lung cancer, Wanda Poche has a hard time believing she ever had the disease.

"I always felt like from the date I was diagnosed that I didn't have cancer," she said.

The 65-year-old woman is cancer-free after receiving a newly developed treatment that uses the body's immune system to fight the disease.

Immunotherapy, doctors say, is an innovative advancement that could change the way certain cancers are viewed.

"Everybody's excited about it," said Dr. Vince Cataldo, an oncologist at Mary Bird Perkins Our Lady of the Cancer Center in Baton Rouge. "We're definitely on the forefront."

Chemotherapy attacks a cancer cell's DNA to stop the cell from dividing, thereby stopping the cancer's growth. Traditional chemotherapy "tears the immune system apart," Cataldo said.

"It suppresses the immune system, and people's biggest side effects from chemotherapy are the risk of infection because there is no immune system," he said.

Immunotherapy tries to "make the immune system smarter," he said.

Normally, the body's immune system remains inactive until it needs to fight a threat. But our bodies put the brakes on the immune system to slow it down. An unchecked immune response can eventually kill you.

The new immunotherapy cancer drugs remove those brakes, Cataldo said.

"It has truly changed the way we fight multiple diseases," Cataldo said.

Some prominent drugs, like the one Poche received, target certain cancer cells to make them prone to damage from the immune system.

Cataldo explained that the cancer cells have a receptor similar to an antenna. The immunotherapy drugs block that antenna and allow the immune system to attack the cells.

Poche's battle started in October of 2014 with what she thought was a nagging sinus infection. Her doctor took a chest X-ray and found lung cancer. Because she had quit smoking decades before, Poche was surprised.

"I never expected that," she said. "All through this, I never had shortness of breath. I could always climb stairs. I've always been pretty healthy."

But her cancer had spread to her adrenal gland and lymph nodes. The ear, nose and throat doctor had saved her life, she said.

After months of different chemotherapy treatments, Poche was making no progress against the tumors. Cataldo decided she would be a candidate for a trial of a drug marketed as OPDIVO.

Poche had no side effects from the drug, which Cataldo said is common.

"It doesn't beat up the immune system," he said. "We don't normally see hair loss. We don't typically see vomiting."

After 15 months of IV infusions, there were no signs of Poche's tumors in an August scan. Last month she had a full-body scan, and the cancer had not returned.

"It was still showing clear," she said. "God is great."

Poche will take the treatments every two weeks for the foreseeable future to stop the cancer from returning. But that's a small price to pay, she said.

While immunotherapy works well for lung cancer, it doesn't treat all cancers. This class of drug has been approved to treat kidney cancer, melanoma and Hodgkin lymphoma in addition to lung cancer, diseases that "have nothing in common," Cataldo said.

But the therapy doesn't work for everyone. Patients who have autoimmune disorders like rheumatoid arthritis or lupus may experience harsh side effects.

Doctors are hopeful that more cancers can be treated with this type of drug.

"Cancer centers are looking for new indications, and they're doing cutting-edge clinical trials to see what the next one is going to be," Cataldo said.

Follow Kyle Peveto on Twitter, @kylepeveto.

Read the original:
Immunology takes new approach to beating cancer - The Advocate