Category Archives: Neuroscience

Innovative Fiber to Tackle Alzheimer’s Developed – Neuroscience News

Summary: A collaborative team is developing a neural fiber to combat Alzheimers disease. This high-priority NIH-funded project aims to create a minimally invasive fiber, capable of electrical stimulation and drug delivery, to study and potentially reverse memory loss.

The fiber will enable detailed imaging and analysis of amyloid deposits in the brain, a key factor in Alzheimers. With a one-year deadline, this ambitious project could revolutionize our approach to understanding and treating Alzheimers.

Key Facts:

Source: Virginia Tech

Every 65 seconds, someone in the United States develops Alzheimers disease, a devastating form of dementia that affects 6.2 million Americans.

Though it was initially identified almost 120 years ago, Alzheimers diseaseis a progressive neurological disorder with no cure and few treatments. It starts out with minor memory loss that, over time, advances to a mental decline so severe, individuals have difficulty even swallowing.

Xiaoting Jia, associate professor in theBradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, experienced the direct, cruel impact of Alzheimers diseaseas it ravaged her grandmothers mind, destroying memories of a long-lived and loved life.

Alzheimers is a devastating problem Ive seen firsthand how bad it could be, Jia said. Its why it concerns me as an electrical engineer. I want to build tools and try to assist neuroscientists in solving brain problems.

Its this personal connection that makes thehigh priority, short-term grant from the National Institutes of Healthso poignant.

A pioneer in the neural fiber field, Jia has partnered with longtime collaboratorHarald Sontheimer, professor and chair of neuroscience at the University of Virginia, and fellow brain imaging expertSong Hu, associate professor of biomedical engineering at Washington University in St. Louis, on the development of a new neural tool: a deep brain, multipurpose fiber.

Their goal? Slowing down or reversing memory loss.

Examples of previous preform pulled through Xiaoting Jias thermal fiber drawing tower. The preform gets thinner and thinner as its pulled, creating the tube that houses different fibers or filaments. Photo by Ben Murphy for Virginia Tech.

What we are doing here together is creating a device with which we can visualize the build up of biomarkers that are the culprits of Alzheimers disease, Sontheimer said. Usually you cant access or image that part of the brain, but this device will provide access to the hippocampus, home of spatial memory and retention.

The team has one year to build a minimally invasive, long-term fiber not much thicker thana strand of hair to study those biomarkers, including thick protein deposits called amyloids in the hippocampus.

Current electrical and imaging toolsby neuroscientists are limited in resolution, both time and spatial, such as an MRI or electroencephalogram. Some are more invasive with large electrodes with which doctors need to fish around in an attempt to apply electrical stimulation to the deep brain.

A big problem in Alzheimers research is there are a lot of dysfunctions in the brain having to do with neurovascular changes, Hu said, but we dont totally understand how those changes impact memory loss and behaviors that eventually impair their life. Conventional techniques have provided an important understanding of neurons and vasculature, but theres a technology limitation.

The super fiber Jia will construct stands out from other existing technologies because of the flexible polymer platform. Little to no damage of brain tissue and long-lasting potential means fewer complicated surgeries, and more time with family.

Amyloid deposits are the main feature for AD [Alzheimers disease], and they begin developing years, even decades, before people show AD symptoms, Jia said. Its still a mystery how the deposits even begin.

According to Jia, theres no confirmed causal relationship between Alzheimers diseaseand the deposits yet. However, the relationship between plaque buildup and the onset of symptoms is the guiding focus of the teams research, with each researcher taking on a key component in the creation of this first-of-its-kind fiber:

Xiaoting Jia holds up an example of the embedded fiber the team would use in its research. Photo by Peter Means for Virginia Tech.

Target one for the team is to utilize the endoscope. It will provide images to the team for observing neuroactivity, the initial stages of amyloid deposition, and the blood flow in vessels. The team will use this data to analyze the memory loss-amyloid relationship.

Target two is sending electrical pulses and later, anti-amyloid drugs in the hopes of re-establishing blood flow and oxygenation to dead neurons and restoring memory.

If that sounds complex it is. And the team only has 12 months to develop and test two prototypes.

This is a very ambitious goal, what were trying to do in one year, Jia said. The brain is very nuanced with more than 80 billion neurons, and were still behind on fully understanding how the brain functions and how diseases are formed.

Achieving its targets will enable the fiber team to seek additional multiyear funding from the National Institutes of Health. The ultimate hope? The researchers will be able to prove their technology has the possibility to improve the quality of life for the millions of Americans impacted by Alzheimers disease.

Author: Chelsea Seeber Source: Virginia Tech Contact: Chelsea Seeber Virginia Tech Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Go here to see the original:
Innovative Fiber to Tackle Alzheimer's Developed - Neuroscience News

Can You Actually Rewire Your Brain? Here’s What Experts Say | mindbodygreen – mindbodygreen

Assistant Beauty & Health Editor

Assistant Beauty & Health Editor

Hannah Frye is the Assistant Beauty Editor at mindbodygreen. She has a B.S. in journalism and a minor in womens, gender, and queer studies from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Hannah has written across lifestyle sections including health, wellness, sustainability, personal development, and more.

Image by Kayla Snell / Stocksy

The phrase rewire your brain is used so loosely lately that it can seem more like a metaphor than a scientific reality. Is it really possible to rewire one's brain? And if so, how? We asked neuroscience and psychiatry experts for a much-needed lesson on brain rewiring and even snagged some actionable tips you can start today.

Rewiring your brain, scientifically, means to learn new things or to, in many cases, eliminate old habits that don't serve us and replace them with new habits that do serve us, says board-certified psychiatrist, neuroscientist, and founder of mindfulness wearable brand Apollo, Dave Rabin, M.D.

When your brain is "rewired," the connections between brain cells strengthen. This makes it easier for certain brain pathways to complete the tasks at hand. The more you do a task, the tighter those connections get, and thus, the more the task becomes a habit. This applies to many scenarios, including practicing an instrument, exercising, using positive self-talk, etc.

The science behind the phrase comes from the work of Eric Kandel, M.D., a Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientist who demonstrated that practice makes mastery, so anything you do (whether its good for you or not) gets wired in the brain as the action repeats.

The brain is much more flexible than we might thinkand shifting the status quo is possible.

You may have heard of the term neuroplasticity before, which, as a refresher, is the brain's ability to form new connections. Neuroplasticity often happens when we learn or experience something new. And there's an element of neuroplasticity involved in rewriting the brain: That's where the re in rewiring" comes in.

Board-certified psychiatrist Sue Varma, M.D. explains that the brain is much more flexible than we might thinkand shifting the status quo is possible. However, she adds that this flexibility can be both helpful and unhelpful, given that traumatic experiences can rewire the brain for the worse.

This is where the concept of brain rewiring becomes more complex. As you can imagine, rewiring your brain from past trauma, especially traumatic memories youve mentally blocked out or your brain chemistry has prevented you from remembering clearly, is much harder than changing a daily habit in your life.

So, while the following tips for positively rewiring your brain can help with many goals, overcoming complex trauma often requires a different approach that includes professional therapy.

Now, just because its possible to rewire your brain doesnt mean its easy. Behavior change takes time, effort, and a whole lot of patience, but these tips can help you get started:

1 .

Youll want to set yourself up for success by making realistic goals. To do so, focus on areas you have control over and try not to ruminate on those you dont. Otherwise, youll just spark negative thoughts.

Anxiety stems from spending time thinking about things we don't have control over, Rabin says. So waste no time worrying about those and start with something you know is realistic.

The same applies to habits related to diet, exercise, and personal care. If you want to cut back on addicting processed food, for example, consider a small goal at first: Start by adjusting one snack a day, and then move onto your meals once youve formed the initial habit of reaching for a whole food snack.If you want to go to the gym more often, start by going once a week rather than four times a week to prevent feeling overwhelmed.

2 .

Some people say it takes 21 days to form a new habit, but modern research suggests 10 weeks is more realistic2 . Even with that extension, it varies greatly from person to person and goal to goal, and thus, you shouldnt hold yourself to a time constraint if its not going to help you.

Rather, just focus on practicing your new habit daily and staying committed to it.

Using the example from above, if you want to stop self-deprecating thoughts surrounding burnout, then have a few positive affirmations at the ready and plug them in when your brain starts taking a negative path.

Say to yourself, out loud or in your head, Im allowed to take breaks, or Giving myself time to rest will improve my performance later on, or Im doing something positive for my mental health right now, and Im proud of that. You get the idea.

Its critical to have your new habits at the ready to replace the old ones. If you want to cut out processed food snacks but dont have a healthy alternative stocked in your pantry, its going to be even more of an uphill battle.

3 .

Picturing success really can change your brain, and both experts agree youll have to start being optimistic about your goals if you want to achieve them.

Visualize the best possible outcomeone year and five years from now, Varma suggests. You may even try writing down what you see as success to get a clear picture of what you want.

Even when you slip up, remind yourself that youre going to make mistakes along the way, and thats all a part of the process, Varma adds. This is an essential part of viewing your success and your journey in a positive light, encouraging you to keep going.

A final reminder: Its always okay to ask for help, even with goals you think seem simple. Talking to a mental health professional can make a huge difference in your process of planning and executing the changes you want to make. Rewiring the brain is possible, but its hardly ever going to be easy. Ask for support, and see that as a step in the direction of success.

Structurally, rewiring your brain means tightening connections between certain brain cells. Once you have a particular goal in mind, rewiring your brain can strengthen the brain pathways required to achieve that goal. It can also weaken the pathways involved in less desirable habits or thought patterns. It calls on the concept that repetitive action, good or bad, becomes habitual over time. Some habits are rooted in deep trauma and may call for a more complex approach and extra professional support, so dont be afraid to ask for help. Here, more ways to build healthy habits that stick.

Read more from the original source:
Can You Actually Rewire Your Brain? Here's What Experts Say | mindbodygreen - mindbodygreen

Trinity Health Michigan opens neuroscience center in Muskegon – Grand Haven Tribune

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

Read the rest here:
Trinity Health Michigan opens neuroscience center in Muskegon - Grand Haven Tribune

The Cerebellum’s Role in Human Cognitive Evolution – Neuroscience News

Summary: New research reveals the cerebellums significant role in the evolution of human cognitive functions. The study mapped the genetic development of cerebellar cells in humans, mice, and opossums, uncovering both ancestral and unique cellular characteristics.

Key findings include the increased proportion of specific Purkinje cells in humans, potentially linked to higher cognitive functions, and the identification of over 1,000 genes with varying activity profiles across species, some related to neurodevelopmental disorders.

Key Facts:

Source: Heidelberg University

The evolution of higher cognitive functions in human beings has so far mostly been linked to the expansion of the neocortex a region of the brain that is responsible, inter alia, for conscious thought, movement and sensory perception.

Researchers are increasingly realizing, however, that the little brain or cerebellum also expanded during evolution and probably contributes to the capacities unique to humans, explains Prof. Dr Henrik Kaessmann from the Center for Molecular Biology of Heidelberg University.

His research team has together with Prof. Dr Stefan Pfister from the Hopp Childrens Cancer Center Heidelberg generated comprehensive genetic maps of the development of cells in the cerebella of human, mouse and opossum.

Comparisons of these data reveal both ancestral and species-specific cellular and molecular characteristics of cerebellum development spanning over 160 million years of mammalian evolution.

Although the cerebellum, a structure at the back of the skull, contains about 80 percent of all neurons in the whole human brain, this was long considered a brain region with a rather simple cellular architecture, explains Prof. Kaessmann.

In recent times, however, evidence suggesting a pronounced heterogeneity within this structure has been growing, says the molecular biologist.

The Heidelberg researchers have now systematically classified all cell types in the developing cerebellum of human, mouse and opossum. To do so they first collected molecular profiles from almost 400,000 individual cells using single-cell sequencing technologies. They also employed procedures enabling spatial mapping of the cell types.

On the basis of these data the scientists noted that in the human cerebellum, the proportion of Purkinje cells large, complex neurons with key functions in the cerebellum is almost double that of mouse and opossum in the early stages of fetal development.

This increase is primarily driven by specific subtypes of Purkinje cells that are generated first during development and likely communicate with neocortical areas involved in cognitive functions in the mature brain.

It stands to reason that the expansion of these specific types of Purkinje cells during human evolution supports higher cognitive functions in humans, explains Dr Mari Sepp, a postdoctoral researcher in Prof. Kaessmanns research group Functional evolution of mammalian genomes.

Using bioinformatic approaches, the researchers also compared the gene expression programmes in cerebellum cells of human, mouse and opossum. These programmes are defined by the fine-tuned activities of a myriad of genes that determine the types into which cells differentiate in the course of development.

Genes with cell-type-specific activity profiles were identified that have been conserved across species for at least about 160 million years of evolution.

According to Henrik Kaessmann, this suggests that they are important for fundamental mechanisms that determine cell type identities in the mammalian cerebellum. At the same time, the scientists identified over 1,000 genes with activity profiles differing between human, mouse and opossum.

At the level of cell types, it happens fairly frequently that genes obtain new activity profiles. This means that ancestral genes, present in all mammals, become active in new cell types during evolution, potentially changing the properties of these cells, says Dr Kevin Leiss, who at the time of the studies was a doctoral student in Prof. Kaessmanns research group.

Among the genes showing activity profiles that differ between human and mouse the most frequently used model organism in biomedical research several are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders or childhood brain tumours, Prof. Pfister explains. He is a director at the Hopp Childrens Cancer Center Heidelberg, heads a research division at the German Cancer Research Center and is a consultant paediatric oncologist at Heidelberg University Hospital.

The results of the study could, as Prof. Pfister suggests, provide valuable guidance in the search for suitable model systems beyond the mouse model to further explore such diseases.

The research results were published in the journal Nature. Also participating in the studies apart from the Heidelberg scientists were researchers from Berlin as well as China, France, Hungary, and the United Kingdom. The European Research Council financed the research. The data are available in a public database.

Author: Ute Mueller-Detert Source: Heidelberg University Contact: Ute Mueller-Detert Heidelberg University Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Closed access. Cellular development and evolution of the mammalian cerebellum by Henrik Kaessmann et al. Nature

Abstract

Cellular development and evolution of the mammalian cerebellum

The expansion of the neocortex, a hallmark of mammalian evolution, was accompanied by an increase in cerebellar neuron numbers. However, little is known about the evolution of the cellular programs underlying cerebellum development in mammals.

In this study, we generated single-nucleus RNA-sequencing data for ~400,000 cells to trace cerebellum development from early neurogenesis to adulthood in human, mouse, and the marsupial opossum.

We established a consensus classification of the cellular diversity in the developing mammalian cerebellum and validated it by spatial mapping in the fetal human cerebellum.

Our cross-species analyses revealed a largely conserved developmental dynamics of cell type generation, except for Purkinje cells, where we observed an expansion of early-born subtypes in the human lineage.

Global transcriptome profiles, conserved cell state markers, and gene expression trajectories across neuronal differentiation show that cerebellar cell type-defining programs have been overall preserved for at least ~160 million years.

However, we also identified many orthologous genes that gained or lost expression in cerebellar neural cell types in one of the species, or evolved new expression trajectories during neuronal differentiation, indicating widespread gene repurposing at the cell type level.

Altogether, our study unveils shared and lineage-specific gene expression programs governing the development of cerebellar cells, and expands our understanding of mammalian brain evolution.

View original post here:
The Cerebellum's Role in Human Cognitive Evolution - Neuroscience News

YouTube Habits Linked to Increased Loneliness and Anxiety – Neuroscience News

Summary: Researchers have found a link between frequent YouTube usage and increased levels of loneliness, anxiety, and depression, especially among viewers under 29.

The study raises concerns about parasocial relationships between creators and viewers, as well as the algorithmic recommendation of suicide-related content. The team suggests AI-based solutions to guide users towards positive mental health content.

Key Facts:

Source: Griffith University

Frequent users of YouTube have higher levels of loneliness, anxiety, and depression according to researchers from the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention (AISRAP).

Dr Luke Balcombe and Emeritus Professor Diego De Leo from Griffith Universitys School of Applied Psychology and AISRAP sought to understand both the positive and negative impacts of the worlds most used streaming platform on mental health.

They found the most negatively affected individuals were those under 29 years of age, or who regularly watched content about other peoples lives.

Lead author Dr Luke Balcombe said the development of parasocial relationships between content creators and followers could be cause for concern, however some neutral or positive instances of creators developing closer relationships with their followers also occurred.

These online relationships can fill a gap for people who, for example, have social anxiety, however it can exacerbate their issues when they dont engage in face-to-face interactions, which are especially important in developmental years, he said.

We recommend individuals limit their time on YouTube and seek out other forms of social interaction to combat loneliness and promote positive mental health.

Dr Balcombe said the amount of time spent on YouTube was often a concern for parents, who struggled to monitor their childrens use of the platform for educational or other purposes.

For the purpose of the study, over two hours per day of YouTube consumption was classed as high frequency use and over five hours a day as saturated use.

The study also determined more needed to be done to prevent suicide-related content being recommended to users based on algorithms for suggested viewing.

While ideally, people shouldnt be able to search for these topics and be exposed to methods, the YouTube algorithm does push recommendations or suggestions based on previous searches, which can send users further down a disturbing rabbit hole.

Users can report this type of content, but sometimes it may not be reported, or it could be there for a few days or weeks and with the sheer volume of content passing through, its almost impossible for YouTubes algorithms to stop all of it.

If a piece of content is flagged as possibly containing suicide or self-harm topics, YouTube then provides a warning and asks the user if they want to play the video.

With vulnerable children and adolescents who engage in high frequency use, there could be value in monitoring and intervention through artificial intelligence, Dr Balcombe said.

Weve explored humancomputer interaction issues and proposed a concept for an independent-of-YouTube algorithmic recommendation system which will steer users toward verified positive mental health content or promotions.

YouTube is increasingly used for mental health purposes, mainly for information seeking or sharing and many digital mental health approaches are being tried with varying levels of merit, but with over 10,000 mental health apps currently available, it can be really overwhelming knowing which ones to use, or even which ones to recommend from a practitioner point of view.

There is a gap for verified mental health or suicide tools based on a mix of AI-based machine learning, risk modeling and suitably qualified human decisions, but by getting mental health and suicide experts together to verify information from AI, digital mental health interventions could be a very promising solution to support increasing unmet mental health needs.

Author: Christine BowleySource: Griffith UniversityContact: Christine Bowley Griffith UniversityImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.The Impact of YouTube on Loneliness and Mental Health by Luke Balcombe et al. Informatics

Abstract

The Impact of YouTube on Loneliness and Mental Health

There are positives and negatives of using YouTube in terms of loneliness and mental health. YouTubes streaming content is an amazing resource, however, there may be bias or errors in its recommendation algorithms.

Parasocial relationships can also complicate the impact of YouTube use. Intervention may be necessary when problematic and risky content is associated with unhealthy behaviors and negative impacts on mental health. Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable.

Although YouTube might assist in connecting with peers, there are privacy, safety, and quality issues to consider.

This paper is an integrative review of the positive and negative impacts of YouTube with the aim to inform the design and development of a technology-based intervention to improve mental health. The impact of YouTube use on loneliness and mental health was explored by synthesizing a purposive selection (n= 32) of the empirical and theoretical literature.

Next, we explored humancomputer interaction issues and proposed a concept whereby an independent-of-YouTube algorithmic recommendation system steers users toward verified positive mental health content or promotions.

See original here:
YouTube Habits Linked to Increased Loneliness and Anxiety - Neuroscience News

Shared Interests, Shared Essence: Unraveling the Psychology of Instant Connections – Neuroscience News

Summary: New research sheds light on the similarity-attraction effect, a psychological principle that governs how we form relationships based on shared interests.

The study highlight the critical role of self-essentialist reasoning, a belief system where individuals perceive an inherent essence as the driver of their preferences and dislikes.

Findings suggest individuals who subscribe to this reasoning are inclined to extrapolate shared worldviews from singular common interests. However, this approach may lead to unfounded assumptions, limiting the breadth of potential relationships due to minor disagreements or differences.

Key Facts:

Source: Boston University

Sometimes lifes most meaningful relationships grow from the briefest of connections. Like when you go to a party and meet someone wearing your favorite bands T-shirt, or who laughs at the same jokes as you, or who grabs that unpopular snack you alone (or so you thought) love. One small, shared interest sparks a conversationthats my favorite, too!and blossoms into lasting affection.

This is called the similarity-attraction effect: we generally like people who are like us. Now, new findings from a Boston University researcher have uncovered one reason why.

In a series of studies, Charles Chu,a BU Questrom School of Business assistant professor of management and organizations, tested the conditions that shape whether we feel attracted toor turned off byeach other. He found one crucial factor was what psychologists call self-essentialist reasoning, where people imagine they have some deep inner core or essence that shapes who they are.

Chu discovered that when someone believes an essence drives their interests, likes, and dislikes, they assume its the same for others, too; if they find someone with one matching interest, they reason that person will share their broader worldview.

The findingswere published in the American Psychological AssociationsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology.

If we had to come up with an image of our sense of self, it would be this nugget, an almost magical core inside that emanates out and causes what we can see and observe about people and ourselves, says Chu, who published the paper withBrian S. Lowery of Stanford Graduate School of Business.

We argue that believing people have an underlying essence allows us to assume or infer that when we see someone who shares a single characteristic, they must share my entire deeply rooted essence, as well.

But Chus research suggests this rush to embrace an indefinable, fundamental similarity with someone because of one or two shared interests may be based on flawed thinkingand that it could restrict who we find a connection with.

Working alongside the pull of the similarity-attraction effect is a countering push: we dislike those who we dont think are like us, often because of one small thingthey likethatpolitician, or band, or book, or TV show we loathe.

We are all so complex, says Chu. But we only have full insight into ourownthoughts and feelings, and the minds of others are often a mystery to us. What this work suggests is that we often fill in the blanks of others minds with our own sense of self and that can sometimes lead us into some unwarranted assumptions.

To examine why were attracted to some people and not to others, Chu set up four studies, each designed to tease out different aspects of how we make friendsor foes.

In the first study, participants were told about a fictional person, Jamie, who held either complementary or contradictory attitudes to them.

After asking participants their views on one of five topicsabortion, capital punishment, gun ownership, animal testing, and physician-assisted suicideChu asked how they felt about Jamie, who either agreed or disagreed with them on the target issue.

They were also quizzed about the roots of their identity to measure their affinity with self-essentialist reasoning.

Chu found the more a participant believed their view of the world was shaped by an essential core, the more they felt connected to Jamie who shared their views on one issue.

In a second study, he looked at whether that effect persisted when the target topics were less substantive. Rather than digging into whether people agreed with Jamie on something as divisive as abortion, Chu asked participants to estimate the number of blue dots on a page, then categorized themand the fictional Jamieas over- or under-estimators.

Even with this slim connection, the findings held: the more someone believed in an essential core, the closer they felt to Jamie as a fellow over- or under-estimator.

I found that both with pretty meaningful dimensions of similarity as well as with arbitrary, minimal similarities, people who are higher in their belief that they have an essence are more likely to be attracted to these similar others as opposed to dissimilar others, says Chu.

In two companion studies, Chu began disrupting this process of attraction, stripping out the influence of self-essentialist reasoning. In one experiment, he labeled attributes (such as liking a certain painting) as either essential or nonessential; in another, he told participants that using their essence to judge someone else could lead to an inaccurate assessment of others.

It breaks this essentialist reasoning process, it cuts off peoples ability to assume that what theyre seeing is reflective of a deeper similarity, says Chu.

One way I did that was to remind people that this dimension of similarity is actually not connected or related to your essence at all; the other way was by telling people that using their essence as a way to understand other people is not very effective.

Chu says theres a key tension in his findings that shape their application in the real world. On the one hand, were all searching for our communityits fun to hang out with people who share our hobbies and interests, love the same music and books as us, dont disagree with us on politics.

This type of thinking is a really useful, heuristic psychological strategy, says Chu. It allows people to see more of themselves in new people and strangers.

But it also excludes people, sets up divisions and boundariessometimes on the flimsiest of grounds.

When you hear a single fact or opinion being expressed that you either agree or disagree with, it really warrants taking an additional breath and just slowing down, he says.

Not necessarily taking that single piece of information and extrapolating on it, using this type of thinking to go to the very end, that this person is fundamentally good and like me or fundamentally bad and not like me.

Chu, whose background mixes the study of organizational behavior and psychology, teaches classes on negotiation at Questrom and says his research has plenty of implications in the business world, particularly when it comes to making deals.

I define negotiations as conversations, and agreements and disagreements, about how power and resources should be distributed between people, he says.

What inferences do we make about the other people were having these conversations with? How do we experience and think about agreement versus disagreement? How do we interpret when someone gets more and someone else gets less? These are all really central questions to the process of negotiation.

But in a time when political division has invaded just about every sphere of our lives,including workplaces, the applications of Chus findings go way beyond corporate horse trading.

Managing staff, collaborating on projects, team bondingall are shaped by the judgments we make about each other. Self-essentialist reasoning may even influence societys distribution of resources, says Chu: who we consider worthy of support, who gets funds and who doesnt, could be driven by this belief that peoples outcomes are caused by something deep inside of them.

Thats why he advocates pushing pause before judging someone who, at first blush, doesnt seem like you.

There are ways for us to go through life and meet other people, and form impressions of other people, without constantly referencing ourselves, he says.

If were constantly going around trying to figure out,whos like me, whos not like me?,thats not always the most productive way of trying to form impressions of other people. People are a lot more complex than we give them credit for.

Author: Katherine GianniSource: Boston UniversityContact: Katherine Gianni Boston UniversityImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Closed access.Self-Essentialist Reasoning Underlies the Similarity-Attraction Effect by Charles Chu et al. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Self-Essentialist Reasoning Underlies the Similarity-Attraction Effect

We propose that self-essentialist reasoning is a foundational mechanism of the similarity-attraction effect.

Our argument is that similarity breeds attraction in two steps: (a) people categorize someone with a shared attribute as a person like me based on the self-essentialist belief that ones attributes are caused by an underlying essence and (b) then apply their essence (and the other attributes it causes) to the similar individual to infer agreement about the world in general (i.e., a generalized shared reality).

We tested this model in four experimental studies (N = 2,290) using both individual difference and moderation-of-process approaches.

We found that individual differences in self-essentialist beliefs amplified the effect of similarity on perceived generalized shared reality and attraction across both meaningful (Study 1) and minimal (Study 2) dimensions of similarity.

We next found that manipulating (i.e., interrupting) the two crucial steps of the self-essentialist reasoning processthat is, by severing the connection between a similar attribute and ones essence (Study 3) and deterring people from applying their essence to form an impression of a similar other (Study 4)attenuated the effect of similarity on attraction.

We discuss the implications for research on the self, similarity-attraction, and intergroup phenomena.

More here:
Shared Interests, Shared Essence: Unraveling the Psychology of Instant Connections - Neuroscience News

Diet and Dementia: Study Uncovers Gut-Brain Link to Alzheimer’s – Neuroscience News

Summary: A new study sheds light on the potential role of diet in preventing dementia. The analysis explored the relationship between gut health and Alzheimers disease, uncovering a strong link between specific types of gut bacteria and the likelihood of developing dementia.

The findings highlight the significance of gut microbiota in brain health and provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of Alzheimers disease.

This research opens up new avenues for personalized treatments and interventions that target gut health to potentially slow down or prevent the development of dementia.

Key Facts:

Source: University of Nevada Las Vegas

Could changing your diet play a role in slowing or even preventing the development of dementia? Were one step closer to finding out, thanks to a new UNLV study that bolsters the long-suspected link between gut health and Alzheimers disease.

The analysis led by a team of researchers with the Nevada Institute of Personalized Medicine (NIPM) at UNLV and published this spring in the Nature journalScientific Reports examined data from dozens of past studies into the belly-brain connection. The results? Theres a strong link between particular kinds of gut bacteria and Alzheimers disease.

Between 500 and 1,000 species of bacteria exist in the human gut at any one time, and the amount and diversity of these microorganisms can be influenced by genetics and diet.

The UNLV teams analysis found a significant correlation between 10 specific types of gut bacteria and the likelihood of developing Alzheimers disease. Six categories of bacteria Adlercreutzia, Eubacterium nodatum group, Eisenbergiella, Eubacterium fissicatena group, Gordonibacter,andPrevotella9 were identified as protective, and four types of bacteria Collinsella, Bacteroides, Lachnospira,andVeillonella were identified as a risk factor for Alzheimers disease.

Certain bacteria in humans guts can secrete acids and toxins that thin and seep through the intestinal lining, interact with theAPOE(a gene identified as a major risk factor for Alzheimers disease), and trigger a neuroinflammatory response affecting brain health and numerous immune functions, and potentially promoting development of the neurodegenerative disorder.

Researchers said their novel discovery of the distinct bacterial groups associated with Alzheimers disease provides new insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and the worlds most common form of dementia. The findings also advance scientists understanding of how an imbalance of that bacteria may play a role in the disorders development.

Most of the microorganisms in our intestines are considered good bacteria that promote health, but an imbalance of those bacteria can be toxic to a persons immune system and linked to various diseases, such as depression, heart disease, cancer, and Alzheimers disease, said UNLV research professorJingchun Chen.

The take-home message here is that your genes not only determine whether you have a risk for a disease, but they can also influence the abundance of bacteria in your gut.

While their analysis established overarching categories of bacteria typically associated with Alzheimers disease, the UNLV team said further research is needed to drill down into the specific bacterial species that influence risk or protection.

The hope is to one day develop treatments that are customized for an individual patient and their genetic makeup, such as medications or lifestyle change.

Studies have shown that changes in gut microbiome through probiotic use and dietary adjustments can positively impact the immune system, inflammation, and even brain function.

With more research it would be possible to identify a genetic trajectory that could point to a gut microbiome that would be more or less prone to developing diseases such as Alzheimers, said study lead author and UNLV graduate student Davis Cammann, but we also have to remember that the gut biome is influenced by many factors including lifestyle and diet.

Author: Keyonna SummersSource: University of Nevada Las VegasContact: Keyonna Summers University of Nevada Las VegasImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.Genetic correlations between Alzheimers disease and gut microbiome genera by Jingchun Chen et al. Scientific Reports

Abstract

Genetic correlations between Alzheimers disease and gut microbiome genera

A growing body of evidence suggests that dysbiosis of the human gut microbiota is associated with neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimers disease (AD) via neuroinflammatory processes across the microbiota-gut-brain axis.

The gut microbiota affects brain health through the secretion of toxins and short-chain fatty acids, which modulates gut permeability and numerous immune functions. Observational studies indicate that AD patients have reduced microbiome diversity, which could contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease.

Uncovering the genetic basis of microbial abundance and its effect on AD could suggest lifestyle changes that may reduce an individuals risk for the disease.

Using the largest genome-wide association study of gut microbiota genera from the MiBioGen consortium, we used polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses with the best-fit model implemented in PRSice-2 and determined the genetic correlation between 119 genera and AD in a discovery sample (ADc12 case/control: 1278/1293).

To confirm the results from the discovery sample, we next repeated the PRS analysis in a replication sample (GenADA case/control: 799/778) and then performed a meta-analysis with the PRS results from both samples.

Finally, we conducted a linear regression analysis to assess the correlation between the PRSs for the significant genera and theAPOEgenotypes. In the discovery sample, 20 gut microbiota genera were initially identified as genetically associated with AD case/control status.

Of these 20, three genera (Eubacterium fissicatenaas a protective factor, Collinsella,andVeillonellaas a risk factor) were independently significant in the replication sample. Meta-analysis with discovery and replication samples confirmed that ten genera had a significant correlation with AD, four of which were significantly associated with theAPOErs429358 risk allele in a direction consistent with their protective/risk designation in AD association.

Notably, the proinflammatory genusCollinsella,identified as a risk factor for AD, was positively correlated with theAPOErs429358 risk allele in both samples. Overall, the host genetic factors influencing the abundance of ten genera are significantly associated with AD, suggesting that these genera may serve as biomarkers and targets for AD treatment and intervention.

Our results highlight that proinflammatory gut microbiota might promote AD development through interaction withAPOE. Larger datasets and functional studies are required to understand their causal relationships.

Read the original here:
Diet and Dementia: Study Uncovers Gut-Brain Link to Alzheimer's - Neuroscience News

Human Brain Organoids Reveal How Microglia Develop and Function – Neuroscience News

Summary: Researchers have developed human brain organoids that contain microglia, the immune cells of the brain. These organoids allow researchers to study how microglia develop and function in a more realistic setting than previous models.

The researchers found that microglia are influenced by the environment in which they develop and that they play a role in both development and disease. Their findings could lead to new treatments for neurological disorders.

Key Facts:

Source: Salk Institute

Situated at the intersection of the human immune system and the brain are microglia, specialized brain immune cells that play a crucial role in development and disease. Although the importance of microglia is undisputed, modeling and studying them has remained a difficult task.

Unlike some human cells that can be studied outside of the body or in nonhuman models, human microglia are difficult to study when removed from the human-brain-like environment.

To overcome this barrier, Salk scientists developed an organoid modela three-dimensional collection of cells that mimics features of human tissues. This model allows researchers to study human microglial development and function for the first time in living human-derived tissue.

Further, the scientists examined patient-derived microglia from children with macrocephalic autism spectrum disorder (a condition where infant head circumference is greater than 97 percent of other infants) to determine whether brain environment influences the development of more reactive microglia.

The findings, published inCellon May 11, 2023, highlight the importance of immune cell and brain interaction, and improve the understanding of neurodegenerative and developmental diseases, such as autism spectrum disorder and Alzheimers disease.

Outside of the brain environment, microglia lose almost all function and meaning, says ProfessorRusty Gage, senior author and holder of the Vi and John Alder Chair for Research on Age-Related Neurodegenerative Disease.

We knew that if we found a way to replicate the human brain environment in an organoid in order to study human microglia, then we would finally have a tool for examining how the heathy and diseased brain influence microglia and, reciprocally, how healthy and diseased microglia influence the brain.

Emerging roughly 10 years ago, organoids have become a prevalent tool to bridge the gap between cell and human studies. Organoids can mimic human development and organ generation better than other laboratory systems, allowing researchers to study how drugs or diseases affect human cells in a more realistic setting.

Brain organoids are typically grown in culture dishes, but the organoids are structurally and functionally limited by the lack of blood vessels, short survival time, and inability to sustain diverse cell types (like microglia).

To createabrainorganoid model thatcontainsmature microgliaand enables us to research them, we used a noveltransplantationtechnique to create a human-brain-like environment says co-first author Abed Mansour, aformerpostdoctoral researcher in Gages lab and now an assistant professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

So we could finally make a human brain organoid that had all the features necessary to orchestrate human microglia growth, behavior, and function.

Unlike previous models, the researchers created a human brain organoid that had microgliaanda human-brain-like environment, which finally allowed them to look at environmental influences on microglia throughout brain development.

They found that a characteristic protein called SALL1 appeared as early as eleven weeks into development and served to confirm microglial identity and promote mature function. Additionally, they found that brain environment-specific factors, like the proteins TMEM119 and P2RY12, were necessary for microglia to function.

Creating a human brain model that can effectively replicate the human brain environment is very exciting, says Associate ProfessorAxel Nimmerjahn, another author of the study.

With this model, we can finally investigate how human microglia function within the human brain environment.

As the team learned more about microglia, the importance of the relationship between brain environment and microglia became clearespecially in disease scenarios.

The labpreviously examinedneurons derived from people with autism spectrum disorder and found their neurons grew faster and had more complex branches than neurotypical counterparts.

With the new organoid model, the team could ask whether those neuronal differences altered the brain environment and influenced microglia development.

To do so, they compared microglia derived from skin samples from three individuals with macrocephalic autism spectrum disorder versus three neurotypical individuals with macrocephaly.

The researchers found that individuals with autism spectrum disorder exhibited the neuronal differences the team had previously noted, and that the microglia were influenced by those differences in their growth environment.

Because of this neuron-dependent environmental change, the microglia became more reactive to damage or intrudersa finding that may explain the brain inflammation observed in some individuals with autism spectrum disorder.

Since this was a preliminary study with a small sample size, the team plans to examine more microglia from additional people in the future to verify their findings. They also aim to expand their research to study other developmental and neurodegenerative diseases to see how microglia are contributing to disease onset.

Rather than deconstruct the brain, we decided to construct it ourselves, says co-first author Simon Schafer, a former postdoctoral researcher in Gages lab and now an assistant professor at Technical University of Munich.

By building our own brain model we can work from the bottom up and see solutions that may be impossible to see from the top down. We are eager to continue improving on our model and unravelling the relationship between the brain and immune system.

Other authors include Monique Pena, Saeed Ghassemzadeh, Lisa Mitchell, Amanda Mar, Daphne Quang, Sarah Stumpf, and Clara Baek of the Salk Institute; Johannes C. M. Schlachetzki, Addison J. Lana, and Christopher K. Glass of UC San Diego; Irene Santisteban of the Technical University of Munich; and Raghad Zaghal of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Funding: The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AG056306, R01 AG057706, R01 AG056511, R01 AG061060, R01 NS108034, U19 NS123719, NCI CCSG: P30 014195, NCI CCSG: P30 014195), the American Heart Association and Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group (grant 19PABHI34610000), the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (27685 and 30421), the German Research Foundation (500300695), the Milky Way Research Foundation, Annette C. Merle-Smith and the Robert and Mary Jane Engman Foundation, the European Molecular Biology Organization (ALTF 1214-2014), the Human Frontier Science Program (LT001074/2015), the European Research Council, the Chapman Foundation, the JBP Foundation and the Helmsley Charitable Trust.

Author: Salk CommunicationsSource: Salk InstituteContact: Salk Communications Salk InstituteImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes by Rusty Gage et al. Cell

Abstract

An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes

Microglia are specialized brain-resident macrophages that play crucial roles in brain development, homeostasis, and disease. However, until now, the ability to model interactions between the human brain environment and microglia has been severely limited.

To overcome these limitations, we developed aninvivoxenotransplantation approach that allows us to study functionally mature human microglia (hMGs) that operate within a physiologically relevant, vascularized immunocompetent human brain organoid (iHBO) model.

Our data show that organoid-resident hMGs gain human-specific transcriptomic signatures that closely resemble theirinvivocounterparts.Invivotwo-photon imaging reveals that hMGs actively engage in surveilling the human brain environment, react to local injuries, and respond to systemic inflammatory cues.

Finally, we demonstrate that the transplanted iHBOs developed here offer the unprecedented opportunity to study functional human microglia phenotypes in health and disease and provide experimental evidence for a brain-environment-induced immune response in a patient-specific model of autism with macrocephaly.

Go here to read the rest:
Human Brain Organoids Reveal How Microglia Develop and Function - Neuroscience News

Neurological Symphony of Taste: Unraveling the Brain’s Flavor Pathways – Neuroscience News

Summary: Researchers are delving into the intricacies of taste perception and its impact on the brain. Their goal is to understand how the brain processes sensations like the sweet pleasure of a dessert or the fiery burn of a hot pepper.

The team found that taste and touch sensations can stimulate the same neurons in the midbrain. This intriguing overlap hints at the brains multitasking abilities, where limited cells perform multiple functions.

By exploring the interplay between taste and touch, and the emotional responses they elicit, this five-year project hopes to shed light on fundamental principles of brain organization, potentially leading to health and disease insights.

Key Facts:

Source: University of Oklahoma

Taste is a complex neurological experience that has the potential to provide extensive, and perhaps surprising, information on how the brain makes sense of sensations and the organization of brain pathways.

A research project funded by the National Institutes of Health, led byChristian H. Lemon, Ph.D., an associate professor in the Department of Biology in the Dodge Family College of Arts and Sciences, aims to better understand how the brain processes taste and how those neural pathways can evolve.

Taste is connected to a range of neural activities such as the pleasure of tasting something sweet. Taste is a part of flavor, which includes the pain experienced in tasting a hot pepper. However, there is a gap in knowledge about how taste and flavor preferences develop and evolve over time.

Taste is a component of flavor; it contributes sensations like saltiness and sweetness. When were eating food, we get a lot of pleasure from taste and flavor, but taste is actually a sensory system that we really dont fully understand in terms of how it works in guiding eating behavior and also how it works in the brain, Lemon said.

This project will build on a discovery made by Lemons research group while studying a part of the brain where taste sensations can excite neurons in the midbrain region.

Importantly, many other senses from various parts of the body are processed in the same neural location, with preliminary data suggesting somebodys senses can activate brain cells excited by tastes.

By determining how neurons are receiving signals for taste and touch sensations, Lemons study hopes to better understand how these integrations happen and whether it is reflective of an emotional correlation.

There is a part of the brain that takes in sensory information from basically almost all over the body, and taste is a part of this.

Were wanting to understand, essentially, how taste is mapping into this part of the brain, along with all of these other body sensations as well, with the idea that if we can understand this it might actually tell us more about how taste works and how the taste system and other senses are organized, and why there appears to be neural overlap between them, he said.

Lemon believes this neural correlation may be evidence of the brain multitasking, making use of limited brain cells to perform multiple functions for the body.

Past research suggests there is a pattern to the way these brain signals are being put together that Lemon believes to be reflecting the emotions elicited by different sensations.

Studies in the new grant will combine molecular, genetic and neurophysiological testing to examine the organization of brain circuits that support the intersection of taste and touch sensations, and how these circuits work to influence behavior, he said.

Throughout the five-year project, Lemon aims to better understand how and why these signals come together and further define basic organizational principles of the brain relevant to health and disease.

Funding: The project Taste and Somatosensory Processing is funded by an expected $1.9 million from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Project no. 2R01DC011579-12A1.

Author: Chelsea JulianSource: University of OklahomaContact: Chelsea Julian University of OklahomaImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

View post:
Neurological Symphony of Taste: Unraveling the Brain's Flavor Pathways - Neuroscience News

Thought Power: Altering Tactile Perception With the Power of Imagination – Neuroscience News

Summary: Researchers have discovered that our beliefs, when strongly held, can actually change how we physically experience the world around us.

In a new study, participants were hypnotized and convinced to believe their index finger was either five times smaller or five times larger than its actual size. When participants believed their finger was larger, they could feel two close-together needle pricks as separate points, something they couldnt do before.

However, when they believed their finger was smaller, their ability to distinguish between the two points got worse.

The findings show how our minds can impact our physical sensations, suggesting that our beliefs can reshape our perception of reality.

Key Facts:

Source: RUB

Two needles feel like one

The researchers measured the tactile perception of their 24 test participants using the two-point discrimination method. This involves the index finger lying relaxed on a device with two needles repeatedly touching the finger painlessly but perceptibly.

If the needles are far enough apart, we can easily distinguish two points of contact, explains Hubert Dinse from the Neurological Clinic of Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universittsklinikum Bergmannsheil.

But if the needles are very close together, we only feel the touch in one place.

At a certain distance between the needles, the sensation changes from feeling two needles to feeling just one, although two are presented. This discrimination threshold is stable for each person given normal everyday consciousness.

If the finger were five times bigger

We wanted to find out whether its possible to change this sensation threshold by activating a verbally articulated thought in a person, explains Albert Newen from the Philosophy Institute II at Ruhr University Bochum.

The research team chose two thought cues: Imagine your index finger is five times smaller and Imagine your index finger is five times bigger.

To specifically activate these semantic contents, the researchers used hypnotic suggestion. During a controlled state of hypnosis induced by a professional hypnotist, the participant was asked to sincerely accept the first belief for a series of tests and then the second.

The subjects took part in a total of four experiments to determine the sensation threshold in each case: under normal everyday consciousness, under hypnosis without suggestion, and under two hypnotic conditions with the suggestions of a bigger or smaller index finger.

Changes in the sense of touch

Discrimination thresholds did not differ when measured during normal consciousness and hypnosis without suggestion. This supports our preliminary assumption that hypnosis alone doesnt lead to changes, says Martin Tegenthoff.

However, if the beliefs are induced as suggestions under hypnosis, we observe a systematic change in the tactile discrimination threshold.

When a test person imagined that their index finger was five times bigger than it actually was, their discrimination threshold improved and they were able to feel two needles, even when they were closer together. When the suggestion was that their index finger was five times smaller, the discrimination threshold worsened.

This means that it is the beliefs that change perception. The behavioral results were supported by parallel recordings of brain activity such as spontaneous EEG and sensory evoked potentials.

The scientific community is divided on the question of whether or not perceptual processes can be influenced by semantic content alone experts refer to this as the question of cognitive penetrability of perception.

Our study provides another building block supporting the idea that such top-down influences of beliefs on perception do indeed exist, stresses Hubert Dinse.

The beliefs we hold do indeed change how we experience the world.

Cooperation partners

The interdisciplinary team at Ruhr University Bochum consisted of researchers from the fields of neuroscience, medicine and philosophy. In addition to team leaders Hubert Dinse, Albert Newen and Martin Tegenthoff, the experiment was conducted by Marius Markmann and Dr. Melanie Lenz from Bergmannsheil.

They were assisted in data collection by Agn Steponaviite and in evaluation by Professor Oliver Hffken. The basic concept was developed by the lead team together with Professor Martin Brne (LWL University Clinic for Psychiatry, Bochum).

Author: Meike DriessenSource: RUBContact: Meike Driessen RUBImage: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

Original Research: Open access.Hypnotic suggestions cognitively penetrate tactile perception through top-down modulation of semantic contents by Hubert Dinse et al. Scientific Reports

Abstract

Hypnotic suggestions cognitively penetrate tactile perception through top-down modulation of semantic contents

Perception is subject to ongoing alterations by learning and top-down influences. Although abundant studies have shown modulation of perception by attention, motivation, content and context, there is an unresolved controversy whether these examples provide true evidence that perception is penetrable by cognition.

Here we show that tactile perception assessed as spatial discrimination can be instantaneously and systematically altered merely by the semantic content during hypnotic suggestions. To study neurophysiological correlates, we recorded EEG and SEPs.

We found that the suggestion your index finger becomes bigger led to improved tactile discrimination, while the suggestion your index finger becomes smaller led to impaired discrimination. A hypnosis without semantic suggestions had no effect but caused a reduction of phase-locking synchronization of the beta frequency band between medial frontal cortex and the finger representation in somatosensory cortex.

Late SEP components (P80N140 complex) implicated in attentional processes were altered by the semantic contents, but processing of afferent inputs in SI remained unaltered.

These data provide evidence that the psychophysically observed modifiability of tactile perception by semantic contents is not simply due to altered perception-based judgments, but insteadis a consequence of modified perceptual processes which change the perceptual experience.

Read more:
Thought Power: Altering Tactile Perception With the Power of Imagination - Neuroscience News