Category Archives: Neuroscience

Dr. Xiaokui Zhang to Present Aspen Neuroscience, Inc. at 2022 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa – PR Newswire

SAN DIEGO, Oct. 11, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- This week Xiaokui Zhang, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer of Aspen Neuroscience, Inc. will present at the 2022 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa Conference in Carlsbad, Calif. including presenting a live corporate update and participating in a panel session to highlight new developments in the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) field.

Dr. Xiaokui Zhang to Present Aspen Neuroscience at 2022 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa

This morning Dr. Zhang will present "Transforming Cell Therapy: Autologous in the Neuroscience Space," taking place at 9:15 a.m. in the Oxford Biomedica Ballroom. Dr. Zhang will provide the latest updates in a corporate overview of Aspen Neuroscience, which is developing the first iPSC-derived autologous neuron replacement treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD).

This Thursday, Dr. Zhang will serve as panel member for the discussion, "New Developments and Advancements in the World of PSCs," which will highlight the latest advances in the field, taking place at 9:45 a.m. in the UBC Ballroom.

Headquartered in San Diego, Aspen Neuroscience, Inc. is a development stage, private biotechnology company focused on personalized autologous cell therapies. The company is developing iPSCs to address diseases with high unmet medical need, beginning with autologous neuron replacement for both sporadic and genetic forms of Parkinson's disease, and extending across the brain and affected organs.

A leading iPSC company, Aspen combines stem cell biology with the latest artificial intelligence and genomic approaches to investigate patient-specific restorative treatments.

The company has developed a best-in-class platform to create and characterize pluripotent-derived cell medicines, which includes in-house bioinformatics, manufacturing and QC. Aspen's platform consistently produces high quality iPSCs and autologous dopaminergic neurons and has broad potential with multiple opportunities to expand the current pipeline.

For more information and important updates, please visitaspenneuroscience.com.

SOURCE Aspen Neuroscience , Inc.

Follow this link:
Dr. Xiaokui Zhang to Present Aspen Neuroscience, Inc. at 2022 Cell & Gene Meeting on the Mesa - PR Newswire

Faculty, Staff Honored as Good Stewards – University of California, Davis

Chancellor Gary S. May, center, is flanked by Faculty and Staff Stewardship Award recipients Kimberley McAllister, left, and Tammy Ainsley, right. Also pictured are Shaun Keister, vice chancellor, Development and Alumni Relations, and Cecelia Sullivan, chair of the UC Davis Foundation. Not pictured: Marcie Kirk Holland. (Samuel Sellers/UC Davis)

UC Davis last week presented its annual Faculty and Staff Stewardship Awards, honoring three individuals considered exceptionally dedicated to building the strong relationships that are critical to the universitys fundraising efforts.

This years recipients are recognized as leaders in a variety of fields on the Davis and Sacramento campuses:

These faculty and staff go the extra mile in their commitment to philanthropy at UC Davis, inspiring donors and those around them, said Shaun Keister, vice chancellor of Development and Alumni Relations and president of the UC Davis Foundation, who joined in presenting the awards during an Oct. 7 luncheon. The passion they have for their work and for building strong relationships has a transformational impact on our campus.

Chancellor Gary S. May and UC Davis Foundation Chair Cecelia Sullivan 83 also participated in the awards presentation.

Kimberley McAllister is passionate for neuroscience research and training, and dedicated to the Center for Neuroscience, or CNS, with which she has been affiliated for 23 years, bolstering its research, contributing to its success and inspiring the support of many donors.

Since becoming the director in 2016, McAllister has led several initiatives to strengthen the center, including launching the CNS Directors Circle, a recognition society aimed at engaging generous donors with the centers research, faculty and trainees through several popular annual events.

McAllister also leads the centers annual Brain Awareness Week event, NeuroFest, to bring the community together to learn about neuroscience at UC Davis. With her support, the event continues to grow each year.

A personal touch is key to McAllisters stewardship. She has traveled throughout California and beyond, visiting many donors, giving presentations, writing handwritten thank-you notes and providing follow-up information about the impact of philanthropy. She cares deeply about each of the centers donors and is dedicated to making sure that the impact of their investments is maximized in every way possible.

Tammy Ainsley has been with UC Davis Health for more than 20 years, building strong relationships within her department and with patients, including those who are donors.

She inspires her team in their commitment to patient care. Ainsleys priority is always ensuring every patient and family at the UC Davis Medical Center has the best experience possible during their stays.

She led the development and launch of a guest relations team to better guide and support patients and their loved ones as they arrive at the medical center.

Receiving medical services is often a stressful experience, but Ainsley offers wonderful customer care and establishes trust to serve those in need in a timely manner with compassion and kindness.

Ainsley believes that donor stewardship is good for patient and family health and healing, and she leads the way to make it happen. She ensures her team is a compassionate and collaborative partner to development, and that they do their part to help advance philanthropy at UC Davis.

Marcie Kirk Holland is a longtime advocate of helping students find success in their post-graduation careers and has been a key player in growing and initiating career prep programs across campus.

A UC Davis employee of 30 years, she has served as executive director of the Internship and Career Center since 2014. Her many years of service on campus are fueled by her love of helping students find paths that are meaningful to them.

She is the co-champion for Aggie Launch, the UC Davis initiative to provide comprehensive career preparation resources for all students. Kirk Hollands leadership was essential to growing the program into a major campus priority, and in inspiring greater giving and engagement from individuals, corporations and foundations.

Always focusing on people and follow-through, Kirk Holland fosters strong relationships with donors and makes herself available to anyone who is interested in supporting Aggie Launch programs.

She frequently speaks at receptions for parents and students and is always looking for new ways to serve the university while providing resources and assistance to others.

Clmentine Sicard is a communications specialist in the Office of Development and Alumni Relations.

View post:
Faculty, Staff Honored as Good Stewards - University of California, Davis

Birth Weights Below the 25th Percentile Linked to Later Developmental Concerns – Neuroscience News

Summary: Babies born below the 25th percentile for birth weight are at higher risk for developmental concerns than children born between the 25-75th percentiles, with the smallest babies carrying the most risk.

Source: PLOS

Being born below the 25th percentile for birthweight may put a child at risk for developmental difficulties, according to a new study by Abiodun Adanikin of Coventry University, U.K., and colleagues, publishing October 11 in the open access journalPLOS Medicine.

Babies that are too big or too small are believed to be at risk of poor birth outcomes and problems related tochildhood development, but little is known about this relationship across the entire range of birthweights for non-prematurebabies. To fill this gap, researchers studied the development of more than 600,000 infants born after 37 weeks of gestation in Scotland.

At around two or three years of age, the children underwent evaluation forsocial developmentand for fine motor, gross motor and communication skills. The researchers looked for associations betweenbirthweightandearly childhooddevelopmental concerns, taking into account complicating factors, such as the childs sex and gestational age at delivery, as well as the health, ethnicity and socio-economic status of the mother.

The study showed that babies born below the 25th percentile for birthweight had a higher risk of developmental concerns compared to babies born between the 25th and 75th percentiles, with the smallest babies carrying the greatest risk.

Babies born above the 75th percentile of weights did not have a substantially increased risk of developmental concerns compared to babies born in the middle range.

The researchers conclude that having a low birthweight is an unrecognized and potentially important contributor to the prevalence of issues related to childhood development.

Traditionally, babies below the 10th percentile were believed to be at risk for developmental concerns. But the new study found a greater number of babies within the 10th to 24th percentile range of birthweights with these issues, simply because there are a larger number of babies within that population.

The researchers suggest that better birthweight surveillance, counseling for the parents and increased support during childhood may help reduce the risks associated with babies born with lower birthweights.

Coauthor Abiodun Adanikin adds, Though it is mostly unrecognized, babies who are mild-to-moderately small at birth are key contributors to the burden of childhood developmental concerns. They may need closer monitoring and increased support to reduce the risk of developmental concerns.

Author: Press OfficeSource: PLOSContact: Press Office PLOSImage: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Open access.Association of birthweight centiles and early childhood development of singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation in Scotland: A population-based cohort study by Abiodun Adanikin et al. PLOS Medicine

Abstract

Association of birthweight centiles and early childhood development of singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation in Scotland: A population-based cohort study

Birthweight centiles beyond the traditional thresholds for small or large babies are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes but there is a paucity of data about the relationship between birthweight centiles and childhood development among children born from 37 weeks of gestation. This study aims to establish the association between birthweight centiles across the whole distribution and early childhood development among children born from 37 weeks of gestation.

This is a population-based cohort study of 686,284 singleton infants born from 37 weeks of gestation. The cohort was generated by linking pregnancy and delivery data from the Scottish Morbidity Records (2003 to 2015) and the child developmental assessment at age 2 to 3.5 years. The main outcomes were childs fine motor, gross motor, communication, and social developmental concerns measured with the Ages and Stages Questionnaires3 (ASQ-3) and Ages and Stages Questionnaire: Social & Emotional2 (ASQ:SE-2), and for a subset of children with additional specialist tools such as the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (M-CHAT) if the ASQ3/SE indicate these are necessary. The ASQ score for each domain was categorised as concern and no concern.

We used multivariate cubic regression splines to model the associations between birthweight centiles and early childhood developmental concerns. We used multivariate Poisson regression models, with cluster robust errors, to estimate the relative risks (RRs) of developmental concerns below and above the established thresholds. We adjusted for maternal age, early pregnancy body mass index (BMI), parity, year of delivery, gestational age at delivery, smoking history, substance misuse in pregnancy, alcohol intake, ethnicity, residential area deprivation index, maternal clinical conditions in pregnancy (such as diabetes and pre-eclampsia), induction of labour, and childs sex.

Babies born from 37 weeks of gestation with birthweight below the 25th centile, compared to those between the 25th and 74th centile, were at higher risk of developmental concerns. Those born between the 10th and 24th centile had an RR of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.12,p< 0.001), between the 3rd and 9th centile had an RR: 1.18 (95% CI: 1.12 to 1.25,p< 0.001), and <3rd centile had an RR of 1.37 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.50,p< 0.001). There was no substantial increase in the risk of early childhood developmental concerns for larger birthweight categories of 75th to 89th (RR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.05;p= 0.56), 90th to 96th (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.05;p= 0.86), and 97th centiles (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.12;p= 0.27), referent to birthweight between 25th and 74th centile.

The percentage of developmental concerns attributable to birthweight between the 10th and 24th centile was more than that of birthweight <3rd centile (p= 0.023) because this group includes more of the population. Approximately 2.50% (95% CI: 1.26 to 3.61) of social skills concerns and 3.00% (95% CI: 1.33 to 4.67) of fine motor developmental concerns were attributable to birthweight between the 10th and 24th centile compared to 0.90% (95% CI: 0.48 to 1.26) and 2.30% (95% CI: 1.73 to 2.67) respectively for birthweight <3rd centile. We acknowledge the limitation of ASQ as a screening tool, the subjective nature of developmental assessments (particularly for speech) among young children, and inability to control for early childhood illness and upbringing factors may have an impact on our findings.

We observed that from 37 weeks of gestation birthweight below the 25th centile was associated with child developmental concerns, with an association apparent at higher centiles above the conventional threshold defining small for gestational age (SGA, 3rd or 10th centile). Mild to moderate SGA is an unrecognised potentially important contributor to the prevalence of developmental concerns. Closer surveillance, appropriate parental counselling, and increased support during childhood may reduce the risks associated with lower birthweight centiles.

Here is the original post:
Birth Weights Below the 25th Percentile Linked to Later Developmental Concerns - Neuroscience News

Ask Me Anything: Neuroscience with Andrew Huberman – Scope

Ever wonder what science says you should do to quell daily anxiety? What about how to fall back asleep when you wake in the middle of the night?

In our latest #AskMeAnything on Stanford Medicine's Instagram account, neuroscientist and podcaster Andrew Huberman, PhD, untangled those and other complicated questions about human behavior, and shared the latest on what's brewing in his lab.

During a live conversation with our senior manager of media relations, Lisa Kim, Huberman explored, among other things, how to get a good night's sleep, the importance of exercise and quality nutrition, building resilience against stress, and why we need sunlight in our day-to-day lives.

Parts of the conversation are represented in the following Q&A, which has been condensed and edited for clarity.

Light sets your circadian rhythm for wakefulness, and it helps you feel better throughout the day. It's what we call a slow integration system. Going outside first thing in the morning and looking into sunlight for five to 30 minutes, depending on how bright it is outside, taps into hormone systems and neurotransmitter systems in the brain and body that kick in over the course of minutes to hours.

That ends up feeling like a slow increase in your overall energy and mood. Every 24 hours, we release a hormone called cortisol. A lot of people think cortisol is bad, but it's important for your immune system and for energy, provided it's not too high or too frequent. A cortisol release needs to arrive early in the day to get the most out of it.

But work from my Stanford Medicine colleague David Spiegel and others has shown that if you don't get sunlight early in the day, that cortisol release starts shifting later, which creates issues with insomnia and anxiety and even some low-level depression later in the day. Now, that does not mean that if you miss getting sunlight one day that you're going to get depressed. It's a slow, integrated mechanism.

It's effective in that it can shift your circadian clock. But I am a strong believer in avoiding taking exogenous melatonin. First of all, it's been well documented that many of the supplements that contain melatonin have far too much -- 3 to 6 milligrams is a massive dose. Typically, the body makes very little melatonin.

The other issue is that not all supplements contain what they say they contain. This is especially true for melatonin -- even supposedly reliable brands can contain 15% to 155% of the dosage that's listed on the bottle.

There are healthier alternatives, but I want to really emphasize -- and I'll probably go into my grave saying this -- use behavioral tools first. Get morning sunlight, avoid too much light late at night, then look to quality of nutrition and eating habits. Being too hungry or eating too close to bedtime can both inhibit sleep. Get quality exercise, and don't drink caffeine after 2 or 3 o'clock in the afternoon. Before you start thinking about supplements or prescription drugs for sleep, it's really important to have all the other things right. And the nice thing about all those is that they are all zero cost.

For day-to-day anxiety as opposed to an anxiety disorder -- which should be taken seriously and addressed with the help of a medical professional -- there are real-time tools to push back on anxiety and stress and raise our threshold for stress. We are collaborating with our associate chair of psychiatry, David Spiegel, on a study that harnesses a natural pattern of breathing that we do in sleep. It's called the physiological sigh, which was discovered by physiologists in the 1930s and is very effective at reducing anxiety practices while we're awake.

During sleep, carbon dioxide in your bloodstream sometimes gets too high and your levels of oxygen will get too low, so you're actually becoming asphyxiated but don't realize it because you're asleep. Under those conditions, your body will do a double inhale through your nose and then a long exhale through your mouth.

To use this technique to address anxiety, take a really deep inhale through the nose and, when you feel your lungs are full, make every effort to sneak in a little bit more air. Then slowly release all the air through the mouth.

What does the physiological sigh do to the brain and body?

When you are stressed, you tend to under-breathe, which can elevate the level of carbon dioxide in your bloodstream. This makes the little sacs, or alveoli, that increase the surface of your lungs collapse. They don't easily re-inflate, which is why we sneak that air in at the end. Then do a long exhale to get rid of all the carbon dioxide that's built up in your system and is causing your body stress.

When someone is trying to help you de-stress and they tell you to take a deep breath, what they really should tell you is take a long exhale. This type of sigh can also be great if you are having a hard time falling asleep or back to sleep. Try doing a few physiological sighs, really extending that exhale, and you'll notice your core, your diaphragm region, will start to relax. This feeds back to the nervous system, then to the brain, which then feeds back to the body to relax it.

What about being mentally strong? How do you build mental resilience?

We hear about grit, resilience and mental toughness. How do you cope better? The best way to cope is to not get stressed in the first place. But the next best thing is to get comfortable with certain levels of stress -- with having a spike of adrenaline in your body.

Many people are not familiar with the feeling of their heart racing, which can happen in a social setting: Maybe you're preparing for a presentation at work or for a tough conversation, or you're afraid of going to the doctor. These situations can increase adrenaline, and people start to get nervous. So, here's the key: David Spiegel says there's something very powerful about self-inducing a state. The stress isn't created from the outside; you're creating that sense of stress deliberately.

There are a couple ways to do this. You need to increase the adrenaline but you need to do it in a healthy way. What can you do? You could take a cold shower and learn to stay calm or calm yourself with the inevitable increase in adrenaline. Remember, adrenaline is non-negotiable. What matters is how you navigate the choppy waters of adrenaline in your system. You can train that by taking a cold shower for a minute to three minutes, and you will get better at tolerating stress.That shot of adrenaline will become a familiar place.

Another way is called cyclic hyperventilation, or self-directing adrenaline increases by deliberately hyperventilating. I would suggest that people who have anxiety not do this when they're in an anxious state and to ease into it over time, because it will very quickly liberate adrenaline in your body.

It's essentially breathing rapidly in through the nose and out through the mouth repeatedly, then exhaling all your air, waiting 10 or 15 second and trying again. But be very careful: If you're somebody who is prone to panic attacks, you might throw yourself into one.

But if you're somebody who suffers from moderate levels of anxiety and you want to build resilience, try five breaths every few days, then maybe 10 breaths for few rounds. What you'll notice over time is that your threshold for adrenaline starts to go up.

Can you talk about the power of cognition in health?

I'm always a proponent of changing behaviors first. But wouldn't it be beautiful if there was something that we could do just with our mind, with our thinking, to enhance our health and well-being? Well, that tool exists. It's a script, of sorts, that my lab has been working on called non-sleep deep rest, or NSDR. It can help us rewire our thinking and our ability to heal and deal with psychological and/or physical problems better.

NSDR involves bringing your nervous system into a state of deep relaxation, and it has been shown to have a handful of major positive effects. It can lead to replenished levels of dopamine, which is a molecule responsible for motivation, among other things. There is also early data showing improvements in cognitive function for people who do this regularly. It can also help replace some of the sleep that you may have missed. If you're not getting enough sleep, you can do this when you wake up in the morning.

For more information on Andrew Huberman's research, visit the Huberman Lab website. For more #AskMeAnything content, visit the Stanford Medicine Instagram page or related Scope stories.

Photo courtesy of Andrew Huberman

Continue reading here:
Ask Me Anything: Neuroscience with Andrew Huberman - Scope

Beautiful brain: exhibit illuminates the human connections behind neuroscience – University of Alberta

It can be hard to get your head around the scope of neuroscience. The never-ending and complex interactions between all of the neurons that drive our nervous systems and our brains are almost unfathomable. Just a small malfunction can lead to disease, yet research to find potential repairs so far just scratches the surface of what there is to know and understand.

This is why pharmacology professor Simonetta Sipione an expert in the causes of neurodegeneration in Huntingtons disease and member of the Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute reached out to experts from other disciplines to give others insight into neuroscience research.

The result is Connections: Bringing Neuroscience and Art Together, a luminous art exhibit of 70 multimedia pieces and a few poems that has been on display at the Friends of University Hospitals McMullen Gallery over the summer and is now available online and as a book.

The exhibit depicts the beauty of the brain, its fragility, and the hope that connects everyone touched by the field of neuroscience from patients to family members, scientists and clinicians. The institute conceived and sponsored the cross-faculty collaboration between the Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry and the Faculty of Arts.

As scientists, we had this desire to share with the general public our excitement for the beauty of the brain, for the way the brain works, things that are revealed on a daily basis during our research work at the institute, says Sipione.

But they also wanted to connect directly on an emotional level with people living with brain diseases and mental health problems.

We wanted to send the message that we hear them, we see them, and we really work hard as scientists and as clinicians to clarify the mysteries of the brain and understand what goes wrong in diseases and develop treatments, Sipione says.

The images on their own and as a collection are striking. A fractured photo collage depicts the nonlinear thought of a person with dementia. A painted face with flesh dripping off one side to reveal the skull illustrates the experience of chronic migraines. A sculpture of wool, silk, wire and wood shows a female figure bent over with the anguish of isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Social anxiety, stress, stroke, autism, benign brain tumour, depression, borderline personality disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder all are explored in submissions sent in by U of A students, neuroscience researchers, professional artists, and community members with lived experience who make art to heal.

The materials used are just as varied as the artists: paint, beads, glass, metal, even sticky notes. Some are actual medical images, such as the live photo of a larval zebrafishs eye submitted by neuroscience post-doctoral fellow Chinmayee Das. Her piece, An angle of observation, captures the moment when the fish perceives a threat and calcium rushes into its eye cells to trigger a fight-or-flight response.

A masters student in the Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute graduate program, An Bui studies recovery after stroke, but she also works as a freelance artist and illustrator. Her print, A beautiful mind, shows a doctor peering into the eye of a patient, with flowers and leaves of gold depicting what the doctor sees inside her mind.

There are so many ways connections are made in neuroscience, between different parts of the brain, between the brain and the rest of the body systems, and most importantly, between humans and humans, Bui says.

Master of fine arts candidate Emily Legleitners woodcut on mulberry paper, entitled I will nestle myself within your hunger for the ground, depicts her personal struggle with anxiety. Legleitner says sharing her own experiences helps others feel safe to share stories of their own mental health.

Art can be a very powerful tool in this way: it opens doors and asks us to grapple with difficult questions, Legleitner says.

Sipione collaborated with assistant professor of art Marilne Oliver, assistant professor in design studies Gillian Harvey, and professor of French and media studies Daniel Laforest. The trio had previously worked together on Dyscorpia, an exhibition exploring the impact of technology on the human body.

They considered the title Disconnections, since that is often what happens in disease, but instead settled on Connections as a better description of the goals of the project. A class ofHarveys visual communication design students designed concepts for the visualidentity, which Harvey applied to the design of the catalogue, website and exhibition. Laforest wrote an essay on the overarching theme of the exhibition and introductions to the three parts of the collection.

The purpose of our efforts is to display the beautiful connections that exist among our brain cells; to weave together the threads that bridge neuroscience research, clinical care, and recovery from brain diseases and mental health disorders; to amplify the warm, inspiring, healing power of art; and most importantly, to highlight our human connection, he wrote on the projects website.

Laforest is struck by how the artists reveal their own stories through their art.

It reaches very deep for a lot of these artists, showing experiences that are sometimes heartbreaking, sometimes awesome, but every time there's a lot of personal emotion tied to both being ill and to healing, he says.

For Oliver, the exhibit is like a conversation between the artworks and the artists, illuminating connections between people, between art and science, and between illness and health.

Its only when we're surrounded by the pieces that we realize there are very few images that have depth of field, and the surfaces are often kind of fragmented or fractured, Oliver notes.

Harvey agrees, pointing out that the layering in each piece is almost like a symbolic representation of psychosis or brain dysfunction.

For Sipione, she hopes the exhibit will help people understand the importance of scientific research on disease mechanisms and treatments, and that her neuroscience colleagues and students will find a powerful emotional stimulus for their work from the exhibit.

The art and the contributions of all these many artists help us remember why we do what we do.

Read the original here:
Beautiful brain: exhibit illuminates the human connections behind neuroscience - University of Alberta

A New Function of the Cerebellum – Neuroscience News

Summary: The cerebellum plays a key role in the storage of both positive and negative memories of emotional events.

Source: University of Basel

The cerebellum is known primarily for the regulation of movement. Researchers at the University of Basel have now discovered that the cerebellum also plays an important role in remembering emotional experiences.

The study appears in the journalPNAS.

Both positive and negative emotional experiences are stored particularly well in memory. This phenomenon is important to our survival, since we need to remember dangerous situations in order to avoid them in the future.

Previous studies have shown that a brain structure called the amygdala, which is important in the processing of emotions, plays a central role in this phenomenon.

Emotions activate the amygdala, which in turn facilitates the storage of information in various areas of the cerebrum.

The current research, led by Professor Dominique de Quervain and Professor Andreas Papassotiropoulos at the University of Basel, investigates the role of the cerebellum in storing emotional experiences. In a large-scale study, the researchers showed 1,418 participants emotional and neutral images and recorded the subjects brain activity using magnetic resonance imaging.

In a memory test conducted later, the positive and negative images were remembered by the participants much better than the neutral images. The improved storage of emotional images was linked with an increase in brain activity in the areas of the cerebrum already known to play a part.

However, the team also identified increased activity in the cerebellum.

The cerebellum in communication with the cerebrum

The researchers were also able to demonstrate that the cerebellum shows stronger communication with various areas of the cerebrum during the process of enhanced storage of the emotional images. It receives information from the cingulate gyrus a region of the brain that is important in the perception and evaluation of feelings.

Furthermore, the cerebellum sends out signals to various regions of the brain, including the amygdala and hippocampus. The latter plays a central role in memory storage.

These results indicate that the cerebellum is an integral component of a network that is responsible for the improved storage of emotional information, says de Quervain.

Although an improved memory for emotional events is a crucial mechanism for survival, it does have its downsides: in the case of very negative experiences, it can lead to recurring anxiety.

This means that the findings, which have now been released, may also be relevant in understanding psychiatric conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

Basel research on emotions and memory

The current study forms part of a large-scale research project conducted by the Research Platform Molecular and Cognitive Neurosciences (MCN) at the University of Basel and the University Psychiatric Clinics (UPK) Basel.

The aim of this project is to gain a better understanding of emotional and cognitive processes and to transfer results from basic research to clinical projects.

Author: Angelika JacobsSource: University of BaselContact: Angelika Jacobs University of BaselImage: The image is credited to MCN, University of Basel

Original Research: Open access.Human cerebellum and corticocerebellar connections involved in emotional memory enhancement by Dominique de Quervain et al. PNAS

Abstract

Human cerebellum and corticocerebellar connections involved in emotional memory enhancement

Emotional information is better remembered than neutral information. Extensive evidence indicates that the amygdala and its interactions with other cerebral regions play an important role in the memory-enhancing effect of emotional arousal.

While the cerebellum has been found to be involved in fear conditioning, its role in emotional enhancement of episodic memory is less clear.

To address this issue, we used a whole-brain functional MRI approach in 1,418 healthy participants. First, we identified clusters significantly activated during enhanced memory encoding of negative and positive emotional pictures. In addition to the well-known emotional memoryrelated cerebral regions, we identified a cluster in the cerebellum.

We then used dynamic causal modeling and identified several cerebellar connections with increased connection strength corresponding to enhanced emotional memory, including one to a cluster covering the amygdala and hippocampus, and bidirectional connections with a cluster covering the anterior cingulate cortex.

The present findings indicate that the cerebellum is an integral part of a network involved in emotional enhancement of episodic memory.

View post:
A New Function of the Cerebellum - Neuroscience News

New Study Undermines the Theory That Depressed People Are Just More Realistic – Neuroscience News

Summary: Depressive realism, a theory that has been touted since the late 1970s, states those with depression are more realistic in how they judge the control they have over their lives. A new study says the evidence is not there to sustain this old theory.

Source: UC Berkeley

Are depressed people simply more realistic in judging how much they control their lives, while others view the world through rose-colored lenses, living under the illusion that they have more control than they do?

Thats the general idea behind depressive realism, a theory that has held sway in science and popular culture for more than four decades.

The problem is, its just not true, new research finds.

Its an idea that exerts enough appeal that lots of people seem to believe it, but the evidence just isnt there to sustain it, says Professor Don Moore, the Lorraine Tyson Mitchell Chair in Leadership and Communication at UC Berkeleys Haas School of Business and co-author of the study in the journalCollabra:Psychology. The good news is you dont have to be depressed to understand how much control you have.

Depressive realism

The concept of depressive realism stems from a 1979 study ofcollege studentsexamining whether they could predict how much control they had over whether a light turned green when they pushed a button.

The original research concluded that the depressed students were better at identifying when they had no control over the lights, while those who werent depressed tended to overestimate their level of control.

Moore and his colleagues set out to try to replicate those findings as part of a broader effort to restore trust inscientific research, much of which is woven into the fabric of the scientific community and wider culture. Researchers are revisiting bedrock studies to shore up the most basic of scientific principles: Can the researchand its conclusionsbe replicated?

Why test the theory of depressive realism in particular? Its decades-long infusion into science, culture, and even potential mental health treatment policy makes it important, Moore says. The original study, for instance, was cited more than 2,000 times in subsequent studies or research, according to Google Scholar.

At the top of the list of reasons why we ought to revisit this particular article is its widespread acceptance in both the scholarly and popular literature, says Moore, who studies overconfidence, confidence, and decision-making. That means a lot of people are building theories or policies premised on this effect being true. If its not, its really important to establish that.

Replicating the original study

Moore co-authored the study with University of California Berkeley psychology professor Sheri Johnson and former undergraduate student researcher Karin Garrett, BA 21, along with University of Miami doctoral student Amelia Dev, BA 17.

The authors studied two groups of participants, whom they screened for depression via a questionnaire. The first group of 248 participants came from Amazons Mechanical Turk, an online service that provides paid survey-takers and study participants from a range of backgrounds, in this case all over 18 years old. The second group was made up of 134 college students who participated in return for college credit.

The researchers added or used more modern and robust measurements for the study. For example, they added a mechanism to measure bias, and experimentally varied the amount of control participants actually had.

Participants performed a task similar to that in the 1979 study. In 40 rounds, each chose whether to press a button, after which a lightbulb or a black box appeared. Each was told to figure out whether pushing (or not pushing) the button impacted whether the light came on. After the rounds, each reported how much control they had over the light.

Both the online groups and college student groups were split into three experimental conditions. Each condition experienced different relationships between the button and the light during the 40 rounds.

The participants in the first two conditions had no actual control over the lights appearance, yet saw it illuminate one-quarter or three-quarters of the time, respectively. Participants in the third condition had some control, seeing the light three-quarters of the time after pushing the button.

The researchers were unable to replicate the original studys results. In fact, people in the online group with a higher level of depression overestimated their controla direct contradiction to the original study. That finding may be driven by anxiety rather than depression, the researchers note, an observation Moore says merits further study.

In the college student group, depression levels had little impact on their view of their control, the authors found.

Researchers also tested for overconfidence. Study participants were asked to estimate their scores on an intelligence test. Depression had no impact there, either.

Results undermine the theory

The results, Moore says, undermined his belief in depressive realism.

The study does not suggest that there are benefits to being depressed, so no one should seek depression as a cure to their cognitive biases, Moore says.

Imagine, for example, a manager hiring someone who is depressed because they believebased on the original studythat the person is less likely to be overconfident and will have better judgment. That would be a mistake, Moore says.

While depression may not improve judgment, the issue of how to accurately gauge our level of control in various situations has broader implications throughout life, Moore says.

We live with a great deal of uncertainty about how much control we haveover our careers, our health, our body weight, our friendships, or our happiness, says Moore. What actions can we take that really matter? If we want to make good choices in life, its very helpful to know what we control and what we dont.

Author: Press OfficeSource: UC BerkeleyContact: Press Office UC BerkeleyImage: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Closed access.Sadder Wiser: Depressive Realism is not Robust to Replication by Amelia Shepley Dev et al. Collabra:Psychology

Abstract

Sadder Wiser: Depressive Realism is not Robust to Replication

The theory of depressive realism holds that depressed individuals are less prone to optimistic bias, and are thus more realistic, in assessing their control or performance.

Since the theory was proposed 40 years ago, many innovations have been validated for testing cognitive accuracy, including improved measures of bias in perceived control and performance.

We incorporate several of those innovations in a well-powered, pre-registered study designed to identify depressive realism. Amazon MTurk workers (N = 246) and undergraduate students (N = 134) completed a classic contingency task, an overconfidence task, and measures of mental health constructs, including depression and anxiety.

We measured perceived control throughout the contingency task, allowing us to compare control estimates at the trial-level to estimates assessed at task conclusion. We found no evidence that depressive symptoms relate to illusory control or to overconfidence.

Our results suggest that despite its popular acceptance, depressive realism is not replicable.

Link:
New Study Undermines the Theory That Depressed People Are Just More Realistic - Neuroscience News

The Effect of the Color Red on Brain Waves – Neuroscience News

Summary: The color red is not particularly strong in terms of the strength of gamma oscillations it generates in the brain.

Source: ESI

Red traffic lights make drivers stop. The color red produces a signaling and warning effect. But is this also reflected in the brain?

Researchers at the Ernst Strngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience have now investigated this question. They wanted to know whether red triggers brain waves more strongly than other colors.

The study, titled Human visual gamma for color stimuli, is published in the journaleLife.

The research of Benjamin J. Stauch, Alina Peter, Isabelle Ehrlich, Zora Nolte, and ESI director Pascal Fries focuses on the early visual cortex, also known as V1. It is the largest visual area in the brain and the first to receive input from the retina.

When this area is stimulated by strong and spatially homogeneous images, brain waves (oscillations) arise at a specific frequency called thegammaband (3080 Hz). But not all images generate this effect to the same extent.

Color is hard to define

Recently, a lot of research has attempted to explore which specific input drives gamma waves, explains Benjamin J. Stauch, first author of the study. One visual input seems to be colored surfaces. Especially if they are red. Researchers interpreted this to mean that red is evolutionarily special to the visual system because, for example, fruits are often red.

But how can the effect of color be scientifically proven? Or refuted? After all, it is difficult to define a color objectively, and it is equally difficult to compare colors between different studies.

Every computer monitor reproduces a color differently, so red on one screen is not the same as on another. In addition, there are a variety of ways to define colors: based on a single monitor, perceptual judgments, or based on what their input does to thehuman retina.

Colors activate photoreceptor cells

Humans perceive color when photoreceptor cells, the so-called cones, are activated in the retina. They respond to light stimuli by converting them into electrical signals, which are then transmitted to the brain.

To recognize colors, we need several types of cones. Each type is particularly receptive to a specific range of wavelengths: red (L cones), green (M cones), or blue (S cones). The brain then compares how strongly the respective cones have reacted and deduces a color impression.

It works similarly for all human beings. It would therefore be possible to define colors objectively by measuring how strongly they activate the different retinal cones. Scientific studies with macaques have shown that the early primate visual system has two color axes based on these cones: the L-M axis compares red to green, and the S(L+M) axis is yellow to violet.

We believe that a color coordinate system based on these two axes is the right one to define colors when researchers want to explore the strength of gamma oscillations. It definescolorsaccording to how strongly and in what way they activate the earlyvisual system, Benjamin J. Stauch says.

He and his team wanted to measure a larger sample of individuals (N = 30) because previous work on color-related gamma oscillations has mostly been run withsmall samplesof a few primates or human participants, and the spectra of cone activation can vary genetically from individual to individual,

Red and green have an equal effect

In doing so, Benjamin J. Stauch and his team investigated whether the color red is special and whether this color causes stronger gamma oscillations than green of comparable color intensity (i.e., cone contrast).

They also explored a side question: Can color-induced gamma oscillations also be detected by magnetoencephalography (MEG), a method for measuring the magnetic activities of the brain?

They conclude that the color red is not particularly strong in terms of the strength of the gamma oscillations it induces. Rather, red and green produce equally strong gamma oscillations in the early visual cortex at the same absolute L-M cone contrast.

Moreover, color-induced gamma waves can be measured in human MEG when treated carefully, so future research could follow the 3R principles foranimal experiments(reduce, replace, refine) by using humans rather than nonhuman primates.

Colors that activate only the S-cone (blue) generally appear to elicit only weak neuronal responses in the early visual cortex. To some extent, this is to be expected, since the S-cone is less common in the primate retina, evolutionarily older, and more sluggish.

The results of this study led by ESI scientists contribute to understanding how the early human visual cortex encodes images and may one day be used to help develop visual prostheses. These prostheses may attempt to activate the visual cortex to induce vision-like perceptual effects in people with damaged retinas. However, this goal is still a long way off.

Much more needs to be understood about the specific responses of the visual cortex to visual input.

Author: Press OfficeSource: ESIContact: Press Office ESIImage: The image is credited to ESI/C. Kernberger

Original Research: Open access.Human visual gamma for color stimuli by Benjamin J Stauch et al. eLife

Abstract

Human visual gamma for color stimuli

Strong gamma-band oscillations in primate early visual cortex can be induced by homogeneous color surfaces (Peter et al., 2019; Shirhatti and Ray, 2018). Compared to other hues, particularly strong gamma oscillations have been reported for red stimuli.

However, precortical color processing and the resultant strength of input to V1 have often not been fully controlled for. Therefore, stronger responses to red might be due to differences in V1 input strength.

We presented stimuli that had equal luminance and cone contrast levels in a color coordinate system based on responses of the lateral geniculate nucleus, the main input source for area V1. With these stimuli, we recorded magnetoencephalography in 30 human participants.

We found gamma oscillations in early visual cortex which, contrary to previous reports, did not differ between red and green stimuli of equal L-M cone contrast.

Notably, blue stimuli with contrast exclusively on the S-cone axis induced very weak gamma responses, as well as smaller event-related fields and poorer change-detection performance.

The strength of human color gamma responses for stimuli on the L-M axis could be well explained by L-M cone contrast and did not show a clear red bias when L-M cone contrast was properly equalized.

Read the original:
The Effect of the Color Red on Brain Waves - Neuroscience News

3D Neuroscience Market Demand Analysis and Projected huge Growth by 2030 – openPR

The most recent report published by Market Research Inc. indicates that the 3D Neuroscience Market is likely to accelerate significantly in the next few years. Specialists have studied market drivers, restraints, risks and prospects in the global market. The 3D Neuroscience Market report shows the likely direction of the market in the coming years along with its assessments. A meticulous study purposes to understand the market price. By analyzing the competitive landscape, the authors of the report have made excellent efforts to help readers understand the key business strategies that significant organizations are utilizing to keep up with market sustainability.3D neuroscience is defined as 3 dimensional study of nervous system, which is related to evaluating and imaging of the brain activity. It is broad term which focuses on cellular, molecular, developmental, structural, evolutionary computing, psychosocial and medical aspects of the nervous system.

Key Players in the 3D Neuroscience Market Research Report:Doric lenses Inc., GE Healthcare, Siemens Helthineers, Laserglow Technologies, Mightex Systems, Kendall Research Systems, Neuronexus Technologies, Prixmatic Ltd., Noldus Information Technology, Bioserve GmbH

Get a Sample Copy of Report: https://www.marketresearchinc.com/request-sample.php?id=115639

The report includes organizational profiles of virtually all major players in the 3D Neuroscience market. The Company Profiles segment provides important analysis of strengths and weaknesses, business trends, recent advances, mergers and acquisitions, expansion plans, global presence, market presence, and portfolios of products from significant market players. This data can be used by players and other market members to expand their productivity and streamline their business strategies.

By Type:Instruments and consumablesSoftware and services

By Technology:Brain imagingNeuro-MicroscopyElectrophysiologyNeuroproteomic Analysis

By Application:HospitalsDiagnostic LaboratoriesResearch and Academic institutes

:The research report extensively lists the regional landscape of this industry. According to the review, 3D Neuroscience Market regional landscape is bifurcated into , , , , and .The study provides significant data relating to the market share that every region is estimated to hold, in tandem with the growth opportunities anticipated for each geography.The report describes the growth rate in which each geography is estimated to register over the forecast time period.

Get Exclusive Discount: https://www.marketresearchinc.com/ask-for-discount.php?id=115639

The global market for 3D Neuroscience is segmented on the basis of product, type. These segments have been concentrated separately. The detailed examination permits evaluation of the factors influencing the 3D Neuroscience Market. Specialists have analyzed the nature of growth, investments in research and development, changing utilization patterns, and rising number of applications. Furthermore, experts have additionally assessed the changing economics around the 3D Neuroscience Market that are likely affect its course.

The report's regional analysis segment allows players to focus on high-growth regions and countries that could help them to expand their presence in the 3D Neuroscience market. Aside from expanding their footprint in the 3D Neuroscience market, the regional analysis assists players to increase their sales while having a better comprehension of customer behavior in specific regions and countries. The report provides CAGR, revenue, production, consumption and other significant measurements and figures related to the global and regional markets. It shows how different type, application, and regional segments are advancing in the 3D Neuroscience market in terms of growth.

Some of the Key benefit in the report:Which are the five top players of the 3D Neuroscience market?How might the 3D Neuroscience showcase change in the following five years?Which item and application will take a largest part of the 3D Neuroscience showcase?What are the drivers and limitations of the 3D Neuroscience market?Which local market will show the most elevated development?What will be the CAGR and size of the 3D Neuroscience market all through the estimate period?

Enquire before purchasing this report: https://www.marketresearchinc.com/enquiry-before-buying.php?id=115639

To know more about the Market Research Inc. Reports

Robotic Process Automation Market https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/global-robotic-process-automation-market-2022-future-set-to-massive-growth-major-player-automation-anywhere-blue-prism-celaton-ltd-ipsoft-nice-systems-ltd-pegasystems

IoT sensors market https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/iot-sensors-market-key-players-to-witness-huge-revenue-growth-between-2022-2030-linear-technology-texas-instruments-lord-corp-semtech-analog-devices

Offshore Support Vessels Operation Market https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/offshore-support-vessels-operation-market-to-boost-the-revenue-over-the-forecast-period-2022-2030-siem-offshore-as-vallianz-mcdermott-international-allseas-saipem-subsea-7

Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Market https://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/atomic-absorption-spectroscopy-market-2022-swot-analysis-and-significant-growth-top-player-perkinelmer-agilent-technologies-thermo-fisher-scientific-shimadzu-hitachi-high-technologies

Customization of this Report: This report can be customized as per your needs, Please contact our sales professional (sales@marketresearchinc.com), we will ensure you obtain the report which works for your needs

Contact UsMarket Research IncAuthor: KevinUS Address: 51 Yerba Buena Lane, Ground Suite,Inner Sunset San Francisco, CA 94103, USACall Us: +1 (628) 225-1818Write Us: sales@marketresearchinc.com

About UsMarket Research Inc. is farsighted in its view and covers massive ground in global research. Local or global, we keep a close check on both markets. Trends and concurrent assessments sometimes overlap and influence the other. When we say market intelligence, we mean a deep and well-informed insight into your products, market, marketing, competitors, and customers. Market research companies are leading the way in nurturing global thought leadership. We help your product/service become the best they can with our informed approach.

This release was published on openPR.

Original post:
3D Neuroscience Market Demand Analysis and Projected huge Growth by 2030 - openPR

Scientists Hit Their Creative Peak Early in Their Careers – Neuroscience News

Summary: Overall, scientists and researchers are most innovative and creative early in their careers, a new study reports.

Source: Ohio State University

A new study provides the best evidence to date that scientists overall are most innovative and creative early in their careers.

Findings showed that, on one important measure, the impact of biomedical scientists published work drops by between one-half to two-thirds over the course of their careers.

Thats a huge decline in impact, saidBruce Weinberg, co-author of the study and professor ofeconomics at The Ohio State University.

We found that as they get older, the work of biomedical scientists was just not as innovative and impactful.

But the reasons behind this trend of declining innovativeness make the findings more nuanced and show why it is still important to support scientists later in their careers, Weinberg said.

The study was published online Oct. 7, 2022 in theJournal of Human Resources.

Researchers have been studying the relationship between age or experience with innovativeness for nearly 150 years, but no consensus has emerged. Findings, in fact, have been all over the map, Weinberg said.

For a topic that so many people with so many approaches have studied for so long, it is pretty remarkable that we still dont have a conclusive answer.

One advantage of this study is that the authors had a huge dataset to work with 5.6 million biomedical science articles published over a 30-year period, from 1980 to 2009, and compiled by MEDLINE. These data include detailed information on the authors.

This new study measured the innovativeness of the articles by biomedical scientists using a standard method the number of times other scientists mention (or cite) a study in their own work. The more times a study is cited, the more important it is thought to be.

With detailed information on the authors of each paper, the researchers in this study were able to compare how often scientists work was cited early in their careers compared to later in their careers.

As they analyzed the data, Weinberg and his colleagues made a discovery that was a key to understanding how innovation changes over a career.

They found that scientists who were the least innovative early in their careers tended to drop out of the field and quit publishing new research. It was the most productive, the most important young scholars who were continuing to produce research 20 or 30 years later.

Early in their careers, scientists show a wide range of innovativeness. But over time, we see selective attrition of the people who are less innovative, Weinberg said.

So when you look at all biomedical scientists as a group, it doesnt look like innovation is declining over time. But the fact that the least innovative researchers are dropping out when they are relatively young disguises the fact that, for any one person, innovativeness tends to decline over their career.

Results showed that for the average researcher, a scientific article they published late in their career was cited one-half to two-thirds less often than an article published early in their careers.

But it wasnt just citation counts that suggest researchers were less innovative later in their career.

We constructed additional metrics that captured the breadth of an articles impact based on the range of fields that cite it, whether the article is employing the best and latest ideas, citing the best and latest research, and whether the article is drawing from multiple disciplines, said Huifeng Yu, a co-author, who worked on the study as a PhD student at the University at Albany, SUNY.

These other metrics also lead to the same conclusion about declining innovativeness.

The findings showing selective attrition among less-innovative scientists can help explain why previous studies have had such conflicting results, Weinberg said.

Studies using Nobel Laureates and other eminent researchers, for whom attrition is relatively small, tend to find earlier peak ages for innovation. In contrast, studies using broader cross-sections of scientists dont normally find an early peak in creativity, because they dont account for the attrition.

Weinberg noted that attrition in the scientific community may not relate only to innovativeness. Scientists who are women or from underrepresented minorities may not have had the opportunities they needed to succeed, although this study cant quantify that effect.

Those scientists who succeeded probably did so through a combination of talent, luck, personal background and prior training, he said.

The findings suggest that organizations that fund scientists have to maintain a delicate balance between supporting youth and experience.

Young scientists tend to be at their peak of creativity, but there is also a big mix with some being much more innovative than others. You may not be supporting the very best researchers, said Gerald Marschke, a co-author of the study and associate professor of economics at the University at Albany,

With older, more experienced scientists, you are getting the ones who have stood the test of time, but who on average are not at their best anymore.

Other co-authors on the study were Matthew Ross of New York University and Joseph Staudt of the U.S. Census Bureau.

Funding: The research was supported by theNational Institute on Aging, theOffice of Behavioral and Social Science Research, theNational Science Foundation, theEwing Marion KauffmanandAlfred P. Sloanfoundations, and theNational Bureau of Economic Research.

Author: Jeff GrabmeierSource: Ohio State UniversityContact: Jeff Grabmeier Ohio State UniversityImage: The image is in the public domain

Original Research: Closed access.Publish or Perish: Selective Attrition as a Unifying Explanation for Patterns in Innovation over the Career by Bruce Weinberg et al. Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

Publish or Perish: Selective Attrition as a Unifying Explanation for Patterns in Innovation over the Career

Studying 5.6 million biomedical science articles published over three decades, we reconcile conflicts in a longstanding interdisciplinary literature on scientists life-cycle productivity by controlling for selective attrition and distinguishing between research quantity and quality.

While research quality declines monotonically over the career, this decline is easily overlooked because higher ability authors have longer publishing careers.

Our results have implications for broader questions of human capital accumulation over the career and federal research policies that shift funding to early-career researchers while funding researchers at their most creative, these policies must be undertaken carefully because young researchers are less able on average.

Read more here:
Scientists Hit Their Creative Peak Early in Their Careers - Neuroscience News