Category Archives: Physiology

Study: For good health, don’t stay up later than 2 hours on days off | The Asahi Shimbun: Breaking News, Japan News and Analysis –

Going to bed at least two hours later on days off and getting up that much later disturbs the weekday body cycle and is detrimental to overall good health, a study in Japan found.

We found that maintaining a regular sleep cycle and not staying up more than two hours later on days off prevents people from feeling dozy on weekdays, said Kazuhiro Yagita, a professor of environmental physiology at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine who headed the team with Yuh Sasawaki, an assistant professor in the same field.

They announced the finding on June 8. It was also publishedin the German academic magazine Journal of Sleep Research at (https://doi.org/10.1111/JSR.13661).

Yagita said people who wanted to stay up a bit later on days off should restrict the time difference to under two hours. The study also looked at larger time gaps with weekday sleep patterns to gauge the impact on healthto determinethe ideal time people should call it a night.

With that in mind, the team sent questionnaires to 13 high schools in northern and southern areas of Kyoto Prefecture. The researchers based their findings on answers from 756 students.

The study asked the respondents what time they turn in, how long they sleep, when they have meals and whether they feel drowsy during the day. The students were required to keep records over an eight-day period straddling a weekend.

Comparing the results with international sleep quality standards, the team found that students with poor sleep patterns accounted for more than half of the respondents. More than one-third felt so drowsy during the the daytime that they dozed off in classes at times.

To gain a better grasp of the situation, theteam looked at what they referred to as social jet lag. This refers tothe difference of the middle point between when to call it a night and when to waken on weekends compared with weekdays.

It becamestatistically obvious that a social jet lag of two hours or longer is associated with extremely lowered sleep quality and strong daytime drowsiness among students.

Whereas social jet lag was already known to affect the quality of sleep, no studies had been carried out over how large a gap will have a significant impact, according to the team.

Originally posted here:
Study: For good health, don't stay up later than 2 hours on days off | The Asahi Shimbun: Breaking News, Japan News and Analysis -

Dr Christopher Thompson Discusses Innovative Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity – AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Christopher Thompson, MD, MSc, FASGE, FACG, AGAF, FJGES, director of endoscopy and codirector of the Center for Weight Management and Wellness at Brigham & Womens Hospital, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, discusses duodenal jejunal bypass liner treatment and future innovations in gastroenterology.

Christopher Thompson, MD, MSc, FASGE, FACG, AGAF, FJGES, director of endoscopy and codirector of the Center for Weight Management and Wellness at Brigham & Womens Hospital, professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School,discusses findings on treatment with duodenal jejunal bypass liner for patients experiencing type 2 diabetes and obesity. This interview took place during the recent annual meeting, Digestive Disease Week.

In this first part of a 2-part interview, Thompson discusses a study involving duodenal jejunal bypass liner (DJBL). This interview is edited lightly for clarity.

AJMC: When treating patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity who were being treated with insulin, what are some patient experiences you saw firsthand?

Thompson: I'm a gastroenterologist and an endoscopist, so I spend most of my time doing procedures. I do remember taking care of patients with diabetes when I was a resident. I know that once they get on insulin, they start to have a decline in their health; insulin causes weight gain and causes all sorts of other problemsit's not well tolerated. So, I guess I would say this is kind of a unique niche for gastroenterologists to care for obesity. There's a growing number of us but since I've really started caring for obesity, I started to see these diabetic patients again, and nothing seemed to have improved. I mean, it was so many years ago, 20 years ago, when I was a residentactually more than that probablytaking care of patients with diabetes and it seemed like it was very similar. There's more oral antidiabetic medications available now, but still, once they go on insulin, they don't seem to do very well. So, it's definitely time for a change, and whatever technology we can have to help these patients I think would be very welcomed.

AJMC: Can you first explain how the duodenal jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) works, and what makes it different from other treatments for patients with T2D and obesity trying to achieve similar results (such as bariatric surgery)? Why is this new method needed?

Thompson: The DJBL is quite unique in that it uses the body's physiology and an understanding of the physiology to treat type 2 diabetes. What it's doing is sheltering the duodenum from seeing any food, and it's also preventing the mixing of food with bile or pancreatic juices. Well, I could start by saying the DJBL is a 60-centimeter-long sheath, like a sleeve, is anchored in the duodenal bulb and extends all the way to just about the jejunum. What it does is it shelters the duodenal from contact with food or chyme, and it prevents the mixing of that food or chyme with bile and/or pancreatic juices. So, it is getting this undigested food and bile to the distal small bowel in a state where it has a pretty dramatic effect on incretin-producing cellswe thinksuch as L-cells, so that we're exploiting the cells production of GLP-1 and probably other substances that then have some beneficial effects on type 2 diabetes. They're known to increase insulin production and decrease glucagon, and cross the blood-brain barrier as a neurotransmitter and signal that the patient may be full, also slows gastric emptying. These substances, these gut hormones, have several beneficial effects.

AJMC: Can you summarize your research and findings into the utilization of the DJBL for this patient group?

Thompson: This was an FDA [approved] clinical trial, and they had some predefined end points. It was a randomized, sham-controlled trial with 2-to-1 randomization, so patients would be randomized. For every 2 patients, they got the procedure, 1 would get a sham procedure. The patients were blinded, as were the investigators that were following them. The predefined end points were both related to safety as well as efficacy. The efficacy end point involved hemoglobin A1C (A1C), and they wanted to see a changean improvementin A1C of at least .4% above the sham. Then, the safety end point was that they wanted the rate of serious adverse event-related device removal to be less than 15%.

So, the study did meet both of those end points, those primary end points. the treatment group was 1.1% drop in A1C. The sham was .3%. Clearly, it was well above that .4% margin, as an efficacy end point. The safety end point, I think it was just above 9% removals due to SAEs [serious adverse event-related device removal] and that's well below the 15%. So, it did meet both of those end points. However, what did also occur in this study was that the hepatic abscess rate was unexpectedly higher than they thought. This was not something they anticipated. All the patients did well, all hepatic abscesses resolved with antibiotics and some cases some percutaneous drainage. But that was just something that caught them off guard, so the company stopped the trial due to that.1

AJMC: Is there another study taking place as a result of these findings?

Thompson: Theres another registry trial run by a Dr Bob Ryder out of England. He's an endocrinologist. He has over 1000 patients in that and the hepatic abscess rate is only 1.1%, I believe. That's a lower rate than we were seeing in our study, but it has much more patients. It turns out that in our protocol, the PPI [proton pump inhibitor], we had maximum-dose PPIs; we were using very high-dose PPIs, and the rest of these patients the registry, they weren't. It makes sense that PPIs are certainlytheyre an independent risk factor for hepatic acid formation, and very high doses in diabetic population certainly could be the cause.

We started another trial. Now, we do not have the patients on PPIs. Were using H2-receptor antagonists, and they're doing really quite well.2 We've not seen any recurrence of hepatic abscesses so far. We've also instituted some measures to make sure that we would catch anything early as well. The patients have Wifi-enabled thermometers, and they take their temperatures every day, and they get monthly ultrasounds to look at the liver. We've not seen any further hepatic abscesses since we stopped PPIs, so we're cautiously optimistic

AJMC: How did this study ensure a diverse population? How do the findings reflect the needs of patients in various demographics?

Thompson: It is an FDA [approved] clinical trial, so they have in therekind of baked into itthey make sure you have a certain amount of diversity. What you try to do is find centers that are in different locations that would make sure to pull in a nice, wide, diverse population. We did, I think, have quite good diversity. Over 50% were womenof the patientsand we had a good breakdown from underrepresented minority status as well.

AJMC: What are the long-term implications of DJBLs? This study had a 12-month follow-up; are there any implications for a longer follow-up?

Thompson: Some other folks have looked at this. Oursyou knowthe analysis was done at 12 months because the sham patients were then offered an open-label placement of the device. That's really all you could do as far as the analysis goes, but other studies have looked at it more longitudinally. It seems like the results you see during the treatment period persist well after device removal, and it's not clear exactly why that's happening. It might be due to some kind of remodeling of the duodenal mucosa. There are other companies are looking at just ablating the mucosa, and they're getting good anti-diabetic effects as well. So, it might be that the duodenum itself changes over time, and that's what leads to the durability of the results.

AJMC: What other lifestyle changes do patients with DJBLs need to make?

Thompson: I think lifestyle is hugely important in achievement of obesity and diabetes, and keep in mind this population was a population of patients with obesity and diabetes, so it wasn't thin type 2 diabetics, which is a different population. No one had type 1 diabetes. Additionally, no one in this study was on insulin. Thats probably another important point to make, that these were people that you were trying to prevent them from going on insulin, right? It's not to say that it might not help get people off insulin, but I think that just the focus of the trial was to have a uniform population in a sense, and give it enough power and be able to understand the results. We had limited to people that were kind of poorly controlled diabetics, so their A1C had to be above 7.5% to 10%, somewhere in that range, and kind of maximal therapy, if you would, just short of insulin. We were trying to kind of look at that population specifically.

References

More:
Dr Christopher Thompson Discusses Innovative Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes and Obesity - AJMC.com Managed Markets Network

Could reptiles and amphibians hold the key to the fountain of youth? – Popular Science

When it comes to longevity, scientists have long suspected that scaly and slimy vertebrates have an edge. Galpagos tortoises, eastern box turtles, cave-dwelling salamanders known as olms, and a number of other reptiles and amphibians can live more than a century. And the oldest known land animal, a Seychelles giant tortoise named Jonathan, recently celebrated his 190th birthday.

Until now, though, most of the evidence highlighting the long lifespans of these animals have come from anecdotal reports from zoos, says Beth Reinke, a biologist at Northeastern Illinois University in Chicago. She and a team of more than 100 researchers from around the globe have compared rates of aging in 77 species of reptiles and amphibians in the wild. The study initially grew out of the long-running notion that turtles can live for a long time. We wanted to know how widespread that is, Reinke says.

The researchers found that although aging and lifespan varied greatly from one species to the next, turtles, crocodilians, and salamanders generally aged very slowly and had disproportionately long lifespans for their size. Meanwhile, another group of researchers in Denmark reached similar conclusions after comparing 52 species of turtles and tortoises living in zoos and aquariums: roughly 75 percent of the reptiles showed slow or negligible senescence, and 80 percent aged more slowly than modern humans.

Both teams reported their results on June 23 in Science. The new findings arent particularly surprising but do challenge the idea that senescencea gradual decline in bodily functions that increases the mortality risk after an organism reaches sexual maturityis universal, says Rob Salguero-Gmez, an ecologist at the University of Oxford who wasnt involved in the research.

Theyre both excellent pieces of research, he says. They add a new layerupon our understanding of senescence across the tree of life.

For their analysis, Reinke and her collaborators drew from long-running studies on a wide variety of animals that included turtles, frogs, salamanders, crocodilians, snakes, lizards, and the lizard-like tuatara. These studies tracked reptile and amphibian populations over an average period of 17 years and encompassed more than 190,000 individual animals.

To determine how quickly a species aged, Reinke and her team calculated the rate at which its individual members died over time after hitting sexual maturity. The team estimated lifespan from the number of years it took for 95 percent of these adult animals to die.

One caveat to these estimates, Reinke notes, is that the researchers didnt distinguish between different causes of death. When people hear aging, they tend to think of just physiology, she says. Our measure of aging includes not just physiology, but all things that could cause death in the wild.

[Related: These jellyfish seem to cheat death. Whats their secret?]

The team also compared their estimates with previously published data on aging in mammals and birds. These groups of vertebrates are warm-blooded or endothermic, meaning they are capable of regulating their own body temperature. Reinke and her team expected to find that the cold-blooded, or ectothermic, reptiles and amphibians would age more slowly on the whole than birds and mammals because their slower metabolisms put less physiological wear and tear on their bodies. But the results revealed a mixed bag. While some reptiles and amphibians did age more slowly than most birds and mammals, others aged faster. Longevity in reptiles and amphibians varied from 1 to 137 yearsa much wider range than the 4 to 84 years seen in primates.

However, species with negligible aging appeared across the reptile and amphibian family tree, and turtles as a group were uniquely slow agers, she says.

Species equipped with protective shells, scaly armor, or venom aged more slowly and lived longer. In both reptiles and amphibians, species that began reproducing later in life ended up living longer. The team also observed that reptiles that lived in warm temperatures aged more quickly, while amphibians in similar conditions aged more slowly.

More research is needed to tease out how these and other variables drive differences in aging and longevity. There are a lot of really interesting patterns that we brought to light that need to be explored further, Reinke says. I think that ectotherms could have the answers to a lot of what we want to know about aging for human health.

In the quest to extend human life, salamanders may be a particularly promising group to focus on. A lot of them can live for 10 years or more, which for their size is a lot, Reinke says. These amphibians are famous for their ability to regrow lost limbs and tails, leading some scientists to believe that there may be a connection between these regenerative capabilities and the salamanders impressive longevity.

For the second new paper, the team out of Denmark focused on aging in captive reptiles.

All these theories of senescence state thatthe risk of mortality would increase with age after sexuality maturity, when we stop putting so much energy into repairing cell damage and tissues and put more energy into reproduction, says Rita da Silva, a biologist at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense and coauthor of the findings.

The best candidates for a species that might escape the damaging effects of getting old are those that continue growing their entire lives, such as turtles and tortoises.

What we were mainly interested in is if their risk of mortality increases with age as it does in humans for instance, and in other mammals and in birds, da Silva says. She and her colleagues analyzed records of captive turtles and tortoises, with data for each species ranging from 58 to several thousand individuals.

In most species, mortality either remained constant with age or actually decreased. On average, male turtles and tortoises lived longer than femalesthe opposite of whats seen in mammals. For three of the species, the team also examined data on wild populations, and found that captive animals enjoyed lower rates of aging.

In some way these populations found a way to lower their aging rates when the conditions are favorable, da Silva says. In captivity, reptiles dont need to pour energy into finding food or shelter. But its not clear why only some reptiles seem to respond to this bounty by minimizing or avoiding senescence. For some other species either the conditions are not ideal or they are not really able to switch off the senescence, da Silva speculates.

[Related: Has the fountain of youth been in our blood all along?]

While the majority of turtle and tortoise species studied aged more slowly than humans, its too soon to say what implications the findings could have for efforts to understand human health and aging.

We need to be careful when making these comparisons, da Silva says. We cannot draw a clear connection between this and humans, [but] I can say that we are one step closer to understanding the mechanisms of aging.

The two new papers show how much remains to be discovered about aging and how it differs among humans and other animals, plants, and more distantly related organisms, Salguero-Gmez says.

Theres true value in this type of research beyond the potential translations into biomedical research, just for a higher appreciation for our place in the tree of life and also for the realization that not everything follows a human way of living, he says.

View post:
Could reptiles and amphibians hold the key to the fountain of youth? - Popular Science

Cameron Smith: If you want to understand politics, train to be a foster parent – AL.com

This is an opinion column.

Foster parent training has helped me understand more about American politics than years of experience in the halls of Congress ever could. The psychology and physiology of a traumatized child puts the interconnected web of politics, policy, and power in a whole new light. In truth, many foster children arent that different from modern American partisans.

Trauma and stress attend almost any situation where the state intervenes in a relationship between parent and child. As a result, foster parents train to address those factors which deeply influence both behavior and development. Thankfully, my wife and I trained with Dr. Daniel Siegels hand model of the brain to help us understand some complex neurological interactions.

Read more Cameron Smith columns:

Look at your hand. The wrist represents the spinal cord, the palm is the brainstem (basic body functions), and the thumb is the amygdala (danger detection). Place the thumb into the palm to form the limbic system. The other four fingers fold over the thumb to represent the cerebral cortex, and the tips of those fingers are the prefrontal cortex (emotional governor).

If theres a simpler model of brain anatomy, I certainly havent found it.

The limbic system is the instinctual survival part of our brain which also handles memories and emotions. The cortex is responsible for imagination, creativity, problem-solving, and our higher level thinking in general.

If a grizzly bear is chasing me through the woods, Im quite grateful for my limbic system which triggers a rush of cortisol, a stress hormone, increasing my heart rate and giving me a burst of energy to flee. If I stopped and reasoned through my options before moving to escape, Id become bear food.

On the other hand, I cant effectively consider the best policies to reduce gun violence while chased by said bear, because the limbic system is in the drivers seat. If I need to think and process, the cortex must retake control. That happens when I feel safe from the bear and calm down.

The prefrontal cortex is especially important because it allows us to evaluate a signal from the amygdala and control our emotions before they get to the point where our fight or flight response takes over. For example, it helps us keep our cool even after someone says something particularly offensive.

Our foster trainers explained that our prefrontal cortex isnt fully developed until were almost 30 years old. As such, children have less of an ability to control their emotions. When they flip their lids, its often up to parents to help them calm down before their thought centers can effectively engage and address a situation.

Sounds good for parenting. What about politics?

For the longest time, I couldnt understand why politicians I respected ran negative, fear-based ads I absolutely despised. Brain physiology explains so much.

Thinking, rational people challenge politicians. They ask all kinds of questions, discuss issues in detail, and expect politicians to demonstrate statesmanship.

Rather than rise to the challenge, many politicians create grizzly bears barreling towards us. Democrats want to take our constitutional rights. Republicans are white supremacists. Liberals want to force you to clap for drag queens performing at your church. Conservatives will commandeer your uterus. If the other party wins, your future and family are at risk.

In response, our lids flip and too often stay that way. The limbic system drives our actions. We look to our leaders to tell us what to do to address the immediate threats. We become reactionary and aggressive. As far as our brains are concerned, stress is stress. Our belief in the threats around us is every bit as relevant as reality. My brain doesnt care whether the grizzly is actually chasing me. Im running until I believe Im safe.

Cable news makes for a toxic political partner. If were angry or afraid, were glued to the screen awaiting the next grizzly coming over the horizon. As long as were focused on a string of partisan monsters, we dont hold our own elected officials accountable or stop watching. We become strung out, inconsistent, and unquestionably compliant.

If our political leaders and media companies were foster parents, theyd calm us down. Theyd help us sort through our emotions in productive ways. Theyd help us prioritize what really impacts our families and communities.

But then we might not vote for them. We might realize that so many of them are directionally loud and otherwise incompetent. We might turn off the televisions and play with our children and grandchildren in a creek somewhere. Above all, wed operate in reality and not useful political fiction.

Our only path to a better future is understanding whats happening to us and ending the cycle. Whether its cable news, social media, or even casual conversation, were all worse off participating in a political battle royale. When we sense anger and rage developing because of something we watch, read, or hear, we should put our lids back on. Change the subject, step back for a bit, or do something unexpectedly kind. Keep the thoughtful parts of our brains in control and realize we cant effectively communicate when theyre not.

Better yet, train to be a foster parent. Many children need a calming adult influence, and many of us could use a little help learning to be just that.

Smith is a recovering political attorney with three boys, two dogs, and an extremely patient wife. He engages media, business, and policy through the Triptych Foundation and Triptych Media. Please direct outrage or agreement to csmith@al.com or @DCameronSmith on Twitter.

The rest is here:
Cameron Smith: If you want to understand politics, train to be a foster parent - AL.com

Men, women might have different optimal times of day for exercise – Medical News Today

Not everyone exercises for the same reason. For some, exercise is a means of addressing a health issue such as hypertension. Some work out to build strength in one part of the body or another, and some to improve their mood.

A new study suggests the time of day at which a person exercises may produce different results. In addition, those results are not the same for women and men.

Professor Paul J. Arciero, lead author of the study and professor at the Health and Human Physiological Sciences Department at Skidmore College in New York, tells BBC News that the best time for exercise is when people can fit it into their schedules.

Nonetheless, the study reveals certain time periods when individuals are most likely to achieve specific exercise goals.

Dr. Asad R. Siddiqi, assistant professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation at Weill Cornell Medicine in NYC, who was not involved in the study, told Medical News Today:

I appreciated the authors stated goal of adding to our understanding of the effects of training on female athletes and how that may differ from male athletes.

Women are notoriously underrepresented in the medical literature, and even hypothesizing that there may be a difference between how different biological sexes respond to exercise indicates a level of thoughtfulness and nuance that has long been missing from scientific inquiry. Dr. Asad R. Siddiqi

The study was published in frontiers in Physiology.

The researchers tracked the benefits of exercise in a group of 30 women and 26 men who were assigned to exercise in the morning specifically between 6:00 to 8:00 am or in the evening from 6:30 to 8:30 PM.

All participants were healthy, non-smoking, athletically trained individuals.

The participants trained according to the PRISE (Protein pacing intake combined with Resistance functional, Interval sprint, Stretching, Endurance exercise) exercise and fitness paradigm developed by Dr. Arciero.

All participants followed a designed healthy meal plan and intake was similar in morning and evening groups.

The authors of the study measured a range of outcomes, including muscular strength, endurance and power, body composition, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, respiratory exchange ratio, and mood states, as well as their dietary intake.

Dr. Siddiqi cautioned that the participants were all healthy, active, lean, and weight-stable individuals, which may not be particularly reflective of the habits, demographics, or goals of the larger population.

He noted, in particular, that they were middle-aged adults with no cardiovascular disease. Thus, this would not be representative of the general population.

One of the unique aspects of the study is its exploration of exercise time of day on mood.

[F]or the first time, we show that exercise time of day significantly alters mood state in women and men, Dr. Arciero told MNT.

Specifically, women who exercise in the [p.m.] significantly boost overall mood state compared to those exercising in the morning. Prof. Paul J. Arciero

Dr. Siddiqi also pointed out another interesting finding:

The men studied had greater improvement in perceived mood state than women. Exercise seemed to decrease tension, depression, anger, substantially in men regardless of time of day, whereas improvements in tension and depression were only seen in women who exercised at night.

He added that studying mood is inherently more difficult due to its reliance on self-reporting.

All participants showed improvements in all areas after the 12-week trial. However, the nature of improvements varied.

The effect was less pronounced in men. However, there were differences:

Dr. Arciero noted that a direct comparison between women and men was not the goal of the study.

However, he said, several potential mechanisms for the differences between women and men with regards to their response to exercising at different times of the day may include; variations in neuromuscular function, capillary density, hunger responses, and fat metabolism between women and men.

[These differences] suggest molecular, endocrine, metabolic, and neuromuscular factors likely contribute to these diurnal variations in health and physical performance outcomes between women and men. Prof. Paul J. Arciero

The precise mechanism, Dr. Arciero continued, is not clear, but may be related to neuro-hormonal-psychological effects of exercising later in the day as a form of a stress-reliever that may also favorably impact sleep quality. Its interesting to note that [p.m.] exercise in men also significantly reduced feelings of fatigue.

The studys findings suggest that people consider the time of day at which they will exercise as they develop exercise or fitness programs with their physicians, added Dr. Arciero.

Read the original post:
Men, women might have different optimal times of day for exercise - Medical News Today

Neuron Physiology & Sports Injury Centre – Why choose a physical therapist with expertise or experience in pediatrics? – Business Wire

HONG KONG--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Neuron Physiology & Sports Injury Centre -Physical therapy for children requires special skills. Children are not adults. Their bodies are different, and children grow, move, and think differently than adults. Physiotherapy in Hong Kong, Physiotherapists are specialists in child development, especially mobility development. Activities are the foundation of life and are vital to life. Therefore, physical therapy for children in physical therapist referrals plays an important role in infant and child development.

Physiotherapy for children at the Physiotherapy Center is for children from birth to under 19 years of age. Children's physiotherapy develops specialized skills and has expertise and experience in child development and childhood disorders.

What diseases or conditions do child physical therapists at the Physical Therapy and Sports Trauma Center work on:Nervous System Disorders: Brain injury in children such as cerebral palsy, autism cluster disorder or traumatic brain, congenital disorders, genetic diseases such as childhood idiopathic arthritis injury, or long-term illness with growth-related joint and posture correction.

Children in Physiotherapy Hong Kong Hong Kong physiotherapists are specialists in assessing, identifying, and managing developmental and mobility impairments in children. They have the knowledge and practical skills to tailor postural treatment for each child, to enable the child to participate in the treatment session actively and communicate with their parents and caregivers to assist the child in daily life and social activities.

When should a child see a pediatric physical therapist?Excessive range of motion of joints, genetic and metabolic abnormalities, neurological diseases, posture problems: accidents such as high and low shoulders, scoliosis, O-shaped legs, X-shaped legs, Muscle strain, etc., after surgery or major health accidents, or joint or muscle pain

Exercise therapy and physical therapy programs:Maintain or improve joint range of motionImprove muscle strength, and core stabilityRestoring body positioning and correct postureRe-adjust the movement mode and gait to meet the development requirements of large muscle movements and small muscle movementsEducation and SupportPromote activities of daily living

Neuron Physiology & Sports Injury Centre also provides physiotherapy services and stretching treatments including Tennis Elbow Physiotherapy, Chiropractic, Chiropractic Physiotherapy, Sacral Therapy, Chiropractic, Fifty Shoulder Physiotherapy, Orthopedic Physiotherapy, Frozen Shoulder Physiotherapy, High and low shoulder physical therapy, cruciate ligament physical therapy, intervertebral disc herniation therapy, cold back therapy, arthritis therapy, intervertebral disc herniation physical therapy, pain therapy, condylar and sacral therapy, muscle and bone sprain, joint strain and home physical therapy.

Here is the original post:
Neuron Physiology & Sports Injury Centre - Why choose a physical therapist with expertise or experience in pediatrics? - Business Wire

C. Shan Xu named Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Physiology – Yale News

C. Shan Xu

C. Shan Xu, a pioneer in the field of instrumentation development, has been appointed Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Physiology, effective July 1.

Xu is a graduate of the University of Science and Technology of China and earned his Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley in 1997. He was a technical director in charge of research, development, and dissemination of advanced semiconductor technologies at Lam Research Corporation. In 2009, Xu joined the Janelia Research Campus of Howard Hughes Medical Institute as a senior scientist to develop enhanced focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) and later became the director of FIB-SEM technologies. He was recently recruited to Yale to further develop the next generation FIB-SEM technologies as a senior faculty member in the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology.

A pioneer in instrumentation development, Xu holds more than 20 patents and is known for his work transforming conventional FIB-SEM from a metrology tool that is unreliable for more than a few days to a robust imaging platform with 100% effective reliability: capable of years of continuous imaging without defects in the final image stack. The enhanced FIB-SEM technology was initially invented to generate the largest and most detailed brain connectome to date, and was recently used to create an open-access, 3D atlas of whole cells and tissues at the finest isotropic resolution, including cancer and immune cells, mouse pancreatic islets, and Drosophila neural tissues. The story was featured in Nature and The Scientist. This technology has enabled significant discoveries in tissue biology, cell biology, and neuroscience where nano-scale resolution coupled with meso and even macro scale volumes is critical. In addition to technology development, Xu is well known for his leadership in disseminating enhanced FIB-SEM technology to worldwide research community.

Read more:
C. Shan Xu named Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Physiology - Yale News

Special Master’s Program in Physiology | Georgetown University

Preparing You for Your Future in Medicine

Established in 1975, the Georgetown University Special Masters Program is the foremost and longest-running program of its kind for college graduates seeking to apply to medical school. Our students learn alongside Georgetown medical students, and over 85% are accepted to med schools within two years.

See more here:
Special Master's Program in Physiology | Georgetown University

Earths Largest Rodents Were Smaller Than We Once Thought – The New York Times

Modern rodents range in size from pygmy mice weighing less than an ounce to stocky capybaras pushing 175 pounds. But even the largest capybara is a pipsqueak compared with some prehistoric rodents that resembled a cross between a supersized capybara and a hairy hippopotamus. Paleontologists estimate that one, Phoberomys pattersoni, may have weighed as much as 1,300 pounds. Another, Josephoartigasia monesi, was believed to be around 2,000 pounds, as big as a bison.

But these size predictions have long sparked debate. People have said theyre the size of bison, but no one had any methods that could confidently nail down these sizes, said Russell Engelman, a paleontologist pursuing his Ph.D. from Case Western Reserve University.

So Mr. Engelman proposed a new method for accurately describing the dimensions of these rodents of unusual size. In a study published Wednesday in the journal Royal Society Open Science, he downsized the animals by comparing a joint at the back of the skulls of Phoberomys, Josephoartigasia and other prehistoric rodents with those in large modern mammals instead of their pint-size relatives.

Between two million and eight million years ago, giant rodents like Phoberomys and Josephoartigasia inhabited South Americas wetlands. According to Ernesto Blanco, a paleontologist at Universidad de la Repblica in Uruguay who discovered the Josephoartigasia skull in 2008, these giant rodents had a powerful bite that could generate three times as much force as a modern tiger bite, potentially protecting them from predators like terror birds and saber-toothed marsupials.

Much of our understanding of these rodents is tied to their size. Body size is a key trait in mammals because everything you cannot physically measure in the fossil like ecology and physiology is correlated with body size, said Virginie Millien, a zoologist at McGill University who studies the body sizes of rodents and was not involved in the new study. In 2010, Dr. Millien used fossilized femurs to estimate that Phoberomys was the size of a large antelope.

Accurately sizing these gargantuan rodents has proved difficult. One reason is a lack of fossils. While paleontologists have unearthed leg bones and other bits of Phoberomyss skeleton, Josephoartigasia is known from only a single skull. Without fossil evidence, researchers often rely on the anatomies of an extinct animals closest living relatives. However, traits like Josephoartigasias prolonged skull and Phoberomyss bulky femurs are not found in living rodents. Thus, simply increasing the size of a capybara fails to render accurate anatomical estimates, and can yield distorted sizes similar to those seen in a carnival mirror.

So Mr. Engelman turned to the occipital condyle, the joint that helps connect an animals skull with its spine. The size of this joint varies little across all mammals to ensure the skull and spine stay securely attached, making it a bellwether for comparing different species. Usually paleontologists look for traits that are different between animals, Mr. Engelman said, but when youre looking at body size, you want to nail down the parts that have changed the least.

Recently, Mr. Engelman measured the width of the joint in more than 400 species of mammals, including mice and African elephants. He discovered that the occipital condyle width was an accurate predictor of their dimensions. Because the width of these joints was similar across mammals of a particular size, he could compare the size of the prehistoric rodents joints with those of other large mammals without having to extrapolate.

This left Mr. Engelman with drastically decreased sizes: Phoberomys maxed out under 450 pounds, and Josephoartigasia weighed around 1,000 pounds much closer to the size of a pony than a bison. If I made every reasonable assumption I could to make the masses higher, I still couldnt make them as big as people were saying, Mr. Engelman said. Even unreasonable assumptions couldnt get them that big.

Mr. Engelman also believes that this decrease in brawn may boost these rodents brains, which are measly for their perceived size. They have small brains, but they may not have these ridiculously tiny brains that people think they had, he said.

Dr. Blanco believes these figures are more realistic than previous estimates of these rodents weighing a metric ton. But he believes more fossil evidence is required before it is certain how large the largest rodents grew. Even with this excellent method, well have significant uncertainties until we have more than a skull, he said.

While the new findings are less eye-popping than earlier estimates, Dr. Millien said 1,000 pounds is still a really big rat.

Link:
Earths Largest Rodents Were Smaller Than We Once Thought - The New York Times