Category Archives: Physiology

Does Stretching Cause More Harm Than Good? Yogi Aaron Transforms the Narrative in the Stop Stretching Podcast Come June 14th – PR Newswire

Ushering in a new era of stability, Yogi Aaron challenges the status quo by dismantling damaging ideologies to help others live a pain-free life

PUERTO JIMNEZ, Costa Rica, June 13, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Whether young or old, athlete or beginner, everyone has been fed the same narrative for decades: "If your muscles are tight, just stretch it out", but what if that idea is doing more harm than good? The words yoga and stretching seem synonymous, right? But what if they preach two separate truths to either hinder or heal pain? One yogi is on a mission to pull back the curtain, uncover the truth, and dismantle the false belief that stretching helps ease pain. Yogi Aaron is proud to announce the release of the Stop Stretching podcast, come June 14th on all major streaming platforms.

Yogi Aaron is the creator of AYAMA (Applied Yoga Anatomy + Muscle Activation), and the owner and yoga director at Blue Osa Yoga Retreat in Costa Rica. During his 30 years of practicing and teaching yoga, Yogi Aaron has developed an intrinsic understanding of yogic philosophy, anatomy, and the subtle body, which spurred his passion for unveiling the truth about how much stretching causes harm.

"Let's answer the BIG question! Why is stretching hurting us? What is actually going on! Many of us have heard that we need to stretch to prevent injuries when we are doing sports, and yet there is no evidence that supports this claim."

As the only yogi in the industry breaking the norm, Yogi Aaron created the Stop Stretching podcast to help each listener understand the physiology of their body, tap into their limitless potential, and develop the confidence to embody yoga both on and off the mat. Listeners will be amazed by the mass influx of information that contradicts mainstream thinking, bringing physiology back into the equation with precision and purpose to reduce pain and implement sustainable change rooted in science.

"Inflexibility is not a sign that muscle needed to be "stretched", but rather muscle tightness is actually a sign that is a muscular instability and that a group of muscles were not contracting properlyWe are no longer focusing on stretching, but instead, activating and stabilizing."

Through proof of concept, dedication to the craft, and unwavering commitment to helping others live a pain-free life, Yogi Aaron's purpose-driven vision has come to fruition with the release of the Stop Stretching podcast, available on all major streaming platforms come June 14th.

To learn more about Yogi Aaron or the Stop Stretching Podcast, please visit:https://YogiAaron.com

Spotify

Apple

About Yogi Aaron

Yogi Aaron, the creator of AYAMA Applied Yoga Anatomy + Muscle Activation, has been teaching yoga for over 30 years, is a bestselling author, and owner and yoga director at Blue Osa Yoga Retreat in Costa Rica. A revolutionary at heart, he's on a mission to get people back in touch with the true essence of yoga, flip the script on stretching, and help humanity live pain-free! Come June 14th, Yogi Aaron will launch his purpose-driven podcast, Stop Stretching to change the conversation around stretching and usher in a new era of activation and stability. He has studied under yogic masters such as Alan Finger, Bryan Kest, Genny Kapuler, Rod Stryker, Swami Rama, and David Swenson, among others.

PRESS CONTACT

AaronWhatsApp +50687047006https://YogiAaron.com

SOURCE Yogi Aaron

Go here to see the original:
Does Stretching Cause More Harm Than Good? Yogi Aaron Transforms the Narrative in the Stop Stretching Podcast Come June 14th - PR Newswire

Fact check: No evidence that foot pads can detoxify the body, experts say – USA TODAY

4 simple tips to detox your home

While we may be careful about what we feed our bodies, the air in our home also affects our health. With a few simple precautions you can get rid of harmful toxins and clear the air. Krystin Goodwin (@krystingoodwin) has tips to help you detox your

Buzz60

A widely shared video circulating on social mediapurports to show detox foot pads removing toxins from the bottom of the feet.

"Cleansing Foot Pads provides a healthy and fast effect to your body while you are sleeping," reads the text of aFacebook post shared April 21."From reducing inflammation, relieving the body, to detoxifying your body from all the impurities."

The video generated over 300,000 viewsand close to 500 interactionswithin two weeks. Several other Facebook users have shared similar posts.

But there is no credible evidence to support foot pads clearing the body of toxins. Experts told USA TODAY no scientific studies have been published proving detox foot pads work.

Fact check: No, celery juice will not help heal fibromyalgia

USA TODAY reached out to the Facebook user who shared theclaim for comment.

There is no scientific evidence that proves detox foot pads are effective.

"One of the most common claims for (foot pads)is that they draw out toxins like heavy metals, and that is a claim for which there is very little evidence," said Dr. Murad Alam, vice chair of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

When the foot pad is removed, it appears dark and discolored,and that supposedlyreflects the toxinsexpelled from the body overnight, social media posts say.

But the discoloration stems from sweat reacting with chemicals in the foot pad,Alam said.

"There's some chemicals like vinegar (in the foot pad), andit's probably just a chemical reaction of moisture affecting the footpad," he said.

The Journal of Heavy Metal Toxicity and Diseases published a study in 2018 that examined whether foot pads remove metals from the body. The presence of metals in the pads before and after use was investigated in 53 participants. It concluded that"detox foot pad(s)did not induce the eliminationof studied metals through the feet."

Fact check: Claim misinterprets data from a 2021 Pfizer report

A 2008 National Public Radio report compared used and unused foot pads and shippedthem to a laboratory for analysis. The labfoundno significant changes between the used and unused pads.

The human body is well-equipped for filtering and eliminating unwanted substances without the use of any external device, experts say. The liver, intestines, kidneys and sweat glands in the epidermisremove toxins.

"Feet are not a detoxification organ," saidDr.Adrianne Fugh-Berman, a professor of pharmacology and physiology at Georgetown University. Fugh-Bermanadded that sweat eliminates few waste compounds compared to the kidneys and liver.

Fact check: New study found 'potential biomarker' of SIDS, but calling it a cause misrepresents findings

In 2010, a federal judge, at the request of theFederal Trade Commission,banned the manufacturersof the Kinoki Foot Pads from selling their products. According to the FTC, the makers "falsely claimed to have scientific proof that the foot pads removed toxic materials from the body."

"There's no special characteristics of foot skinthat make foot skin more likely to be a way to take out toxins or other bad substances," said Alam.

Based on our research, we rate FALSEthe claim that cleansing foot padsdetoxify the body. Expertssaid there's no reliable evidence foot pads work.The pads' discoloration is primarily due to chemicals in the pads. The FTC has also charged a detox foot pad manufacturer with misleading advertising for claiming the pads detoxify the body.

Thank you for supporting our journalism. You cansubscribe to our print edition, ad-free app or electronic newspaper replica here.

Our fact-check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.

Go here to read the rest:
Fact check: No evidence that foot pads can detoxify the body, experts say - USA TODAY

Lishko named BJC Investigator – The Source – Washington University in St. Louis – Washington University in St. Louis

Polina V. Lishko, a noted molecular biologist and entrepreneur, has been named a BJC Investigator at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Lishko, whose innovative investigations of molecular mechanisms of bioactive lipid signaling has advanced scientific understanding in fields as varied as reproductive biology, vision and neurodegeneration, joins theDepartment of Cell Biology & Physiology.

TheBJC Investigator Programbrings to the School of Medicine scientists who will have a transformational impact on research programs, bring innovative approaches to major biological questions, and whose discoveries stand to inform new ways of understanding disease and developing treatments.

Lishko is an associate professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, Berkeley. Her appointment at Washington University begins Dec. 1.

The BJC Investigators Program is focused on basic science and was inspired by the Howard Hughes Medical Institutes philosophy of investing in scientists with exceptional creative talent. The program aims to bring 10 highly regarded researchers to the School of Medicine and the life sciences ecosystem in St. Louis. Lishko is the seventh BJC Investigator named.

BJC Investigators are recommended by a search committee of leading scientists at the School of Medicine. Their charge is to select candidates who already have indelibly changed their fields, whose discoveries will result in new and fundamental shifts in scientific thinking, and whose laboratories have become hubs for even more work that can galvanize and advance the impact of the schools preclinical departments.

I am so pleased to announce that Dr. Polina Lishko has accepted our offer to join the School of Medicine, said David H. Perlmutter, MD, executive vice chancellor for medical affairs, the George and Carol Bauer Dean, and the Spencer T. and Ann W. Olin Distinguished Professor. Through her dedication to understanding basic biological mechanisms, Dr. Lishko has made breakthroughs and overturned established dogma within multiple fields. Her expertise and innovative approaches to investigating bioelectricity and regulation of ion channels has transformed scientific understanding of the physiology of the retina, fluid flow in the brain and fertility. Dr. Lishkos ability to link detailed molecular mechanisms to disease processes and her broad scientific interests will set the stage for collaborations across the campus that could lead to translational advances in many fields.

Lishko is best known for basic reproductive biology research that has advanced our understanding of male and female infertility and could lead to alternatives to hormonal contraceptives. Many contraceptives for women such as birth control pills, patches and injections; vaginal rings; and some intrauterine devices contain synthetic hormones that prevent pregnancy but cause unpleasant side effects such as weight gain, headaches and mood changes. Effective nonhormonal contraceptives could reduce the burden of birth control for women and perhaps also provide better contraceptive options for men.

Lishko has discovered a protein receptor on sperm cells that revs up sperm so they have the power to drill through the protective outer layer of a human egg and fertilize it, as well as several compounds that can interfere with this process. Separately, she and colleagues identified a drug that short-circuits the energy supply in sperm cells, leaving sperm short of the fuel needed to swim to the egg. These and other findings form the basis of promising experimental contraceptives for women and men.

In 2018, Lishko co-founded the startup company YourChoice Therapeutics. While she has since stepped away from the company, YourChoice Therapeutics continues to build on her research to develop temporary, nonhormonal contraceptives.

Lishkos wide-ranging interests also extend to neurodegeneration and vision. In the field of neurodegeneration, she is studying whether the drop in sex hormones that occurs at menopause changes fluid flow and waste removal in the brain, and contributes to older womens increased risk of Alzheimers disease. In vision, she is developing an eyedrop to prevent age-related macular degeneration, a leading cause of blindness in people over age 60, by encouraging normal function of supportive cells in the eye. Lishko has co-founded another startup company, BioTock, to move this translational research from bench to bedside.

We are delighted that Dr. Lishko will be joining our department and bringing her expertise in biophysical and physiological investigations to enrich our research community, saidDavid W. Piston, the Edward Mallinckrodt Jr. Professor and head of theDepartment of Cell Biology & Physiology.Beyond her research accomplishments, Dr. Lishko has an exceptional record as a mentor who has made a major impact through teaching and educational leadership positions. We welcome her to Washington University and look forward to collaborating with her.

Lishko earned her doctorate in biophysics at the Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv, Ukraine. After completing her degree, she undertook postdoctoral research at Harvard Medical School and the University of California, San Francisco, before joining the faculty at UC Berkeley in 2012. Among her numerous accolades, she was selected as a Sloan Foundation Fellow and a Pew Scholar in the Biomedical Sciences in 2015, and received a MacArthur Genius Grant in 2020.

Lishkos husband, Yuriy Kirichok, will join theDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biophysicsat Washington University School of Medicine. He is a professor of physiology at the University of California, San Francisco. His pioneering work focuses on channels and transporters that move charged ions across the outer membrane of mitochondria tiny organelles that generate power and serve other functions for cells and how such channels and transporters affect mitochondrial function and contribute to conditions such as diabetes, obesity and neurodegenerative diseases.

Washington University School of Medicines 1,700 faculty physicians also are the medical staff ofBarnes-JewishandSt. Louis Childrenshospitals. The School of Medicine is a leader in medical research, teaching and patient care, and currently is No. 4 in research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Childrens hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked toBJC HealthCare.

Originally published by the School of Medicine

Original post:
Lishko named BJC Investigator - The Source - Washington University in St. Louis - Washington University in St. Louis

Unlocking the mysteries of cell migration – EurekAlert

image:Atsuo Sasaki, PhD view more

Credit: Photo/Colleen Kelley

When youre hungry and find your cupboards are bare, youll probably find yourself heading to the grocery store to restock on food.

Human cells act similarly when starved for energy, showing a remarkable resiliency to move to an energy-rich environment to gather nutrients. However, cancer cells also have this ability, and moving toward nutrients can help cancer cells grow and spread (or metastasize) throughout the body.

It is still unclear exactly what mechanisms help cells move to meet energy demands, and an international research group including the University of Cincinnatis Atsuo Sasaki, PhD, has been awarded a $1.5 million Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) research grant to learn more. Each of the three lead researchers and their institutions, including Sasaki and UC, will receive $500,000 of funding for the project.

HFSP awards grants for basic research projects that require collaboration from an international team of researchers from different disciplines with a goal of explaining sophisticated and complex mechanisms within living organisms. The grants are highly competitive and difficult to earn, but are reserved for top-tier research, as 28 HFSP awardees have gone on to win the Nobel Prize in fields including physiology, medicine, chemistry and physics.

Sasaki has focused his research on cellular energy and metabolism and said his fourth HFSP application proved successful after finding collaborators Laura Machesky of the Beatson Institute for Cancer Research in Scotland and Yasufumi Takahashi of Kanazawa Universitys Nano Life Science Institute in Japan.

About two years ago, Sasaki connected with Machesky, an expert on cellular invasion, a process where cells move and infiltrate nearby tissues. Cancer cells that become invasive help the cancer grow and metastasize to secondary sites.

Takahashi, who specializes in cellular imaging, rounded out the team. Takahashi is a pioneer in a technique known as scanning ion-conductance microscopy (SICM), which uses ion currents to produce high-resolution images of individual cell structures that can be as small as a single micrometer in length.

Sasaki and his lab have focused their study on an energy molecule called GTP. Previous studies have found that brain tumors use a special process to utilize GTP for energy, and tumors in animal models shrunk when that process was blocked.

More recent research from Sasakis team suggests GTP is brought to the front of the cell to help cancer cells move, grow and spread, but it is not known exactly how this happens.

GTP-specific enzymes cannot just go to the front of the cell, said Sasaki, associate professor at the UC College of Medicine. So once we can identify this system, probably we can shut off this GTP-driven cell metastasis. Thats our goal: to identify it, then target it to suppress cancer metastasis.

One of the studys goals is to observe and confirm that GTP is indeed synthesized at the front of cells, which will be accomplished using Takahashis SICM imaging technique. SICM will allow the team to detect cellular metabolic changes at the subcellular level, something that has never been done before, as well as identify specific protein machinery at the front of cells that help cells migrate and grow.

The team will develop a system able to be controlled remotely so that SICM imaging can be performed by anyone, anywhere in the world, a useful feature for international research like this project. They will also explore machine learning technology so that artificial intelligence can use SICM to identify cellular characteristics automatically without the need for human analysis.

The hope is that this new information will help better define what mechanisms are used to help cells move, utilize energy and allocate energy to cell movement, Sasaki said. These mechanisms could become the next generation of targets for cancer drugs.

If we can [observe] this system, then some tumor-specific metabolic or metastatic components can be targeted, Sasaki said. Maybe we can shut off that process to directly suppress the cell migration, or we can control the cells migratory process. Thats the long-term goal of this project.

Cell migration is also involved in certain neurological conditions and defense from bacterial infections, so the knowledge gained from this research may also extend beyond treatments for cancer.

There are so many potential applications, Sasaki said. We are hopeful that this technology can provide a new platform.

Sasaki is the first UC researcher to ever be awarded an HFSP research grant.

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

See the original post:
Unlocking the mysteries of cell migration - EurekAlert

Cannabis users can misperceive how well their romantic relationships are functioning – EurekAlert

Cannabis users may think their approaches to managing conflict in romantic relationships are better than they are and dont recognize potentially problematic dynamics that might exist, according to a collaborative study conducted by Rutgers and Mount Holyoke College.

The study, published in the journal Drug and Alcohol Dependence, is one of a few to examine how cannabis use is associated with how couples relate. Researchers say the findings can assist couples in which at least one of the partners uses cannabis better navigate conflict discussion and resolution.

We looked at different indicators of relationship functioning: how satisfied and committed people felt about their relationship, their behavior and physiology during a laboratory-based conflict interaction and their perceptions about their conflict discussion and relationship afterward, said author Jessica Salvatore, an associate professor in the department of psychiatry at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.

In the study, 145 couples in which at least one partner used cannabis were asked to report how often they used the substance and how satisfied they were in their relationship. The couples were videotaped engaging in a 10-minute discussion on a topic that they identified as a major source of conflict, during which researchers measured their physiological stress response through their heart rate and respiration.

The couples then had a five-minute discussion on areas where they were in agreement. After, researchers asked how they thought the conversations went and how satisfied they were with conflict resolution.

The videos were observed by two sets of trained raters who assessed each partners conflict behavior, including avoidance (deflecting, skirting or ignoring areas of disagreement) and negative engagement (making demands for change, criticizing or blaming) on separate five-point scales.

A separate set of raters assessed the extent to which partners were able to transition out of conflict, regardless of resolution, toward a discussion of agreements and positive aspects of their relationship. They assigned low scores when participants made no substantive contributions to the discussion of positive aspects of the relationship and high scores when they nominated areas of agreement or positive aspects of the relationship or when they elaborated upon their partners suggestions.

The researchers found participants who used cannabis more frequently showed less parasympathetic withdrawal during their interaction with their partner indicating reduced capacity to flexibly respond to stress. They also issued more criticism and demands, avoided conflict during the discussion and were less able to reorient themselves to a discussion about the positive aspects of their relationship. Yet, paradoxically, when asked how they thought the conflict conversation went, cannabis users reported greater satisfaction with how the conflict was resolved and did not perceive themselves as having used demand or avoidance strategies.

The assessments by the cannabis users were almost the exact opposite of what independent raters found, said Salvatore. However, it is important to note that this studys findings do not mean that cannabis use is wholesale good or bad for relationships. Rather, it gives insight into how couples can better navigate conflict and come to a resolution. When you dont see problems, you cant solve them.

The study was conducted in collaboration with Katherine C. Haydon, an associate professor in the psychology and education department at Mount Holyoke College.

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Observational study

People

Relationship perceptions and conflict behavior among cannabis users

6-Jun-2022

Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.

Continued here:
Cannabis users can misperceive how well their romantic relationships are functioning - EurekAlert

Research Fellow, Department of Anatomy and Physiology job with UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE | 296108 – Times Higher Education

Location: ParkvilleRole type: Full time; Fixed-termfor 12 monthsFaculty:Medicine, Dentistry, and Health SciencesDepartment/School:Department of Anatomy and PhysiologySalary: Level A -$76,886 - $88,312 p.a. plus 17% super

Founded in 1853, the University of Melbourne is Australias #1 university and is consistently ranked amongst the leading universities in the world. We are proud of our people, our commitment to research and teaching excellence, and our global engagement.

AbouttheDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology

https://biomedicalsciences.unimelb.edu.au/departments/anatomy-and-physiology

The Department of Anatomy and Physiology has only recently come into fruition and is an amalgamation between the Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience and the Department of Physiology. Both Departments have a long and illustrious history and have come together to produce a Department with a remarkable breadth and depth in research expertise that underpins our key research themes of neuroscience, metabolism, and cardiovascular sciences, muscle biology, and cell biology.

The increase in a critical mass of our researchers will also help position the Department as a key partner for Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) and other large-scale grant applications relating to chronic, developmental, and degenerative diseases. The goal of the combined Department is to remain at the forefront of scientific research aimed at understanding the structure and function of the human body in health and disease, employing novel and imaginative research methods.

About the Role

An opportunity exists, for a PhD qualified research scientist with specialised skills in neuroscience and metabolism. The Research Fellow will undertake research within a team that is funded by NHRMC and ARC research grants to explore the neuronal control of metabolism and its contribution to metabolic diseases such as type-2 diabetes and obesity. These projects are led by Dr. Garron Dodd. They aim to develop new knowledge and technologies to understand how metabolic hormones (insulin, leptin) work in the brain and what brain cells are important (neurons, neuroglia, endothelial cells) to develop new treatments for metabolic disease. This work will have a strong focus on neuroscience and will explore the brain using in vivo calcium imaging, optogenetics, and CRISPR/Cas-9 technologies

In a typical week at work, you may:

About You

You will be an experienced researcher with a background and understanding of the anatomy and physiology sector. You will possess excellent verbal and written communication skills for effective research collaboration and engagement. You will have evidence of emerging local academic standing through research contributions and the desire to buildan academic career trajectory.

Ideally, you will further have:

Benefits of Working with Us

In addition to having the opportunity to grow and be challenged, and to be part of vibrant campus life, our people enjoy a range of rewarding benefits:

To find out more, please visithttps://about.unimelb.edu.au/careers/staff-benefits.

Be Yourself

At UoM, we value the unique backgrounds, experiences and contributions that each person brings to our community, and we encourage and celebrate diversity. Indigenous Australians, those identifying as LGBTQIA+, females, people of all ages with disabilities and culturally diverse backgrounds are encouraged to apply for our roles. Our aim is to create a workforce that reflects the community in which we live.

Join Us!

If you feel this role is right for you, please submit your application including a brief cover letter, your resume and your responses against the selection criteria^ (found in the Position Description) for the role.

^For information to help you with compiling short statements to answer the selection criteria and competencies, please go tohttp://about.unimelb.edu.au/careers/selection-criteria

Should you require any reasonable adjustments with the recruitment process, please contact the Talent Acquisition team athr-talent@unimelb.edu.au.

Due to the impacts of COVID-19, we are currently prioritising applications with current valid working rights in Australia and candidates who are not affected by travel restrictions. Please see the latest updates to Australia's immigration and border arrangements: https://covid19.homeaffairs.gov.au/

The University of Melbourne is required to comply with applicable health guidance and directions issued from the Victoria Health Minister. The University of Melbourne requires all University of Melbourne employees to be fully vaccinated against COVID-19, unless an exemption order applies. All applicants therefore must meet this requirement when submitting an application.

Position Description :PD for Research Fellow (GD) final.pdf

Applications close: 1st July2022 11:55 PMAUS Eastern Standard Time

Continue reading here:
Research Fellow, Department of Anatomy and Physiology job with UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE | 296108 - Times Higher Education

This Key Protein Is Essential for Brain Cell Longevity and Growth – SciTechDaily

Recent research finds that the insulin receptor protein (INSR) is pivotal for brain stem cell longevity and growth.

Stem cells are the bodys raw materials they are the cells that give rise to all other cells with specialized functions. In the right circumstances, stem cells in the body divide to produce new cells known as daughter cells.

Humans contain neural stem cells in their brains. These brain stem cells may develop into neurons, astrocytes, or oligodendrocytes. Because neural stem cells generate all of the brains cell types, there is a multitude of stem cells in an embryos brain. In fact, the majority of brain cells are born in the embryo stage. These cells persist till adulthood and can be found in particular regions of the brain. Neural stem cells are essential for your brain to properly function.

According to research from Rutgers University, a receptor that was first identified as necessary for insulin action and is also found on neural stem cells found deep in the brains of mice is crucial for brain stem cell longevity, a finding that has important implications for brain health and future therapies for brain disorders.

The research, published in the journal Stem Cell Reports, focuses on a particular protein known as the insulin receptor (INSR), which is prevalent in neural stem cells in the brains subventricular zone. Neural stem cells give rise to the entire nervous system throughout development and persist into adulthood. Over the course of a persons life, these neural stem cells generate new neurons and non-neuronal cells that help the brains infrastructure and function.

Separately, while studying brain tumors, the researchers discovered that INSR plays an important role in the survival and maintenance of a population of specialized brain cancer cells known as glioblastoma (GBM) stem cells. They were able toreducethe growth of those primitive tumor-forming cells by inactivating the INSR in GBM stem cells.

Its important to understand the molecular mechanisms that are critical for the growth and sustenance of the brains stem cells under normal and abnormal growth states, said study author Steven Levison, a professor of neuroscience in the Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience and director of the Laboratory for Regenerative Neurobiology at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School. Comprehending the signals that regulate these primitive cells could one day lead to new therapeutics for brain disorders.

Many neurodegenerative disorders, such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinsons disease, and Alzheimers disease, are connected with the destruction of brain cells, said co-author Teresa Wood, a Distinguished Professor and Rena Warshow Endowed Chair in Multiple Sclerosis in the Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School.

If we could influence how brain stem cells function then we can use this knowledge to replace diseased or dead brain cells with living ones, which would advance the treatment of neurological diseases and brain injuries, said Wood, who also teaches and conducts research at the Cancer Institute of New Jersey.

Cell receptors such as INSR are protein molecules that reside on the surfaces of cells. Substances, either natural or human-made, that open the lock of a receptor can spur a cell to divide, differentiate or die. By identifying which receptors perform these functions on specific cell types, and by understanding their structures and functions, scientists can design substances that act as keys to receptors, to turn them on or off.

Previous studies by this research team had shown that a certain key, the signaling protein that is known as the insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II), was necessary to maintain the neural stem cells in the two places of the adult brain that harbor these primitive cells. In the current experiment, scientists were looking to identify the receptor. To do so, they used genetic tools that allowed them to both delete the INSR and introduce a fluorescent protein so they could track the neural stem cells and the cells they generate. They found that the numbers of neural stem cells in the subventricular zone in the brains of mice lacking the INSR collapsed.

Adult neurogenesis the idea that new cells are produced in the adult brain has been a burgeoning field of scientific inquiry since the late 1990s, when researchers confirmed what had only been a theory in lab studies of human, primate, and bird brains. Neural stem cells in the adult are stem cells that can self-renew and produce new neurons and the supporting cells of the brain, oligodendrocytes, and astrocytes.

Given the widespread interest in stem cells as well as interest in whether alterations to adult stem cells might contribute to cancer, our research findings should be of interest, Levison said.

Other Rutgers authors included Shravanthi Chidambaram, Fernando J. Velloso, Deborah E. Rothbard, Kaivalya Deshpande, and Yvelande Cajuste of the Department of Pharmacology, Physiology, and Neuroscience at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School. Other participating investigators were at the University of Minnesota, the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and Brown University.

Reference: Subventricular zone adult mouse neural stem cells require insulin receptor for self-renewal by Shravanthi Chidambaram, Fernando J. Velloso, Deborah E. Rothbard, Kaivalya Deshpande, Yvelande Cajuste, Kristin M. Snyder, Eduardo Fajardo, Andras Fiser, Nikos Tapinos, Steven W. Levison and Teresa L. Wood, 5 May 2022, Stem Cell Reports.DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.04.007

More:
This Key Protein Is Essential for Brain Cell Longevity and Growth - SciTechDaily

Stress Influences Your Heart Rate Variability and Performance – runnersworld.com

Stress is a normal part of life and your body is designed to react to it. According to the American Psychological Association, your body is well-equipped to handle small increases in stress levels, like running late for a meeting. But when stress becomes chronic or too intense, it can have negative effects on all systems of the bodyincluding negatively affecting your running performance.

You have probably experienced physiological changes like increased heart rate, heavy breathing, or sweating before the start of a race or a big presentation. One effect of stress that is not as noticeable is the change to heart rate variability (HRV), or the variation in the time between heartbeats measured in milliseconds. Paying attention to heart rate variability can help runners recognize when stress is impacting performance and when you need to make modifications to training or stress management.

Heres what to know about stress and heart rate variability, how this measure can be a tool to monitor your training, and ways to improve HRV to help manage stress and boost running performance.

Stress affects your heart via the autonomic nervous systemthe direct line between your heart and your brain. The autonomic nervous system consists of two parts: the sympathetic nervous system initiates the fight or flight response to stress, which triggers increases in heart rate and blood pressure, while the parasympathetic nervous system controls the relaxation response, lowering heart rate, and blood pressure.

We view heart rate variability as a reflection of the balance between the two primary arms of the nervous system, the sympathetic nervous system and the parasympathetic nervous system, Timothy Churchill, M.D., a cardiologist at the Cardiovascular Performance Program at Massachusetts General Hospital and an instructor at Harvard Medical School tells Runners World.

According to the Cleveland Clinic, your heart rates variability reflects the adaptability of your body. A higher heart rate variability is a good thing and can indicate your body is more resilient, whereas lower heart rate variability may reflect difficulty adapting to changes and may be considered a sign of current or future health problems.

We would think of [stress] as augmenting the sympathetic side of the nervous system and resulting in reduced heart rate variability, and theoretically manifesting in increasing the resting heart rate, adds Churchill. While both heart rate variability and resting heart rate are ways to see the effect of stress on the cardiovascular system, much of the research to date focuses on heart rate variability.

For example, a review published in Psychiatry Investigation in 2018 showed HRV variables changed in response to stress. Researchers induced stress in various ways, including simulating a medical emergency, responding to work or school-related stressors, or taking psychological tests in a lab environment. The most common effect of stress across studies was low parasympathetic activity, or an inability to calm down an activated sympathetic nervous system, resulting in low heart rate variability.

Churchill adds that the relationship between stress and heart rate variability applies to different forms of stress: emotional stress such as worrying about an exam or presentation, physiological stress like overtraining or dehydration, or environmental stress including heat or noise. Other factors like diet, sleep, and medications can also affect HRV.

However, stress doesnt always result in a decreased heart rate variability. Whether you frame your pre-race butterflies as excitement or anxiety can determine if it results in an increase or decrease in HRV. When we are interpreting stress as bad, as damaging, as anxiety and fear that are somehow detrimental, that is going to decrease heart rate variability. Thats going to decrease our objective performance. Thats going to decrease our feeling of competence. Its going to further increase anxiety, says Inna Khazan, Ph.D., clinical health and performance psychologist in Boston and lecturer in the psychiatry department at Harvard Medical School, tells Runners World. If in the same situation, the person interprets this sensation of physical activation as helpful and adaptive, that leads to the oppositeheart rate variability is higher. You get a much more positive response, both physiologically and emotionally.

As an indicator of adaptability and resiliency, runners can use heart rate variability as a training tool to suggest when you might be able to push harder or when you need some time to recover.

Low HRV might reflect being stressed, overworked, or inadequately rested. Training in that state of fatigue might make it feel like you are working harder to achieve a normal pace on the run or like you are not ready to tackle your next workout.

A review in the Journal of Exercise Physiology Online published in 2013 looked at how heart rate variability can be applied to exercise training, including running. The studies reviewed showed HRV can be an effective tool to prescribe exercise intensity, as well as monitor training to prevent and diagnose overtraining. The review added that age, gender, and athletic conditioning are independent factors that can also affect HRV and should be considered when prescribing training or recovery plans for individuals.

For the amateur runner, Churchill sees heart rate variability as a tool to assess if you are allowing your body sufficient time to recover from workouts, where low HRV is an indicator that more light or moderate work should replace harder efforts in your training plan. Probably the most underutilized element in training programs among amateur or recreational athletes is appropriate rest and recovery, he says. I think these metrics are one pathway that people can use to gain insight into that. Its a lens that people can use primarily to see if they should be modulating down their intensity and/or building more rest into their training programs.

While the most accurate way to measure heart rate variability is in a medical setting with an electrocardiogram (ECG), for the purposes of monitoring stressors and overtraining, many of the devices that runners already have can track your hearts response to stress.

While HRV can be a valuable metric to monitor your bodys readiness to perform, the data can also be tricky to interpret. According to Khazan, while there are normal ranges for heart rate variability, its not as simple as identifying ranges for normal resting heart rate because there are several ways to measure HRV. The most common ones are statistical analyses of the intervals between heartbeats like RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences) and SDNN (standard deviation of normal-to-normal interval).

Devices like those from Garmin, Whoop, and Apple collect heart rate variability data and may use the same measurements, like RMSSD, or create their own scores or variables based on these measures. For example, Garmin notes that it uses HRV in other measurements like the stress score and body battery.

With varying ways to measure and varying characteristics among individuals, its hard to prescribe a precise change in score at which to intervene, but using HRV numbers to identify whats normal for you, and then monitoring changes to those numbers, can still be a valuable tool. One day of lower HRV may not be a big deal, says Khazan, but if the trend continues for several days, you might want to pay attention to factors like stress, sleep, diet, and training load to get you back on track.

If you see a decline in HRV or youre simply seeking another way to optimize your performance, there are ways to improve heart rate variability. For example, practices like mindfulness can help in stress reduction and athletic performance. A study published in PLoS ONE in 2020 found an increase in HRV both during and following mindfulness practice, indicating the stress reduction benefits can stick around even after youre done.

Biofeedback trainingor the process of measuring your physiological responses, like heart rate and breathing, and displaying it visually on a device, so you can make changes in your body like altering your breathing and see how those responses changehas also shown success in increasing heart rate variability.

The most direct way to increase your heart rate variability is by practicing slow, paced breathing exercises. As you breathe in, your heart rate goes up; as you breathe out, your heart rate comes down. There is an optimal rate of breathing, that will produce maximum heart rate variability, Khazan explains. That breathing is called resonance frequency breathing rate. Its basically a way to stimulate the heart rate to increase as much as possible on each inhalation and decrease as much as possible in each exhalation.

If you look at it on a monitor, the goal is to get the ups and downs of your heart rate to look like a sine wave and coincide with your breath, says Tim Herzog, clinical and sport psychologist and certified mental performance coach in Annapolis, Maryland.

When you practice breathing at this resonance frequency rate its like a workout for your nervous system, says Herzog. Practicing your paced breathing while not running strengthens the connection between the brain and the heart and can increase heart rate variability that carries through even when you are not breathing at your resonance frequency rate.

The research suggests practicing breathing for twenty minutes twice a day, but Herzog encourages starting with whatever time you have available. By proactively engaging in our breathing regimen, we can manage to take that baseline level of anxiety down. So that when the stressor comes along, were starting from a lower place to begin with, Herzog says.

Professionals, like Herzog and Khazan, certified in biofeedback can help you identify that resonance frequency breathing rate, usually around six breaths per minute. Although working with a licensed counsellor has its advantages beyond biofeedback training, if you are not interested or able to work with a professional, there are ways to do it yourself.

Khazan helped develop the Optimal HRV app, which she says will determine your resonance frequency, provide biofeedback training, and track heart rate variability. It just requires a Bluetooth-enabled HRV reader, like a Polar chest strap or Biostrap. Khazan adds other apps, like Elite HRV and Heart Math, do slightly different things but are also good options for helping to increase HRV.

While there are limited controlled studies, biofeedback training seems to show promising positive effects on heart rate variability. A 2021 study published in the journal Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback looked at HRV, running, recovery and perceived exertion following a treadmill test before and after HRV biofeedback training. The study did not include a control group, but found improvements in HRV, time spent exercising, perceived exertion, and recovery time when participants used HRV biofeedback in recovery.

Research on specific performance improvements are harder to come by. A systematic review also published in the journal Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback in 2017 found improvements in psychological and performance outcomes including reduced anxiety, improved concentration, and improvement in skills like dribbling and shooting accuracy in basketball players.

In the one running study included in the review, runners who received biofeedback training showed greater improvements in their 5K times and VO2 max. However, upon further review of the specific study, the improvements in 5K times over a ten-week period were dramatic (18.27 minutes to 15.89 minutes) and call into question if other factors also contributed to the lower times.

Additionally, most of the studies included less than thirty participants, and vary in HRV biofeedback training guidelines, so results can be difficult to generalize across broader populations.

However, a systematic review and meta-analysis from 2020 in the journal Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback provides evidence that HRV biofeedback had positive effects on a variety of physical, behavioral, and cognitive conditions, athletic/artistic performance, depression, anxiety, and gastrointestinal problems.

Even if it doesnt result in a 5K personal best, HRV biofeedback training is safe, accessible, and easy to learn and may be a complementary practice to enhance your training and stress management.

Whether you try biofeedback training or decide to track your heart rate variability as you train for your next race, regardless of what the data says, Churchill reminds runners that the most important tool for maximizing performance is listening to your body: If your body tells you it needs rest and recovery, then you should be doing that.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

More here:
Stress Influences Your Heart Rate Variability and Performance - runnersworld.com

How to use ‘flow state’ to do the impossible – Big Think

STEVEN KOTLER: Why does the impossible become possible? One of the really incredible things about being human is we're all built for peak performance. It comes as a fundamental part of being human. And what I mean by that is getting our biology to work for us rather than against us. This is not a new idea. William James said the great thing in all education is to get our nervous system to be our ally and not our enemy. And by our nervous system, right, he meant our brain and our biology. We're all capable of so much more than we know. When we hear something impossible has been done, we start thinking about it. And then you start asking questions, "Well, what would it look like when I did it?" And then you start thinking about, "How would you do it?" "How would you train it?" And you're like, "Oh wow, far out." "I guess that is possible."

My name is Steven Kotler. I'm a writer and a researcher. And my latest book is "The Art of Impossible." There's something in psychology and neuroscience we talk about as the Bannister Effect. This is the idea that you have to believe something is possible before it becomes possible. It's named after Roger Bannister. Roger Bannister was the first person to run a sub four mile. And before he did it, this was a great, crazy impossible. TV ANNOUNCER: May 6th, a British medical student Roger Bannister earns sports immortality, the first man to break the legendary four minute barrier running a mile in three minutes, 59, and four tenth seconds.

They really thought the first person who did it was gonna die from it. It was a total impossible. Bannister runs the first sub four mile. And then a month later, somebody breaks his record. And then a couple months after that, somebody shatters that new record. And within five years, teenagers have done it. So you gotta ask yourself, "What the hell happened?" Right? The same physical requirements for running a sub four mile haven't changed. All that's changed is the mental frame we've built a around the feat. What used to be impossible is now seen as possible. And we start thinking about it and the brain thinks in pictures, and it starts working out, "Well, what would that look like?" And then you start asking questions. "Well, how would you do it?" "How would you train it?" And it becomes a little more probable.

What it essentially says is that look, there's a very, very, very tight coupling between our psychology and our physiology. And if we can pre-wire our brain with the patterns we're gonna perform ahead of time. When we actually start to perform those patterns, you're gonna get dopamine from pattern matching. It may help drive us into flow. And flow is an optimized state of consciousness where feel our best and we perform our best. This idea dates back all the way to Goethe who uses the German word "rausch," which means overflowing with joy. Neitzche actually wrote about flow. William James worked on the topic, but Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi is often referred to as the godfather of flow psychology. And he went around the world talking to people about the times in their lives when they felt their best, and they performed their best.

Everywhere he went, people said the same thing. They said, "You know, when I'm at my best, "when I'm feeling my best, "when I'm performing my best, "I'm in this alterative of consciousness "where every action, "every decision I make seems to flow "effortlessly, perfectly, seamlessly from the last." So that's where the term flow comes from. It's actually another phenomenological description of the state. Flow actually feels flowy. When psychologists wanna know if you were in flow, they say, well, "Was there complete concentration on the task at hand?" "Was there a merger of action and awareness?" "Did self vanish?" "Did time dilate?" And this is an experience we all have, right? You get so sucked into what you're doing, you look up, and five hours go by in like five minutes. Because we don't register peak performance as a sensation, what we feel on the inside is sense of control. The ability to control things that we normally can't control.

This is a basketball player in the zone talking about seeing the hoop and suddenly it's as big as a hula hoop. And throughout all aspects of performance, both mental and physical go through the roof. Across the board flow tends to show up, whenever we see the impossible become possible. Productivity, motivation, skyrocket in flow and sometimes 500% above baseline. And that seems like a huge stratospheric number. And it would be very, very suspicious if it wasn't in line with all the other research. For example, the Department of Defense looked at soldiers in flow, and they were looking at learning. Turns out we will learn 240 to 500% faster than normal when we're in flow. We see creativity spike 400 to 700% in flow. On the physical side flow will amplify strength, stamina, endurance.

This might sound like, "What the hell?" "Why would one state of consciousness amplify all these different things?" Like, what is going on? That almost doesn't make any sense until you remember that it was evolution that shaped flow. Evolution itself is predominantly a reaction to scarcity, right? Resources get scarce. That's the biggest driver on evolution, and we have two options. We can fight over dwindling resources, or we can flee or avoid becoming somebody else's resources, or we can get cooperative, get creative, get innovative, and make new resources.

This is everything that flow amplifies. Flow is universal in humans. Actually universal in most mammals and definitely all social mammals. So all the systems that produce flow are in all of us. What we're getting is everything we need to fight or flee, or get creative, get cooperative and make new resources. That was the largest lesson that 30 years in studying peak performance has taught me, is that we're all hardwired for flow, and flow is a massive amplification of what's possible for ourselves.

Read the original here:
How to use 'flow state' to do the impossible - Big Think

Psychological Health Outcomes A Narrative Review in US Vet | COPD – Dove Medical Press

Introduction

Approximately 78% of adults in the United States (US) currently identify as Veterans of the Armed Forces; of these, approximately 4249% are recipients of Veteran Affairs (VA) benefits, which include services such as healthcare, disability compensation or pension, loan and insurance programs, and burial services.1,2 In general, Veterans who complete a minimum 24 months of service with an honorable discharge are eligible for healthcare through the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), one of the largest nationally integrated systems. Although VA benefits are available to most Veterans, due to priority assignments for enrollment (based on service connection, disability, and income) and copays, the approximately 9 million Veterans who currently utilize VA healthcare and participate in VA-sponsored research represent a unique subset of the Veteran population.1,2

Recipients of VA healthcare are typically older than the general population (median age 64 versus 38 years, respectively) and are predominantly (91%) male, although enrollment of female Veterans is rising.1,2 The proportion of Veterans who utilize VA with an annual household income less than $35,000 is higher than that of the general US population (43% versus 26%)1,3 as is the prevalence of ever-smoking (60% versus 3540%).1,2,4 Economic disadvantage and increased rates of smoking, coupled with service-related and occupational exposures, have likely contributed to the high prevalence and rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), among Veterans.5,6

COPD is not objectively different in terms of disease manifestation in Veterans compared to civilians.7 However, the prevalence of COPD among Veterans, which is currently estimated to be between 8% and 19%,6,8 is higher than among the general population (6%).9 Importantly, COPD is likely underdiagnosed among Veterans, with only a minority of individuals with objective airflow limitation on lung function testing reporting a clinical diagnosis of COPD.10 Veterans with COPD have increased all-cause and respiratory-related health-care utilization as well as higher rates of comorbid conditions relative to Veterans without COPD.6 Moreover, the prevalence of mental health conditions, particularly alcohol and substance abuse, is higher in Veterans compared to civilians.11 Comorbid mental health conditions commonly serve as a barrier to utilization and/or responsiveness to evidence-based care, such as self-management interventions.12 Given the prevalence and significant burden of COPD within the VHA, substantial resources have been applied towards both clinical and research initiatives to improve outcomes for Veterans with COPD.

The VHA provides evidence-based treatment to Veterans with COPD in order to optimize physiological, physical, and psychological health. These treatments and interventions are comprehensively described in the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines.13 Notably, Veterans with COPD and VHA researchers have contributed to early research examining such treatments and interventions to improve COPD outcomes. The objective of this paper is to provide a narrative review of interventions for key physiological, physical, and psychological health outcomes in US Veterans. Articles were identified if they were conducted with US Veterans and broadly addressed interventions for physiological, physical, or psychological outcomes.

Due to the high burden of COPD within the VA, Veterans and VHA investigators have been involved in studies which have contributed to the collective knowledge on COPD physiology. Physiological and clinical outcomes which have been examined among Veterans with COPD have included lung function, hypoxemia, and systemic effects associated with disease, such as alterations in body composition and bone mineral density. These studies support current evidence-based guidelines which include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of both stable COPD and acute exacerbations of COPD. Key studies examining these physiological and clinical outcomes are summarized below.

Longitudinal studies based within the VHA, such as the Normative Aging Study (NAS), have resulted in an improved understanding of and delineation between healthy aging and disease processes such as COPD.14,15 Comprised of over 2000 participants who were first enrolled in 1963 who have triennial follow-up data,16 the NAS represents a rich source of multi-dimensional information contributing to studies which have identified environmental (eg, smoking, air pollution)17,18 as well as genetic, epigenetic, and genomic risk factors that affect lung function and COPD susceptibility.14,15,17,19

VHA research was a key stakeholder in establishing the detrimental effects of hypoxemia on not only end organ function but also reactive vasoconstriction in the pulmonary vasculature leading to pulmonary hypertension and cor pulmonale. Sentinel publications supported by the VHA include a brief report by Renzetti et al20 in 1968 which established the associations between COPD and mortality, spirometric lung function, and hypoxemia. Findings from this observational report gave rise to numerous subsequent studies, both within and outside of the VHA, which established the safety and benefit of supplemental oxygen on exercise tolerance and dyspnea,21 cardiovascular parameters,21 and survival22 among COPD patients with significant hypoxemia. As research practices evolved over the decades from single-site studies to multi-center collaborative initiatives, VA investigators continued to contribute to research on the management of hypoxemia in COPD patients. Multiple VA facilities served as research study sites for the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial (LOTT) which examined oxygen supplementation for COPD patients with moderate resting or exercise-induced hypoxemia.23 While the benefits of oxygen supplementation in COPD patients with severe resting hypoxemia (defined as an oxygen saturation (SpO2) <89% or an arterial oxygen tension, PaO2 55 mmHg, or PaO259 or SpO289% with signs of cor pulmonale) had been previously established,24,25 LOTT demonstrated that routine supplementation in moderate resting (SpO2 8993%) or exercise-induced hypoxemia (SpO2 8090%) was not associated with improved all-cause mortality or time to first hospitalization,23 leading to a significant revision of management guidelines issued by the VHA, professional societies, and the GOLD recommendations.13 Current guidelines on the initiation of oxygen supplementation (as outlined above) as well as the titration of supplemental oxygen to a goal SpO2 >9092% represent the integrated results of trials conducted both within and outside the VHA.

Veterans and VHA investigators have contributed substantially to studies of medications, such as bronchodilators, that improve symptoms through improvements in lung function by increasing airway diameter and decreasing air trapping and hyperinflation. Early trials examined systemic bronchodilators, such as theophylline26 and metaproterenol,27,28 and were later supplanted by studies of inhaled beta-agonists and antimuscarinic agents,29 the two dominant classes of bronchodilators in use today. Use of long-acting inhaled beta-agonists and antimuscarinic agents is currently recommended as first-line, evidence-based maintenance therapies for COPD.13 Additional studies of pharmacological agents have included investigations of the effect of morphine on dyspnea,30 an important strategy for the palliative care of Veterans with advanced chronic lung disease associated with air hunger.

Significant morbidity is attributed to acute exacerbations of COPD and investigations into pharmacological strategies to treat and prevent these events have also involved Veteran populations. In a multi-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) sponsored by the VA Cooperative Studies Program (CSP), systemic corticosteroids for Veterans hospitalized with acute exacerbations of COPD were found to reduce the incidence of a combined endpoint of all-cause mortality, mechanical ventilation, readmission for COPD, or escalation of therapy relative to placebo.31 Systemic corticosteroids are now considered the standard of care for management of acute exacerbations of COPD,13 although the optimal doses and duration of therapy remain active areas of investigation.

Significant resources have also been allocated to preventing acute exacerbations among COPD patients. Multiple VA medical centers served as research study sites for a RCT of chronic macrolide therapy using azithromycin to target chronic airways inflammation and prevent acute exacerbations of COPD.32 Findings from the study, which examined daily azithromycin taken for a year in addition to usual therapy, were notable for decreased COPD exacerbations and improved health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but also increased risk for hearing loss. Chronic suppressive macrolide therapy is now endorsed by the GOLD guidelines as an adjunctive maintenance medication for exacerbation-prone individuals.13

The performance of roflumilast, another pharmacological agent for the prevention of exacerbations, was examined relative to chronic suppressive azithromycin use among Veterans. In this observational study, the unified medical records system within the VHA, known as the Corporate Data Warehouse, was examined along with Medicare usage data for 3875 Veterans. Results showed that roflumilast, an oral selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, was associated with increased all-cause mortality and COPD-related hospitalizations relative to chronic suppressive macrolide therapy.33 The findings from this study supported the need for head-to-head studies of chronic macrolide therapy relative to roflumilast which are currently being investigated through an ongoing RCT (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04069312).

Although airflow obstruction is the defining feature of COPD, there is increasing appreciation of the extra-pulmonary and systemic consequences of COPD. Due to the higher rates of and cumulative exposure to smoking, as well as intermittent use of systemic corticosteroids, COPD has been identified as an independent risk factor for osteoporosis among Veterans.34 The clinical consequences of the increased prevalence of osteoporosis were subsequently confirmed in a study of 87,360 Veterans aged >50 years with newly diagnosed COPD between 1999 and 2003, where high rates of hip and wrist fragility fractures were observed.35 Additional findings from this study included low rates of bone mineral density testing and anti-resorptive treatment (eg, bisphosphonates)35 and identified a crucial need for screening for bone health among Veterans with COPD.

In addition to bone health, there has been increasing attention given to the impact of differences in body mass and body composition among Veterans with COPD. Body-mass index (BMI), a widely used metric of the weight-to-height relationship, is an integral component of the BMI, obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise limitation (BODE) index, which correlates with mortality and exacerbation frequency in COPD and has been validated in Veterans.36 In addition to body mass, the role of fat-free mass, a proxy measure for muscle mass, and its relationship with functional outcomes and exercise tolerance in Veterans with COPD represent important future areas of research.37

Other work in Veterans to improve physical outcomes in COPD has focused less on the individual patient, and more on the quality and type of care the patient receives. Although the majority of COPD-related care is managed by primary care providers, Veteran access to specialty care and referrals patterns to pulmonologists for COPD are comparable to those in the general community.38 A significant proportion of the morbidity and direct costs associated with COPD within the VHA arise from hospitalizations due to acute exacerbations of COPD.8 In an effort to develop and introduce programs to reduce COPD hospitalizations, the VHA sponsored a multicenter RCT examining the efficacy of a multidisciplinary comprehensive care management plan comprised patient and primary care provider education, the development of an action plan for exacerbation management, and proactive case management relative to usual care.39 Unfortunately, the study was terminated prematurely in 2012 due to increased rates of COPD-related hospitalizations and excess all-cause mortality in the intervention (comprehensive care) arm.39 Notably, similar results for comprehensive care programs at non-VHA hospitals have subsequently been reported,40 supporting that additional research and alternative strategies for preventing COPD hospitalizations are needed.

While effective strategies to prevent COPD hospitalizations remain an active field of investigation, programs to reduce the length of stay and prevent re-admissions have also received priority within the VHA. VHA-wide initiatives to reduce hospital utilization through expanded outpatient care resulted in a 51% reduction in length of stay for COPD exacerbations over 19941998, notably without increased mortality or non-VA hospital use.41 Additionally, individual programs focused on coordinated transitional care, a nurse-driven, telephone-based program targeting high-risk patients with comorbid COPD and congestive heart failure prior to discharge to home at an urban VA medical center resulted in a 54% reduction in 30-day re-hospitalization risk and was shown to be cost-effective.42 Moreover, one study examined the association of using non-VA outpatient care (both VA and non-VA care [ie, dual-care], and non-VA care only) and VA-only care with 30-day re-admission among Veterans. Overall, compared to Veterans who received VA-only care, Veterans who received dual-care and non-VA care only were 20% more likely to be readmitted for a COPD-specific exacerbation.43 These initiatives likely explain the recent finding of lower rates for 30-day re-admissions following hospitalizations for COPD at VA relative to non-VA hospitals.44

An overarching goal in the treatment of Veterans with COPD is to maximize physical function. However, the clinical course of COPD can contribute to a vicious cycle of reduced function. Patients who experience dyspnea, a major symptom of COPD, tend to avoid physical activities that worsen dyspnea, causing further muscle deconditioning and reductions in exercise capacity.45 Pain is another common symptom of COPD, which can also contribute to lower physical function.46 Physical outcomes, such as dyspnea, exercise capacity, physical activity (PA), and pain, reflect potentially modifiable risk factors of all-cause and respiratory-related mortality.47 As such, there has been great interest within VHA to develop effective interventions to improve physical outcomes in Veterans with COPD. The following sections detail several of these interventions, and highlight the impact of these interventions on dyspnea, PA, exercise capacity, pain, and risk for acute COPD exacerbations.

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a well-established treatment of COPD, effectively improving exercise capacity, dyspnea, and HRQoL.48 PR is a comprehensive intervention that focuses on exercise training and self-management education. It typically occurs 23 times a week across 812 weeks. Access to traditional, in-person PR can be difficult. In the VA with regional medical centers, distance is a significant barrier. In the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, participants who lived greater than 36 miles from the treatment facility were 51% less likely to complete PR compared to those who lived less than 6 miles away.49 In one urban VA medical center, 25% of initially evaluated Veterans never started PR, 29% dropped-out, while only 46% completed a full course of 18 sessions.50 Some Veterans who would benefit from PR decline participation due to access-related barriers, such as time and distance to travel to the program.50,51 Earlier work within VA compared outcomes in Veterans who completed PR to Veterans who were referred to PR but declined.52 Overall, Veterans with COPD who completed PR significantly improved exercise capacity, as measured with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) by an average of 75 m and reported a decrease in dyspnea on the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire by 7.3 points.52 Additionally, COPD-related acute emergency visits and hospitalizations declined post-PR.52 More recently, predictors of Veterans PR engagement were examined through a retrospective study of Veterans who attended their initial PR intake session between 2010 and 2018.50 Participants who dropped out of PR (ie, dropped out before session 18) compared to completers (ie, Veterans who completed all 18 session) had worse dyspnea, as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire-Self-Reported (CRQ-SR) at baseline, and were more likely to be current smokers and have a history of alcohol use disorder. No differences emerged between those who never started and those who dropped out.50 Thus, while PR is unequivocally effective for improving physical outcomes, it is important that future work continue to address ongoing access barriers to PR.

Patients with COPD tend to engage in significantly less daily PA compared to healthy-matched controls.53 Physical activity as an outcome is important in COPD, as it is directly associated with poor health outcomes such as increased risk of acute exacerbations and increased mortality, independent of lung function.54 Many factors can contribute to lower levels of PA, including physiologic, behavioral, and environmental factors.55 As such, there has been a substantial amount of work within VA to develop effective interventions that promote and sustain PA and exercise.

There have been several related RCTs examining the effectiveness of a web-mediated, pedometer-based PA intervention in Veterans with COPD (Taking Healthy Steps,56 Every Step Counts,57 and Walking and Education to Breathe58). This web intervention provides Veterans with COPD personalized daily step count goals, iterative feedback, disease-specific education, motivational tips, and an online community forum. Taking Healthy Steps was a RCT conducted virtually in a national sample of Veterans with COPD identified by diagnosis code. Compared to those who were randomly assigned to use a pedometer alone, those who were assigned to the website walked on average 779 more steps per day at 4 months.56 Every Step Counts used a more well-characterized cohort (ie, COPD diagnosis validated via spirometry). Compared to the pedometer-only control group, Veterans assigned to the website significantly increased their daily step count by 804 steps at 3 months.57 Those assigned to the intervention also demonstrated a significant reduced risk of experiencing a COPD acute exacerbation across a 12-month follow-up.59 Walking and Education to Breathe, the most recent RCT, evaluated the effectiveness of the intervention across two VA sites to include a more heterogeneous sample, and examined if lengthening the duration of the intervention period to 6 months would translate into improvements in exercise capacity. At 6 months, participants who were assigned to the web-based intervention walked on average 1312 more steps per day compared to those who were assigned to usual care.58 Across these three studies, despite the significant improvements in daily step count (7791312), there were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in changes with respect to exercise capacity (6MWT distance) or dyspnea (mMRC).5658

Additionally, a priority in PR is to facilitate behavior change so patients will sustain engagement in long-term exercise. However, it remains difficult to maintain improvements in exercise after PR. Coultas et al tested the efficacy of a 20-week, telephone-based lifestyle PA intervention compared to usual care in COPD patients eligible for PR. They did not find significant differences for their primary outcome of 6MWT distance; however, subgroup analysis found that among Veterans with moderate COPD, the intervention resulted in stability of 6MWT distance at 18 months compared to participants who received usual care.60

In addition to daily walking, the effectiveness of alternative exercise forms, such as Tai Chi and yoga, has been explored in Veterans with COPD. Tai Chi may be a promising intervention to support physical outcomes. Compared to a mind-body breathing intervention, a Tai Chi intervention resulted in more substantial improvements in exercise capacity (6MWT distance) among persons with COPD.61 Similarly, a recent pilot RCT found that Tai Chi after completion of PR may support maintaining exercise capacity (6MWT distance) compared to usual care in persons with COPD after completing PR.62 Results from another RCT suggest that Tai Chi over 6 months may help to maintain exercise capacity.63 However, participants in the RCT reported barriers to attending the Tai Chi program similar to those reported for center-based PR (ie, distance, time).63 One recent pilot examined the effect of yoga training on inspiratory muscle performance.64 Inspiratory muscle strength is impaired in patients with COPD and leads to debilitating dyspnea and poor functional performance.65 Veterans were assigned to a 6-week yoga training program that included poses (asana) and controlled breathing (pranayama). Inspiratory muscle performance (measured via the Test of Incremental Respiratory Endurance) significantly improved from baseline, although no significant improvements were seen in exercise capacity (6MWT distance).64

In many patients with COPD, dynamic hyperinflation of the lungs during exercise is a major contributor to decreased exercise capacity.66 A recent study in Veterans examined if breathing retraining coupled with exercise training, a cornerstone of PR,48 would improve exercise capacity more than exercise training alone.67 Exercise training occurred via treadmill and took place three times every week for 12 weeks. The researchers used a metronome to provide acoustic feedback to train participants to achieve a slower respiratory rate and prolonged exhalation. Overall, despite achieving changes in breathing pattern with breathing retraining, improvements in exercise duration and dynamic hyperinflation were not significantly different with exercise training plus breathing retraining versus with exercise training alone.68

Depressive disorders are by far the most studied psychological disorder among Veterans with COPD. Rates of depressive disorder diagnosed by structured clinical interview range from 38% to 86% based on the study sample.69,70 Rates of diagnosed anxiety disorders range from 23% to 61%.69,70 Despite the high prevalence of depression and anxiety in Veterans with COPD, only a third receive any mental health treatment.69 In cross-sectional studies of Veterans, clinically significant depression symptoms were associated with low PA levels,71 worse self-reported functional impairment,7274 greater dyspnea,72 and worse HRQoL.72,73 Moreover, epidemiological studies in large samples of Veterans with COPD have shown that depression is associated with 1.53 times higher 30-day mortality compared to Veterans without depression.75 Depression was also associated with 1.36 times increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission for COPD acute exacerbation.75 Clinically significant anxiety among Veterans with COPD shows similar associations to health and functional outcomes such as depression. Anxiety symptoms are associated with greater self-reported functional impairment and worse HRQoL. One study found a significant association between clinically significant anxiety and greater daily PA,71 a finding that requires replication in prospective studies. Anxiety is associated with 1.72 times higher 30-day mortality compared to Veterans without anxiety and 1.22 times increased risk of 30-day hospital readmission for COPD acute exacerbation.75

Insomnia is an independent psychological disorder characterized by difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, or early morning awakenings that cause significant distress and occur outside the diagnosis of another mental health condition.76 Research on insomnia in Veterans remains scarce. In one study, insomnia was found to occur in 27% (50 of 183) of Veterans with COPD. A much larger percentage of Veterans reported sleep complaints with 50% of the sample reporting at least one or more sleep complaint more than three times per week.77

A key outcome in Veterans with COPD, HRQoL reflects an individuals perception of their quality of life when they consider their overall health (eg, 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36))78 or in reference to their COPD diagnosis (eg, The Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire).79 Illness intrusiveness, a psychological construct, describes the extent to which an individual perceives their illness to impede in their daily life and valued activities and can be assessed with self-report measures. It is a meaningful treatment outcome for Veterans with COPD who prioritize daily functioning. The VHA has prioritized intervention development to improve psychological outcomes in Veterans with COPD. The following sections describe several of these interventions and their impact on psychological outcomes.

CBT is a time-limited, collaborative, present-focused, skills-based intervention that focuses on behavioral and cognitive change to treat psychological disorders. CBT is transdiagnostic, thus applicable in the treatment of the most common psychological disorders in COPD. Fundamental to CBT is that suffering is not directly caused by events themselves, but is a result of clients interpretation, appraisal, meaning, and behavioral response attached to events. Thus, treatment focuses on addressing the connection between events, thoughts, emotions, and behaviors while challenging and modifying unhelpful patterns.80

While CBT has been studied by several research groups in civilian samples with COPD, only one research group in the US accounts for almost all empirical research on the efficacy of CBT in Veterans with COPD. Cully et al81 conducted an RCT comparing brief cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) to enhanced usual care (EUC) in 302 Veterans with either heart failure (HF) or COPD and clinically significant depression and/or anxiety symptoms. The primary outcomes were depression and anxiety symptoms measured by validated self-report measures. HRQoL was the secondary outcome.

bCBT was delivered in six sessions either in-person or by telephone based on patient preference with two booster sessions provided over four months. Each session focused on a particular skill and the number of sessions varied based on patient preference and discussion with their therapist. Skill sessions focused on modification of unhelpful thinking patterns, behavioral activation, relaxation, and chronic disease self-management. Content was adapted to focus on the intersection between physical symptoms and mental health. Like traditional CBT, bCBT addressed topics such as usual and past coping styles and strengths and resources in the patients life. Skills were taught alongside practice assignments focused on goal setting and modifying behavior and thinking patterns. Therapists for the study ranged from psychology and social work trainees to staff psychologists and physician assistants. The EUC group received assessment of mental health symptoms and a note in their chart for their primary care provider to address these concerns. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 4 (post-intervention), 8, and 12 months.

At 4 months, there were meaningful improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms in patients with COPD or HF. Veterans with COPD showed significant improvement in all domains of HRQoL. At 12 months, differences were maintained between the treatment and control group, but there was no further improvement in symptoms.81

Stemming from this parent study, secondary analyses were conducted in several separate articles and provide important insights into the optimization of psychological health in Veterans with COPD. First, the impact of bCBT on illness intrusiveness was examined among Veterans with COPD in the parent study.82 Illness intrusiveness was measured with the Illness Intrusiveness Rating Scale (IIRS) which provides a total score, as well as three validated subscales: Relationships (eg, family, civil engagement), Intimacy (eg, sexual functioning, relationship with spouse), and Instrumental (eg, health, work, active recreation). bCBT significantly improved IIRS total score at four months compared to EUC. At the subscale level, differences were found for Intimacy and Instrumental but not Relationships.

Second, in a separate study,83 bCBT was found to result in a significant reduction of high-frequency suicidal ideation (SI) in the bCBT group compared to the EUC at 4- and 8-month time points after controlling for baseline SI but the treatment effect was not sustained at 12 months. Specifically, at 4 and 8 months, respectively, participants who received bCBT compared to EUC had 72% and 68% lower likelihood of reporting high-frequency SI.

Third, predictors of treatment response to bCBT were explored in secondary analysis.84 Multivariate regression models examined whether hypothesized baseline variables including baseline depression or anxiety symptoms, functional limitations, self-efficacy for disease management, adaptive coping, maladaptive coping, number of sessions attended, and working alliance (ie, relationship between therapist and client) predicted improvement in primary outcomes of depression symptoms or anxiety symptoms. The same predictors emerged for both improvement in depression and anxiety symptoms. Participants with greater physical functioning impairment and lower self-efficacy showed less improvement in anxiety and depression symptoms. Those with greater baseline depression or anxiety showed greater improvement in symptoms.

The fourth and final study stemming from the parent study describes a utilization analysis of the content delivered in bCBT.85 They found that participants who received the physical health and thoughts modules earlier in treatment had a greater likelihood of remaining in treatment. Results have important clinical implications suggesting that early psychoeducation and skill building should focus on the intersection between physical and mental health, as well as dysfunctional or unhelpful thought patterns to optimize treatment completion rates. Together, these studies offer important data on the efficacy of bCBT, as well as treatment predictors.

As described in the physical outcomes section, PR is the standard of care for Veterans with COPD targeting exercise capacity and physical functioning. However, PR also improves many psychological outcomes, but studies with Veteran samples are limited. In a retrospective study, Veterans with COPD who participated in twice weekly outpatient PR for 18 weeks demonstrated significant improvement in depression symptoms over the course of PR. Greater reduction in depression over the course of treatment was significantly associated with greater improvement in CRQ-SR total score and the following subscales: fatigue, mastery, and emotional function.86 Similar findings were documented in a prior study examining the relation between change in depression symptoms and change in CRQ-SR subscales. In a sample of 81 Veterans enrolled in 8 weeks of biweekly PR, significant improvements were found for depression symptoms but not anxiety symptoms. Moreover, change in depression symptoms, but not anxiety symptoms, was associated with change in CRQ-SR domains of fatigue, emotion, and mastery.87 PR, a core treatment for Veterans with COPD and significant depression symptoms, improves physical functioning and psychological outcomes. However, depression and anxiety symptoms, particularly in Veterans with more than one mental health diagnosis and/or lifetime/chronic course of psychological disorders may require more intensive outpatient therapy specifically for mental health following PR or concurrently. Re-assessment of depression and anxiety symptoms is important at the end of PR to determine treatment needs.

Other work within VA has examined the effect of PR on insomnia. A recent retrospective study examined subjective and objective sleep changes after eight weeks of conventional, in-person, structured PR and 12 months of an unstructured exercise program.88 Despite sustained improvements in exercise capacity (measured via the 6MWT distance; mean improvement 68.8 m) and dyspnea (measured via the mMRC; mean difference 0.4 points), neither subjective sleep (measured via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) nor objective sleep (measured via actigraphy) improved.88

Surprisingly, research testing PA interventions in Veterans with COPD has not found significant improvements in depression or anxiety symptoms. One VA-based study compared the effects of a 4-month pedometer plus internet-mediated intervention to waitlist control (pedometer) on HRQoL in Veterans with COPD measured at 4 and 12 months.56,89,90 While HRQoL improved in the intervention group compared to the control group at 4 months, there was no difference at 12 months. Moreover, no change in depression scores was observed at either 4 or 12 months. However, these results are confounded by the fact that the treatment of anxiety and depression was not the main focus nor well characterized in the sample. For example, participants were not recruited based on significant levels of depression and anxiety nor was the intervention personalized in any way to participants based on their depression and/or anxiety levels.

Research on pharmacotherapy to improve psychological outcomes in individuals with COPD is limited in both civilian and Veterans samples. Drawing from the general literature, a Cochrane review published in 2018 found insufficient evidence for pharmacotherapy for the treatment of depression in individuals with COPD.91 In their review of the literature on anti-depressants for depression in COPD, no recommendation was made for any anti-depressant type. Rather, non-pharmacological treatments, such as collaborative care models and CBT, were encouraged as first-line therapy.92

Pharmacological treatment of COPD is focused on maximizing lung function, reducing risk for acute exacerbations, and symptoms management, namely the reduction of dyspnea.93 More recently, advances in COPD treatment have utilized precision medicine to target COPD in its early stages or before disease onset.94 However, to our knowledge, there are few funded research studies in the VHA focused on early COPD or prevention efforts. This is notable given that Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts will be entering midlife and have already been identified to be at greater risk for respiratory diseases given environmental exposures.95 Prior studies in civilians have begun to characterize those who may have early COPD targeting adults <50 years of age with 10 pack-years of smoking history with evidence of lung function abnormality by CT or spirometry that do not meet criteria for COPD.96 Improved understanding of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry, a classification of individuals who have proportional reductions in FEV1 and FVC but preserved ratio, provides a group of individuals at higher risk for transitioning to COPD and may particularly benefit from early intervention.97 Advances in imaging technology can help identify those who may be at-risk for COPD.98 At least one funded study within the VHA is exploring the application of computation imaging technology (CT) using Quantitative Imaging Analysis (QIA) to identify structural defects in the lungs before disease onset. By targeting individuals in the early COPD stage, effective clinical management can be offered and presents a vital area for future research in Veterans.

Similarly, identification of predictive biomarkers within COPD remains an active area of research with many unanswered questions.94 While review of the research on biomarkers of COPD is beyond the scope of this paper, more research is needed exploring COPD biomarkers in Veterans with careful delineation of endotypes connected to the proposed biomarker and clinical manifestation of disease activity.99 For example, past research in civilians established an association between epigenetic changes and inflammatory-response cytokines in COPD patients undergoing a prolonged, 24-session exercise training regimen.100 Early changes were observed in DNA methylation between baseline and after the first session but no changes were observed in H4 acetylation status at any point during the intervention. Inflammatory markers changed in response to the exercise intervention with an increase in interleukin-6 (IL-6) and a decrease in growth factor-beta after session 24.

In Veteran samples using a cross-sectional design, greater daily step count and higher 6MWT distance were associated with lower systematic inflammation, as measured by CRP and IL-6.101 After controlling for age, FEV1% predicted, pack-years smoked, cardiac disease, current statin use, history of acute exacerbations, and season, each 1000-step increase in daily step count was significantly associated with 0.94 mg/L and 0.96 pg/mL decrease in CRP level. Similarly, for every 30-m increase in 6MWT distance, there was a 0.94 pg/mL decrease in CRP and 0.96 pg/mL decrease in IL-6 level. While not causal, these studies point to potential epigenetic changes associated with exercise-induced inflammatory biomarkers in COPD.

Research with Veteran samples has established correlations between epigenetic markers of biological age and functioning in COPD.102 At baseline, epigenetic age and age acceleration, measures that capture the difference between biological and chronological age, were inversely associated with 6MWT distance and PA after adjusting for chronological age, sex, race, smoking status, pack-years, BMI, cohort, and estimated cell counts. Importantly, longitudinal change in one of the measures of epigenetic age was inversely associated with change in 6MWT distance at 12 weeks, suggesting that epigenetic age may represent a potentially modifiable molecular signature of exercise capacity.102 Potential applications of epigenetics and biomarkers for the prediction of clinical outcomes, such as COPD acute exacerbations or response to exercise training programs such as pulmonary rehabilitation, represent active areas of investigation.

While PA promotion interventions show promising short- and some long-term benefit in terms of increasing daily PA and reducing COPD acute exacerbation risk, improvements in exercise capacity have not been observed.58 In the next decade, RCTs are needed to test the dose of PA promotion (ie, duration, intensity) required to sustain functional improvements. Long-term trials testing beyond 12 months are necessary. Moreover, development and testing of novel interventions that leverage varying levels of Veteran engagement, such as hybrid approaches that combine self-guided and in-person/provider-delivered components are needed to examine the impact of frequency of promotional and supportive messages and check-ins from staff.58 Additionally, little is known about the social context and its association with short- and long-term adoption of PA. Studies exploring the role caregivers, family members, and friends in the adoption and maintenance of PA in COPD are needed, particularly given that social context has proved important for the success of COPD self-management efforts.103,104 Finally, it is important to consider the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on habitual PA and exercise patterns.105,106 Indoor walking and exercise in malls, gyms, and senior centers have been reduced and alternatives are not always available. As such, innovative research is needed to better understand how patients with COPD prefer to engage in PA in their current environments and preferences for in-home exercises.

Notably, the VHA is a leader in telemedicine and prioritized access to care well before the COVID-19 pandemic107 which only expanded over the last two years.108 The VHA system provides iPad, with built in internet access, at no cost to Veterans without a personal device and/or internet access. Moreover, the VA has an established Care Coordination/Home Telehealth (CCHT)109 for chronic diseases including COPD, which provides home equipment for daily monitoring and disease management by a nurse care coordinator. In 2017, from funding through the VAs Office of Rural Health, home-based PR was offered across 13 VA medical centers. While several studies in civilians have established the efficacy of home-based PR,110,111 until 2017 only hospital-based PR was offered in the VHA system. Based on home-based cardiac rehabilitation provided in the VA,112 home-based PR involves an initial in-person evaluation, followed by 11 weekly telephone or video appointments, an in-person evaluation at week 12, and follow-up phone/video calls at 3 and 6 months. A final in-person evaluation occurs at 12 months from the start of the program.112 However, the extent to virtual only rehabilitation and exercise programs are available to Veterans varies by VA. Future research is needed to demonstrate implementation of existing evidence-based PR programs delivered virtually in the VHA as part of routine clinical care.

There is extensive evidence documenting increased inflammatory markers in psychological disorders and, in particular, major depressive disorder. Increases in pro-inflammatory markers including peripheral blood IL-1, IL-6, Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are well documented.113 Yet, the role of inflammation and shared pathways between depression and COPD remain inconclusive. Limited cross-sectional research on civilians with COPD has found that greater depression symptoms are associated with higher TNF- and sTNFR after adjusting for possible confounders.114,115 However, one prospective study did not find a significant association between depression and inflammatory markers in individuals with stable COPD.116 Janssen et al116 measured several inflammatory markers (white blood cell, hsCRP, IL6, fibrinogen) in COPD patients at baseline and 36-month follow-up. They classified individuals as having persistent systemic inflammation if they had 2 or more markers elevated in the upper quartile at baseline and follow-up or no inflammation corresponding to no elevation in inflammation at either time point. They found no association between baseline depression scores and inflammation group after adjusting for confounders, and no differences were found either in change in depression scores or mean levels at follow-up between inflammation groups. Nonetheless, given the notable role of inflammation in both COPD and depression, as well as the heterogeneity of both diseases, future research examining the association between inflammation and depression in COPD utilizing prospective designs is needed. Furthermore, reduction in inflammatory markers reflects a meaningful marker of treatment response in COPD100,101 and depression,117 thus it is plausible that targeting both COPD symptoms and depression concurrently could result in greater reduction in inflammatory markers corresponding to treatment response compared standalone therapies that separately target physical functioning and psychological symptoms.

In order to advance interventions for psychological outcomes in COPD, it is critical that researchers begin dually targeting both physical functioning and psychological outcomes. For example, past research with patients with diabetes and HF found that combining a physical intervention (ie, exercise) with psychotherapy (ie, CBT) produced superior outcomes in both functioning and mental health symptoms.118,119 Yet, up to this point, two independent bodies of literature have focused on separately addressing physical functioning via pulmonary rehabilitation and exercise, and mental health through psychotherapy/behavioral interventions. One funded study in the VHA is testing the integration of a pedometer-based walking intervention with CBT in a 12-week virtual intervention with Veterans with COPD, low PA levels, and clinically significant depression and/or anxiety symptoms (NCT04953806). The intervention will target daily step count and self-reported physical disability, as well as depression and anxiety symptoms.

While research establishing the efficacy of treatments for COPD has been fruitful, implementation of guideline-based care remains fraught with health-care inequities. Women Veterans hospitalized for COPD are less likely to have received inhaler therapies prior to admission compared to men.43 In addition, women are less likely during the course of a COPD hospitalization to receive appropriate inhaler combinations and more likely to receive inappropriate inhaler combinations.43 Moreover, women, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals with drug and alcohol use disorders are less likely to have pulmonary function tests performed, possibly leading to delays in diagnosis and under-treatment.120 In considering optimizing outcomes, it is imperative to consider and equally target health-care inequities that serve as barriers to guideline-based care. Similarly, enhanced recruitment of underserved groups (ie, lower socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic minorities) in COPD research studies is needed. Research and quality improvement projects are important to examine system and individual-level approaches to ensure equity in guideline-based care for all Veterans with COPD. Funding for COPD research that include focus on minority healthcare is needed.

The coming decade will see an increase in COPD prevalence in US Veterans as Vietnam era Veterans fully reach older adulthood and Iraq and Afghanistan conflict Veterans enter midlife. A multi-pronged agenda targeting system-level factors that increase access and improve care delivery, as well as bench and clinical research will be needed to advance our understanding, treatment, and management of COPD in Veterans. Partnerships with all stakeholders including patients, university-affiliated hospitals, industry, and the international research community will be critical to accelerate the development and implementation of novel treatments to improve physiological, physical, and psychological health outcomes for this heterogenous disease.

This work was supported, in part, by the following grants from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service: Merit Award I01 RX001150 (M.L.M.); Career Development Award-2 (CDA2) Award 1IK2RX003527-01A2 (P.M.B.); and CDA2 Award IK2RX002165 (E.S.W.).

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

1. National Center for Veterans Analysis and Statistics. VA utilization profile FY2017. Available from: https://www.va.gov/vetdata/docs/Quickfacts/VA_Utilization_Profile_2017.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2022.

2. Wang ZJ, Dhanireddy P, Prince C, Larsen M, Schimpf M, Pearman G. 2019 survey of veteran enrollees health and use of health care. Available from: https://www.va.gov/HEALTHPOLICYPLANNING/SOE2019/2019_Enrollee_Data_Findings_Report-March_2020_508_Compliant.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2022.

3. Percentage distribution of household income in the US in 2020. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/. Accessed May 20, 2022.

4. Jamal A, Phillips E, Gentzke AS, et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(2):5359. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6702a1

5. Pugh MJ, Jaramillo CA, Leung KW, et al. Increasing prevalence of chronic lung disease in veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2016;181(5):476481. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00035

6. Sharafkhaneh A, Petersen NJ, Yu HJ, Dalal AA, Johnson ML, Hanania NA. Burden of COPD in a government health care system: a retrospective observational study using data from the US Veterans Affairs population. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010;5:125132. doi:10.2147/copd.s8047

7. Group TMoCOPDW. VA/DOD clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2021.

8. Darnell K, Dwivedi AK, Weng Z, Panos RJ. Disproportionate utilization of healthcare resources among veterans with COPD: a retrospective analysis of factors associated with COPD healthcare cost. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013;11:13. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-11-13

9. Wheaton AG, Liu Y, Croft JB, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and smoking status - United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(24):533538. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6824a1

10. Murphy DE, Chaudhry Z, Almoosa KF, Panos RJ. High prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among veterans in the urban midwest. Mil Med. 2011;176(5):552560. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-10-00377

11. Karel MJ, Wray LO, Adler G, et al. Mental health needs of aging veterans: recent evidence and clinical recommendations. Clin Gerontol. 2022;45(2):252271. doi:10.1080/07317115.2020.1716910

12. Schz N, Walters JA, Cameron-Tucker H, Scott J, Wood-Baker R, Walters EH. Patient anxiety and depression moderate the effects of increased self-management knowledge on physical activity: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial on health-mentoring in COPD. COPD. 2015;12(5):502509. doi:10.3109/15412555.2014.995289

13. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2022 report; 2021. Available from: https://goldcopd.org/2022-gold-reports-2/. Accessed December 20, 2021.

14. Bosse R, Sparrow D, Rose CL, Weiss ST. Longitudinal effect of age and smoking cessation on pulmonary function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981;123(4 Pt 1):378381. doi:10.1164/arrd.1981.123.4.378

15. Breen M, Nwanaji-Enwerem JC, Karrasch S, et al. Accelerated epigenetic aging as a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and decreased lung function in two prospective cohort studies. Aging. 2020;12(16):1653916554. doi:10.18632/aging.103784

16. Bell B, Rose CL, Damon A. The Veterans Administration longitudinal study of healthy aging. Gerontologist. 1966;6(4):179184. doi:10.1093/geront/6.4.179

17. Bosse R, Costa P, Cohen M, Podolsky S. Age, smoking inhalation, and pulmonary function. Arch Environ Health. 1975;30(10):495498. doi:10.1080/00039896.1975.10666760

18. Mordukhovich I, Lepeule J, Coull BA, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, Schwartz J. The effect of oxidative stress polymorphisms on the association between long-term black carbon exposure and lung function among elderly men. Thorax. 2015;70(2):133137. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206179

19. Hunninghake GM, Cho MH, Tesfaigzi Y, et al. MMP12, lung function, and COPD in high-risk populations. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(27):25992608. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0904006

20. Renzetti AD, McClement JH, Litt BD. The Veterans Administration cooperative study of pulmonary function. 3. Mortality in relation to respiratory function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Aspen Emphysema Conf. 1968;9:367378.

21. Dean NC, Brown JK, Himelman RB, Doherty JJ, Gold WM, Stulbarg MS. Oxygen may improve dyspnea and endurance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and only mild hypoxemia. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(4):941945. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/146.4.941

22. Stewart BN, Hood CI, Block AJ. Long-term results of continuous oxygen therapy at sea level. Chest. 1975;68(4):486492. doi:10.1378/chest.68.4.486

23. Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial Research Group. A randomized trial of long-term oxygen for COPD with moderate desaturation. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(17):16171627. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1604344

24. GROUP* NOTT. Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy in hypoxemic chronic obstructive lung disease: a clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 1980;93(3):391398. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-93-3-391

25. Party MR. Long term domiciliary oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic cor pulmonale complicating chronic bronchitis and emphysema. Lancet. 1981;1(8222):681686.

26. Chetty KG, Despars JA, Giron A, Light RW. Conversion of COPD patients from multiple to single dose theophylline. Serum levels and symptom comparison. Chest. 1991;100(4):10641067. doi:10.1378/chest.100.4.1064

27. Berger R, Smith D. Effect of inhaled metaproterenol on exercise performance in patients with stable fixed airway obstruction. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138(3):624629. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/138.3.624

28. Jenne JW, Ridley DJ, Marcucci RA, Druz WS, Rook JC. Objective and subjective tremor responses to oral beta 2 agents on first exposure. A comparison of metaproterenol and terbutaline. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(4):607610. doi:10.1164/arrd.1982.126.4.607

29. Ashutosh K, Dev G, Steele D. Nonbronchodilator effects of pirbuterol and ipratropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1995;107(1):173178. doi:10.1378/chest.107.1.173

30. Beauford W, Saylor TT, Stansbury DW, Avalos K, Light RW. Effects of nebulized morphine sulfate on the exercise tolerance of the ventilatory limited COPD patient. Chest. 1993;104(1):175178. doi:10.1378/chest.104.1.175

31. Niewoehner DE, Erbland ML, Deupree RH, et al. Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(25):19411947. doi:10.1056/NEJM199906243402502

32. Albert RK, Connett J, Bailey WC, et al. Azithromycin for prevention of exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(8):689698. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1104623

33. Lam J, Tonnu-Mihara I, Kenyon NJ, Kuhn BT. Comparative effectiveness of roflumilast and azithromycin for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2021;8(4):450463. doi:10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0224

34. Yeh SS, Phanumas D, Hafner A, Schuster MW. Risk factors for osteoporosis in a subgroup of elderly men in a Veterans Administration nursing home. J Investig Med. 2002;50(6):452457. doi:10.1136/jim-50-06-05

35. Morden NE, Sullivan SD, Bartle B, Lee TA. Skeletal health in men with chronic lung disease: rates of testing, treatment, and fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(6):18551862. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1423-y

36. Cote CG, Pinto-Plata VM, Marin JM, Nekach H, Dordelly LJ, Celli BR. The modified BODE index: validation with mortality in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(5):12691274. doi:10.1183/09031936.00138507

37. Tunsupon P, Mador MJ. The influence of body composition on pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Lung. 2017;195(6):729738. doi:10.1007/s00408-017-0053-y

38. Nunez ER, Johnson SW, Qian SX, et al. Patterns of pulmonary consultation for veterans with incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(7):12491252. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202008-1075RL

39. Fan VS, Gaziano JM, Lew R, et al. A comprehensive care management program to prevent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalizations: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(10):673683. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-156-10-201205150-00003

40. Aboumatar H, Naqibuddin M, Chung S, et al. Effect of a hospital-initiated program combining transitional care and long-term self-management support on outcomes of patients hospitalized with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(14):13711380. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11982

41. Ashton CM, Souchek J, Petersen NJ, et al. Hospital use and survival among Veterans Affairs beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(17):16371646. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa003299

42. Reese RL, Clement SA, Syeda S, et al. Coordinated-transitional care for veterans with heart failure and chronic lung disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(7):15021507. doi:10.1111/jgs.15978

43. Rinne ST, Elwy AR, Bastian LA, Wong ES, Wiener RS, Liu C-F. Impact of multisystem health care on readmission and follow-up among veterans hospitalized for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Care. 2017;55:S20S25. doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000000708

44. LaBedz SL, Krishnan JA, Chung YC, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease outcomes at veterans affairs versus non-veterans affairs hospitals. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2021;8(3):306313. doi:10.15326/jcopdf.2021.0201

45. ODonnell DE, Milne KM, James MD, De Torres JP, Neder JA. Dyspnea in COPD: new mechanistic insights and management implications. Adv Ther. 2020;37(1):4160. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-01128-9

46. Hajghanbari B, Garland SJ, Road JD, Reid WD. Pain and physical performance in people with COPD. Respir Med. 2013;107(11):16921699. doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2013.06.010

47. Wan E, Goldstein R, Kantorowski A, Moy M. Association between exercise capacity and physical activity with long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality among US veterans with COPD. In: TP41. TP041 DIAGNOSIS and RISK ASSESSMENT in COPD. American Thoracic Society; 2021:A2284A2284.

48. Spruit MA, Pitta F, McAuley E, ZuWallack RL, Nici L. Pulmonary rehabilitation and physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(8):924933. doi:10.1164/rccm.201505-0929CI

49. Fan VS, Giardino ND, Blough DK, Kaplan RM, Ramsey SD; Nett Research Group. Costs of pulmonary rehabilitation and predictors of adherence in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. COPD. 2008;5(2):105116. doi:10.1080/15412550801941190

50. Bamonti PM, Boyle JT, Goodwin CL, et al. Predictors of outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation uptake, adherence, completion, and treatment response among male US veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.021

Here is the original post:
Psychological Health Outcomes A Narrative Review in US Vet | COPD - Dove Medical Press