Equating scientific perspective with the classic NBC sitcom Friends is probably something no one was expecting, but its happened thanks to celebrated scientific author, Malcolm Gladwell. Latter recently wrote a new book called Talking to Strangers that examines how we read people and whether body language is really accurate.

As Gladwell is known for, he uses a lot of pop culture examples to arrive to his conclusion that most of us cant really read other people accurately. Equating this idea to Friends may seem like a stretch, yet Gladwell makes a very interesting point connecting the famous sextet to how people think.

Perhaps it wont surprise many to learn Gladwell has a big issue with Friends in how it depicts people in the real world. Well, what should we expect from just a sitcom?

Back in September, Gladwell appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live and explained the basic premise of formers Talking to Strangers book.

As one of the greatest scientists alive on examining how we think and human behavior, Gladwell notes there really isnt an accurate way to read body language.

All of the science saying the public can is really false after all based on how many mismatched people there are.

A good example is someone in an audience whos sitting with their arms folded and looking unresponsive when, in reality, theyre very engaged. Gladwell says theres more people like this in the world than not, making it impossible to really know whos telling the truth or lying anymore.

According to Gladwell, Friends is the perfect metaphor for describing those who are matched with how they think and body language. The problem, Gladwell says, is this doesnt reflect how the real world works.

To test this out, he says he carefully studied all the facial expressions of the Friends characters.

Further enhancing his point, Gladwell told Kimmel he watched various episodes of Friends with the sound on mute to see if he could still figure out the plot based entirely on facial expressions.

It turned out Gladwell could, based on how the characters always emote so strongly to situations.

Of course, this is typical of sitcoms anyway as a way to enhance the comedy. Nobody should consider that anywhere close to being how the real world works, though.

In Gladwells mind, Friends is the most unrealistic depiction of people ever placed on TV, which could be argued as inaccurate.

Almost every sitcom in existence has done the same process of having characters react in exaggerated ways to the plot scenarios. Nobody would ever say a sitcom is trying hard to mimic reality anyway, even if Friends fans keep watching because they think it really did capture the zeitgeist of friendships in the 1990s.

Perhaps this insight about Friends will make the cast members more self-conscious about whether they emote just as much in real life as they did on the show.

If Gladwell convinced everyone its becoming impossible to determine whos lying and who isnt nowadays, he at least admitted some people in the world have perfectly matched expressions with how they think.

Maybe the cast of Friends were some of the rare ones who projected exactly whats going on in their heads. Should there be any truth to this, they maybe werent entirely acting. Of course, the best reactions are when actors encounter something unexpected in the show if theres ever any potential for improvising.

The only way to really test this is to look at interviews of Friends cast members to see if they really emote to what theyre thinking. It seems Jennifer Aniston definitely does, perhaps making her stunning performance on The Morning Show one paralleling her own life a little too closely.

The rest is here:
The 1 Big Problem With 'Friends' According to Malcolm Gladwell - Showbiz Cheat Sheet